• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO06052 | Contesting Islamists’ Absolutism on the Islamic State
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO06052 | Contesting Islamists’ Absolutism on the Islamic State
    Muhammad Haniff Hassan

    14 June 2006

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    A significant segment of Islamists not only believe that establishing an Islamic state is obligatory upon all Muslims but they also view the obligation as a principle of the Islamic faith that cannot be compromised.

    In their view, Muslims who do not subscribe to, or challenge such a view, run the risk of committing what they term as nawaqidh ash-shadatain – acts that nullify a Muslim’s testimony of faith. This is a very serious allegation amounting to charging him of being an infidel.

    However, the strongest argument offered by the Islamists to support the above view is based on the verse, “…and whoever did not judge by what Allah revealed, those are they that are the unbelievers.” (The Quran, 5:44).

    These Islamists argue that the verse obligates Muslims to rule by God’s laws (syariah), failing which they could be regarded as unbelievers. According to them, the implementation of God’s law, which is obligatory, cannot be fully realised except through a political institution or when Muslims are in power. The law of hudud, for example, cannot be implemented except by a legitimate Muslim ruler which clearly necessitates the establishment an Islamic state. According to them, this is a fundamental obligation entrenched in the faith because Muslim scholars have agreed on a maxim which says: “ma la yatimmul wajib illa bihi, fahuwa wajib (when an obligation cannot be fulfilled without a means, then the means become obligatory)”. Applying this maxim, they conclude that establishing an Islamic state is an obligation because it is a precondition for the full implementation of the syariah.

    However, if one considers the jurisprudential methodology used in Islamic studies, the maxim only takes effect if and only if there is a ijma’ (consensus among Muslim scholars) for issues with no definitive ruling (hukm qat’ii) from the Quran or the hadits (Prophet’s tradition). Moreover, by studying the many rulings in fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence), one will find many cases that do not conform to the above maxim. For example, although the zakat (tithe) and haj (pilgrimage) are two of the five pillars of Islam that are obligatory for Muslims, no Muslim scholar is of the view that saving money or acquiring wealth as a means and with specific intention to pay zakat or to perform haj is obligatory, failing which those Muslims would be considered as sinners.

    Similarly, in the case of the Islamic state, a critical study on the issue of Islamic state shows that there is neither a direct statement in the Quran or the hadits (Prophet’s tradition) relating to such obligation nor is there the requisite consensus amongst scholars. Hence, though the Islamists’ argument is one way to interpret the verse, it certainly is not the only way. Following from this, the claim that the establishment of an Islamic state is an indisputable principle of faith is inaccurate. The use of the maxim to interpret the above verse does not produce an absolute ruling that the establishment of Islamic state is obligatory.

    Thus, while the Islamists have the right to interpret the text the way that they have, framing it as an absolute obligation is incorrect and is also a violation of jurisprudential reasoning.

    This violation of jurisprudential reasoning resonates negatively upon the wider Muslim community as it contributes to the willy-nilly declaration of Muslims who do not agree with the Islamists as takfir (ruling a Muslim as apostate). The misuse of takfir not only polarises Muslim community but, in addition, it is also jurisprudentially erroneous as passing judgement on a person or group as kufr (apostate/infidel) can only be carried out by an Islamic judicial authority. If there is no Islamic judicial body able to determine the apostasy of a person, that right is not transferable to any other party.

    Besides the incorrect jurisprudential reasoning deployed to justify their argument for the establishment of an Islamic state, the narrowness of the Islamist interpretation is also unacceptable as it limits the options available for Muslims in contemporary society. Those who view Islam’s positive role in politics as the development of the best possible framework for government balancing Islamic principles and the contemporary situation have no space. Unfortunately, the majority of Islamists have an overly simple view of a truly Islamic state where the state is ruled by a Muslim ruler and syariah is an enforced legal code that is the sole basis of law. To the Islamists, a government is considered unIslamic if any one of the above criteria is not met – regardless whether it possesses other positive aspects that are in line with the Islamic teachings.

    Such absolutism needs to be corrected because, as demonstrated above, it has no basis from the perspective of the jurisprudential methodology used in Islamic studies. The disagreement as to whether an Islamic state is obligatory or not falls under the area Muslim scholars regard as majal al-khilaf – an area where disagreement is inevitable and permissible. In this respect, the jurisprudential maxim that should be applied here is: la inkar fi masail al-ijtihad (no denial to permit an opinion in issues that are open to independent judgement).

    In conclusion, Islam allows Muslims to “agree to disagree” on the obligation of establishing an Islamic state and any disagreement that arises thereof should not be the cause of hostility between the differing parties.

    While offering the argument that the establishment of an Islamic state is non-obligatory in Islam, the argument here does not suggest that the establishment of an Islamic state is haram (prohibited) or heresy. It only means that Muslims who view Islam as inseparable from politics have more options to ensure Islam’s positive role in politics than what the Islamists offer.

    Political power is not directly related to a Muslim’s obligation to live by the syariah. Muslims are required to live by the syariah in all circumstances, whether they hold political power or not. However, the syariah must be understood in its truest meaning that encompasses rituals, faith, moral values and not simply a legal code to be enforced. Furthermore, Islam does not dictate that all in the syariah should be established through legal means. Most importantly, the obligation to live by the syariah is not unconditional as the Quran maintains, “So keep your duty to Allah as best you can” (The Quran, 64:16) – thus holding that every effort must moderated by a realistic view and within existing constraints.

    Political power via an Islamic state does not guarantee the ability of Muslims to live fully by the syariah because constraints will still exist in various forms owing to God’s design of His creations. Thus, living as a Muslim within constraints is a necessity that does not necessarily lower his status in the eyes of God.

    About the Author

    Muhammad Haniff Hassan is a research analyst at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, Nanyang Technological University.

    Categories: Commentaries /

    Last updated on 03/10/2014

    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    A significant segment of Islamists not only believe that establishing an Islamic state is obligatory upon all Muslims but they also view the obligation as a principle of the Islamic faith that cannot be compromised.

    In their view, Muslims who do not subscribe to, or challenge such a view, run the risk of committing what they term as nawaqidh ash-shadatain – acts that nullify a Muslim’s testimony of faith. This is a very serious allegation amounting to charging him of being an infidel.

    However, the strongest argument offered by the Islamists to support the above view is based on the verse, “…and whoever did not judge by what Allah revealed, those are they that are the unbelievers.” (The Quran, 5:44).

    These Islamists argue that the verse obligates Muslims to rule by God’s laws (syariah), failing which they could be regarded as unbelievers. According to them, the implementation of God’s law, which is obligatory, cannot be fully realised except through a political institution or when Muslims are in power. The law of hudud, for example, cannot be implemented except by a legitimate Muslim ruler which clearly necessitates the establishment an Islamic state. According to them, this is a fundamental obligation entrenched in the faith because Muslim scholars have agreed on a maxim which says: “ma la yatimmul wajib illa bihi, fahuwa wajib (when an obligation cannot be fulfilled without a means, then the means become obligatory)”. Applying this maxim, they conclude that establishing an Islamic state is an obligation because it is a precondition for the full implementation of the syariah.

    However, if one considers the jurisprudential methodology used in Islamic studies, the maxim only takes effect if and only if there is a ijma’ (consensus among Muslim scholars) for issues with no definitive ruling (hukm qat’ii) from the Quran or the hadits (Prophet’s tradition). Moreover, by studying the many rulings in fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence), one will find many cases that do not conform to the above maxim. For example, although the zakat (tithe) and haj (pilgrimage) are two of the five pillars of Islam that are obligatory for Muslims, no Muslim scholar is of the view that saving money or acquiring wealth as a means and with specific intention to pay zakat or to perform haj is obligatory, failing which those Muslims would be considered as sinners.

    Similarly, in the case of the Islamic state, a critical study on the issue of Islamic state shows that there is neither a direct statement in the Quran or the hadits (Prophet’s tradition) relating to such obligation nor is there the requisite consensus amongst scholars. Hence, though the Islamists’ argument is one way to interpret the verse, it certainly is not the only way. Following from this, the claim that the establishment of an Islamic state is an indisputable principle of faith is inaccurate. The use of the maxim to interpret the above verse does not produce an absolute ruling that the establishment of Islamic state is obligatory.

    Thus, while the Islamists have the right to interpret the text the way that they have, framing it as an absolute obligation is incorrect and is also a violation of jurisprudential reasoning.

    This violation of jurisprudential reasoning resonates negatively upon the wider Muslim community as it contributes to the willy-nilly declaration of Muslims who do not agree with the Islamists as takfir (ruling a Muslim as apostate). The misuse of takfir not only polarises Muslim community but, in addition, it is also jurisprudentially erroneous as passing judgement on a person or group as kufr (apostate/infidel) can only be carried out by an Islamic judicial authority. If there is no Islamic judicial body able to determine the apostasy of a person, that right is not transferable to any other party.

    Besides the incorrect jurisprudential reasoning deployed to justify their argument for the establishment of an Islamic state, the narrowness of the Islamist interpretation is also unacceptable as it limits the options available for Muslims in contemporary society. Those who view Islam’s positive role in politics as the development of the best possible framework for government balancing Islamic principles and the contemporary situation have no space. Unfortunately, the majority of Islamists have an overly simple view of a truly Islamic state where the state is ruled by a Muslim ruler and syariah is an enforced legal code that is the sole basis of law. To the Islamists, a government is considered unIslamic if any one of the above criteria is not met – regardless whether it possesses other positive aspects that are in line with the Islamic teachings.

    Such absolutism needs to be corrected because, as demonstrated above, it has no basis from the perspective of the jurisprudential methodology used in Islamic studies. The disagreement as to whether an Islamic state is obligatory or not falls under the area Muslim scholars regard as majal al-khilaf – an area where disagreement is inevitable and permissible. In this respect, the jurisprudential maxim that should be applied here is: la inkar fi masail al-ijtihad (no denial to permit an opinion in issues that are open to independent judgement).

    In conclusion, Islam allows Muslims to “agree to disagree” on the obligation of establishing an Islamic state and any disagreement that arises thereof should not be the cause of hostility between the differing parties.

    While offering the argument that the establishment of an Islamic state is non-obligatory in Islam, the argument here does not suggest that the establishment of an Islamic state is haram (prohibited) or heresy. It only means that Muslims who view Islam as inseparable from politics have more options to ensure Islam’s positive role in politics than what the Islamists offer.

    Political power is not directly related to a Muslim’s obligation to live by the syariah. Muslims are required to live by the syariah in all circumstances, whether they hold political power or not. However, the syariah must be understood in its truest meaning that encompasses rituals, faith, moral values and not simply a legal code to be enforced. Furthermore, Islam does not dictate that all in the syariah should be established through legal means. Most importantly, the obligation to live by the syariah is not unconditional as the Quran maintains, “So keep your duty to Allah as best you can” (The Quran, 64:16) – thus holding that every effort must moderated by a realistic view and within existing constraints.

    Political power via an Islamic state does not guarantee the ability of Muslims to live fully by the syariah because constraints will still exist in various forms owing to God’s design of His creations. Thus, living as a Muslim within constraints is a necessity that does not necessarily lower his status in the eyes of God.

    About the Author

    Muhammad Haniff Hassan is a research analyst at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, Nanyang Technological University.

    Categories: Commentaries

    Last updated on 03/10/2014

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    CO06052 | Contesting Islamists’ Absolutism on the Islamic State

    Commentary

    A significant segment of Islamists not only believe that establishing an Isl ...
    more info