Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS Newsletter
Other Research
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Alumni & Networks
Alumni
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
Commentaries
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
IDSS Paper
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
RSIS Publications for the Year
Glossary of Abbreviations
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
External Publications for the Year
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
Media
2024 Indonesia Elections
Great Powers
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
Media Mentions
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Future Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSIS Newsletter
      Other ResearchScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to Apply
      Financial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      AlumniAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)SRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersCommentariesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsIDSS PaperInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking PapersRSIS Publications for the Year
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-EdsExternal Publications for the Year
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      2024 Indonesia ElectionsGreat PowersSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesMedia Mentions
      News ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • US Presidential Election 2020 – The Biden Presidency: A Different China Policy?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO20195 | US Presidential Election 2020 – The Biden Presidency: A Different China Policy?
    Zhang Baohui

    13 November 2020

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    As Joe Biden fights to claim his presidency, analysts are already debating what changes in foreign policy he will introduce on China. Will he pursue a different China policy, shaped more by his personality? Or will he be constrained by the international system?


    Source: flickr

    COMMENTARY

    THE PROJECTED victory of Joe Biden in the United States presidential election raises the question of whether his China policy will significantly differ from that of the Trump administration. This question is important due to the major changes in the China policy of the US under Donald Trump. These changes have profoundly affected the dynamics of not only Sino-US ties but also international relations in the Asia Pacific region.

    The Trump administration’s emphasis on great power competition has drastically sharpened strategic rivalry between China and the US. Other countries in the region have faced increasing pressure to “choose sides”. The critical question that many are asking now is what will the Biden administration’s China policy be like?

    Biden’s China Policy in an Anarchic Order

    In the study of international relations, the matter here fundamentally concerns the classic “man vs. structure” issue. Whether individual leaders matter in terms of foreign policies of state has been continuously debated by scholars. Also known as agency vs. structure debate, most IR scholars place great stress on the incentives and constraints posed by the environment, be it domestic or international. They tend to see significant continuities in the foreign policies of states.

    On the other hand, some argue that the tendency to overlook the roles of individual leaders is misguided, as their personalities and background experiences do affect their approaches to foreign policy. Therefore, whether leaders can make a difference in the foreign policy of states is a significant issue for the rest of the world to gauge Joe Biden’s China policy.

    Here, structural approaches to the study of international relations suggest that the anarchic order of the international system will impose significant constraints on Biden and his China policy will continue to emphasise strategic competition. The anarchic international system forces states, especially the great powers, to put a premium on their relative power and influences over rival great powers.

    In fact, this is the key insight of offensive realism, famously coined by American political scientist John Mearsheimer. Defensive realism, which is another structural theory, also predicts continued rivalry between China and the US. The anarchic order causes the security dilemma between states due to mutual mistrust.

    Continued Strategic Rivalry?

    As power continues to shift between China and the US, they both tend to assume the worst about the other’s intentions. While Beijing sees the US determined to thwart its rise, Washington sees China determined to undermine its global primacy.

    In this context many have argued that strategic rivalry will continue under the Biden administration. It is now widely accepted that there is a strong consensus in the US regarding its China policy. A structural perspective on Biden’s China policy will therefore predict that his administration will more or less continue a policy of strategic competition.

    However, leaders do possess different ideas about the foreign policy challenges that confront their countries. According to constructivist IR theory, ideas matter. They shape leaders’ understanding of the issues they face and ways to resolve these issues. Different leaders subscribe to different ideas, thereby leading to significant variations in their foreign policies and strategies.

    Mikhail Gorbachev’s “new thinking” is often said to be the key factor in the rapid end of the Cold War in the late 1980s. No structural approaches to the study of international relations predicted this outcome.

    Biden’s Restrained or Selective Competition?

    From this perspective, the Biden administration’s China policy could see significant differences from that of the Trump administration. While his China policy may continue to reflect the competition logic, it would nonetheless show major differences at the operational level.

    For example, while Biden does see China as the biggest competitor, he also argues that the US needs to carefully manage its relations with Beijing in order to avoid scenarios such as military conflicts. In the trade area, he has indicated that while he would also pursue a more reciprocal trade relationship with China, he nonetheless considers the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration harming American consumers and companies.

    As a typical liberal Democrat, Biden has also promised that his government would once again pay more attention to urgent global governance issues, ranging from COVID-19 to climate change. In this regard, his administration may seek China’s cooperation on these issues.

    The above indicate that under the Biden presidency Sino-US relations will see more restrained strategic competition, perhaps even selective cooperation.

    The Biden presidency will therefore offer an interesting test of the agency vs. structure debate in international relations. In the coming year his administration’s China policy will tell if leaders or the international system play greater roles in shaping the foreign policies of states.

    Will Biden’s China policy be significantly different from that of Trump’s? The answer to this question will not only shed light on a classic debate in the study of international relations but also shape international politics in the next few years with Biden in the White House. How different will the US be under a Biden presidency?

    About the Author

    Baohui Zhang is Professor of Political Science at Lingnan University, Hong Kong. He contributed this to RSIS Commentary. This is part of an RSIS Series.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Global / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 15/11/2020

    comments powered by Disqus
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    As Joe Biden fights to claim his presidency, analysts are already debating what changes in foreign policy he will introduce on China. Will he pursue a different China policy, shaped more by his personality? Or will he be constrained by the international system?


    Source: flickr

    COMMENTARY

    THE PROJECTED victory of Joe Biden in the United States presidential election raises the question of whether his China policy will significantly differ from that of the Trump administration. This question is important due to the major changes in the China policy of the US under Donald Trump. These changes have profoundly affected the dynamics of not only Sino-US ties but also international relations in the Asia Pacific region.

    The Trump administration’s emphasis on great power competition has drastically sharpened strategic rivalry between China and the US. Other countries in the region have faced increasing pressure to “choose sides”. The critical question that many are asking now is what will the Biden administration’s China policy be like?

    Biden’s China Policy in an Anarchic Order

    In the study of international relations, the matter here fundamentally concerns the classic “man vs. structure” issue. Whether individual leaders matter in terms of foreign policies of state has been continuously debated by scholars. Also known as agency vs. structure debate, most IR scholars place great stress on the incentives and constraints posed by the environment, be it domestic or international. They tend to see significant continuities in the foreign policies of states.

    On the other hand, some argue that the tendency to overlook the roles of individual leaders is misguided, as their personalities and background experiences do affect their approaches to foreign policy. Therefore, whether leaders can make a difference in the foreign policy of states is a significant issue for the rest of the world to gauge Joe Biden’s China policy.

    Here, structural approaches to the study of international relations suggest that the anarchic order of the international system will impose significant constraints on Biden and his China policy will continue to emphasise strategic competition. The anarchic international system forces states, especially the great powers, to put a premium on their relative power and influences over rival great powers.

    In fact, this is the key insight of offensive realism, famously coined by American political scientist John Mearsheimer. Defensive realism, which is another structural theory, also predicts continued rivalry between China and the US. The anarchic order causes the security dilemma between states due to mutual mistrust.

    Continued Strategic Rivalry?

    As power continues to shift between China and the US, they both tend to assume the worst about the other’s intentions. While Beijing sees the US determined to thwart its rise, Washington sees China determined to undermine its global primacy.

    In this context many have argued that strategic rivalry will continue under the Biden administration. It is now widely accepted that there is a strong consensus in the US regarding its China policy. A structural perspective on Biden’s China policy will therefore predict that his administration will more or less continue a policy of strategic competition.

    However, leaders do possess different ideas about the foreign policy challenges that confront their countries. According to constructivist IR theory, ideas matter. They shape leaders’ understanding of the issues they face and ways to resolve these issues. Different leaders subscribe to different ideas, thereby leading to significant variations in their foreign policies and strategies.

    Mikhail Gorbachev’s “new thinking” is often said to be the key factor in the rapid end of the Cold War in the late 1980s. No structural approaches to the study of international relations predicted this outcome.

    Biden’s Restrained or Selective Competition?

    From this perspective, the Biden administration’s China policy could see significant differences from that of the Trump administration. While his China policy may continue to reflect the competition logic, it would nonetheless show major differences at the operational level.

    For example, while Biden does see China as the biggest competitor, he also argues that the US needs to carefully manage its relations with Beijing in order to avoid scenarios such as military conflicts. In the trade area, he has indicated that while he would also pursue a more reciprocal trade relationship with China, he nonetheless considers the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration harming American consumers and companies.

    As a typical liberal Democrat, Biden has also promised that his government would once again pay more attention to urgent global governance issues, ranging from COVID-19 to climate change. In this regard, his administration may seek China’s cooperation on these issues.

    The above indicate that under the Biden presidency Sino-US relations will see more restrained strategic competition, perhaps even selective cooperation.

    The Biden presidency will therefore offer an interesting test of the agency vs. structure debate in international relations. In the coming year his administration’s China policy will tell if leaders or the international system play greater roles in shaping the foreign policies of states.

    Will Biden’s China policy be significantly different from that of Trump’s? The answer to this question will not only shed light on a classic debate in the study of international relations but also shape international politics in the next few years with Biden in the White House. How different will the US be under a Biden presidency?

    About the Author

    Baohui Zhang is Professor of Political Science at Lingnan University, Hong Kong. He contributed this to RSIS Commentary. This is part of an RSIS Series.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies

    Last updated on 15/11/2020

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info