• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO13209 | The “Allah” Issue Revisited
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO13209 | The “Allah” Issue Revisited
    Choong Pui Yee

    11 November 2013

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Synopsis

    The Malaysian Court of Appeal ruling on the “Allah” issue contradicts the Cabinet Ten-Point Solution, a decision that allows the usage of the word “Allah” by Christians in East Malaysia. The controversy continues to divide Malaysians while it pacifies the Muslim community.

    Commentary

    THE MALAYSIAN Court of Appeal ruling last month upholding the Home Ministry’s ban on the use of the term “Allah” by the Catholic weekly The Herald has not really settled the controversy that divides Malaysians of the Christian and Muslim faiths. The ruling contradicts the Ten-Point Solution of the Malaysian cabinet that allowed the continued usage of the word “Allah” by Christians in East Malaysia.

    The verdict overturns the 2009 High Court ruling giving the Herald the right to use the term “Allah” for God. The Appeal Court held that the use of “Allah” by Christians was not justified on the grounds that the usage of “Allah” is not integral to the Christian faith. Notwithstanding this, Prime Minister Najib Razak stated that the Christians in East Malaysia would not be affected by this decision and that they can continue to use the word “Allah”. In his Muslim New Year message, he had also said he would continue to defend the exclusive rights of the Muslims in Malaysia to use the word “Allah”.

    Overview of the “Allah” Saga

    At the same time, 2,000 weekly newsletters of The Herald which were meant to be distributed to the churches in Sabah were seized by the Home Ministry within weeks of the Court of Appeal ruling. The Home Ministry stated that they needed to ensure the newsletters did not contain the word “Allah”. It released the seized bibles a few days later.

    The contest over the word “Allah” started in 1986 when the Malaysian government gazetted legislation that banned non-Muslims from using four Arabic words – Allah, Solat, Kaabah and Baitullah. The reasons for such legislation were to prevent the propagation of Christianity among Muslims and to avoid confusing Muslims. Despite this legislation, many Malay-speaking Christians especially in the eastern part of Malaysia had continued to use the word “Allah” to refer to their God. Publishers of The Herald based their case on historical grounds. They argued that the term “Allah” predates Islam and was in fact used by pagan nomadic tribes in the Arabian Peninsula to refer to a supreme deity. More importantly, they also made the case that because both Islam and Christianity are monotheistic religions and have a tradition elsewhere in the Arabic-speaking world of using the term “Allah”, the Malaysian government had no basis to ban Christians from using the term.

    Lingering confusion

    During the appeal hearing, presiding Judge Mohd Zawawi bin Salleh declared that the Christians themselves have not reached a consensus as to how to use the word “Allah”. This is despite the fact that the Christian Federation of Malaysia had consistently and unanimously fought to use this word. It is also important to note that the basis for this conclusion by Judge Zawawi derived from his own extensive research which had not been discussed by the lawyers representing the parties. Compounding the matter, Prime Minister Najib had assured the Christians in East Malaysia that the Ten-Point Solution remained.

    Clearly the court decision and the Ten-Point Solution are contradictory. As the court decision did not specify that the Ten-Point Solution remains for the Christians in East Malaysia, this means that the court decision should override the Ten-Point Solution notwithstanding Najib’s assurance to the Christians in East Malaysia. Yet different ministers and legal experts have continued to debate the matter. While some had argued that the court decision was applicable to the whole of Malaysia, others had continued to abide by the Ten-Point Solution as assured by the Prime Minister. It seems that the confusion would likely continue in the near future.

    Wider ramifications

    The recent court ruling will also have wider ramifications with regards to minority rights in Malaysia. The media summary of the Appeal Court highlights that the safety of the people and the state is the supreme law and that the welfare of the individual or group must yield to that of the community. This ruling seems to imply that one community is more equal than others. The continued usage of the word “Allah” by the Christian community may have repercussions on the safety of the people and the state.

    There is no doubt that a multi-religious society needs to be sensitive especially when dealing with religious issues. However, once one community’s rights are prioritised over others, it will only deepen the anxieties of those who consequently feel aggrieved and complicate matters of religious and minority rights. In the long run, the state will suffer a legitimacy deficit among the minority communities.

    As of now, the dilemma over how to reconcile the Ten-Point Solution and the court ruling will remain. The Christian minority who has been addressing their God as “Allah” will probably have to think twice before they do so. If anything, there is no winner in the continuing “Allah” saga.

    About the Author

    Choong Pui Yee is a Senior Analyst with the Malaysia Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.

    Categories: Commentaries /

    Last updated on 09/09/2014

    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Synopsis

    The Malaysian Court of Appeal ruling on the “Allah” issue contradicts the Cabinet Ten-Point Solution, a decision that allows the usage of the word “Allah” by Christians in East Malaysia. The controversy continues to divide Malaysians while it pacifies the Muslim community.

    Commentary

    THE MALAYSIAN Court of Appeal ruling last month upholding the Home Ministry’s ban on the use of the term “Allah” by the Catholic weekly The Herald has not really settled the controversy that divides Malaysians of the Christian and Muslim faiths. The ruling contradicts the Ten-Point Solution of the Malaysian cabinet that allowed the continued usage of the word “Allah” by Christians in East Malaysia.

    The verdict overturns the 2009 High Court ruling giving the Herald the right to use the term “Allah” for God. The Appeal Court held that the use of “Allah” by Christians was not justified on the grounds that the usage of “Allah” is not integral to the Christian faith. Notwithstanding this, Prime Minister Najib Razak stated that the Christians in East Malaysia would not be affected by this decision and that they can continue to use the word “Allah”. In his Muslim New Year message, he had also said he would continue to defend the exclusive rights of the Muslims in Malaysia to use the word “Allah”.

    Overview of the “Allah” Saga

    At the same time, 2,000 weekly newsletters of The Herald which were meant to be distributed to the churches in Sabah were seized by the Home Ministry within weeks of the Court of Appeal ruling. The Home Ministry stated that they needed to ensure the newsletters did not contain the word “Allah”. It released the seized bibles a few days later.

    The contest over the word “Allah” started in 1986 when the Malaysian government gazetted legislation that banned non-Muslims from using four Arabic words – Allah, Solat, Kaabah and Baitullah. The reasons for such legislation were to prevent the propagation of Christianity among Muslims and to avoid confusing Muslims. Despite this legislation, many Malay-speaking Christians especially in the eastern part of Malaysia had continued to use the word “Allah” to refer to their God. Publishers of The Herald based their case on historical grounds. They argued that the term “Allah” predates Islam and was in fact used by pagan nomadic tribes in the Arabian Peninsula to refer to a supreme deity. More importantly, they also made the case that because both Islam and Christianity are monotheistic religions and have a tradition elsewhere in the Arabic-speaking world of using the term “Allah”, the Malaysian government had no basis to ban Christians from using the term.

    Lingering confusion

    During the appeal hearing, presiding Judge Mohd Zawawi bin Salleh declared that the Christians themselves have not reached a consensus as to how to use the word “Allah”. This is despite the fact that the Christian Federation of Malaysia had consistently and unanimously fought to use this word. It is also important to note that the basis for this conclusion by Judge Zawawi derived from his own extensive research which had not been discussed by the lawyers representing the parties. Compounding the matter, Prime Minister Najib had assured the Christians in East Malaysia that the Ten-Point Solution remained.

    Clearly the court decision and the Ten-Point Solution are contradictory. As the court decision did not specify that the Ten-Point Solution remains for the Christians in East Malaysia, this means that the court decision should override the Ten-Point Solution notwithstanding Najib’s assurance to the Christians in East Malaysia. Yet different ministers and legal experts have continued to debate the matter. While some had argued that the court decision was applicable to the whole of Malaysia, others had continued to abide by the Ten-Point Solution as assured by the Prime Minister. It seems that the confusion would likely continue in the near future.

    Wider ramifications

    The recent court ruling will also have wider ramifications with regards to minority rights in Malaysia. The media summary of the Appeal Court highlights that the safety of the people and the state is the supreme law and that the welfare of the individual or group must yield to that of the community. This ruling seems to imply that one community is more equal than others. The continued usage of the word “Allah” by the Christian community may have repercussions on the safety of the people and the state.

    There is no doubt that a multi-religious society needs to be sensitive especially when dealing with religious issues. However, once one community’s rights are prioritised over others, it will only deepen the anxieties of those who consequently feel aggrieved and complicate matters of religious and minority rights. In the long run, the state will suffer a legitimacy deficit among the minority communities.

    As of now, the dilemma over how to reconcile the Ten-Point Solution and the court ruling will remain. The Christian minority who has been addressing their God as “Allah” will probably have to think twice before they do so. If anything, there is no winner in the continuing “Allah” saga.

    About the Author

    Choong Pui Yee is a Senior Analyst with the Malaysia Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.

    Categories: Commentaries

    Last updated on 09/09/2014

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    CO13209 | The “Allah” Issue Revisited

    Synopsis

    The Malaysian Court of Appeal ruling on the “Allah” issue contradicts the Cabinet Ten-Point Solution, a decision that al ...
    more info