• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Cohesive Societies
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Cohesive Societies
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • COVID-19 Resources
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Masculinity Among Indonesian Militants
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO21141 | Masculinity Among Indonesian Militants
    Noor Huda Ismail

    22 September 2021

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    The path into and out of extremism is influenced by various factors. One under-researched factor is the role of masculinity ─ how manhood and its accompanying sense of perceived responsibility drive individuals to resort to violence. How valid is this argument?


    Source: pxhere

    COMMENTARY

    INDONESIAN MILITANTS often frame their participation in violent groups like Jamaah Islamiyah (JI) or Jamaah Ansharut Daulah (JAD) in masculine tropes ─ as protectors, warriors, or brothers. Such ‘masculinity’ often drives them towards a sense of perceived responsibility to defend the ummah.

    At the same time, their pathways out of violent groups are also defined by their ability to recraft and negotiate their new masculinity to one that is less toxic in society. Existing work on radicalisation and de-radicalisation will not be sufficient without seriously considering the role of masculinity. One way to further understand the possible relationship between masculinity and violent groups is to study the lived experiences of former or reformed militants.

    The Case of Syahrul Munif

    Syahrul Munif, 40, is a returned Indonesian IS fighter. His life history should not be taken to represent all experiences of Indonesian militants but to highlight how context shapes one’s masculinity that eventually influences one to join and leave violent groups.

    The selection of Syahrul from the network of Indonesian foreign fighters is due to its significance to the region and growing impact globally of Indonesian foreign fighters. They have fostered other violent movements across Southeast Asia (particularly in Malaysia, Singapore, and The Philippines), and have well-established networks originating from the Darul Islam (DI) rebellion in the mid-20th century.

    Furthermore, Indonesian fighters have participated in conflicts across the globe ranging from Afghanistan in the 1980s to recent struggles in Syria. Many of them have now taken up new roles within violent networks in the region.

    These include serving as military trainers, financiers, recruiters, advisors and even as participants in ongoing violence or attacks. Additionally, their previous experiences often enhance their capacity to commit acts of violence and can provide focal points for organising those who failed to do ‘hijrah’ to Syria ─ to join the jihad there.

    No Radical History or Background

    Unlike many Indonesian men who became foreign fighters, Syahrul does not come from a community with a strong JI influence. Instead, he was a member of the largest Islamic organisation, Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), in East Java that often adopts a principled position of moderation on issues. As a young man he was actively involved in NU, he felt constantly confronted by ‘a glass ceiling’ because he did not come from ‘blue blood’ NU family.

    After graduating from high school, he went to a local university to study law. Through his passion for Islamic activism while studying between 2000 until 2004, he became a student leader. This activism gave him a sense of meaning and belonging as a man to a group that has social standing in the society.

    Mingling with Islamic activists in Malang, East Java, allowed him to attend Islamic sermons at a local mosque by an ustad, Abu Bakar Ba’asyir, who was then the senior leader in Majelis Mujahidin Indonesia (MMI). This was a jihadi organisation led by Ba’asyir whose sermons deepened Syahrul’s commitment to the Islamic cause.

    When there was a split within MMI and Ba’asyir left to establish a new jihadi group called Jamaat Ansharut Tauhid (JAT), Syahrul followed. But Syahrul quickly left JAT because he did not see any ‘concrete action’ by JAT to respond the challenges faced by Muslims globally. As a man, he needed that ‘action’ partly to demonstrate one’s commitment to Islam.

    Need For ‘Concrete Action’

    After leaving JAT, Syahrul met with an IS recruiter, Abu Jandal, an Indonesian of Yemeni descent who offered him opportunities for ‘concrete action’. “We must help our oppressed brothers and sisters. Moreover, you will get paid and can always come back home once the mission has been accomplished,” Abu Jandal said.  Syahrul was very motivated to go when the recruiter said he could always come home after the mission.

    When Syahrul was in Syria with IS, he soon felt uncomfortable to see the brutality of the group. Although he had agreed with the idea of defending the oppressed, he was disillusioned by IS’ broken promises and their unIslamic ways such as beheadings. More importantly, he also felt guilty about lying to his parents and wife regarding his departure to Syria.

    This was something very emotional for him as he would have brought him to tears by it during the interview. After six months, Syahrul decided to travel back to Indonesia and then arrested by the Indonesian authority.

    Recrafting and Negotiating Masculinity

    Inside the prison, Syahrul reflected his harsh experience with IS that had seriously challenged his pre-existing ideas about masculinity as not emphasising violence. He admitted that when he became a student activist, he held hard-line religious ideals. But while he valorised men who could forward ‘concrete action’, it did not mean he championed violence. In this regard, understanding the subtle diversity of gendered performances of masculinity among the Indonesian militants is critical.

    After three years in prison, Syahrul needed time to adapt back to normal life ─ his work, family, the local community, and Indonesian society. It was at this crucial time that he met Arif Tuban – a reformed convicted terrorist who was running a community website, www.ruangobrol.id.

    Arif encouraged and provided an opportunity for Syahrul to become a guest speaker in various prevention activities, including with the national counter-terrorism agency. Arif also helped Syahrul to restore his reputation in the community by introducing him to the local police and involving him in joint deradicalisation assistance activities.

    Need for Wider Research

    In retrospect, Syahrul’s commitment to the jihadi network came through a desire for leadership (which he did not find in NU) and the desire to do good (through humanitarian work). It also demonstrates that joining and leaving violent groups could be a highly gendered process.

    Thus, without incorporating masculinity perspective such as acknowledging the struggles of men with social status, employment and the family, any work on radicalisation and deradicalisation will not be sufficient. But how valid is the argument that masculinity drives radicalism?

    More research needs to be done to determine this conclusively. A larger number of participants in the research would in turn allow for more robust findings. The end result could be the potential to transform the traditional way of dealing with the issue of violent extremism not only in Indonesia but also in the region.

    About the Author

    Noor Huda Ismail is Visiting Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. He is also the founder of an award-winning community website, www.ruangobrol.id to amplify the role of credible voice of reformed terrorists in Indonesia.

    Categories: Commentaries / Conflict and Stability / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / Religion in Contemporary Society / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Global / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 23/09/2021

    comments powered by Disqus
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    The path into and out of extremism is influenced by various factors. One under-researched factor is the role of masculinity ─ how manhood and its accompanying sense of perceived responsibility drive individuals to resort to violence. How valid is this argument?


    Source: pxhere

    COMMENTARY

    INDONESIAN MILITANTS often frame their participation in violent groups like Jamaah Islamiyah (JI) or Jamaah Ansharut Daulah (JAD) in masculine tropes ─ as protectors, warriors, or brothers. Such ‘masculinity’ often drives them towards a sense of perceived responsibility to defend the ummah.

    At the same time, their pathways out of violent groups are also defined by their ability to recraft and negotiate their new masculinity to one that is less toxic in society. Existing work on radicalisation and de-radicalisation will not be sufficient without seriously considering the role of masculinity. One way to further understand the possible relationship between masculinity and violent groups is to study the lived experiences of former or reformed militants.

    The Case of Syahrul Munif

    Syahrul Munif, 40, is a returned Indonesian IS fighter. His life history should not be taken to represent all experiences of Indonesian militants but to highlight how context shapes one’s masculinity that eventually influences one to join and leave violent groups.

    The selection of Syahrul from the network of Indonesian foreign fighters is due to its significance to the region and growing impact globally of Indonesian foreign fighters. They have fostered other violent movements across Southeast Asia (particularly in Malaysia, Singapore, and The Philippines), and have well-established networks originating from the Darul Islam (DI) rebellion in the mid-20th century.

    Furthermore, Indonesian fighters have participated in conflicts across the globe ranging from Afghanistan in the 1980s to recent struggles in Syria. Many of them have now taken up new roles within violent networks in the region.

    These include serving as military trainers, financiers, recruiters, advisors and even as participants in ongoing violence or attacks. Additionally, their previous experiences often enhance their capacity to commit acts of violence and can provide focal points for organising those who failed to do ‘hijrah’ to Syria ─ to join the jihad there.

    No Radical History or Background

    Unlike many Indonesian men who became foreign fighters, Syahrul does not come from a community with a strong JI influence. Instead, he was a member of the largest Islamic organisation, Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), in East Java that often adopts a principled position of moderation on issues. As a young man he was actively involved in NU, he felt constantly confronted by ‘a glass ceiling’ because he did not come from ‘blue blood’ NU family.

    After graduating from high school, he went to a local university to study law. Through his passion for Islamic activism while studying between 2000 until 2004, he became a student leader. This activism gave him a sense of meaning and belonging as a man to a group that has social standing in the society.

    Mingling with Islamic activists in Malang, East Java, allowed him to attend Islamic sermons at a local mosque by an ustad, Abu Bakar Ba’asyir, who was then the senior leader in Majelis Mujahidin Indonesia (MMI). This was a jihadi organisation led by Ba’asyir whose sermons deepened Syahrul’s commitment to the Islamic cause.

    When there was a split within MMI and Ba’asyir left to establish a new jihadi group called Jamaat Ansharut Tauhid (JAT), Syahrul followed. But Syahrul quickly left JAT because he did not see any ‘concrete action’ by JAT to respond the challenges faced by Muslims globally. As a man, he needed that ‘action’ partly to demonstrate one’s commitment to Islam.

    Need For ‘Concrete Action’

    After leaving JAT, Syahrul met with an IS recruiter, Abu Jandal, an Indonesian of Yemeni descent who offered him opportunities for ‘concrete action’. “We must help our oppressed brothers and sisters. Moreover, you will get paid and can always come back home once the mission has been accomplished,” Abu Jandal said.  Syahrul was very motivated to go when the recruiter said he could always come home after the mission.

    When Syahrul was in Syria with IS, he soon felt uncomfortable to see the brutality of the group. Although he had agreed with the idea of defending the oppressed, he was disillusioned by IS’ broken promises and their unIslamic ways such as beheadings. More importantly, he also felt guilty about lying to his parents and wife regarding his departure to Syria.

    This was something very emotional for him as he would have brought him to tears by it during the interview. After six months, Syahrul decided to travel back to Indonesia and then arrested by the Indonesian authority.

    Recrafting and Negotiating Masculinity

    Inside the prison, Syahrul reflected his harsh experience with IS that had seriously challenged his pre-existing ideas about masculinity as not emphasising violence. He admitted that when he became a student activist, he held hard-line religious ideals. But while he valorised men who could forward ‘concrete action’, it did not mean he championed violence. In this regard, understanding the subtle diversity of gendered performances of masculinity among the Indonesian militants is critical.

    After three years in prison, Syahrul needed time to adapt back to normal life ─ his work, family, the local community, and Indonesian society. It was at this crucial time that he met Arif Tuban – a reformed convicted terrorist who was running a community website, www.ruangobrol.id.

    Arif encouraged and provided an opportunity for Syahrul to become a guest speaker in various prevention activities, including with the national counter-terrorism agency. Arif also helped Syahrul to restore his reputation in the community by introducing him to the local police and involving him in joint deradicalisation assistance activities.

    Need for Wider Research

    In retrospect, Syahrul’s commitment to the jihadi network came through a desire for leadership (which he did not find in NU) and the desire to do good (through humanitarian work). It also demonstrates that joining and leaving violent groups could be a highly gendered process.

    Thus, without incorporating masculinity perspective such as acknowledging the struggles of men with social status, employment and the family, any work on radicalisation and deradicalisation will not be sufficient. But how valid is the argument that masculinity drives radicalism?

    More research needs to be done to determine this conclusively. A larger number of participants in the research would in turn allow for more robust findings. The end result could be the potential to transform the traditional way of dealing with the issue of violent extremism not only in Indonesia but also in the region.

    About the Author

    Noor Huda Ismail is Visiting Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. He is also the founder of an award-winning community website, www.ruangobrol.id to amplify the role of credible voice of reformed terrorists in Indonesia.

    Categories: Commentaries / Conflict and Stability / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / Religion in Contemporary Society

    Last updated on 23/09/2021

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    Masculinity Among Indonesian Militants

    SYNOPSIS

    The path into and out of extremism is influenced by various factors. One under-researched factor is the role of masculinity ─ how manhood and its a ...
    more info