• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Cohesive Societies
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Cohesive Societies
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • COVID-19 Resources
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Interreligious Relations (IRR) Issue 24 – Covid-19 and Religious Organisations: Constitutional Environment and Organisational Choices by Jaclyn L. Neo and Shazny Ramlan
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    Interreligious Relations (IRR) Issue 24 – Covid-19 and Religious Organisations: Constitutional Environment and Organisational Choices by Jaclyn L. Neo and Shazny Ramlan
    Jaclyn L. Neo , Shazny Ramlan

    01 June 2021

    download pdf

    Abstract:

    Religious organisations play critical functions in societies around the world. The role of religious organisations in secular states however tends to be under-studied in disciplines outside of the sub-discipline of sociology of religious organisation. Within some disciplines, including law, this is partly because of the dominant view that secular states should stand apart from religion (and religious organisations), and that any entanglement would undermine the “neutrality” of the state, and hence its secularity. There has been increased attention on religious organizations in relation to their responses to COVID-19 measures, which included restricting religious gatherings and other collective religious activities. These restrictions go to the heart of religious practice. How religious organisations responded however depend on a range of factors, including their status within the social order. In this article, we further discuss how the constitutional environment shapes the religious organisations’ responses to Covid-19 restrictions. By constitutional environment, we refer to the existing constitutional arrangement of state and religion, and the degree to which the constitutional right to freedom of religion is founded on a strong idea of individual and group rights, as opposed to being seen as subjected to or even subsidiary to public interests. Where the constitutional environment is seen as conducive to rights-assertion, religious organisations are more likely to resist state restrictions because such action would enhance their standing among their own adherents. Under such conditions, they performatively present themselves as freedom fighters standing against state oppression. Filing a lawsuit against Covid-19 measures is seen as an act of resistance in pursuit of freedom and divine blessings. In contrast, where the constitutional environment is not conducive to rights claims but emphasises communitarian values, religious organisations would tend to employ the language of duties in complying with state restrictions. Many, however, do not do this simply as passive subjects but may consciously adopt public health values and encourage their adherents to do the same because doing so could enhance their social standing and legitimacy. Thus, by emphasising their value to society through an explicit commitment to public health, specifically, and to the community’s interests, more generally, and avoiding an emphatic insistence on rights, Covid-19 became an opportunity for religious organisations to performatively present themselves as civic-minded and socially responsible social actors. This allowed them to frame their adoption of public health measures partly as group choices, and not merely top-down imposition by the state.

    Categories: Interreligious Relations /

    Last updated on 17/11/2021

    Abstract:

    Religious organisations play critical functions in societies around the world. The role of religious organisations in secular states however tends to be under-studied in disciplines outside of the sub-discipline of sociology of religious organisation. Within some disciplines, including law, this is partly because of the dominant view that secular states should stand apart from religion (and religious organisations), and that any entanglement would undermine the “neutrality” of the state, and hence its secularity. There has been increased attention on religious organizations in relation to their responses to COVID-19 measures, which included restricting religious gatherings and other collective religious activities. These restrictions go to the heart of religious practice. How religious organisations responded however depend on a range of factors, including their status within the social order. In this article, we further discuss how the constitutional environment shapes the religious organisations’ responses to Covid-19 restrictions. By constitutional environment, we refer to the existing constitutional arrangement of state and religion, and the degree to which the constitutional right to freedom of religion is founded on a strong idea of individual and group rights, as opposed to being seen as subjected to or even subsidiary to public interests. Where the constitutional environment is seen as conducive to rights-assertion, religious organisations are more likely to resist state restrictions because such action would enhance their standing among their own adherents. Under such conditions, they performatively present themselves as freedom fighters standing against state oppression. Filing a lawsuit against Covid-19 measures is seen as an act of resistance in pursuit of freedom and divine blessings. In contrast, where the constitutional environment is not conducive to rights claims but emphasises communitarian values, religious organisations would tend to employ the language of duties in complying with state restrictions. Many, however, do not do this simply as passive subjects but may consciously adopt public health values and encourage their adherents to do the same because doing so could enhance their social standing and legitimacy. Thus, by emphasising their value to society through an explicit commitment to public health, specifically, and to the community’s interests, more generally, and avoiding an emphatic insistence on rights, Covid-19 became an opportunity for religious organisations to performatively present themselves as civic-minded and socially responsible social actors. This allowed them to frame their adoption of public health measures partly as group choices, and not merely top-down imposition by the state.

    Categories: Interreligious Relations

    Last updated on 17/11/2021

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    Interreligious Relations (IRR) Issue 24 – Covid-19 and Religious Organisations: Constitutional Environment and Organisational Choices by Jaclyn L. Neo and Shazny Ramlan
    Abstract:

    Religious organisations play critical functions in societies around the world. The role of religious organisa ...

    more info