• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO07050 | A Drop in the Ocean: China’s Aspirations to Acquire an Aircraft Carrier
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO07050 | A Drop in the Ocean: China’s Aspirations to Acquire an Aircraft Carrier
    Paul T. Mitchell, Richard A. Bitzinger

    30 May 2007

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    PRIVATE BOAT owners joke that their vessels are a hole in the water, surrounded by wood, into which money is poured. In its quest to establish progressively larger areas of control over the oceans, China’s musings over aircraft carrier programmes have set off alarm bells from Singapore to Washington. However, an aircraft carrier is a highly complex weapons system. The past is littered with less-than-effective but highly expensive carrier programmes, including, most spectacularly, Soviet attempts during the 1980s, but also more recently the Thai acquisition of the Chakri Nareubet. Ships can be built, but whether they can be used for operational effect is a different matter entirely.

    The Vessel

    China has two ways of acquiring a working aircraft carrier: it can buy one or it can build one. In fact, China has in recent years acquired three surplus carriers as scrap from Russia – the Minsk and the Kiev (two “pocket carriers,” capable of only flying Harrier-type “jump-jets” from their decks), and the Varyag, one of the former Soviet Union’s attempts to construct a mega-carrier that could compete with the United States’ Nimitz-class nuclear carriers. The Minsk and the Kiev were both turned into tourist attractions (the Minsk has subsequently gone bankrupt and is closed), but the fate of the Varyag continues to captivate China watchers.

    The Varyag was a casualty of the post-Cold War: laid down in the early 1980s, construction was halted in 1992 with the ship only 70 percent complete. Ukraine, which inherited it after the breakup of the Soviet Union, stripped the ship bare and left it exposed to the elements for several years. When the Varyag was finally sold and delivered to China in 2001 – ostensibly to be turned into a Macau casino – it was a rusted shell, without engines, rudder, weapons systems, or electronics. In addition, the process of removing sensitive equipment from the vessel had resulted in damage to its core structure, so even its seaworthiness must be questioned.

    The casino plans never came to fruition, but in mid-2005 the Varyag was moved to a drydock at the Dalian shipyards, where it was painted the grey of the Chinese Navy and its flightdeck repaired. Yet despite the flurry of speculation these activities caused, it is doubtful that the Varyag will become China’s first working aircraft carrier anytime soon, given its needs for engines, operating systems, wiring, and so on. Restoring the Varyag to full effectiveness would take several years, and it would still be an unfamiliar and unreliable ship. At most, it may be used as a research and training platform for future carrier designs and crews.

    So China is left with designing and constructing its own aircraft carrier. Rumours to this effect have persisted for the last 20 years, and the current conventional wisdom is that the Chinese plan to have a carrier in the water by 2010. If so, then the Chinese had better start cutting metal now, because the average heavy carrier takes several years to build, not including the design and preplanning phases. Even after it is launched, it can take up to two years more to outfit a major warship and put it through acceptance trials before it is commissioned and accepted into service – even more so if it is the lead ship in that particular class.

    The Aircraft

    Commissioning an aircraft carrier carries additional burdens. More than any other surface combatant, a carrier is a “system-of-systems” in and of itself. To be tactically effective, carriers typically have several different aircraft types aboard in a “carrier air wing”. An American carrier air wing has four separate fighter squadrons, an electronic warfare squadron, a squadron of anti-submarine and search-and-rescue helicopters, an early warning squadron, and a cargo aircraft detachment. Moreover, each of these aircraft types must be designed specifically for carrier operations – land-based aircraft cannot simply be used at sea. Carrier aircraft require large fuel tanks for long-range operations, different landing gear for the stresses of landing aboard carriers, and special metal and paint combinations for their fuselage to resist the corrosive effects of salt and water at sea.

    China may purchase the Su-33 fighter jet, which is flown off Russia’s single carrier, the Admiral Kusnetzov. It may also use its new indigenous J-10 fighter – in which case, it would have to be extensively modified in order to be used aboard a future carrier. But in order to duplicate the flexibility of American naval air power, the Chinese navy would have to begin a significant development programme in attack aircraft, airborne early warning, and in-flight refueling.

    The Software

    Carrier operations, by their very nature, are among the most dangerous conducted by militaries. The potential for mishap resulting in the death of the pilot or those supporting him is very high. The carrier deck is one of the most dangerous work areas given its relatively small size and the number of aircraft, operating jet engines and spinning propellers. During cyclic operations, the aircraft carrier is launching and recovering aircraft at the same time. The deck hands must guide aircraft to their launch positions, and others must guide those that have just landed to their storage positions. All the while, other deck hands are moving about the work space fueling aircraft, performing maintenance, and arming aircraft. Movement of these many pieces on the deck is a highly choreographed but deadly ballet: one misstep can result in a deck hand being struck by a moving aircraft, blown into the ocean by jet blast, or worse, sucked into the engine itself.

    Landing aircraft on board the deck, moving in all three axes, is one of the most stressful aspects of flight. Indeed, studies have shown that naval aviators experience more stress during landing, especially at night, than during actual combat. The pilot is guided to his target by a series of indicator lights known as the “meatball” as well as receiving instructions from a “landing signal officer” who talks the pilot down. Finally, the pilot not so much lands as he “crashes” his aircraft onto the deck: his engines must be at full power so that if the arrestor hook misses the cable that stops the aircraft, the pilot can immediately take his aircraft back into the air.

    Conclusion

    There is little doubt that China is capable of building an aircraft carrier, just as Britain, France, Spain, and Italy have. The significant issue is not industrial capability but operational effect. No other programme has come close to challenging American dominance at sea. An American carrier projects significant power due to its ability to sustain operations over several days, resulting in multiple and continuous strikes on targets. This ability comes not just from technological capability but also the training and practice of the ship’s crew and pilots.

    A single Chinese carrier operating a handful of fighters might be able to cow smaller navies. But any reasonably competent regional air force would likely outclass Chinese naval aviation its ability to sustain power, just as the Argentinean air force, limited only by the extreme range of its operations, nearly frustrated the British during the Falklands War. Like other carriers before it, a Chinese programme is more likely to resemble the proverbial money- draining hole in the water.

    About the Authors

    Richard A. Bitzinger is a Senior Fellow and Paul T. Mitchell is an Associate Professor with the Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA) Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University. 

    Categories: Commentaries /

    Last updated on 06/03/2018

    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    PRIVATE BOAT owners joke that their vessels are a hole in the water, surrounded by wood, into which money is poured. In its quest to establish progressively larger areas of control over the oceans, China’s musings over aircraft carrier programmes have set off alarm bells from Singapore to Washington. However, an aircraft carrier is a highly complex weapons system. The past is littered with less-than-effective but highly expensive carrier programmes, including, most spectacularly, Soviet attempts during the 1980s, but also more recently the Thai acquisition of the Chakri Nareubet. Ships can be built, but whether they can be used for operational effect is a different matter entirely.

    The Vessel

    China has two ways of acquiring a working aircraft carrier: it can buy one or it can build one. In fact, China has in recent years acquired three surplus carriers as scrap from Russia – the Minsk and the Kiev (two “pocket carriers,” capable of only flying Harrier-type “jump-jets” from their decks), and the Varyag, one of the former Soviet Union’s attempts to construct a mega-carrier that could compete with the United States’ Nimitz-class nuclear carriers. The Minsk and the Kiev were both turned into tourist attractions (the Minsk has subsequently gone bankrupt and is closed), but the fate of the Varyag continues to captivate China watchers.

    The Varyag was a casualty of the post-Cold War: laid down in the early 1980s, construction was halted in 1992 with the ship only 70 percent complete. Ukraine, which inherited it after the breakup of the Soviet Union, stripped the ship bare and left it exposed to the elements for several years. When the Varyag was finally sold and delivered to China in 2001 – ostensibly to be turned into a Macau casino – it was a rusted shell, without engines, rudder, weapons systems, or electronics. In addition, the process of removing sensitive equipment from the vessel had resulted in damage to its core structure, so even its seaworthiness must be questioned.

    The casino plans never came to fruition, but in mid-2005 the Varyag was moved to a drydock at the Dalian shipyards, where it was painted the grey of the Chinese Navy and its flightdeck repaired. Yet despite the flurry of speculation these activities caused, it is doubtful that the Varyag will become China’s first working aircraft carrier anytime soon, given its needs for engines, operating systems, wiring, and so on. Restoring the Varyag to full effectiveness would take several years, and it would still be an unfamiliar and unreliable ship. At most, it may be used as a research and training platform for future carrier designs and crews.

    So China is left with designing and constructing its own aircraft carrier. Rumours to this effect have persisted for the last 20 years, and the current conventional wisdom is that the Chinese plan to have a carrier in the water by 2010. If so, then the Chinese had better start cutting metal now, because the average heavy carrier takes several years to build, not including the design and preplanning phases. Even after it is launched, it can take up to two years more to outfit a major warship and put it through acceptance trials before it is commissioned and accepted into service – even more so if it is the lead ship in that particular class.

    The Aircraft

    Commissioning an aircraft carrier carries additional burdens. More than any other surface combatant, a carrier is a “system-of-systems” in and of itself. To be tactically effective, carriers typically have several different aircraft types aboard in a “carrier air wing”. An American carrier air wing has four separate fighter squadrons, an electronic warfare squadron, a squadron of anti-submarine and search-and-rescue helicopters, an early warning squadron, and a cargo aircraft detachment. Moreover, each of these aircraft types must be designed specifically for carrier operations – land-based aircraft cannot simply be used at sea. Carrier aircraft require large fuel tanks for long-range operations, different landing gear for the stresses of landing aboard carriers, and special metal and paint combinations for their fuselage to resist the corrosive effects of salt and water at sea.

    China may purchase the Su-33 fighter jet, which is flown off Russia’s single carrier, the Admiral Kusnetzov. It may also use its new indigenous J-10 fighter – in which case, it would have to be extensively modified in order to be used aboard a future carrier. But in order to duplicate the flexibility of American naval air power, the Chinese navy would have to begin a significant development programme in attack aircraft, airborne early warning, and in-flight refueling.

    The Software

    Carrier operations, by their very nature, are among the most dangerous conducted by militaries. The potential for mishap resulting in the death of the pilot or those supporting him is very high. The carrier deck is one of the most dangerous work areas given its relatively small size and the number of aircraft, operating jet engines and spinning propellers. During cyclic operations, the aircraft carrier is launching and recovering aircraft at the same time. The deck hands must guide aircraft to their launch positions, and others must guide those that have just landed to their storage positions. All the while, other deck hands are moving about the work space fueling aircraft, performing maintenance, and arming aircraft. Movement of these many pieces on the deck is a highly choreographed but deadly ballet: one misstep can result in a deck hand being struck by a moving aircraft, blown into the ocean by jet blast, or worse, sucked into the engine itself.

    Landing aircraft on board the deck, moving in all three axes, is one of the most stressful aspects of flight. Indeed, studies have shown that naval aviators experience more stress during landing, especially at night, than during actual combat. The pilot is guided to his target by a series of indicator lights known as the “meatball” as well as receiving instructions from a “landing signal officer” who talks the pilot down. Finally, the pilot not so much lands as he “crashes” his aircraft onto the deck: his engines must be at full power so that if the arrestor hook misses the cable that stops the aircraft, the pilot can immediately take his aircraft back into the air.

    Conclusion

    There is little doubt that China is capable of building an aircraft carrier, just as Britain, France, Spain, and Italy have. The significant issue is not industrial capability but operational effect. No other programme has come close to challenging American dominance at sea. An American carrier projects significant power due to its ability to sustain operations over several days, resulting in multiple and continuous strikes on targets. This ability comes not just from technological capability but also the training and practice of the ship’s crew and pilots.

    A single Chinese carrier operating a handful of fighters might be able to cow smaller navies. But any reasonably competent regional air force would likely outclass Chinese naval aviation its ability to sustain power, just as the Argentinean air force, limited only by the extreme range of its operations, nearly frustrated the British during the Falklands War. Like other carriers before it, a Chinese programme is more likely to resemble the proverbial money- draining hole in the water.

    About the Authors

    Richard A. Bitzinger is a Senior Fellow and Paul T. Mitchell is an Associate Professor with the Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA) Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University. 

    Categories: Commentaries

    Last updated on 06/03/2018

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    CO07050 | A Drop in the Ocean: China’s Aspirations to Acquire an Aircraft Carrier

    Commentary

    PRIVATE BOAT owners joke that their ...
    more info