• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Global Health Security COVID-19 and Its Impacts – Indonesia’s Budget 2022: Too Ambitious?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO21131 | Global Health Security COVID-19 and Its Impacts – Indonesia’s Budget 2022: Too Ambitious?
    Richard Borsuk

    27 August 2021

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    On top of all the other damage it has done in Indonesia, COVID-19 has hurt tax collection. That’s a problem, as the country needs to collect more tax to help fund spending and reduce borrowing needs. Is the next budget too ambitious?


    Source: pxhere

    COMMENTARY

    AS INDONESIA tries to get back to solid growth and significantly reduce budget deficits that ballooned because of COVID-19, the country faces a taxing challenge ─ literally. Meeting that challenge, which has been made harder by the pandemic, depends on having good policy and good governance plus good luck.

    For many years predating COVID-19, Indonesia has been weaker in tax collection than other main Southeast Asian economies and many other developing countries. For 2019, the last year before the coronavirus started battering Southeast Asia’s biggest economy, Indonesia had a tax-to-GDP (gross domestic product) ratio of 11.6%, according to the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) ─ below the Philippines (18%) and Papua New Guinea (12.4%) and far below OECD’s average 33.8%.

    Winning Good Sovereign Ratings

    Many economists say Indonesia’s tax-to-GDP ratio, which now is 10% or less, needs to be double that to help support the kind of spending it needs for long-term development. Low tax collection is a short-term as well as long-term problem, due to COVID-19. The core issue is the size of the government’s budget deficit, which is much larger than pre-COVID-19 and is a pivotal variable monitored closely by rating agencies that grade countries’ sovereign debt.

    When it became obvious that COVID-19 would seriously damage the economy, the Indonesian government in 2020 took the big step of suspending for three years a rule that the state’s budget deficit could not exceed 3% of GDP. That legal limit was important for keeping state finances prudent and had helped Indonesia win back “investment grade” sovereign ratings from all three major global agencies S&P, Moody’s and Fitch.

    The government spent heavily on social safety nets for poor Indonesians hurt by COVID-19, and the deficit for 2020 ended up being 6.14%, more than double the temporarily-abandoned 3% ceiling.

    Indonesia was able to spend heavily, while keeping its investment-grade ratings, because years of prudent economic management meant it could borrow substantially overseas and get help financing its big budget deficit from the central bank that, in an unorthodox move, last year bought government bonds in the primary market. On 23 Aug 2021, Bank Indonesia announced it would again make such purchases this year and in 2022, to help the government handle increased spending on countering COVID-19.

    Targets Too Ambitious?

    But Indonesia can’t maintain big deficits. With the increased overseas loans, the debt-service ratio is topping 40%, compared with around 30% at the start of COVID-19, which remains manageable but means interest payments will take a bigger bite of coming budgets. And Indonesia aims to not keep getting help from the central bank, as too much of that could worry the ratings agency and the market.

    Meantime, the government faces a struggle getting the budget deficit back down to 3% in 2023. The government expects this year’s level to be 5.82 percent. And last week (16 Aug), President Joko Widodo presented a proposed budget for 2022 that targets a reduction to 4.85%. Even if Indonesia can lower the deficit that much, a big drop would be needed the following year to get back to 3%.

    For tax-takings, the president has set a target of a 10.5% rise in 2022, which many economists find too ambitious. Indonesia had trouble meeting its tax collection targets long before COVID-19 came, and the pandemic has made things harder.

    Tax collections would be helped if the economy can grow 5.0-5.5% next year, as Widodo targeted. And Indonesia moved out of recession it suffered last year, with a 2.1% contraction, with 7.1% annual growth in April-June. But that size gain was in comparison to serious shrinkage a year earlier. If COVID-19’s Delta variant continues to wreak havoc, growth this year might be marginal.

    Obstacles to 2022 Tax Target

    Even if Indonesia (and the world) manages to get on top of COVID-19, there are multiple obstacles to meeting the 2022 tax target. First, before COVID-19, the corporate tax rate was reduced in stages; in 2022 it will be 20%, compared with 25% earlier. Indonesia is hoping that the lower rate will help attract foreign investment that has been going to Vietnam and other countries.

    Indonesia plans a series of tax reforms, and they potentially could help raise takings ─ in the longer-run. Among the proposed measures is raising value-added taxes, increasing the rate on well-off Indonesians earning more than five billion rupiah (about US$346,000) a year to 35% from 30% and introducing a carbon tax.

    In June, Finance Minister Sri Mulyani Indrawati told parliament the battle against COVID-19 “does not divert our attention from the medium and long-term need to build a fair, healthy, effective and accountable tax system”.

    But even though Widodo has a big majority in parliament, there’s no guarantee tax reforms will be approved any time soon, especially as there could be resistance to raising any taxes before there is sustainable economic recovery from COVID-19.

    Weak Tax Administration

    An obstacle to collecting more tax is weakness in tax administration. Traditionally, some companies report losses when they have gains, but with the hit from COVID-19, many may genuinely have losses this year. Indonesia is making gains in digitalisation that should cut abuse, but it will be hard to eliminate cases where some taxpayers and collectors play “let’s make a deal”.

    In 2013, the Jakarta Post quoted then-director of taxation Fuad Rahmany saying it was hard for him to find “just 200 honest officials” in a department employing thousands.

    A World Bank report in 2020 said Indonesia needed clear, simple rules that “reduce opportunities for corruption, reduce taxpayer errors and make it quicker and easier to pay”. On the importance of having good people on a tax team, the Bank asked: “Is a strong anti-corruption culture engrained as part of the DNA of tax officials?”

    COVID-19 has painfully shown how Indonesia needs to spend more on healthcare, and it still has many other needs. To afford the spending, it must find ways to collect more tax, and raise its low level of tax-to-GDP ratio.

    It is “very difficult to run a modern state” with a ratio of anything less than 20% of GDP, asserts Peter McCawley, an economist who has worked in Indonesia and now is a visiting fellow for the Indonesia Project of Australian National University. “You can’t do it on 10%.”

    About the Author

    Richard Borsuk, the Wall Street Journal’s Indonesia correspondent from 1987 to 1998, is an Adjunct Senior Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He is co-author of “Liem Sioe Liong’s Salim Group: The Business Pillar of Suharto’s Indonesia”.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / Non-Traditional Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Global / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 27/08/2021

    comments powered by Disqus
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    On top of all the other damage it has done in Indonesia, COVID-19 has hurt tax collection. That’s a problem, as the country needs to collect more tax to help fund spending and reduce borrowing needs. Is the next budget too ambitious?


    Source: pxhere

    COMMENTARY

    AS INDONESIA tries to get back to solid growth and significantly reduce budget deficits that ballooned because of COVID-19, the country faces a taxing challenge ─ literally. Meeting that challenge, which has been made harder by the pandemic, depends on having good policy and good governance plus good luck.

    For many years predating COVID-19, Indonesia has been weaker in tax collection than other main Southeast Asian economies and many other developing countries. For 2019, the last year before the coronavirus started battering Southeast Asia’s biggest economy, Indonesia had a tax-to-GDP (gross domestic product) ratio of 11.6%, according to the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) ─ below the Philippines (18%) and Papua New Guinea (12.4%) and far below OECD’s average 33.8%.

    Winning Good Sovereign Ratings

    Many economists say Indonesia’s tax-to-GDP ratio, which now is 10% or less, needs to be double that to help support the kind of spending it needs for long-term development. Low tax collection is a short-term as well as long-term problem, due to COVID-19. The core issue is the size of the government’s budget deficit, which is much larger than pre-COVID-19 and is a pivotal variable monitored closely by rating agencies that grade countries’ sovereign debt.

    When it became obvious that COVID-19 would seriously damage the economy, the Indonesian government in 2020 took the big step of suspending for three years a rule that the state’s budget deficit could not exceed 3% of GDP. That legal limit was important for keeping state finances prudent and had helped Indonesia win back “investment grade” sovereign ratings from all three major global agencies S&P, Moody’s and Fitch.

    The government spent heavily on social safety nets for poor Indonesians hurt by COVID-19, and the deficit for 2020 ended up being 6.14%, more than double the temporarily-abandoned 3% ceiling.

    Indonesia was able to spend heavily, while keeping its investment-grade ratings, because years of prudent economic management meant it could borrow substantially overseas and get help financing its big budget deficit from the central bank that, in an unorthodox move, last year bought government bonds in the primary market. On 23 Aug 2021, Bank Indonesia announced it would again make such purchases this year and in 2022, to help the government handle increased spending on countering COVID-19.

    Targets Too Ambitious?

    But Indonesia can’t maintain big deficits. With the increased overseas loans, the debt-service ratio is topping 40%, compared with around 30% at the start of COVID-19, which remains manageable but means interest payments will take a bigger bite of coming budgets. And Indonesia aims to not keep getting help from the central bank, as too much of that could worry the ratings agency and the market.

    Meantime, the government faces a struggle getting the budget deficit back down to 3% in 2023. The government expects this year’s level to be 5.82 percent. And last week (16 Aug), President Joko Widodo presented a proposed budget for 2022 that targets a reduction to 4.85%. Even if Indonesia can lower the deficit that much, a big drop would be needed the following year to get back to 3%.

    For tax-takings, the president has set a target of a 10.5% rise in 2022, which many economists find too ambitious. Indonesia had trouble meeting its tax collection targets long before COVID-19 came, and the pandemic has made things harder.

    Tax collections would be helped if the economy can grow 5.0-5.5% next year, as Widodo targeted. And Indonesia moved out of recession it suffered last year, with a 2.1% contraction, with 7.1% annual growth in April-June. But that size gain was in comparison to serious shrinkage a year earlier. If COVID-19’s Delta variant continues to wreak havoc, growth this year might be marginal.

    Obstacles to 2022 Tax Target

    Even if Indonesia (and the world) manages to get on top of COVID-19, there are multiple obstacles to meeting the 2022 tax target. First, before COVID-19, the corporate tax rate was reduced in stages; in 2022 it will be 20%, compared with 25% earlier. Indonesia is hoping that the lower rate will help attract foreign investment that has been going to Vietnam and other countries.

    Indonesia plans a series of tax reforms, and they potentially could help raise takings ─ in the longer-run. Among the proposed measures is raising value-added taxes, increasing the rate on well-off Indonesians earning more than five billion rupiah (about US$346,000) a year to 35% from 30% and introducing a carbon tax.

    In June, Finance Minister Sri Mulyani Indrawati told parliament the battle against COVID-19 “does not divert our attention from the medium and long-term need to build a fair, healthy, effective and accountable tax system”.

    But even though Widodo has a big majority in parliament, there’s no guarantee tax reforms will be approved any time soon, especially as there could be resistance to raising any taxes before there is sustainable economic recovery from COVID-19.

    Weak Tax Administration

    An obstacle to collecting more tax is weakness in tax administration. Traditionally, some companies report losses when they have gains, but with the hit from COVID-19, many may genuinely have losses this year. Indonesia is making gains in digitalisation that should cut abuse, but it will be hard to eliminate cases where some taxpayers and collectors play “let’s make a deal”.

    In 2013, the Jakarta Post quoted then-director of taxation Fuad Rahmany saying it was hard for him to find “just 200 honest officials” in a department employing thousands.

    A World Bank report in 2020 said Indonesia needed clear, simple rules that “reduce opportunities for corruption, reduce taxpayer errors and make it quicker and easier to pay”. On the importance of having good people on a tax team, the Bank asked: “Is a strong anti-corruption culture engrained as part of the DNA of tax officials?”

    COVID-19 has painfully shown how Indonesia needs to spend more on healthcare, and it still has many other needs. To afford the spending, it must find ways to collect more tax, and raise its low level of tax-to-GDP ratio.

    It is “very difficult to run a modern state” with a ratio of anything less than 20% of GDP, asserts Peter McCawley, an economist who has worked in Indonesia and now is a visiting fellow for the Indonesia Project of Australian National University. “You can’t do it on 10%.”

    About the Author

    Richard Borsuk, the Wall Street Journal’s Indonesia correspondent from 1987 to 1998, is an Adjunct Senior Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He is co-author of “Liem Sioe Liong’s Salim Group: The Business Pillar of Suharto’s Indonesia”.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / Non-Traditional Security

    Last updated on 27/08/2021

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    Global Health Security COVID-19 and Its Impacts – Indonesia’s Budget 2022: Too Ambitious?

    SYNOPSIS

    On top of all the other damage it has done in Indonesia, COVID-19 has hurt tax collection. That’s a problem, as the country needs to collect more t ...
    more info