• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Malaysia’s Changing Federal-State Relations – Post-GE14: Decentralising Federal-Selangor Governance
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO19032 | Malaysia’s Changing Federal-State Relations – Post-GE14: Decentralising Federal-Selangor Governance
    Prashant Waikar

    01 March 2019

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    Since GE14, the Selangor state government’s relations with the Pakatan Harapan federal government have improved but there are calls for governance to be further decentralised.

    COMMENTARY

    PAKATAN HARAPAN’s (PH) election victory on 9 May 2018 marks a potential turning point for federal-state relations in Malaysia. Whereas state governments controlled by the predecessor Pakatan Rakyat coalition often complained of having a testy relationship with the then Barisan Nasional (BN) federal government, PH states should expect greater ideological and policy compatibility with the centre now that it controls federal power too.

    To assess the extent to which federal-state relations can be expected to evolve, it would be useful to compare and contrast the relationship between the state governments previously under PR (and now PH) and the BN federal government with the relationship they currently have with the PH federal government now in power. Against this backdrop, it would be instructive to assess the possibilities of greater decentralisation. As PR held Selangor for 10 years prior to GE14, it serves as an appropriate case study.

    Relations with BN: Combative but Pragmatic

    After losing Selangor to PR in 2008, BN was bent on regaining control of the state, which is Malaysia’s wealthiest. In 2018, it contributed 23% of the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). BN’s approach towards reclaiming Selangor was politically combative.

    After both the 2008 and 2013 elections, BN refused to name a leader of the opposition. Nor was it willing to substantively participate in state-level select committees or to debate policy issues constructively.

    Additionally, the BN federal government used the Implementation Coordination Unit (ICU), which operates out of the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), to run a parallel administrative system with the aim of outperforming and thus discrediting the PR state government.

    At the same time, BN approached its economic relations with Selangor pragmatically. The then-Minister of International Trade and Industry, Mustapa Mohamed, however, established a good working relationship with his counterparts in Selangor. He frequently brought representatives from Selangor on overseas missions to attract investments.

    The then-Tourism Minister Nazri Aziz also promoted Selangor as a tourist destination actively. BN’s economically pragmatic approach was perhaps not surprising given the important economic role played by Selangor. It can be averred that BN’s strategy was to make PR (and PH subsequently) appear inept at administration without disrupting economic activity.

    Relations with PH Centre: Friendly

    Since the GE14, many members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) from PH in Selangor have acknowledged an improved working relationship with the new federal government, given that both are on the same side.

    The ideological and policy objectives of the state and federal governments are also aligned. Issues that were stalemated between Selangor and the then-BN federal government have since been resolved.

    That said, it is worth noting that the Selangor state government has a number of items on its wish list that it would like to see addressed. Most significant is a wish for greater control of finances. Currently, state governments are not allowed to raise supplementary funding through instruments such as government bonds.

    Many MLAs wish to see an increase in the share of tax revenues. Whereas Selangor contributes over 20% of nationwide tax revenues to the federal government, it receives less than 0.5% of these revenues once the federal government re-allocates them. The counter-argument, though, is that if disproportionately more revenues are given to Selangor, this would eat into development funds available for other states.

    Selangor the Pace Setter

    The worry for the federal government, regardless of which coalition is in control, is that other states would be unable to ‘catch up’ with Selangor, which is by far the country’s most developed state. Still, the Selangor state government’s concerns should be explored more deeply.

    Selangor’s state budget for 2019 is RM2.56 billion. The Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) budget for 2019 is RM2.89 bn. Selangor’s budget is smaller even though it is 33 times bigger and has a population that is 3.6 times larger than KL. The disproportion lends credence to Selangor MLAs’ wish to see greater autonomy over financial control.

    In their view, should this happen, the state government would be able to study the possibilities of pursuing other areas which they believe they should be administering such as health care, transport and primary education.

    Differentiated Decentralisation, with Caveats

    The goal of devolving powers is to make governance more efficient. Compared to the federal government, state governments would generally possess a better understanding of state-level administrative issues. Redistributing non-sensitive responsibilities such as transportation and primary healthcare would likely strengthen the model of federalism in Malaysia.

    First, since Selangor is better developed than other states, its aspirations and requirements cannot be used as a yardstick for decentralising governance across Malaysia. Poorer and smaller states such as Perlis, for instance, would struggle without sufficient federal assistance.

    Second, if in the future, the federal government changes hands again, what would that mean for decentralisation? Would the new federal government turn back the clock?

    That is a question for the future but for now, the federal government should consider studying the prospects of implementing a differentiated system of decentralisation that accounts for the varied capabilities of each state.

    About the Author

    Prashant Waikar is a Research Analyst with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU). This is part of a series on Malaysia’s Changing Federal-State Relations.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 01/03/2019

    comments powered by Disqus
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    Since GE14, the Selangor state government’s relations with the Pakatan Harapan federal government have improved but there are calls for governance to be further decentralised.

    COMMENTARY

    PAKATAN HARAPAN’s (PH) election victory on 9 May 2018 marks a potential turning point for federal-state relations in Malaysia. Whereas state governments controlled by the predecessor Pakatan Rakyat coalition often complained of having a testy relationship with the then Barisan Nasional (BN) federal government, PH states should expect greater ideological and policy compatibility with the centre now that it controls federal power too.

    To assess the extent to which federal-state relations can be expected to evolve, it would be useful to compare and contrast the relationship between the state governments previously under PR (and now PH) and the BN federal government with the relationship they currently have with the PH federal government now in power. Against this backdrop, it would be instructive to assess the possibilities of greater decentralisation. As PR held Selangor for 10 years prior to GE14, it serves as an appropriate case study.

    Relations with BN: Combative but Pragmatic

    After losing Selangor to PR in 2008, BN was bent on regaining control of the state, which is Malaysia’s wealthiest. In 2018, it contributed 23% of the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). BN’s approach towards reclaiming Selangor was politically combative.

    After both the 2008 and 2013 elections, BN refused to name a leader of the opposition. Nor was it willing to substantively participate in state-level select committees or to debate policy issues constructively.

    Additionally, the BN federal government used the Implementation Coordination Unit (ICU), which operates out of the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), to run a parallel administrative system with the aim of outperforming and thus discrediting the PR state government.

    At the same time, BN approached its economic relations with Selangor pragmatically. The then-Minister of International Trade and Industry, Mustapa Mohamed, however, established a good working relationship with his counterparts in Selangor. He frequently brought representatives from Selangor on overseas missions to attract investments.

    The then-Tourism Minister Nazri Aziz also promoted Selangor as a tourist destination actively. BN’s economically pragmatic approach was perhaps not surprising given the important economic role played by Selangor. It can be averred that BN’s strategy was to make PR (and PH subsequently) appear inept at administration without disrupting economic activity.

    Relations with PH Centre: Friendly

    Since the GE14, many members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) from PH in Selangor have acknowledged an improved working relationship with the new federal government, given that both are on the same side.

    The ideological and policy objectives of the state and federal governments are also aligned. Issues that were stalemated between Selangor and the then-BN federal government have since been resolved.

    That said, it is worth noting that the Selangor state government has a number of items on its wish list that it would like to see addressed. Most significant is a wish for greater control of finances. Currently, state governments are not allowed to raise supplementary funding through instruments such as government bonds.

    Many MLAs wish to see an increase in the share of tax revenues. Whereas Selangor contributes over 20% of nationwide tax revenues to the federal government, it receives less than 0.5% of these revenues once the federal government re-allocates them. The counter-argument, though, is that if disproportionately more revenues are given to Selangor, this would eat into development funds available for other states.

    Selangor the Pace Setter

    The worry for the federal government, regardless of which coalition is in control, is that other states would be unable to ‘catch up’ with Selangor, which is by far the country’s most developed state. Still, the Selangor state government’s concerns should be explored more deeply.

    Selangor’s state budget for 2019 is RM2.56 billion. The Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) budget for 2019 is RM2.89 bn. Selangor’s budget is smaller even though it is 33 times bigger and has a population that is 3.6 times larger than KL. The disproportion lends credence to Selangor MLAs’ wish to see greater autonomy over financial control.

    In their view, should this happen, the state government would be able to study the possibilities of pursuing other areas which they believe they should be administering such as health care, transport and primary education.

    Differentiated Decentralisation, with Caveats

    The goal of devolving powers is to make governance more efficient. Compared to the federal government, state governments would generally possess a better understanding of state-level administrative issues. Redistributing non-sensitive responsibilities such as transportation and primary healthcare would likely strengthen the model of federalism in Malaysia.

    First, since Selangor is better developed than other states, its aspirations and requirements cannot be used as a yardstick for decentralising governance across Malaysia. Poorer and smaller states such as Perlis, for instance, would struggle without sufficient federal assistance.

    Second, if in the future, the federal government changes hands again, what would that mean for decentralisation? Would the new federal government turn back the clock?

    That is a question for the future but for now, the federal government should consider studying the prospects of implementing a differentiated system of decentralisation that accounts for the varied capabilities of each state.

    About the Author

    Prashant Waikar is a Research Analyst with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU). This is part of a series on Malaysia’s Changing Federal-State Relations.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies

    Last updated on 01/03/2019

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    Malaysia’s Changing Federal-State Relations – Post-GE14: Decentralising Federal-Selangor Governance

    SYNOPSIS

    Since GE14, the Selangor state government’s relations with the Pakatan Harapan federal government have improved but there are calls for governance ...
    more info