• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Russo-US Ties Under the Biden Presidency
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO20210 | Russo-US Ties Under the Biden Presidency
    Chris Cheang

    18 December 2020

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    President Putin congratulated US President-elect Joseph Biden on 15 December 2020, after the Electoral College confirmed his victory. Putin was the last world power leader to convey his good wishes. It signalled that Russia does not expect ties with the US under the Biden administration to deteriorate any further.

    COMMENTARY

    AS EXPECTED, President Vladimir Putin did not immediately extend his congratulations to President-elect Joe Biden after the US presidential election in late November. Putin was quoted as saying that he was ready to work with any US leader, “who has the confidence of the American people”. He added “that confidence can only be given to a candidate whose victory has been recognised by the opposing party, or after the results are confirmed in a legitimate, legal way”. In response to a media question, Putin replied bluntly that the move would not damage relations as “they’re already ruined”.

    By taking a different approach from other world powers, President Putin appears convinced that Russia’s relationship with the US is unlikely to worsen any further under the Biden presidency, despite the latter’s well-known and long-standing negative perception of Russia under his leadership.

    Biden’s View of Putin and Russia

    During his visit to Moscow in March 2011, then Vice President Biden reportedly told then Prime Minister Putin that he did not have a soul; Biden also reportedly conveyed to Russian opposition leaders his view that it would be better for Russia if Putin did not run for re-election in 2012 (President Putin had stepped down from the presidency in 2008 in accordance with a two-term constitutional limit, making way for Dmitry Medvedev to be elected as president).

    President-elect Biden’s negative view of Russia was reiterated in an interview with CBS News’ 60 Minutes on 26 October when he reportedly said that he considered Russia “the biggest threat to America right now in terms of breaking up our security and our alliances”.

    President Putin therefore has good reasons to distrust the US president-elect, unlike President Donald Trump, for whom he has had words of praise, which Trump reciprocated. Yet under the Trump administration, Russia’s purported initial hopes of a normalisation of relations not only proved groundless but became worse, for the following reasons:

    US Sanctions on Russia:

    President Putin has repeatedly condemned US sanctions on Russia; in late October at a business conference, he noted that “the current administration has imposed sanctions on Russia 46 times on our companies and economic operators, which is the highest number ever”. It is questionable whether the Biden administration would lift these sanctions.

    US Pressure on NATO Allies:

    President Trump’s unrelenting pressure on the US’ NATO allies to increase their defence budgets was certainly neither in Russia’s economic nor security interests. According to a Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) April 2020 study, “Russia’s military burden in 2019 was much higher than that of China and the other large European spenders and slightly higher than that of the USA”.

    Since NATO is considered its principal military threat, any increase in NATO countries’ defence budgets is not in Russia’s security (or economic) interest. Moreover, President Trump’s consistent calls for increased US defence spending can only have been seen in Russia as another threat to its own defence and security posture. The Biden presidency is unlikely to reverse course on this matter as it strengthens the NATO alliance.

    Arms Control Treaties and Confidence-Building Measures:

    The US’ withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty and the Open Skies Treaty, as well as its lukewarm response to repeated Russian suggestions to renew the New START Treaty which expires in February 2021, have not been met with Russian approval. Moscow sees these actions as threatening to Russian security and defence interests in Europe and its nuclear security posture.

    While the Biden presidency might renew the New START Treaty, that remains to be seen.

    Sale of Javelin Anti-tank Missiles to Ukraine:

    The Obama administration had reportedly refused this step which the Trump administration approved in March 2018. This weapon is considered a deterrent to any Russian military action against Ukraine directly or in support of the Ukrainian separatists. The Biden presidency is unlikely to change course as it would not want to relieve any military pressure on or weaken deterrence measures against Russia.

    US Opposition to Nord Stream II Gas Pipeline:

    President Trump’s criticism of Germany’s continued support of this project, and US sanctions on the project, touch on Russia’s gas industry, which is a key part of its economy. President Trump has consistently stated that while the US “protected” Germany from Russia, Germany continued to pay Russia “billions of dollars for energy coming from a pipeline”.

    Russia believes the US wants to eliminate competition to its gas exports to Europe; a Bloomberg report dated  16 July 2020 quoted President Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov as saying that US sanctions were “an attempt to force Europeans to buy more expensive gas under less attractive conditions”.

    The Biden presidency is unlikely to reverse this policy which has wide support among Republicans as well as Democrats.

    US Sanctions on Iran:

    President Trump’s hardline policy towards Iran has also been met with criticism by Moscow.

    Geographically close, Russia desires a stable Iran without access to nuclear weapons technology. Russia also has economic, energy and security interests with respect to Iran. President Trump’s policy jeopardised these interests.

    The possibility of the US rejoining the nuclear deal on Iran under the Biden presidency cannot be ruled out but US hostility towards Iran would still remain strong.

    Russia Unlikely to Worsen Ties

    President Putin will want to ascertain how the Biden presidency approaches all these issues, especially the Democratic Party’s perception that Russia interfered on Trump’s behalf in the 2016 election, and principally whether the Biden presidency would introduce punitive actions against Russia on this score.

    Putin can therefore be expected not to undertake any move that might make an already bad relationship worse. An indication of his instinct for the need to change course can be seen in his reported remarks on President-elect Biden’s son’s apparent business dealings in Ukraine.

    According to media reports in late October, he was quoted as saying that: “I don’t see anything criminal about this, at least we don’t know anything about this (being criminal),” referring to the younger Biden’s apparent business dealings in Ukraine. His position stands in direct contrast to President Trump’s.

    Equally significant is the role and pressure of domestic politics. Currently, the COVID-19 situation has already claimed over 48,000 lives while infections stand at over 2.7 million with over two million recovered cases.

    Putin’s energy and time will continue to be focussed on dealing with the pandemic’s socio-political, health as well as economic consequences. He can ill-afford to leave it entirely to the cabinet and governors. He also would not want to end his current term of office in 2024 still grappling with the pandemic’s consequences.

    Putin would be cognisant that a further deterioration in relations with the US would force Russia further into the arms of China. No Russian leader can afford to lead his country to further dependence on Chinese goodwill and economic largesse. Moreover, Russia’s position as a balancer between the US and China would be weakened, if its already bad relationship with the US were to worsen under the Biden presidency.

    About the Author

    Chris Cheang is a Senior Fellow with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore whose research focusses mainly on Russia.

    Categories: Commentaries / Conflict and Stability / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / Americas / Europe

    Last updated on 24/12/2020

    comments powered by Disqus
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    President Putin congratulated US President-elect Joseph Biden on 15 December 2020, after the Electoral College confirmed his victory. Putin was the last world power leader to convey his good wishes. It signalled that Russia does not expect ties with the US under the Biden administration to deteriorate any further.

    COMMENTARY

    AS EXPECTED, President Vladimir Putin did not immediately extend his congratulations to President-elect Joe Biden after the US presidential election in late November. Putin was quoted as saying that he was ready to work with any US leader, “who has the confidence of the American people”. He added “that confidence can only be given to a candidate whose victory has been recognised by the opposing party, or after the results are confirmed in a legitimate, legal way”. In response to a media question, Putin replied bluntly that the move would not damage relations as “they’re already ruined”.

    By taking a different approach from other world powers, President Putin appears convinced that Russia’s relationship with the US is unlikely to worsen any further under the Biden presidency, despite the latter’s well-known and long-standing negative perception of Russia under his leadership.

    Biden’s View of Putin and Russia

    During his visit to Moscow in March 2011, then Vice President Biden reportedly told then Prime Minister Putin that he did not have a soul; Biden also reportedly conveyed to Russian opposition leaders his view that it would be better for Russia if Putin did not run for re-election in 2012 (President Putin had stepped down from the presidency in 2008 in accordance with a two-term constitutional limit, making way for Dmitry Medvedev to be elected as president).

    President-elect Biden’s negative view of Russia was reiterated in an interview with CBS News’ 60 Minutes on 26 October when he reportedly said that he considered Russia “the biggest threat to America right now in terms of breaking up our security and our alliances”.

    President Putin therefore has good reasons to distrust the US president-elect, unlike President Donald Trump, for whom he has had words of praise, which Trump reciprocated. Yet under the Trump administration, Russia’s purported initial hopes of a normalisation of relations not only proved groundless but became worse, for the following reasons:

    US Sanctions on Russia:

    President Putin has repeatedly condemned US sanctions on Russia; in late October at a business conference, he noted that “the current administration has imposed sanctions on Russia 46 times on our companies and economic operators, which is the highest number ever”. It is questionable whether the Biden administration would lift these sanctions.

    US Pressure on NATO Allies:

    President Trump’s unrelenting pressure on the US’ NATO allies to increase their defence budgets was certainly neither in Russia’s economic nor security interests. According to a Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) April 2020 study, “Russia’s military burden in 2019 was much higher than that of China and the other large European spenders and slightly higher than that of the USA”.

    Since NATO is considered its principal military threat, any increase in NATO countries’ defence budgets is not in Russia’s security (or economic) interest. Moreover, President Trump’s consistent calls for increased US defence spending can only have been seen in Russia as another threat to its own defence and security posture. The Biden presidency is unlikely to reverse course on this matter as it strengthens the NATO alliance.

    Arms Control Treaties and Confidence-Building Measures:

    The US’ withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty and the Open Skies Treaty, as well as its lukewarm response to repeated Russian suggestions to renew the New START Treaty which expires in February 2021, have not been met with Russian approval. Moscow sees these actions as threatening to Russian security and defence interests in Europe and its nuclear security posture.

    While the Biden presidency might renew the New START Treaty, that remains to be seen.

    Sale of Javelin Anti-tank Missiles to Ukraine:

    The Obama administration had reportedly refused this step which the Trump administration approved in March 2018. This weapon is considered a deterrent to any Russian military action against Ukraine directly or in support of the Ukrainian separatists. The Biden presidency is unlikely to change course as it would not want to relieve any military pressure on or weaken deterrence measures against Russia.

    US Opposition to Nord Stream II Gas Pipeline:

    President Trump’s criticism of Germany’s continued support of this project, and US sanctions on the project, touch on Russia’s gas industry, which is a key part of its economy. President Trump has consistently stated that while the US “protected” Germany from Russia, Germany continued to pay Russia “billions of dollars for energy coming from a pipeline”.

    Russia believes the US wants to eliminate competition to its gas exports to Europe; a Bloomberg report dated  16 July 2020 quoted President Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov as saying that US sanctions were “an attempt to force Europeans to buy more expensive gas under less attractive conditions”.

    The Biden presidency is unlikely to reverse this policy which has wide support among Republicans as well as Democrats.

    US Sanctions on Iran:

    President Trump’s hardline policy towards Iran has also been met with criticism by Moscow.

    Geographically close, Russia desires a stable Iran without access to nuclear weapons technology. Russia also has economic, energy and security interests with respect to Iran. President Trump’s policy jeopardised these interests.

    The possibility of the US rejoining the nuclear deal on Iran under the Biden presidency cannot be ruled out but US hostility towards Iran would still remain strong.

    Russia Unlikely to Worsen Ties

    President Putin will want to ascertain how the Biden presidency approaches all these issues, especially the Democratic Party’s perception that Russia interfered on Trump’s behalf in the 2016 election, and principally whether the Biden presidency would introduce punitive actions against Russia on this score.

    Putin can therefore be expected not to undertake any move that might make an already bad relationship worse. An indication of his instinct for the need to change course can be seen in his reported remarks on President-elect Biden’s son’s apparent business dealings in Ukraine.

    According to media reports in late October, he was quoted as saying that: “I don’t see anything criminal about this, at least we don’t know anything about this (being criminal),” referring to the younger Biden’s apparent business dealings in Ukraine. His position stands in direct contrast to President Trump’s.

    Equally significant is the role and pressure of domestic politics. Currently, the COVID-19 situation has already claimed over 48,000 lives while infections stand at over 2.7 million with over two million recovered cases.

    Putin’s energy and time will continue to be focussed on dealing with the pandemic’s socio-political, health as well as economic consequences. He can ill-afford to leave it entirely to the cabinet and governors. He also would not want to end his current term of office in 2024 still grappling with the pandemic’s consequences.

    Putin would be cognisant that a further deterioration in relations with the US would force Russia further into the arms of China. No Russian leader can afford to lead his country to further dependence on Chinese goodwill and economic largesse. Moreover, Russia’s position as a balancer between the US and China would be weakened, if its already bad relationship with the US were to worsen under the Biden presidency.

    About the Author

    Chris Cheang is a Senior Fellow with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore whose research focusses mainly on Russia.

    Categories: Commentaries / Conflict and Stability / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security

    Last updated on 24/12/2020

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    Russo-US Ties Under the Biden Presidency

    SYNOPSIS

    President Putin congratulated US President-elect Joseph Biden on 15 December 2020, after the Electoral College confirmed his victory. Putin was the ...
    more info