• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Vietnam’s New Leadership: Back to the Four Pillars
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO21056 | Vietnam’s New Leadership: Back to the Four Pillars
    Yang Razali Kassim

    03 April 2021

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    As Vietnam’s political top brass convene this week to elect the country’s new leadership, domestic and international attention is on whether the traditional power balance revolving around the so-called Four Pillars will be maintained.


    Source: Unsplash

    COMMENTARY

    VIETNAM’S TOP leadership is changing. This political transition is taking place at the 11th session of the National Assembly (NA) or legislature, currently under way amid some debate in the media whether Vietnam is an emerging middle power in Asia. The country’s steady economic rise and the growing regional clout this consequently brings seems to suggest that Vietnam is on course to be one. But Vietnamese leaders themselves are reticent and cautious about such portrayals. Vietnam, to them, still has a long way to go, notwithstanding its commendable economic growth accompanied by one of the strongest militaries in the region.

    Whether Vietnam is a middle power or not, the trajectory to this status will be defined by the new political leadership that is currently being put in place since February’s 13th Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV) ─ the country’s political backbone. By next week (8 April 2021), this new leadership team will have been finalised at the NA elections to complete the leadership transition. Whoever are elected will form the quartet of power ─ the so-called Four Pillars ─ that will shape Vietnam’s political and economic direction in the new term.

    Back to the Four Pillars

    Significantly, the CPV general secretary, Nguyen Phu Trong, has stepped down as state president, a second post he took over upon the death of his predecessor Tran Dai Quang. That assumption gave Trong two out of the four most important positions in the country. The other two are the prime minister and the chair of the NA.

    Except for the most powerful post of party chief, which Trong continues to hold, the other three will be decided at the NA elections in an indirect system of choosing the country’s leadership. In other words, the power balance in the national leadership will revert to the four-pillar structure.

    The fact that Trong relinquished the presidency seems to suggest that holding two powerful posts at the same time was not meant to be a permanent fixture. Trong, the longest-serving CPV chief since Le Duan, is known as a firm leader and effective anti-corruption campaigner. With Trong already in his late 70s, the quartet will be dominated by a younger team. But who are they likely to be? And will they herald change or continuity of foreign and economic policies?

    The New Quartet

    Likely to step into Trong’s shoes as president is the current prime minister Nguyen Xuan Phuc, 66. With his experience of running the government as well as exposure to regional and international diplomacy, Phuc will make a high-profile president, further raising Vietnam’s growing prominence in the region and internationally.

    In that position, he is likely to continue Vietnam’s pro-ASEAN diplomacy and the country’s foreign policy of balancing China and the United States as the two major powers vie for influence in the South China Sea. This big power rivalry taking place at Vietnam’s doorstep has been a big worry for Hanoi, one of six claimants to the disputed waters that the Vietnamese refer to as East Sea.

    Stepping in turn into Phuc’s shoes as prime minister is likely to be Pham Minh Chinh,62, a current Politburo member and Head of the Central Organising Committee. Unlike previous prime ministers, Chinh has never been a minister or deputy prime minister, so his expected rise is an impressive elevation. Coming from a security-related background, he is also known to be a firm and decisive leader.

    The just-elected NA chair or parliamentary head is Vuong Dinh Hue, a 64-year-old professor of economics who had served previously as deputy prime minister and finance minister and currently holds the party post of Secretary of the Hanoi Party Committee.

    What the Likely New Line-Up Means

    There are several points of significance from the emerging Vietnamese leadership for the next lap.

    Firstly, the return of the four-pillar power structure means that the political direction in the next few years will remain constant and stable. This is interpreted by some in Vietnam as a “better way to check, monitor and control power”. Just as significantly, it means that the country’s political elite prefers a more balanced power structure between the ruling party, the executive branch and the legislative branch, rather than the consolidation of power in one person.

    Secondly, the leadership renewal marks a combination of experience and freshness, a suitable formula for Vietnam’s planned transition towards developed status by 2045. The leaders’ main objectives are aspirational; the strategic tasks of the Vietnamese communists are to develop a prosperous and stable country, striving to be a socialist-oriented developed state.

    To be sure, General Secretary Trong will continue to oversee the strengthening of the party’s hold on power and in the fight against corruption where his success has been proven. Meanwhile, Phuc, if he eventually gets elected as president, will leverage on his experience as prime minister to expand and strengthen Vietnam’s relations with other countries.

    The biggest attention will be on Chinh, the likely new prime minister, whose decisiveness is seen as a quality needed for a head of government. He will have the unenviable task of steering the country towards the dual goal of rolling back and containing the pandemic while maintaining and promoting economic growth. For the new leadership, this goal is foremost.

    Leadership and Foreign Policy

    Foreign policy under the new team is likely to continue the strategy of “openness, multilateralisation and diversification”. This is another way of describing the search for a new balance that tilts towards the US, a former foe, in response to China’s growing dominance in the South China Sea.

    International economic integration will continue with more free trade agreements (FTAs) being signed, thereby creating new impetus for the nation’s economic recovery. Vietnam has set up a network of 17 FTAs and frameworks for economic cooperation with the world’s leading economic regions.

    Vietnam’s diplomatic foray will continue to deepen following its chairmanship of ASEAN in 2020 while its entry into the UN Security Council as a non-permanent member for one year has raised its voice on the global stage.

    As Vietnam pursues its balancing of China and the US, it will continue to back ASEAN’s centrality amid the fluid geopolitical landscape, even as it keeps a close watch on protecting Vietnam’s territorial sovereignty. On 11 March, the Vietnamese foreign ministry  responded to the recent meeting of the emerging platform of Quad partners ─ the US, Japan, Australia and India ─ by urging them “to respect the central role of ASEAN in the formation of regional structures”.

    In a related signal earlier to China, reported by the Vietnamese News Agency, the deputy foreign minister Le Hoai Trung said the most important goal in Vietnamese foreign policy is to “firmly and persistently maintain national independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity”. “This goal has been put at the top of Vietnam’s foreign policy throughout many party congresses, including the (most recent) 13th Congress,” Trung said.

    By the end of the NA elections on 8 April, the new Vietnamese core leadership will be ready to take over. This new “Group of Four” ─ a communist party veteran backed by a set of younger leaders ─ will steer Vietnam towards a more prominent regional role ─ regardless whether it is a middle power or not.

    About the Author

    Yang Razali Kassim is Senior Fellow & Editor RSIS Commentary at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / Maritime Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 05/04/2021

    comments powered by Disqus
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    As Vietnam’s political top brass convene this week to elect the country’s new leadership, domestic and international attention is on whether the traditional power balance revolving around the so-called Four Pillars will be maintained.


    Source: Unsplash

    COMMENTARY

    VIETNAM’S TOP leadership is changing. This political transition is taking place at the 11th session of the National Assembly (NA) or legislature, currently under way amid some debate in the media whether Vietnam is an emerging middle power in Asia. The country’s steady economic rise and the growing regional clout this consequently brings seems to suggest that Vietnam is on course to be one. But Vietnamese leaders themselves are reticent and cautious about such portrayals. Vietnam, to them, still has a long way to go, notwithstanding its commendable economic growth accompanied by one of the strongest militaries in the region.

    Whether Vietnam is a middle power or not, the trajectory to this status will be defined by the new political leadership that is currently being put in place since February’s 13th Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV) ─ the country’s political backbone. By next week (8 April 2021), this new leadership team will have been finalised at the NA elections to complete the leadership transition. Whoever are elected will form the quartet of power ─ the so-called Four Pillars ─ that will shape Vietnam’s political and economic direction in the new term.

    Back to the Four Pillars

    Significantly, the CPV general secretary, Nguyen Phu Trong, has stepped down as state president, a second post he took over upon the death of his predecessor Tran Dai Quang. That assumption gave Trong two out of the four most important positions in the country. The other two are the prime minister and the chair of the NA.

    Except for the most powerful post of party chief, which Trong continues to hold, the other three will be decided at the NA elections in an indirect system of choosing the country’s leadership. In other words, the power balance in the national leadership will revert to the four-pillar structure.

    The fact that Trong relinquished the presidency seems to suggest that holding two powerful posts at the same time was not meant to be a permanent fixture. Trong, the longest-serving CPV chief since Le Duan, is known as a firm leader and effective anti-corruption campaigner. With Trong already in his late 70s, the quartet will be dominated by a younger team. But who are they likely to be? And will they herald change or continuity of foreign and economic policies?

    The New Quartet

    Likely to step into Trong’s shoes as president is the current prime minister Nguyen Xuan Phuc, 66. With his experience of running the government as well as exposure to regional and international diplomacy, Phuc will make a high-profile president, further raising Vietnam’s growing prominence in the region and internationally.

    In that position, he is likely to continue Vietnam’s pro-ASEAN diplomacy and the country’s foreign policy of balancing China and the United States as the two major powers vie for influence in the South China Sea. This big power rivalry taking place at Vietnam’s doorstep has been a big worry for Hanoi, one of six claimants to the disputed waters that the Vietnamese refer to as East Sea.

    Stepping in turn into Phuc’s shoes as prime minister is likely to be Pham Minh Chinh,62, a current Politburo member and Head of the Central Organising Committee. Unlike previous prime ministers, Chinh has never been a minister or deputy prime minister, so his expected rise is an impressive elevation. Coming from a security-related background, he is also known to be a firm and decisive leader.

    The just-elected NA chair or parliamentary head is Vuong Dinh Hue, a 64-year-old professor of economics who had served previously as deputy prime minister and finance minister and currently holds the party post of Secretary of the Hanoi Party Committee.

    What the Likely New Line-Up Means

    There are several points of significance from the emerging Vietnamese leadership for the next lap.

    Firstly, the return of the four-pillar power structure means that the political direction in the next few years will remain constant and stable. This is interpreted by some in Vietnam as a “better way to check, monitor and control power”. Just as significantly, it means that the country’s political elite prefers a more balanced power structure between the ruling party, the executive branch and the legislative branch, rather than the consolidation of power in one person.

    Secondly, the leadership renewal marks a combination of experience and freshness, a suitable formula for Vietnam’s planned transition towards developed status by 2045. The leaders’ main objectives are aspirational; the strategic tasks of the Vietnamese communists are to develop a prosperous and stable country, striving to be a socialist-oriented developed state.

    To be sure, General Secretary Trong will continue to oversee the strengthening of the party’s hold on power and in the fight against corruption where his success has been proven. Meanwhile, Phuc, if he eventually gets elected as president, will leverage on his experience as prime minister to expand and strengthen Vietnam’s relations with other countries.

    The biggest attention will be on Chinh, the likely new prime minister, whose decisiveness is seen as a quality needed for a head of government. He will have the unenviable task of steering the country towards the dual goal of rolling back and containing the pandemic while maintaining and promoting economic growth. For the new leadership, this goal is foremost.

    Leadership and Foreign Policy

    Foreign policy under the new team is likely to continue the strategy of “openness, multilateralisation and diversification”. This is another way of describing the search for a new balance that tilts towards the US, a former foe, in response to China’s growing dominance in the South China Sea.

    International economic integration will continue with more free trade agreements (FTAs) being signed, thereby creating new impetus for the nation’s economic recovery. Vietnam has set up a network of 17 FTAs and frameworks for economic cooperation with the world’s leading economic regions.

    Vietnam’s diplomatic foray will continue to deepen following its chairmanship of ASEAN in 2020 while its entry into the UN Security Council as a non-permanent member for one year has raised its voice on the global stage.

    As Vietnam pursues its balancing of China and the US, it will continue to back ASEAN’s centrality amid the fluid geopolitical landscape, even as it keeps a close watch on protecting Vietnam’s territorial sovereignty. On 11 March, the Vietnamese foreign ministry  responded to the recent meeting of the emerging platform of Quad partners ─ the US, Japan, Australia and India ─ by urging them “to respect the central role of ASEAN in the formation of regional structures”.

    In a related signal earlier to China, reported by the Vietnamese News Agency, the deputy foreign minister Le Hoai Trung said the most important goal in Vietnamese foreign policy is to “firmly and persistently maintain national independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity”. “This goal has been put at the top of Vietnam’s foreign policy throughout many party congresses, including the (most recent) 13th Congress,” Trung said.

    By the end of the NA elections on 8 April, the new Vietnamese core leadership will be ready to take over. This new “Group of Four” ─ a communist party veteran backed by a set of younger leaders ─ will steer Vietnam towards a more prominent regional role ─ regardless whether it is a middle power or not.

    About the Author

    Yang Razali Kassim is Senior Fellow & Editor RSIS Commentary at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / Maritime Security

    Last updated on 05/04/2021

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    Vietnam’s New Leadership: Back to the Four Pillars

    SYNOPSIS

    As Vietnam’s political top brass convene this week to elect the country’s new leadership, domestic and international attention is on whether the tr ...
    more info