• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Cohesive Societies
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Cohesive Societies
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • COVID-19 Resources
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • ASEAN Space Programmes: Navigating Regional Rivalries
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO23008 | ASEAN Space Programmes: Navigating Regional Rivalries
    Dr Quentin Verspieren

    18 January 2023

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    Great power competition in the Asia-Pacific is extending to the space domain, providing ASEAN countries with opportunities to translate regional rivalries into support of their existing or future domestic space programmes through cooperation with their powerful space neighbours: China, India, and Japan.

    231801 C023008 ASEAN Space Programmes Navigating Regional Rivalries
    Source: Freepik

    COMMENTARY

    Regional rivalries in the space domain have escalated in recent years, with parallel developments in security space capabilities and institutions, and the strengthening of minilateral security cooperation frameworks. These have been fuelled primarily by China’s accomplishments in the space and counterspace arenas. In consequence, other regional space powers have also stepped up their game in pursuing space security and diplomacy. Located within this geopolitical hotspot, the ASEAN member states have learnt to navigate these rivalries to benefit their respective space technology development and space utilization objectives and get the best from a rich regional ecosystem.

    ASEAN as Laboratory for Space Development and Cooperation

    ASEAN provides students of space development in emerging countries with an ideal case study. Firstly, it has a unique social and geographical context. With its huge development and connectivity challenges, and as the region in the world most affected by natural disasters, the development of robust space services is for the ASEAN countries a matter of great importance. Secondly, ASEAN’s space development situation is unique with five countries having an established national space programme (Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam), four conducting very little or no space activities (Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar), and one with a distinctive academic-commercial focus (Singapore). Finally, ASEAN is a unique regional grouping with common goals, and with a lot of opportunities and flexibility concerning collaborations with major foreign powers, as for example, in the context of the ASEAN+ frameworks.

    Major ASEAN space powers have collaborated extensively with their advanced space neighbours. Despite having one of the world’s earliest space programmes and emphasizing national independence and sovereignty, Indonesia benefited strongly from foreign support, first from Japan in the 1960s for rocket development, then from Germany in the 2000s for satellite development. Indonesia also benefited through its participation in regional platforms led by China and Japan, the Asia-Pacific Space Cooperation Organization (APSCO) and the Asia-Pacific Regional Space Agency Forum (APRSAF), respectively. As for Vietnam, the country took its first steps in space – quite literally, when Phạm Tuân, the first Asian astronaut, flew with the Soviet Union’s Soyuz 37 mission to rendezvous with the Salyut 6 space station on 23 July 1980. Vietnam went on to develop its current satellite infrastructure with academic, governmental, and industrial support from France, and later Japan. As for the Philippines, the latest entrant in the regional space sector, it based the majority of its early space efforts on an important collaboration framework with Japanese universities, leading to the training of dozens of young engineers and the deployment of the first domestic micro- and nano-satellites.

    A Rich Space Ecosystem Fuelled by Regional Rivalries

    The rivalries among China, India and Japan have shaped the regional space ecosystem, generating a myriad of opportunities for established or aspiring ASEAN space countries through bilateral or regional cooperation frameworks.

    The most visible elements of the regional rivalries are the China-led APSCO and the Japan-led APRSAF. Although often at odds with each other in both journalistic and academic publications, these two platforms are very different in their nature and objectives. Created and led by the Japanese government, and always co-hosted by a local organizer (Vietnam in 2022), the APRSAF is a regional discussion forum which is open to extra-regional countries. It undertakes few projects as its aim is to provide the regional space sector with a regular venue for exchanges and updates on national initiatives in civil space matters. The Chinese APSCO however is a closed membership organization which aims for the conduct of joint technical projects. Other than the projection of soft or normative powers, there is little justification for the description of both frameworks as fierce rivals. In fact, APSCO has been a regular member of the APRSAF.

    India and China have also established regional capacity building centres under the auspices of the United Nations. These are, respectively, the Centre for Space Science and Technology Education in Asia and the Pacific (CSSTEAP, 1995), and the Regional Centre for Space Science and Technology Education in Asia and the Pacific (RCSSTEAP, 2014). These centres provide scholarship programmes, and knowledge and technology transfer opportunities, and hence contribute to the attractiveness of their respective countries.

    Other regional activities led by major Asian space powers include business competitions such as S-Booster Asia, organised by the Cabinet Office of Japan; disaster management frameworks such as Sentinel Asia, established under Japanese leadership as a flagship initiative of the APRSAF; and the provision of space services through the Spatial Information Corridor (SIC) component of the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

    Mapping the China-Japan Scramble for Space Influence in ASEAN

    Chinese, Japanese, and Indian ambitions over the Southeast Asian space sector have provided a myriad of opportunities for some of the ASEAN countries to leverage on, especially those pertaining to the Japan-China rivalry.

    Some countries seem to lean primarily on one side such as the Philippines and Vietnam. The PHL-Microsat programme, which formed the basis of the current Filipino space efforts and which led to the launch of the Diwata 1 and 2 microsatellites, was a major capacity building programme conducted by Japan’s Hokkaido University and Tohoku University. Similarly, the Vietnam Space Centre project received a significant loan from the Japan International Cooperation Agency and capacity support from a consortium of Japanese universities led by The University of Tokyo. Following an opposite route, Cambodia and Laos turned to the state-run China Great Wall Industry Corporation for the obtention of geostationary satellite communication capabilities.

    The rest of the ASEAN countries had space relations with both Japan and China. Until cooperation was suspended following the military coup of 2021, Myanmar was receiving support from Hokkaido University while also discussing its involvement in the BRI’s SIC with the Chinese government. Indonesia is an active participant (and former organizer) of the APRSAF as well as a member of APSCO, although it has been dormant in the latter platform in recent years. Thailand is also known to work closely and actively with both Japan and China.

    The above descriptions are not static, and history has shown that space relations – not unlike general diplomatic relations – are ever-changing. Therefore, this commentary should not be taken as indicative of the future dynamics of ASEAN space relations with their powerful neighbours.

    About the Author

    Dr Quentin Verspieren is Assistant Professor at the Science, Technology, and Innovation Governance (STIG) programme of the University of Tokyo’s Graduate School of Public Policy and Associate Research Fellow at the European Space Policy Institute (ESPI). This commentary is based on remarks delivered at a RSIS event.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / Technology and Future Issues / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Global / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 19/01/2023

    comments powered by Disqus
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    Great power competition in the Asia-Pacific is extending to the space domain, providing ASEAN countries with opportunities to translate regional rivalries into support of their existing or future domestic space programmes through cooperation with their powerful space neighbours: China, India, and Japan.

    231801 C023008 ASEAN Space Programmes Navigating Regional Rivalries
    Source: Freepik

    COMMENTARY

    Regional rivalries in the space domain have escalated in recent years, with parallel developments in security space capabilities and institutions, and the strengthening of minilateral security cooperation frameworks. These have been fuelled primarily by China’s accomplishments in the space and counterspace arenas. In consequence, other regional space powers have also stepped up their game in pursuing space security and diplomacy. Located within this geopolitical hotspot, the ASEAN member states have learnt to navigate these rivalries to benefit their respective space technology development and space utilization objectives and get the best from a rich regional ecosystem.

    ASEAN as Laboratory for Space Development and Cooperation

    ASEAN provides students of space development in emerging countries with an ideal case study. Firstly, it has a unique social and geographical context. With its huge development and connectivity challenges, and as the region in the world most affected by natural disasters, the development of robust space services is for the ASEAN countries a matter of great importance. Secondly, ASEAN’s space development situation is unique with five countries having an established national space programme (Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam), four conducting very little or no space activities (Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar), and one with a distinctive academic-commercial focus (Singapore). Finally, ASEAN is a unique regional grouping with common goals, and with a lot of opportunities and flexibility concerning collaborations with major foreign powers, as for example, in the context of the ASEAN+ frameworks.

    Major ASEAN space powers have collaborated extensively with their advanced space neighbours. Despite having one of the world’s earliest space programmes and emphasizing national independence and sovereignty, Indonesia benefited strongly from foreign support, first from Japan in the 1960s for rocket development, then from Germany in the 2000s for satellite development. Indonesia also benefited through its participation in regional platforms led by China and Japan, the Asia-Pacific Space Cooperation Organization (APSCO) and the Asia-Pacific Regional Space Agency Forum (APRSAF), respectively. As for Vietnam, the country took its first steps in space – quite literally, when Phạm Tuân, the first Asian astronaut, flew with the Soviet Union’s Soyuz 37 mission to rendezvous with the Salyut 6 space station on 23 July 1980. Vietnam went on to develop its current satellite infrastructure with academic, governmental, and industrial support from France, and later Japan. As for the Philippines, the latest entrant in the regional space sector, it based the majority of its early space efforts on an important collaboration framework with Japanese universities, leading to the training of dozens of young engineers and the deployment of the first domestic micro- and nano-satellites.

    A Rich Space Ecosystem Fuelled by Regional Rivalries

    The rivalries among China, India and Japan have shaped the regional space ecosystem, generating a myriad of opportunities for established or aspiring ASEAN space countries through bilateral or regional cooperation frameworks.

    The most visible elements of the regional rivalries are the China-led APSCO and the Japan-led APRSAF. Although often at odds with each other in both journalistic and academic publications, these two platforms are very different in their nature and objectives. Created and led by the Japanese government, and always co-hosted by a local organizer (Vietnam in 2022), the APRSAF is a regional discussion forum which is open to extra-regional countries. It undertakes few projects as its aim is to provide the regional space sector with a regular venue for exchanges and updates on national initiatives in civil space matters. The Chinese APSCO however is a closed membership organization which aims for the conduct of joint technical projects. Other than the projection of soft or normative powers, there is little justification for the description of both frameworks as fierce rivals. In fact, APSCO has been a regular member of the APRSAF.

    India and China have also established regional capacity building centres under the auspices of the United Nations. These are, respectively, the Centre for Space Science and Technology Education in Asia and the Pacific (CSSTEAP, 1995), and the Regional Centre for Space Science and Technology Education in Asia and the Pacific (RCSSTEAP, 2014). These centres provide scholarship programmes, and knowledge and technology transfer opportunities, and hence contribute to the attractiveness of their respective countries.

    Other regional activities led by major Asian space powers include business competitions such as S-Booster Asia, organised by the Cabinet Office of Japan; disaster management frameworks such as Sentinel Asia, established under Japanese leadership as a flagship initiative of the APRSAF; and the provision of space services through the Spatial Information Corridor (SIC) component of the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

    Mapping the China-Japan Scramble for Space Influence in ASEAN

    Chinese, Japanese, and Indian ambitions over the Southeast Asian space sector have provided a myriad of opportunities for some of the ASEAN countries to leverage on, especially those pertaining to the Japan-China rivalry.

    Some countries seem to lean primarily on one side such as the Philippines and Vietnam. The PHL-Microsat programme, which formed the basis of the current Filipino space efforts and which led to the launch of the Diwata 1 and 2 microsatellites, was a major capacity building programme conducted by Japan’s Hokkaido University and Tohoku University. Similarly, the Vietnam Space Centre project received a significant loan from the Japan International Cooperation Agency and capacity support from a consortium of Japanese universities led by The University of Tokyo. Following an opposite route, Cambodia and Laos turned to the state-run China Great Wall Industry Corporation for the obtention of geostationary satellite communication capabilities.

    The rest of the ASEAN countries had space relations with both Japan and China. Until cooperation was suspended following the military coup of 2021, Myanmar was receiving support from Hokkaido University while also discussing its involvement in the BRI’s SIC with the Chinese government. Indonesia is an active participant (and former organizer) of the APRSAF as well as a member of APSCO, although it has been dormant in the latter platform in recent years. Thailand is also known to work closely and actively with both Japan and China.

    The above descriptions are not static, and history has shown that space relations – not unlike general diplomatic relations – are ever-changing. Therefore, this commentary should not be taken as indicative of the future dynamics of ASEAN space relations with their powerful neighbours.

    About the Author

    Dr Quentin Verspieren is Assistant Professor at the Science, Technology, and Innovation Governance (STIG) programme of the University of Tokyo’s Graduate School of Public Policy and Associate Research Fellow at the European Space Policy Institute (ESPI). This commentary is based on remarks delivered at a RSIS event.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / Technology and Future Issues

    Last updated on 19/01/2023

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    ASEAN Space Programmes: Navigating Regional Rivalries

    SYNOPSIS

    Great power competition in the Asia-Pacific is extending to the space domain, providing ASEAN countries with opportunities to translate regional ri ...
    more info