• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Cohesive Societies
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Cohesive Societies
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • COVID-19 Resources
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • War with China?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO21090 | War with China?
    Loro Horta

    04 June 2021

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    The admiral in charge of the US Indo-Pacific Command recently told Congress that China could invade Taiwan in the next six years. However, there is little evidence that China has the intention or even the capabilities to attack Taiwan. Exaggerating the likelihood of war could lead to bad policy planning and a self-fulfilling prophecy.

    COMMENTARY

    THE HEAD of the US Indo Pacific Command, Admiral Philip Davidson, rightly pointed out recently that China’s military, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), is fast modernising and expanding its capabilities. He predicted that China would attack Taiwan in the next six years.

    Is China really getting ready to invade Taiwan, a move that could start a war with the United States? Why in the next six years? The reasons given for this timeframe range from growing Chinese incursions into Taiwan’s air space and territorial waters to more doubtful ones like the PLA wanting to mark its 100th anniversary by reunifying Taiwan with the mainland.

    The Military Balance

    The PLA and the Chinese leadership do not make decisions rashly; they are rational and calculating. Chinese leaders have a healthy dose of respect for US power and know that China is still inferior to the US in many sectors of the military.

    The US navy is the most technologically advanced force in the world and the most experienced. While China has been adding modern warships and submarines to its fleet at an impressive rate  it will take at least 15 years or more for China to reach US levels in terms of modern ships and submarines.

    China currently operates two aircraft carriers, the Liaoning, partially built in the Ukraine during the Soviet era, and the Shandong, an indigenously built copy of the Liaoning with minor improvements. They are no match to the 11 nuclear-powered aircraft carriers operated by the US.

    China is building two more aircraft carriers expected to be far more advanced than its current two. The fourth aircraft carrier, the Type 04, is expected to be similar in capabilities to the US aircraft carriers. However, this vessel will only be operational in 2030.

    While the Chinese air force and navy have received new aircraft such as the J-15 and J-22, they are still small in numbers and most analysts believe that these new models remain inferior to the US F-22 Raptor and F-35 fighters. The US operates 35 nuclear-powered attack submarines against China’s six. The rest of the Chinese attack submarines are diesel powered, slower and noisier than its US opponents.

    Taiwan has a 165,000 strong military, over a million men in the reserves, and a modern air force and navy. China would need to land hundreds of thousands of men in the very first waves of invasion and eventually over a million men in any plan to take the island. China does not have the sealift capacity for such an operation.

    China’s Strategy

    China believes that time is on its side. Beijing is expanding its military without compromising its economic growth. China’s defence budget for 2021 stood at US$209.4 billion, about 1.3 percent of its GDP. While some observers question this figure, it is clear that the US outspends all other nations.

    In comparison the US spent $732 billion in 2020. More than the budgets of the next 10 countries combined. There is a strong belief among China’s leadership that the then Soviet Union went bankrupt and neglected the needs of its people because it engaged in a costly arms race with the US. China wants to avoid the same mistake.

    China is confident that it is slowly winning the contest with the US on the economic front. In Africa it has supplanted its rivals while in Asia it is arguably already the most important economic actor. Its $124 billion Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is a symbol of its growing economic clout.

    The scuttling of the Transpacific Partnership (TPP) by the Trump administration deprived the US of a vital asset in countering China’s growing economic dominance of the region. China’s most powerful asset is not its military. It is its economy.

    In No Hurry for War with US

    Beijing is not in a hurry to go to war; it believes eventually its economy and military will be powerful enough that the US will have no alternative, but to peacefully relinquish its leadership of the region. It will be just like Britain relinquishing its preponderance in the Americas to a rising US in the late 19th century.

    More funding for the Indo-Pacific Command is important, but it should be just one part of the overall strategy of managing China’s growing power. The US defeated the Soviet Union in the Cold War not with its military might but by the power of its economy and those of its allies.

    For almost five decades the US and the Soviet Union were able to avoid war. There is no reason why the US cannot repeat this with China. For that to happen, it is important to have realistic assessments of China’s capabilities and intentions. One must avoid the temptation of threat inflammation.

    About the Author

    Loro Horta is a diplomat from Timor Leste. He is a graduate of the People’s Liberation Army National Defence University’s senior officers course; the US Naval Post Graduate School, the American National Defence University; and the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. The views expressed here are strictly his own.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / Maritime Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Global / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 04/06/2021

    comments powered by Disqus
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    The admiral in charge of the US Indo-Pacific Command recently told Congress that China could invade Taiwan in the next six years. However, there is little evidence that China has the intention or even the capabilities to attack Taiwan. Exaggerating the likelihood of war could lead to bad policy planning and a self-fulfilling prophecy.

    COMMENTARY

    THE HEAD of the US Indo Pacific Command, Admiral Philip Davidson, rightly pointed out recently that China’s military, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), is fast modernising and expanding its capabilities. He predicted that China would attack Taiwan in the next six years.

    Is China really getting ready to invade Taiwan, a move that could start a war with the United States? Why in the next six years? The reasons given for this timeframe range from growing Chinese incursions into Taiwan’s air space and territorial waters to more doubtful ones like the PLA wanting to mark its 100th anniversary by reunifying Taiwan with the mainland.

    The Military Balance

    The PLA and the Chinese leadership do not make decisions rashly; they are rational and calculating. Chinese leaders have a healthy dose of respect for US power and know that China is still inferior to the US in many sectors of the military.

    The US navy is the most technologically advanced force in the world and the most experienced. While China has been adding modern warships and submarines to its fleet at an impressive rate  it will take at least 15 years or more for China to reach US levels in terms of modern ships and submarines.

    China currently operates two aircraft carriers, the Liaoning, partially built in the Ukraine during the Soviet era, and the Shandong, an indigenously built copy of the Liaoning with minor improvements. They are no match to the 11 nuclear-powered aircraft carriers operated by the US.

    China is building two more aircraft carriers expected to be far more advanced than its current two. The fourth aircraft carrier, the Type 04, is expected to be similar in capabilities to the US aircraft carriers. However, this vessel will only be operational in 2030.

    While the Chinese air force and navy have received new aircraft such as the J-15 and J-22, they are still small in numbers and most analysts believe that these new models remain inferior to the US F-22 Raptor and F-35 fighters. The US operates 35 nuclear-powered attack submarines against China’s six. The rest of the Chinese attack submarines are diesel powered, slower and noisier than its US opponents.

    Taiwan has a 165,000 strong military, over a million men in the reserves, and a modern air force and navy. China would need to land hundreds of thousands of men in the very first waves of invasion and eventually over a million men in any plan to take the island. China does not have the sealift capacity for such an operation.

    China’s Strategy

    China believes that time is on its side. Beijing is expanding its military without compromising its economic growth. China’s defence budget for 2021 stood at US$209.4 billion, about 1.3 percent of its GDP. While some observers question this figure, it is clear that the US outspends all other nations.

    In comparison the US spent $732 billion in 2020. More than the budgets of the next 10 countries combined. There is a strong belief among China’s leadership that the then Soviet Union went bankrupt and neglected the needs of its people because it engaged in a costly arms race with the US. China wants to avoid the same mistake.

    China is confident that it is slowly winning the contest with the US on the economic front. In Africa it has supplanted its rivals while in Asia it is arguably already the most important economic actor. Its $124 billion Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is a symbol of its growing economic clout.

    The scuttling of the Transpacific Partnership (TPP) by the Trump administration deprived the US of a vital asset in countering China’s growing economic dominance of the region. China’s most powerful asset is not its military. It is its economy.

    In No Hurry for War with US

    Beijing is not in a hurry to go to war; it believes eventually its economy and military will be powerful enough that the US will have no alternative, but to peacefully relinquish its leadership of the region. It will be just like Britain relinquishing its preponderance in the Americas to a rising US in the late 19th century.

    More funding for the Indo-Pacific Command is important, but it should be just one part of the overall strategy of managing China’s growing power. The US defeated the Soviet Union in the Cold War not with its military might but by the power of its economy and those of its allies.

    For almost five decades the US and the Soviet Union were able to avoid war. There is no reason why the US cannot repeat this with China. For that to happen, it is important to have realistic assessments of China’s capabilities and intentions. One must avoid the temptation of threat inflammation.

    About the Author

    Loro Horta is a diplomat from Timor Leste. He is a graduate of the People’s Liberation Army National Defence University’s senior officers course; the US Naval Post Graduate School, the American National Defence University; and the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. The views expressed here are strictly his own.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / Maritime Security

    Last updated on 04/06/2021

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    War with China?

    SYNOPSIS

    The admiral in charge of the US Indo-Pacific Command recently told Congress that China could invade Taiwan in the next six years. However, there is ...
    more info