• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Towards ICCS 2022 – Cohesion as a Choice: Regardless of Faith and Identity
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO21127 | Towards ICCS 2022 – Cohesion as a Choice: Regardless of Faith and Identity
    Jolene Jerard

    23 August 2021

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    Social cohesion is a work in progress. Societies can choose to achieve greater levels of social cohesion by forging greater inclusivity. Two things can break this: Exclusivist ideas and the imposition of perceived group superiority.


    Source: Max Pixel

    COMMENTARY

    SINGAPORE COMMEMORATES its 56 years of independence in 2021. As much as it is a time for celebration of strengths amidst the crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is also a time for reflection of the human spirit and to deliberate on the vision and aspiration for Singapore for the years ahead.

    President Halimah Yacob mooted the idea of the inaugural International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS), convened in Singapore in June 2019. This timely Conference opened doors for inclusive thought-provoking conversations on critical issues of faith, identity and cohesion.

    A State of Being versus A State of Doing

    Countries aspire towards the broad ideal of cohesive societies. Cohesion is often reflected as a sense of solidarity and togetherness amongst members of the community.

    Social cohesion, an important facet of community resilience, is an ongoing process where communities collectively embrace a sense of belonging, advance the values of the community and guard against occurrences that may tear the fabric of community relations.

    More than ‘a state of being’ where communities arrive at the proverbial destination of cohesion, it can be perceived as ‘a state of doing’. This is often a long-drawn consistent work in progress. It is a process guided by a search for ways through which the community can continuously position itself to sustain and enhance levels of social cohesion. While it is no mean feat, on a positive note, most societies are not starting at a zero baseline of social cohesion.

    Studies have shown why social cohesiveness is integral. Socially cohesive societies are better poised for stability, growth and a general sense of satisfaction and trust in both inter-community and intra-community relations. It provides the scaffolding for a harmonious society.

    Finding Pathways to Higher Levels of Social Cohesion

    Recognising its importance, future-focused thinking, which combines scenario planning and decision analysis, will guide the process towards the desired outcome.

    Instances of casual racism and micro-aggression in society, point to the critical need for reflection on finding pathways for working together towards higher levels of social cohesion.

    It calls for honest, open and engaging conversations, reciprocity of respect and the creation of common space anchored on shared values. This ought to be done in a spirit of finding solutions while refraining from missteps of the past by avoiding the oft-mentioned “difficult and uncomfortable discussions”.

    As communities develop, the ‘toolkits’ that have been used to educate on notions of social cohesion will also need to evolve. Discussions on social cohesion today will need to account for the ebbs and flows of concepts of faith and identity in modernity.

    Regardless of Faith and Identity

    Faith and identity are familiar and potent forces. They often channel an almost primordial reaction amongst groups to enact change for the sake of the greater good. History has constantly shown how these forces can both unite and divide.

    Inclusivity is the inevitable spearhead of efforts to foster social cohesion. In so doing, the first step will be the expansion of the parameters of the terminology. To broaden and open the avenues for discussion, unspoken assumptions on societal norms may need to be re-evaluated.

    The Singapore Census 2020 showed that 20 per cent of Singapore residents had no religious affiliation. Moving forward, discussions need to be expanded across the spectrum to include those without any religious affiliation with a view to furthering the goals of social cohesion. Singapore’s economic success can lull pockets of the community into a sense of complacency. The absence of major disruption to society may well hide cracks and fissures.

    In attempting to identify shared values of social cohesiveness, a fundamental challenge may arise from groups that do not subscribe to the general mores and culture of cohesion ─ the so-called out-group. This refers to a group or community that an individual does not identify with and will perceive them as an outlier.

    Cohesion is A Choice

    While diversity in communities need not divide, the art of cohesion is borne out of a conscious choice. There is strength in diversity albeit not an inevitable outcome. The art lies in manifesting this strength in diversity to harness, nurture and to sustain cohesion.

    Honouring the legacy of our forefathers, cohesion is a choice; it embodies at its crux a commitment to common values. It is one where all sectors of the community have a part to play. In multi-religious, multi-racial and multi-cultural Singapore, the strength in diversity is seen in the art of progressing from tolerance to acceptance of the other.

    On a spectrum, tolerance is the lowest threshold of harmony. Acceptance is the higher ideal. It is a constant quest to climb the metaphorical ladder while helping those around to achieve a common vision of the desired future.

    The length of common and shared history does not instinctively make for a more socially cohesive community. The best possible outcome can be achieved when members of the community set up the necessary infrastructures to ensure that it can maximise the outcome of achieving a cohesive society.

    To achieve the desired cohesive future, the current generation of youth will also need to step up and play a part in all sectors of the community. The scale of success is dependent on choice. A choice the individual members of the community makes towards the greater goal of an inclusive and cohesive society.

    About the Author

    Dr. Jolene Jerard is Executive Director, Centinel, a public safety and management consultancy firm. She is also an Adjunct Senior Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. This is part of a series.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / Singapore and Homeland Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Global / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 23/08/2021

    comments powered by Disqus
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    Social cohesion is a work in progress. Societies can choose to achieve greater levels of social cohesion by forging greater inclusivity. Two things can break this: Exclusivist ideas and the imposition of perceived group superiority.


    Source: Max Pixel

    COMMENTARY

    SINGAPORE COMMEMORATES its 56 years of independence in 2021. As much as it is a time for celebration of strengths amidst the crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is also a time for reflection of the human spirit and to deliberate on the vision and aspiration for Singapore for the years ahead.

    President Halimah Yacob mooted the idea of the inaugural International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS), convened in Singapore in June 2019. This timely Conference opened doors for inclusive thought-provoking conversations on critical issues of faith, identity and cohesion.

    A State of Being versus A State of Doing

    Countries aspire towards the broad ideal of cohesive societies. Cohesion is often reflected as a sense of solidarity and togetherness amongst members of the community.

    Social cohesion, an important facet of community resilience, is an ongoing process where communities collectively embrace a sense of belonging, advance the values of the community and guard against occurrences that may tear the fabric of community relations.

    More than ‘a state of being’ where communities arrive at the proverbial destination of cohesion, it can be perceived as ‘a state of doing’. This is often a long-drawn consistent work in progress. It is a process guided by a search for ways through which the community can continuously position itself to sustain and enhance levels of social cohesion. While it is no mean feat, on a positive note, most societies are not starting at a zero baseline of social cohesion.

    Studies have shown why social cohesiveness is integral. Socially cohesive societies are better poised for stability, growth and a general sense of satisfaction and trust in both inter-community and intra-community relations. It provides the scaffolding for a harmonious society.

    Finding Pathways to Higher Levels of Social Cohesion

    Recognising its importance, future-focused thinking, which combines scenario planning and decision analysis, will guide the process towards the desired outcome.

    Instances of casual racism and micro-aggression in society, point to the critical need for reflection on finding pathways for working together towards higher levels of social cohesion.

    It calls for honest, open and engaging conversations, reciprocity of respect and the creation of common space anchored on shared values. This ought to be done in a spirit of finding solutions while refraining from missteps of the past by avoiding the oft-mentioned “difficult and uncomfortable discussions”.

    As communities develop, the ‘toolkits’ that have been used to educate on notions of social cohesion will also need to evolve. Discussions on social cohesion today will need to account for the ebbs and flows of concepts of faith and identity in modernity.

    Regardless of Faith and Identity

    Faith and identity are familiar and potent forces. They often channel an almost primordial reaction amongst groups to enact change for the sake of the greater good. History has constantly shown how these forces can both unite and divide.

    Inclusivity is the inevitable spearhead of efforts to foster social cohesion. In so doing, the first step will be the expansion of the parameters of the terminology. To broaden and open the avenues for discussion, unspoken assumptions on societal norms may need to be re-evaluated.

    The Singapore Census 2020 showed that 20 per cent of Singapore residents had no religious affiliation. Moving forward, discussions need to be expanded across the spectrum to include those without any religious affiliation with a view to furthering the goals of social cohesion. Singapore’s economic success can lull pockets of the community into a sense of complacency. The absence of major disruption to society may well hide cracks and fissures.

    In attempting to identify shared values of social cohesiveness, a fundamental challenge may arise from groups that do not subscribe to the general mores and culture of cohesion ─ the so-called out-group. This refers to a group or community that an individual does not identify with and will perceive them as an outlier.

    Cohesion is A Choice

    While diversity in communities need not divide, the art of cohesion is borne out of a conscious choice. There is strength in diversity albeit not an inevitable outcome. The art lies in manifesting this strength in diversity to harness, nurture and to sustain cohesion.

    Honouring the legacy of our forefathers, cohesion is a choice; it embodies at its crux a commitment to common values. It is one where all sectors of the community have a part to play. In multi-religious, multi-racial and multi-cultural Singapore, the strength in diversity is seen in the art of progressing from tolerance to acceptance of the other.

    On a spectrum, tolerance is the lowest threshold of harmony. Acceptance is the higher ideal. It is a constant quest to climb the metaphorical ladder while helping those around to achieve a common vision of the desired future.

    The length of common and shared history does not instinctively make for a more socially cohesive community. The best possible outcome can be achieved when members of the community set up the necessary infrastructures to ensure that it can maximise the outcome of achieving a cohesive society.

    To achieve the desired cohesive future, the current generation of youth will also need to step up and play a part in all sectors of the community. The scale of success is dependent on choice. A choice the individual members of the community makes towards the greater goal of an inclusive and cohesive society.

    About the Author

    Dr. Jolene Jerard is Executive Director, Centinel, a public safety and management consultancy firm. She is also an Adjunct Senior Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. This is part of a series.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / Singapore and Homeland Security

    Last updated on 23/08/2021

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    Towards ICCS 2022 – Cohesion as a Choice: Regardless of Faith and Identity

    SYNOPSIS

    Social cohesion is a work in progress. Societies can choose to achieve greater levels of social cohesion by forging greater inclusivity. Two things ...
    more info