• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • The Evolving Role of Malaysia’s Royalty
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO21107 | The Evolving Role of Malaysia’s Royalty
    Piya Raj Sukhani

    12 July 2021

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    As Malaysia’s political instability continues, the royalty will take on an increasingly influential position in the country’s politics and governance.

    Source: Istana Negara, Facebook

    COMMENTARY

    PRIME MINISTER Muhyiddin Yassin has agreed to reopen the country’s suspended parliament for a five-day sitting from 26 July 2021. This comes after the Malaysian King called on 16 June for parliament to be reconvened as soon as possible. This was a contradiction of Muhyiddin’s previously proposed timeline for reopening the House by September at the earliest.

    The rulers have held a largely symbolic position since Malaysia’s Independence, but their role in national politics has become increasingly prominent and critical, particularly since 2020, when political fragmentation reached the point where no coalition had a clear and substantive parliamentary majority.

    Royalty in Politics

    Following Mahathir Mohamad’s abrupt resignation as premier in February 2020, King Sultan Abdullah took centre stage in seeking to resolve a week-long impasse by interviewing each of Malaysia’s 222 Members of Parliament (MPs) to determine who enjoyed a majority in parliament.

    The monarch then announced that Muhyiddin had the support of most legislators and swore him in as prime minister on 1 March 2020. While this majority was not proven in parliament, the King’s move was within his constitutional rights.

    However, challenges to the legitimacy of Muhyiddin’s administration continued. Reports were rife of backroom horse-trading between Opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim and the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) ─ the largest party supporting the governing coalition ─ to unseat Muhyiddin.

    In October 2020, Anwar met the King claiming to have secured a formidable majority though this was not immediately endorsed by the monarch. That in effect, affirmed the Muhyiddin administration.

    Complexity of Emergency Rule

    In the same month, the King and his fellow rulers rejected Muhyiddin’s request to declare an emergency ostensibly meant to enable the government to control the COVID-19 outbreak. In January 2021, Muhyiddin appealed again for emergency rule. The King’s assent this time was widely seen as Muhyiddin’s political lifeline, allowing him to suspend parliament and enact laws without legislative approval.

    Muhyiddin’s hold on a parliamentary majority had come into serious question. The state of emergency was imposed immediately after two UMNO lawmakers withdrew support from the Perikatan Nasional (PN) government. Critics argue that Muhyiddin has abused the vast powers of the emergency rule to shield himself from a no-confidence vote.

    The King’s initial decision to reject the request for the emergency was seemingly aligned with public sentiment since there was broad support for his position. However, his inability to reject Muhyiddin the second time demonstrated the limits of the royalty’s constitutional power vis-à-vis the prime minister.

    As COVID-19 cases rise and the economy falters, the PN government has faced an intense public backlash over the last few months. The public implored the royalty, with its moral authority, to intervene and check the government. The royalty also came under strong criticism on social media platforms, especially from younger ethnic Malays.

    Confronted by unprecedented pressure from Opposition camps and civil society, the King and his fellow rulers publicly called for a return to the legislative process. In a special statement on 16 June, the monarch urged parliament to reconvene “as soon as possible”.

    Significance of Monarchy’s Recent Statements

    In Malaysia’s constitutional monarchy system, nine Malay state rulers rotate to serve as king for five-year terms. The monarchy holds the constitutionally enshrined status as protectors of the Malay culture and Islam in Malaysia.

    The 16 June statement from the national palace calling on parliament to reconvene with haste came after the King hosted a special Conference of Rulers’ meeting with the eight Malay state rulers. The outcome of the King’s initiative to call the meeting had buoyed public confidence in the royalty.

    Following the special meeting, a separate statement was issued by the brother rulers advising against the extension of the nationwide state of emergency, due to expire on 1 August.

    While both the statements emphasised the urgent sitting of parliament, the statement by the rulers was more incisively phrased than the King’s. The monarch’s statement kept mum on the matter of extending the state of emergency. This was notable because it is only the King who can assent or reject the government’s advice on the emergency.

    Royal Pushback

    While acknowledging the royal statements, Muhyiddin had initially been unclear on when exactly parliament would be reconvened. Without oversight from parliament, the PN government, under the National Recovery Plan, was planning to tap into Malaysia’s RM17 billion National Trust Fund, largely generated from petroleum revenue, to pay for vaccinations and related expenses.

    On 30 June, the King followed through with an urgent meeting with the Speakers of the Lower and Upper Houses. Following the meeting, the monarch reiterated his call for parliament to reconvene, to debate two bills on the emergency before 1 August.

    Opposition politicians were quick to assert that any excuse to delay the reconvening of parliament would be an affront to the monarch and would “besmirch the nobility and wisdom of the royal institution”.

    The recent statements by Malaysian royalty have shattered conventions and served to put Muhyiddin in check. Soon enough, the premier reversed his previous timeline to reconvene parliament and yielded to open the federal legislature in July instead.

    While constitutionally, it is the prime minister’s prerogative to advise the King on when parliament ought to be reconvened, the assertions of the Malaysian royalty carry a certain gravitas that had the embattled prime minister defied it, he would have borne a colossal political cost.

    Repercussions for Muhyiddin

    PN has been more insecure than ever after the president of UMNO, the backbone of PN, announced the party’s withdrawal of support for Muhyiddin and called for his resignation on 8 July.

    MPs within UMNO appear split on the Supreme Council decision and some may choose to continue supporting Muhyiddin along with other MPs not from the coalition. But with two seats in the 222-strong parliament vacant, only four UMNO lawmakers need to desert Muhyiddin for the current coalition to fall. UMNO has 38 MPs. Still, the premier may lead a minority government if no other candidate has majority support.

    Until recently, Muhyiddin had managed to leverage the fragmentation of Malaysia’s Opposition and his coalition partner, UMNO, to his advantage. Despite navigating a global pandemic with a precarious government, Muhyiddin has so far managed to maintain power.

    Whether the weakened PM remains in office or he is replaced by a compromise candidate from UMNO or from the Opposition, Malaysian politics is likely to remain unstable and the King will be forced time and again to assert his position within the country’s political life.

    The monarchy is expected to be apolitical, and the King is obliged to abide by the government’s advice in executing most of his constitutional duties. Given that the prime minister’s parliamentary majority in the past had always been clear, the King’s role had largely been ceremonial. This is no longer the case.

    The King is being called upon by partisans to take their side, and by the public to return a modicum of stability to Malaysian politics. He walks a tightrope: he has to make political judgements, consider public sentiment and his brother rulers’ views, and must make monumental decisions within the bounds of the constitution.

    About the Author

    Piya Sukhani is a Research Analyst with the Malaysia Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Global / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 13/07/2021

    comments powered by Disqus
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    As Malaysia’s political instability continues, the royalty will take on an increasingly influential position in the country’s politics and governance.

    Source: Istana Negara, Facebook

    COMMENTARY

    PRIME MINISTER Muhyiddin Yassin has agreed to reopen the country’s suspended parliament for a five-day sitting from 26 July 2021. This comes after the Malaysian King called on 16 June for parliament to be reconvened as soon as possible. This was a contradiction of Muhyiddin’s previously proposed timeline for reopening the House by September at the earliest.

    The rulers have held a largely symbolic position since Malaysia’s Independence, but their role in national politics has become increasingly prominent and critical, particularly since 2020, when political fragmentation reached the point where no coalition had a clear and substantive parliamentary majority.

    Royalty in Politics

    Following Mahathir Mohamad’s abrupt resignation as premier in February 2020, King Sultan Abdullah took centre stage in seeking to resolve a week-long impasse by interviewing each of Malaysia’s 222 Members of Parliament (MPs) to determine who enjoyed a majority in parliament.

    The monarch then announced that Muhyiddin had the support of most legislators and swore him in as prime minister on 1 March 2020. While this majority was not proven in parliament, the King’s move was within his constitutional rights.

    However, challenges to the legitimacy of Muhyiddin’s administration continued. Reports were rife of backroom horse-trading between Opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim and the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) ─ the largest party supporting the governing coalition ─ to unseat Muhyiddin.

    In October 2020, Anwar met the King claiming to have secured a formidable majority though this was not immediately endorsed by the monarch. That in effect, affirmed the Muhyiddin administration.

    Complexity of Emergency Rule

    In the same month, the King and his fellow rulers rejected Muhyiddin’s request to declare an emergency ostensibly meant to enable the government to control the COVID-19 outbreak. In January 2021, Muhyiddin appealed again for emergency rule. The King’s assent this time was widely seen as Muhyiddin’s political lifeline, allowing him to suspend parliament and enact laws without legislative approval.

    Muhyiddin’s hold on a parliamentary majority had come into serious question. The state of emergency was imposed immediately after two UMNO lawmakers withdrew support from the Perikatan Nasional (PN) government. Critics argue that Muhyiddin has abused the vast powers of the emergency rule to shield himself from a no-confidence vote.

    The King’s initial decision to reject the request for the emergency was seemingly aligned with public sentiment since there was broad support for his position. However, his inability to reject Muhyiddin the second time demonstrated the limits of the royalty’s constitutional power vis-à-vis the prime minister.

    As COVID-19 cases rise and the economy falters, the PN government has faced an intense public backlash over the last few months. The public implored the royalty, with its moral authority, to intervene and check the government. The royalty also came under strong criticism on social media platforms, especially from younger ethnic Malays.

    Confronted by unprecedented pressure from Opposition camps and civil society, the King and his fellow rulers publicly called for a return to the legislative process. In a special statement on 16 June, the monarch urged parliament to reconvene “as soon as possible”.

    Significance of Monarchy’s Recent Statements

    In Malaysia’s constitutional monarchy system, nine Malay state rulers rotate to serve as king for five-year terms. The monarchy holds the constitutionally enshrined status as protectors of the Malay culture and Islam in Malaysia.

    The 16 June statement from the national palace calling on parliament to reconvene with haste came after the King hosted a special Conference of Rulers’ meeting with the eight Malay state rulers. The outcome of the King’s initiative to call the meeting had buoyed public confidence in the royalty.

    Following the special meeting, a separate statement was issued by the brother rulers advising against the extension of the nationwide state of emergency, due to expire on 1 August.

    While both the statements emphasised the urgent sitting of parliament, the statement by the rulers was more incisively phrased than the King’s. The monarch’s statement kept mum on the matter of extending the state of emergency. This was notable because it is only the King who can assent or reject the government’s advice on the emergency.

    Royal Pushback

    While acknowledging the royal statements, Muhyiddin had initially been unclear on when exactly parliament would be reconvened. Without oversight from parliament, the PN government, under the National Recovery Plan, was planning to tap into Malaysia’s RM17 billion National Trust Fund, largely generated from petroleum revenue, to pay for vaccinations and related expenses.

    On 30 June, the King followed through with an urgent meeting with the Speakers of the Lower and Upper Houses. Following the meeting, the monarch reiterated his call for parliament to reconvene, to debate two bills on the emergency before 1 August.

    Opposition politicians were quick to assert that any excuse to delay the reconvening of parliament would be an affront to the monarch and would “besmirch the nobility and wisdom of the royal institution”.

    The recent statements by Malaysian royalty have shattered conventions and served to put Muhyiddin in check. Soon enough, the premier reversed his previous timeline to reconvene parliament and yielded to open the federal legislature in July instead.

    While constitutionally, it is the prime minister’s prerogative to advise the King on when parliament ought to be reconvened, the assertions of the Malaysian royalty carry a certain gravitas that had the embattled prime minister defied it, he would have borne a colossal political cost.

    Repercussions for Muhyiddin

    PN has been more insecure than ever after the president of UMNO, the backbone of PN, announced the party’s withdrawal of support for Muhyiddin and called for his resignation on 8 July.

    MPs within UMNO appear split on the Supreme Council decision and some may choose to continue supporting Muhyiddin along with other MPs not from the coalition. But with two seats in the 222-strong parliament vacant, only four UMNO lawmakers need to desert Muhyiddin for the current coalition to fall. UMNO has 38 MPs. Still, the premier may lead a minority government if no other candidate has majority support.

    Until recently, Muhyiddin had managed to leverage the fragmentation of Malaysia’s Opposition and his coalition partner, UMNO, to his advantage. Despite navigating a global pandemic with a precarious government, Muhyiddin has so far managed to maintain power.

    Whether the weakened PM remains in office or he is replaced by a compromise candidate from UMNO or from the Opposition, Malaysian politics is likely to remain unstable and the King will be forced time and again to assert his position within the country’s political life.

    The monarchy is expected to be apolitical, and the King is obliged to abide by the government’s advice in executing most of his constitutional duties. Given that the prime minister’s parliamentary majority in the past had always been clear, the King’s role had largely been ceremonial. This is no longer the case.

    The King is being called upon by partisans to take their side, and by the public to return a modicum of stability to Malaysian politics. He walks a tightrope: he has to make political judgements, consider public sentiment and his brother rulers’ views, and must make monumental decisions within the bounds of the constitution.

    About the Author

    Piya Sukhani is a Research Analyst with the Malaysia Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies

    Last updated on 13/07/2021

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    The Evolving Role of Malaysia’s Royalty

    SYNOPSIS

    As Malaysia’s political instability continues, the royalty will take on an increasingly influential position in the country’s politics and governan ...
    more info