• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO10107 | National Service in Singapore: Rewarding the Positive – Minded
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO10107 | National Service in Singapore: Rewarding the Positive – Minded
    Samuel Chan

    03 September 2010

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Synopsis

    A kaleidoscope of benefits has been initiated to reward National Servicemen. There are, however, those for whom monetary compensation pales in comparison to the reward of service fulfilment. Harnessing such positive intentions might prove mutually beneficial to the defence establishment.

    Commentary

    THE RECENT announcement of the National Service Recognition Awards (NSRA) is another leap forward in recognising and rewarding the nation’s citizen soldiers. The initiative joins a plethora of benefits provided since National Service (NS) was instituted as a rite of passage for Singaporean males 43 years ago. The innovation behind the NSRA lies in rewarding individuals for services rendered during two years of full-time military service spent mastering various combat skills and thereafter as the backbone of Singapore’s defence. The question is: “Can more be done?”

    Three Types of Attitudes in NS

    The efforts and sacrifices of Fulltime National Servicemen (NSFs) and Operationally Ready National Servicemen (ORNSmen) – known colloquially as ‘reservists’ – are continually noticed. The Ministry of Defence established the aptly named “Recognising the Contribution of Operationally Ready NSMen to Total Defence (RECORD)” committee as a means to recognise and reward NS contributions. RECORD committees – which include civilian and military (both career and NS) representatives – have since its inauguration in 1990 convened every five years to remain current and relevant.

    The benefits to NSFs and ORNSMen have in turn grown exponentially over the years and reflect both the dedication and hard work of RECORD. The current plethora includes increasing monetary allowances across a range of categories (rank, combat, command); tax allowances; Internet facilities in camps; family recognition vouchers; improved physical fitness facilities; additional allocations in growth dividend schemes; leisure facilities; allowances for key appointment holders, and individual recognitions such as ‘NSmen / NSF of the Year’ awards.

    Most of these benefits, however, often reward NSFs and ORNSMen for “turning up” and seldom differentiate between the motley arrays of attitudes they harbour toward NS. It is comforting to believe in a uniformly motivated army of citizen soldiers, but this is also self-deception. Far from being monolithic, there are perhaps three types of broad, albeit subjective, attitudes independent of rank, vocations, and age. The motivated “Mr Positive” views NS as a parallel second career. “Mr Just Do” does not have a penchant for military service but tries to fulfil all the requirements expected of him. Finally, there is “Mr Negative” who suffers from an inherent repulsion to military service.

    Multiplier Effect

    Rewarding attitudes towards NS is essential only if NS is important and if we seek to prevent it from falling into perfunctory oblivion. The blanket approach to monetary-based benefits has perhaps transformed such privileges into entitlements, bonuses into expectations, and resulted in diminished utility. A more nuanced tier of non-monetary ‘rewards’ should instead take into consideration and resonate with the serviceman’s predilection for service.

    The NS peers of “Mr Positive” consider him a professional “on NS pay” (for NSFs) or one “on 11 months annual leave” (for ORNSMen). His mentality and approach to service is on par with all-volunteer armies where active/reserve personnel are also volunteers as opposed to legislated manpower. While monetary rewards are appreciated they are also secondary. The reward for this category of servicemen is to be the best they can be. Accolades such as rank, medals, and badges are marks of pride displayed when in uniform, at best, and superficial adornments, at worst. Accolades also pale in comparison to challenging appointments that allow “Mr Positives” to channel their energies and talents as they work towards a terminal level of incompetence.

    Beyond operational readiness, “Mr Positives” can also act as multipliers who encourage “Mr Just Do” to join their ranks, and hopefully turn “Mr Negative” into “Mr Just Do”. We need all the “Mr Positives” to arrest the atrophy and perhaps decreasing standards that invariably plague a “peace time defence force” domiciled in an ostensibly calm region void of clear and present threats, and one that overwhelmingly deploys career/regular servicemen for actual missions. “Mr Positives” also make great facilitators for national education. After all, who better to restore or reinforce an urgency to uphold the standards of the SAF, and encourage and spur future generations to give their best in NS than NSFs and ORNSMen themselves?

    Three Tenets

    “Mr Positives” cherish the opportunities to serve and there is no greater reward than for the top brass to take this desire to serve and acts of voluntarism seriously. To these men fulfilment takes precedence over recognition and trumps monetary compensation. There are many things money can buy but it does not buy sacrifice, sincerity, honour, or patriotism. Yet one must also be mindful that “Mr Positives” are only human. They are fallible and can fall by the wayside, be resigned to ‘fate’, and fall prey to cynicism. In an era where NS is an established institution, they also know full well when they are given the run around or worst of all viewed and treated as an unnecessary nuisance.

    If there is a will, there must be a way. Three tenets are thus crucial for the defence establishment to tap the pool of “Mr Positives” and maximise their effect. Keep to this path and perhaps “Mr Just Do” and “Mr Negative” will eventually join the ranks of “Mr Positives”. First, a transparent avenue must be created for volunteer service in certain vocations, units, and overseas deployments. Most commanders would rather have soldiers who “want to be there” as opposed to “have to be there”. Unsuccessful endeavours must also be addressed and not simply ignored.

    Second, always respect the time sacrificed by NSFs and ORNSMen. They are not a liability or ‘free’ labour. Remember, their experiences have generational repercussions, both positive and negative. Finally, uphold the high military standards of training, discipline, and values. It is often said that “tough times does not last but tough men do”. That was, at least, how it used to be.

    About the Author

    Samuel Chan is an Associate Research Fellow with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. He is attached to the Military Transformations Programme of the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS), a constituent unit of RSIS. 

    Categories: Commentaries / Singapore and Homeland Security / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 13/10/2014

    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Synopsis

    A kaleidoscope of benefits has been initiated to reward National Servicemen. There are, however, those for whom monetary compensation pales in comparison to the reward of service fulfilment. Harnessing such positive intentions might prove mutually beneficial to the defence establishment.

    Commentary

    THE RECENT announcement of the National Service Recognition Awards (NSRA) is another leap forward in recognising and rewarding the nation’s citizen soldiers. The initiative joins a plethora of benefits provided since National Service (NS) was instituted as a rite of passage for Singaporean males 43 years ago. The innovation behind the NSRA lies in rewarding individuals for services rendered during two years of full-time military service spent mastering various combat skills and thereafter as the backbone of Singapore’s defence. The question is: “Can more be done?”

    Three Types of Attitudes in NS

    The efforts and sacrifices of Fulltime National Servicemen (NSFs) and Operationally Ready National Servicemen (ORNSmen) – known colloquially as ‘reservists’ – are continually noticed. The Ministry of Defence established the aptly named “Recognising the Contribution of Operationally Ready NSMen to Total Defence (RECORD)” committee as a means to recognise and reward NS contributions. RECORD committees – which include civilian and military (both career and NS) representatives – have since its inauguration in 1990 convened every five years to remain current and relevant.

    The benefits to NSFs and ORNSMen have in turn grown exponentially over the years and reflect both the dedication and hard work of RECORD. The current plethora includes increasing monetary allowances across a range of categories (rank, combat, command); tax allowances; Internet facilities in camps; family recognition vouchers; improved physical fitness facilities; additional allocations in growth dividend schemes; leisure facilities; allowances for key appointment holders, and individual recognitions such as ‘NSmen / NSF of the Year’ awards.

    Most of these benefits, however, often reward NSFs and ORNSMen for “turning up” and seldom differentiate between the motley arrays of attitudes they harbour toward NS. It is comforting to believe in a uniformly motivated army of citizen soldiers, but this is also self-deception. Far from being monolithic, there are perhaps three types of broad, albeit subjective, attitudes independent of rank, vocations, and age. The motivated “Mr Positive” views NS as a parallel second career. “Mr Just Do” does not have a penchant for military service but tries to fulfil all the requirements expected of him. Finally, there is “Mr Negative” who suffers from an inherent repulsion to military service.

    Multiplier Effect

    Rewarding attitudes towards NS is essential only if NS is important and if we seek to prevent it from falling into perfunctory oblivion. The blanket approach to monetary-based benefits has perhaps transformed such privileges into entitlements, bonuses into expectations, and resulted in diminished utility. A more nuanced tier of non-monetary ‘rewards’ should instead take into consideration and resonate with the serviceman’s predilection for service.

    The NS peers of “Mr Positive” consider him a professional “on NS pay” (for NSFs) or one “on 11 months annual leave” (for ORNSMen). His mentality and approach to service is on par with all-volunteer armies where active/reserve personnel are also volunteers as opposed to legislated manpower. While monetary rewards are appreciated they are also secondary. The reward for this category of servicemen is to be the best they can be. Accolades such as rank, medals, and badges are marks of pride displayed when in uniform, at best, and superficial adornments, at worst. Accolades also pale in comparison to challenging appointments that allow “Mr Positives” to channel their energies and talents as they work towards a terminal level of incompetence.

    Beyond operational readiness, “Mr Positives” can also act as multipliers who encourage “Mr Just Do” to join their ranks, and hopefully turn “Mr Negative” into “Mr Just Do”. We need all the “Mr Positives” to arrest the atrophy and perhaps decreasing standards that invariably plague a “peace time defence force” domiciled in an ostensibly calm region void of clear and present threats, and one that overwhelmingly deploys career/regular servicemen for actual missions. “Mr Positives” also make great facilitators for national education. After all, who better to restore or reinforce an urgency to uphold the standards of the SAF, and encourage and spur future generations to give their best in NS than NSFs and ORNSMen themselves?

    Three Tenets

    “Mr Positives” cherish the opportunities to serve and there is no greater reward than for the top brass to take this desire to serve and acts of voluntarism seriously. To these men fulfilment takes precedence over recognition and trumps monetary compensation. There are many things money can buy but it does not buy sacrifice, sincerity, honour, or patriotism. Yet one must also be mindful that “Mr Positives” are only human. They are fallible and can fall by the wayside, be resigned to ‘fate’, and fall prey to cynicism. In an era where NS is an established institution, they also know full well when they are given the run around or worst of all viewed and treated as an unnecessary nuisance.

    If there is a will, there must be a way. Three tenets are thus crucial for the defence establishment to tap the pool of “Mr Positives” and maximise their effect. Keep to this path and perhaps “Mr Just Do” and “Mr Negative” will eventually join the ranks of “Mr Positives”. First, a transparent avenue must be created for volunteer service in certain vocations, units, and overseas deployments. Most commanders would rather have soldiers who “want to be there” as opposed to “have to be there”. Unsuccessful endeavours must also be addressed and not simply ignored.

    Second, always respect the time sacrificed by NSFs and ORNSMen. They are not a liability or ‘free’ labour. Remember, their experiences have generational repercussions, both positive and negative. Finally, uphold the high military standards of training, discipline, and values. It is often said that “tough times does not last but tough men do”. That was, at least, how it used to be.

    About the Author

    Samuel Chan is an Associate Research Fellow with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. He is attached to the Military Transformations Programme of the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS), a constituent unit of RSIS. 

    Categories: Commentaries / Singapore and Homeland Security

    Last updated on 13/10/2014

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    more info