• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Arrest of 53 Activists: Hong Kong’s Tightening Grip
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO21004 | Arrest of 53 Activists: Hong Kong’s Tightening Grip
    Dylan MH Loh

    07 January 2021

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    On 6 January 2021, 53 political activists in Hong Kong were arrested for alleged subversion under Hong Kong’s national security law. What does this portend for the pro-democracy camp?


    Source: flickr

    COMMENTARY

    SIX DAYS into the new year, on 6 January 2021, 53 political activists in Hong Kong were arrested for allegedly violating the national security laws as they were involved in an unofficial ‘primary election’ in Hong Kong in 2020. This was viewed as potential subversion by the authorities.

    The incoming United States Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, condemned the arrests as “an assault on those bravely advocating for universal rights”. Nevertheless, Washington seems to have exhausted its options on Hong Kong and cannot offer any good response with serious bite. What is the significance of the arrests of the 53 political activists?

    Primaries in 2020: ‘35+ Strategy’

    Unofficial primaries were held in Hong Kong in July 2020 with the goal of selecting the most viable pro-democracy candidates for the Legislative Council elections – to realise the so-called ‘35+ strategy’. The strategy’s purpose, largely the brainchild of Benny Tai, the Hong Kong legal scholar and democracy activist, was to maximise the chances for an outright majority of democratic lawmakers in Hong Kong’s 70-member legislative council.

    It is worth bearing in mind that half of these seats are reserved for ‘functional constituencies’ representing special interest groups such as ‘financial services’ and ‘tourism’. Significantly, these tend to be filled by largely pro-establishment representatives and as such only 35 seats are directly contestable through elections.

    Conducting the unofficial primaries has a couple of distinct advantages for the pro-democratic camp. First, it prevents a cannibalisation of votes as candidates are bound by a gentlemen’s agreement not to contest in the Legislative Council, if they were not the winning candidates. Second, the primaries demonstrated that, despite their ideological differences, different pro-democratic candidates were willing to work together to achieve broader political goals.

    The turnout for the primaries was relatively high, with over 600,000 Hong Kong residents voting, accounting for around 13% of the total registered voters. In response, Chinese state media – the Global Times – warned that the conduct of the primaries is likely to fall afoul of Hong Kong’s national security law.

    “10 Steps to Mutual Destruction”

    There are at least four pertinent reasons for the arrests. Firstly, and perhaps most importantly, Benny Tai’s ‘35+ strategy’ secures an agreement from the candidates to leverage their majoritarian position to veto Hong Kong’s budget. This gets to the heart of the arrests because the Legislative Council is tasked with passing the budget.

    In the event that the Legislative Council does not pass the budget, the Chief Executive must resign. That is the end-goal of the ’35+ strategy’ – to take down Carrie Lam.

    Under the national security laws, however, this falls under the ‘subverting the state power’ category and in the eyes of the authorities, seems to fulfil the criteria of “seriously interfering in, disrupting, or undermining the performance of duties and functions” of the Hong Kong and Central governments.

    Secondly, and perhaps more incendiary from the Hong Kong and Chinese governments’ perspective, is the ’10 steps to mutual destruction’ plan. In this proposal, Benny Tai outlined a progressive series of escalatory steps for political activists to take up to ensure the removal of the current government.

    The proposed steps culminate in a large street protest “leading Hong Kong society to a standstill” and eventually, in the tenth step, causing world powers to enact economic and political sanctions on the Chinese Communist Party.

    Upcoming Sept 2021 Legislative Elections

    The other key motivating factor is the upcoming 2021 September Legislative Elections. By arresting and potentially disbarring these candidates in the upcoming elections, the authorities can essentially eviscerate the pro-democratic movement and their electoral chances in one fell swoop as every candidate that ran in the 2020 primaries were arrested.

    It is also apt to note that the security laws carry a maximum of life imprisonment for ‘principal’ offenders.

    Thirdly, the opportunity is ripe because the United States have almost exhausted all their possible foreign policy options over Hong Kong. The US has already sanctioned Chinese and Hong Kong officials – resulting in Carrie Lam’s inability to use credit cards – over purported human rights abuses in Hong Kong and there is not much more they can do in that regard.

    In that way, beyond verbal opprobrium, there is little else the US and other Western countries can or are willing to do.

    Finally, the arrests and the series of arrests leading up to 6 January send a strong domestic signal that the Central government is firmly in charge. It would not have escaped observers that President Xi Jinping’s annual new year greetings struck an almost triumphalist tone.

    This is understandable given China’s relative success in containing COVID-19 as compared to its western counterparts. Nevertheless, the political leadership in Beijing is delivering on its promise to bring stability and security to Hong Kong through these highly visible securitising activities which demonstrate effective control over the island.

    What Next?

    The legislative election due in Hong Kong is months away but this was originally scheduled to be held in September 2020. It was postponed by the Hong Kong government when it invoked emergency laws due to the worsening coronavirus situation.

    In any event, the latest arrests coupled with an increasingly propensity to wield the powerful national security laws will deal a heavy a blow to the electoral chances of the pro-democrats.

    There are two other developments that bear watching.

    The first is the normalisation of the national security law and the seemingly frequent exercise of the powers therein. Normally, such laws in other jurisdictions are only invoked in exceptional cases. Regularly wielding these powers may have the effect of wearing down resistance, turning it into quiet acceptance.

    The second is how the pro-democratic camp reacts to this. Will this stifle the movement that was already under heavy pressure or will this galvanise them to adopt more extreme measures? In any event, the latest arrests portend a period of stronger, more visible and indeed more decisive control from the Central authorities in Hong Kong’s political and social spheres.

    About the Author

    Dylan MH Loh is an Assistant Professor at the Public Policy and Global Affairs Programme at the Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He was formerly with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) at NTU.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 11/01/2021

    comments powered by Disqus
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    On 6 January 2021, 53 political activists in Hong Kong were arrested for alleged subversion under Hong Kong’s national security law. What does this portend for the pro-democracy camp?


    Source: flickr

    COMMENTARY

    SIX DAYS into the new year, on 6 January 2021, 53 political activists in Hong Kong were arrested for allegedly violating the national security laws as they were involved in an unofficial ‘primary election’ in Hong Kong in 2020. This was viewed as potential subversion by the authorities.

    The incoming United States Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, condemned the arrests as “an assault on those bravely advocating for universal rights”. Nevertheless, Washington seems to have exhausted its options on Hong Kong and cannot offer any good response with serious bite. What is the significance of the arrests of the 53 political activists?

    Primaries in 2020: ‘35+ Strategy’

    Unofficial primaries were held in Hong Kong in July 2020 with the goal of selecting the most viable pro-democracy candidates for the Legislative Council elections – to realise the so-called ‘35+ strategy’. The strategy’s purpose, largely the brainchild of Benny Tai, the Hong Kong legal scholar and democracy activist, was to maximise the chances for an outright majority of democratic lawmakers in Hong Kong’s 70-member legislative council.

    It is worth bearing in mind that half of these seats are reserved for ‘functional constituencies’ representing special interest groups such as ‘financial services’ and ‘tourism’. Significantly, these tend to be filled by largely pro-establishment representatives and as such only 35 seats are directly contestable through elections.

    Conducting the unofficial primaries has a couple of distinct advantages for the pro-democratic camp. First, it prevents a cannibalisation of votes as candidates are bound by a gentlemen’s agreement not to contest in the Legislative Council, if they were not the winning candidates. Second, the primaries demonstrated that, despite their ideological differences, different pro-democratic candidates were willing to work together to achieve broader political goals.

    The turnout for the primaries was relatively high, with over 600,000 Hong Kong residents voting, accounting for around 13% of the total registered voters. In response, Chinese state media – the Global Times – warned that the conduct of the primaries is likely to fall afoul of Hong Kong’s national security law.

    “10 Steps to Mutual Destruction”

    There are at least four pertinent reasons for the arrests. Firstly, and perhaps most importantly, Benny Tai’s ‘35+ strategy’ secures an agreement from the candidates to leverage their majoritarian position to veto Hong Kong’s budget. This gets to the heart of the arrests because the Legislative Council is tasked with passing the budget.

    In the event that the Legislative Council does not pass the budget, the Chief Executive must resign. That is the end-goal of the ’35+ strategy’ – to take down Carrie Lam.

    Under the national security laws, however, this falls under the ‘subverting the state power’ category and in the eyes of the authorities, seems to fulfil the criteria of “seriously interfering in, disrupting, or undermining the performance of duties and functions” of the Hong Kong and Central governments.

    Secondly, and perhaps more incendiary from the Hong Kong and Chinese governments’ perspective, is the ’10 steps to mutual destruction’ plan. In this proposal, Benny Tai outlined a progressive series of escalatory steps for political activists to take up to ensure the removal of the current government.

    The proposed steps culminate in a large street protest “leading Hong Kong society to a standstill” and eventually, in the tenth step, causing world powers to enact economic and political sanctions on the Chinese Communist Party.

    Upcoming Sept 2021 Legislative Elections

    The other key motivating factor is the upcoming 2021 September Legislative Elections. By arresting and potentially disbarring these candidates in the upcoming elections, the authorities can essentially eviscerate the pro-democratic movement and their electoral chances in one fell swoop as every candidate that ran in the 2020 primaries were arrested.

    It is also apt to note that the security laws carry a maximum of life imprisonment for ‘principal’ offenders.

    Thirdly, the opportunity is ripe because the United States have almost exhausted all their possible foreign policy options over Hong Kong. The US has already sanctioned Chinese and Hong Kong officials – resulting in Carrie Lam’s inability to use credit cards – over purported human rights abuses in Hong Kong and there is not much more they can do in that regard.

    In that way, beyond verbal opprobrium, there is little else the US and other Western countries can or are willing to do.

    Finally, the arrests and the series of arrests leading up to 6 January send a strong domestic signal that the Central government is firmly in charge. It would not have escaped observers that President Xi Jinping’s annual new year greetings struck an almost triumphalist tone.

    This is understandable given China’s relative success in containing COVID-19 as compared to its western counterparts. Nevertheless, the political leadership in Beijing is delivering on its promise to bring stability and security to Hong Kong through these highly visible securitising activities which demonstrate effective control over the island.

    What Next?

    The legislative election due in Hong Kong is months away but this was originally scheduled to be held in September 2020. It was postponed by the Hong Kong government when it invoked emergency laws due to the worsening coronavirus situation.

    In any event, the latest arrests coupled with an increasingly propensity to wield the powerful national security laws will deal a heavy a blow to the electoral chances of the pro-democrats.

    There are two other developments that bear watching.

    The first is the normalisation of the national security law and the seemingly frequent exercise of the powers therein. Normally, such laws in other jurisdictions are only invoked in exceptional cases. Regularly wielding these powers may have the effect of wearing down resistance, turning it into quiet acceptance.

    The second is how the pro-democratic camp reacts to this. Will this stifle the movement that was already under heavy pressure or will this galvanise them to adopt more extreme measures? In any event, the latest arrests portend a period of stronger, more visible and indeed more decisive control from the Central authorities in Hong Kong’s political and social spheres.

    About the Author

    Dylan MH Loh is an Assistant Professor at the Public Policy and Global Affairs Programme at the Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He was formerly with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) at NTU.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security

    Last updated on 11/01/2021

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    Arrest of 53 Activists: Hong Kong’s Tightening Grip

    SYNOPSIS

    On 6 January 2021, 53 political activists in Hong Kong were arrested for alleged subversion under Hong Kong’s national security law. What does this ...
    more info