Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS Newsletter
Other Research
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Alumni & Networks
Alumni
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
Commentaries
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Paper
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
2024 Indonesia Elections
Great Powers
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
Media Mentions
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Future Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSIS Newsletter
      Other ResearchScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to Apply
      Financial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      AlumniAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)SRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersCommentariesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PaperInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      2024 Indonesia ElectionsGreat PowersSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesMedia Mentions
      News ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Invasion of Ukraine – Shaking Europe Out Of Complacency
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO22020 | Invasion of Ukraine – Shaking Europe Out Of Complacency
    Frederick Kliem

    09 March 2022

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    Europe’s reaction to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is something Europe is usually not: united, determined and re-energised. The Ukrainian tragedy marks a watershed moment for EU integration and European defence. But as previously unshakable taboos suddenly fall, Europeans must plan long-term.

    eu flag
    Source: Flag of the European Union in front of the EU-Parliament in Brussels, Belgium, Christian Lue, Unsplash

    COMMENTARY

    IT IS futile to debate whether Russian President Vladimir Putin had anticipated the determination and unity of Europe or was surprised by it. But as a matter of fact, the European Union (EU) and its member states are currently untying several “Gordian Knots” at once.

    Take Germany as an example: Russian aggression has achieved what decades of US diplomacy could not: Berlin is finally realising that Germany must take care of its own, and by extension European, security. For decades, Germany’s European neighbours, from France to Poland, as well as successive US administrations have tried – and failed – to put an end to German free-riding on the NATO and US security umbrella. Berlin had long been lacking to both equip its armed forces, the Bundeswehr, adequately and to think strategically about the defence of and challenges for Germany and Europe.

    The Historic German Volte-face

    Despite being the second largest NATO economy, hitherto, it was hopeless to expect Germany to meet its NATO defence budget obligations of 2% of GDP. Berlin’s strategic culture, domestic politics and an entrenched public pacificism made raising the defence budget as difficult as developing a realistic security strategy appropriate for a country so prone to geopolitical challenges.

    Likewise, the “special relationship” with Moscow was long a “holy cow” of Berlin’s diplomacy, preventing both the export of arms to Ukraine as well as unambiguously joining its NATO allies in hard-balancing Russian influence. For example, the much-discussed gas pipeline Nordstream 2 was, despite its obvious geo-strategic nature, long described as a “commercial project” by successive German governments.

    In a series of dramatic moves within just a few days, Chancellor Olaf Scholz announced a historic volte-face that seemed to take even members of his own government by surprise. Upending decades-old fundamental principles of German foreign and security policy, Berlin is now delivering lethal weapons to Ukraine, announced a one-off tripling of the defence budget as well as the intent to henceforth meet NATO’s spending target.

    Likewise, to reduce Germany’s significant dependency on Russian energy imports (every fourth household relies on Russian gas for heating), even Green party leaders agree that Berlin will now likely have to postpone its exit from both coal- and nuclear-energy, and Nordstream 2 is now all but finished.

    New EU Unity

    The President of the European Commission announced a series of measures that denoted a similarly remarkable shift in EU Common Security and Defence Policy. Most astonishing for an organisation that self-identifies as a “normative actor”, the EU will now for the first time finance lethal weapons. To that end, €450 million will go towards Ukrainian armament – a country that is not even a member.

    Beyond defence, member states demonstrated unusual unity in agreeing to substantial sanctions against Russia, including the long-resisted removal of Russia’s leading banks from SWIFT. Not only will this come at significant costs for European economies themselves, but this agreement also bridges the traditionally significant divergence in European perspectives on economic and diplomatic relations with Moscow.

    No less remarkable, only six years after the so-called refugee crisis brought the EU close to breaking point, even those member states that long resisted EU-wide refugee distribution, indeed were opposed to receiving any migrants at all, are now welcoming Ukrainian refugees with open arms.

    Never Waste A Crisis: Europe’s Moment of Truth

    “Europe will be forged in crisis”, Jean Monnet, one of the EU’s founding fathers, famously asserted. Indeed, there seems to be nothing quite like a geopolitical crisis to remind member states of the mutual security imperative of regional integration, to galvanise and unify Europe. Indeed even Boris Johnson shows a renewed interests in cooperation with the EU. This momentum should not be squandered.

    In the medium-term, there might be a welcomed spill-over effect, possibly solving one of Europe’s most intractable problems: creating a functioning migration regime. If the rest of the EU shows now this forthcoming solidarity with its Eastern member states that these states lacked during the 2015 refugee crisis, Europe might once again find the cooperative spirit to progress with deeper integration and policy reform, strengthening Europe’s collective capacity.

    Similarly, substantial German investment in defence can significantly enhance Europe’s defence capacity and work towards Europe’s ability to implement own strategic objectives. Mindful that a shortage of money was never the Bundeswehr’s primary problem, greater defence spending must be accompanied by structural reforms and strategic embedding of German capabilities in a European framework.

    A Re-energised Europe?

    Lastly, part of the truth about Europe’s new unity is the fact that for the first time in decades, Washington very closely cooperated with both NATO allies and the EU institutions on a collective response to a security crisis.

    This cooperative spirit is, however, highly dependent on personalities rather than permanent structural change of US foreign policy. It is indeed likely that a second Trump administration had reacted very differently, side-lining rather than galvanising European cooperation, which would likely have led to political inertia rather than resolve in Europe.

    It is time to seriously consider advancing Europe’s “strategic autonomy”. This does not mean competition with NATO. Rather, strategic autonomy should be a European capacity to determine own strategic interests with the means to achieve them – complementary with but independent from NATO.

    Putin has unwittingly shaken Europe out of complacency. The previously unimaginable is suddenly reality, and the EU is already stronger and more effective and attractive than before Putin’s war against Ukraine. A second “Brexit-like” scenario seems unlikely now, and if there is only one good thing that may come out of this tragedy, it might be a re-energised Europe.

    About the Author

    Frederick Kliem is a Research Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Europe / Global / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 10/03/2022

    comments powered by Disqus
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    Europe’s reaction to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is something Europe is usually not: united, determined and re-energised. The Ukrainian tragedy marks a watershed moment for EU integration and European defence. But as previously unshakable taboos suddenly fall, Europeans must plan long-term.

    eu flag
    Source: Flag of the European Union in front of the EU-Parliament in Brussels, Belgium, Christian Lue, Unsplash

    COMMENTARY

    IT IS futile to debate whether Russian President Vladimir Putin had anticipated the determination and unity of Europe or was surprised by it. But as a matter of fact, the European Union (EU) and its member states are currently untying several “Gordian Knots” at once.

    Take Germany as an example: Russian aggression has achieved what decades of US diplomacy could not: Berlin is finally realising that Germany must take care of its own, and by extension European, security. For decades, Germany’s European neighbours, from France to Poland, as well as successive US administrations have tried – and failed – to put an end to German free-riding on the NATO and US security umbrella. Berlin had long been lacking to both equip its armed forces, the Bundeswehr, adequately and to think strategically about the defence of and challenges for Germany and Europe.

    The Historic German Volte-face

    Despite being the second largest NATO economy, hitherto, it was hopeless to expect Germany to meet its NATO defence budget obligations of 2% of GDP. Berlin’s strategic culture, domestic politics and an entrenched public pacificism made raising the defence budget as difficult as developing a realistic security strategy appropriate for a country so prone to geopolitical challenges.

    Likewise, the “special relationship” with Moscow was long a “holy cow” of Berlin’s diplomacy, preventing both the export of arms to Ukraine as well as unambiguously joining its NATO allies in hard-balancing Russian influence. For example, the much-discussed gas pipeline Nordstream 2 was, despite its obvious geo-strategic nature, long described as a “commercial project” by successive German governments.

    In a series of dramatic moves within just a few days, Chancellor Olaf Scholz announced a historic volte-face that seemed to take even members of his own government by surprise. Upending decades-old fundamental principles of German foreign and security policy, Berlin is now delivering lethal weapons to Ukraine, announced a one-off tripling of the defence budget as well as the intent to henceforth meet NATO’s spending target.

    Likewise, to reduce Germany’s significant dependency on Russian energy imports (every fourth household relies on Russian gas for heating), even Green party leaders agree that Berlin will now likely have to postpone its exit from both coal- and nuclear-energy, and Nordstream 2 is now all but finished.

    New EU Unity

    The President of the European Commission announced a series of measures that denoted a similarly remarkable shift in EU Common Security and Defence Policy. Most astonishing for an organisation that self-identifies as a “normative actor”, the EU will now for the first time finance lethal weapons. To that end, €450 million will go towards Ukrainian armament – a country that is not even a member.

    Beyond defence, member states demonstrated unusual unity in agreeing to substantial sanctions against Russia, including the long-resisted removal of Russia’s leading banks from SWIFT. Not only will this come at significant costs for European economies themselves, but this agreement also bridges the traditionally significant divergence in European perspectives on economic and diplomatic relations with Moscow.

    No less remarkable, only six years after the so-called refugee crisis brought the EU close to breaking point, even those member states that long resisted EU-wide refugee distribution, indeed were opposed to receiving any migrants at all, are now welcoming Ukrainian refugees with open arms.

    Never Waste A Crisis: Europe’s Moment of Truth

    “Europe will be forged in crisis”, Jean Monnet, one of the EU’s founding fathers, famously asserted. Indeed, there seems to be nothing quite like a geopolitical crisis to remind member states of the mutual security imperative of regional integration, to galvanise and unify Europe. Indeed even Boris Johnson shows a renewed interests in cooperation with the EU. This momentum should not be squandered.

    In the medium-term, there might be a welcomed spill-over effect, possibly solving one of Europe’s most intractable problems: creating a functioning migration regime. If the rest of the EU shows now this forthcoming solidarity with its Eastern member states that these states lacked during the 2015 refugee crisis, Europe might once again find the cooperative spirit to progress with deeper integration and policy reform, strengthening Europe’s collective capacity.

    Similarly, substantial German investment in defence can significantly enhance Europe’s defence capacity and work towards Europe’s ability to implement own strategic objectives. Mindful that a shortage of money was never the Bundeswehr’s primary problem, greater defence spending must be accompanied by structural reforms and strategic embedding of German capabilities in a European framework.

    A Re-energised Europe?

    Lastly, part of the truth about Europe’s new unity is the fact that for the first time in decades, Washington very closely cooperated with both NATO allies and the EU institutions on a collective response to a security crisis.

    This cooperative spirit is, however, highly dependent on personalities rather than permanent structural change of US foreign policy. It is indeed likely that a second Trump administration had reacted very differently, side-lining rather than galvanising European cooperation, which would likely have led to political inertia rather than resolve in Europe.

    It is time to seriously consider advancing Europe’s “strategic autonomy”. This does not mean competition with NATO. Rather, strategic autonomy should be a European capacity to determine own strategic interests with the means to achieve them – complementary with but independent from NATO.

    Putin has unwittingly shaken Europe out of complacency. The previously unimaginable is suddenly reality, and the EU is already stronger and more effective and attractive than before Putin’s war against Ukraine. A second “Brexit-like” scenario seems unlikely now, and if there is only one good thing that may come out of this tragedy, it might be a re-energised Europe.

    About the Author

    Frederick Kliem is a Research Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security

    Last updated on 10/03/2022

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info