Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS Newsletter
Other Research
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Alumni & Networks
Alumni
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
Commentaries
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Paper
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
2024 Indonesia Elections
Great Powers
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
Media Mentions
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Future Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSIS Newsletter
      Other ResearchScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to Apply
      Financial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      AlumniAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)SRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersCommentariesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PaperInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      2024 Indonesia ElectionsGreat PowersSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesMedia Mentions
      News ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO10068 | New Directions for ASEAN
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO10068 | New Directions for ASEAN
    Barry Desker

    23 June 2010

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    As ASEAN foreign ministers prepare for their annual meetings next month in Hanoi, a number of key issues await to be resolved. Can the ministers preserve the ASEAN model of community building amidst the emergence of alternative approaches?

    ASEAN will hold its 43rd Foreign Ministers Meeting as well as a series of related meetings of the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) and the ASEAN+3 Foreign Ministers in Hanoi from 19-23 July. While these meetings are routine, this year’s session will provide a significant challenge for ASEAN. The ASEAN model of community building through consensus has come under pressure from alternative approaches.

    Regaining ASEAN’s initiative

    One prominent example is Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s proposal for an Asia-Pacific G8 or G10, which would serve as a concert of major and medium powers in the Asia-Pacific and largely excludes smaller states from decision-making processes in the region. Yet another is former Japanese Prime Minister Hatoyama’s concept of an East Asian Community which excludes the United States. Both these approaches would undermine ASEAN’s efforts to make the regional association the fulcrum of community building in the East Asian region. ASEAN needs to regain the initiative in Hanoi.

    The proposal for an ASEAN+8 grouping, which was discussed at the ASEAN Summit in Hanoi in April this year, should be followed up. The US and Russia would join ASEAN as well as China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand and India in meetings at the summit level whenever the APEC Leaders Meeting is held in an Asian country. ASEAN may want to broaden the criteria so that these meetings could be held even when APEC meets in a non-Asian member economy. This would cement the commitment of participating states to the new process.

    APEC – the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum — has 21 members, of which 7 are ASEAN states. India is the only non-APEC member among the non-ASEAN participants of the proposed ASEAN+8. Thus the grouping would meet at the summit level twice out of every three years.

    ASEAN must ensure that this initiative has substance. The proposal for Meetings of Foreign Ministers and Defence Ministers of the grouping is a good start. ASEAN should put forward proposals for a new security agenda which looks at non-traditional security issues like energy security, pandemics, climate change, food security and trans-national crime as well as the more usual themes of confidence building, especially among militaries, and preventive diplomacy.

    Confidence building and preventive diplomacy are already the focus of the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). However, the ARF is a foreign minister-led network in an environment dominated by summits of national leaders. Its expansion has also resulted in an unwieldy institution. But ASEAN will find it difficult to persuade ARF members – especially those like Bangladesh and Pakistan, which are not part of the other groupings — to agree to winding up of the ARF. This highlights a problem in the structure of regional institutions. They are likely to continue even when the rationale for their existence has passed!

    Risks of New Membership

    Another issue which will attract attention is the interest of Papua New Guinea and Timor – Leste in becoming members of ASEAN. They have been participating as observers at these ASEAN annual foreign ministers’ meetings. ASEAN may feel increasingly pressured to agree to their accession. But the new members are likely to find the large number of ASEAN meetings beyond the capacity of their bureaucracies to manage. The larger problem for ASEAN is that expansion will dilute ASEAN’s coherence and shift ASEAN’s attention away from East Asia. It could be argued that the process of ASEAN’s expansion in the 1990s, with new members admitted without any conditionality, led to the undermining of its effectiveness. Indeed, members such as Myanmar have been an albatross around ASEAN’s neck. The foreign ministers should therefore resist the temptation to expand ASEAN.

    It is inevitable that Myanmar will be discussed during the Hanoi meetings. US and European Union participants will probably refer to reports that Myanmar has embarked on a programme to develop nuclear weapons as well as ballistic missile capabilities. These reports are based on evidence provided by a defector and have been widely circulated. However, such reports should be examined closely and viewed with scepticism. The reports originated from exile groups critical of the Myanmar regime and appear to have been timed to coincide with the US attempt to impose UN Security Council sanctions on Iran.

    The Myanmar government can be criticised for its attempts to control the electoral process in the country and its efforts to prevent Aung San Suu Kyi from competing in the elections planned later this year. Nevertheless, the claim that it is developing nuclear weapons lacks credibility. Unlike North Korea, whose acquisition of nuclear weapons enables it to target Japan, South Korea and the US offshore presence, Myanmar has good relations with its nearest neighbours China, India and Thailand. None of them has participated in Western efforts to impose sanctions on the country. Myanmar would need to surpass North Korean ballistics missile capabilities to pose even a remote threat to US facilities.

    ASEAN has always prided itself on its inclusive character. In the Southeast Asian fashion, it has been reluctant to respond negatively, especially to turn down initiatives from outside the region. The time has come for ASEAN to do so in Hanoi.

    About the Author

    Barry Desker is Dean of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. 

    Categories: Commentaries / Regionalism and Multilateralism

    Last updated on 10/10/2014

    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    As ASEAN foreign ministers prepare for their annual meetings next month in Hanoi, a number of key issues await to be resolved. Can the ministers preserve the ASEAN model of community building amidst the emergence of alternative approaches?

    ASEAN will hold its 43rd Foreign Ministers Meeting as well as a series of related meetings of the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) and the ASEAN+3 Foreign Ministers in Hanoi from 19-23 July. While these meetings are routine, this year’s session will provide a significant challenge for ASEAN. The ASEAN model of community building through consensus has come under pressure from alternative approaches.

    Regaining ASEAN’s initiative

    One prominent example is Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s proposal for an Asia-Pacific G8 or G10, which would serve as a concert of major and medium powers in the Asia-Pacific and largely excludes smaller states from decision-making processes in the region. Yet another is former Japanese Prime Minister Hatoyama’s concept of an East Asian Community which excludes the United States. Both these approaches would undermine ASEAN’s efforts to make the regional association the fulcrum of community building in the East Asian region. ASEAN needs to regain the initiative in Hanoi.

    The proposal for an ASEAN+8 grouping, which was discussed at the ASEAN Summit in Hanoi in April this year, should be followed up. The US and Russia would join ASEAN as well as China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand and India in meetings at the summit level whenever the APEC Leaders Meeting is held in an Asian country. ASEAN may want to broaden the criteria so that these meetings could be held even when APEC meets in a non-Asian member economy. This would cement the commitment of participating states to the new process.

    APEC – the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum — has 21 members, of which 7 are ASEAN states. India is the only non-APEC member among the non-ASEAN participants of the proposed ASEAN+8. Thus the grouping would meet at the summit level twice out of every three years.

    ASEAN must ensure that this initiative has substance. The proposal for Meetings of Foreign Ministers and Defence Ministers of the grouping is a good start. ASEAN should put forward proposals for a new security agenda which looks at non-traditional security issues like energy security, pandemics, climate change, food security and trans-national crime as well as the more usual themes of confidence building, especially among militaries, and preventive diplomacy.

    Confidence building and preventive diplomacy are already the focus of the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). However, the ARF is a foreign minister-led network in an environment dominated by summits of national leaders. Its expansion has also resulted in an unwieldy institution. But ASEAN will find it difficult to persuade ARF members – especially those like Bangladesh and Pakistan, which are not part of the other groupings — to agree to winding up of the ARF. This highlights a problem in the structure of regional institutions. They are likely to continue even when the rationale for their existence has passed!

    Risks of New Membership

    Another issue which will attract attention is the interest of Papua New Guinea and Timor – Leste in becoming members of ASEAN. They have been participating as observers at these ASEAN annual foreign ministers’ meetings. ASEAN may feel increasingly pressured to agree to their accession. But the new members are likely to find the large number of ASEAN meetings beyond the capacity of their bureaucracies to manage. The larger problem for ASEAN is that expansion will dilute ASEAN’s coherence and shift ASEAN’s attention away from East Asia. It could be argued that the process of ASEAN’s expansion in the 1990s, with new members admitted without any conditionality, led to the undermining of its effectiveness. Indeed, members such as Myanmar have been an albatross around ASEAN’s neck. The foreign ministers should therefore resist the temptation to expand ASEAN.

    It is inevitable that Myanmar will be discussed during the Hanoi meetings. US and European Union participants will probably refer to reports that Myanmar has embarked on a programme to develop nuclear weapons as well as ballistic missile capabilities. These reports are based on evidence provided by a defector and have been widely circulated. However, such reports should be examined closely and viewed with scepticism. The reports originated from exile groups critical of the Myanmar regime and appear to have been timed to coincide with the US attempt to impose UN Security Council sanctions on Iran.

    The Myanmar government can be criticised for its attempts to control the electoral process in the country and its efforts to prevent Aung San Suu Kyi from competing in the elections planned later this year. Nevertheless, the claim that it is developing nuclear weapons lacks credibility. Unlike North Korea, whose acquisition of nuclear weapons enables it to target Japan, South Korea and the US offshore presence, Myanmar has good relations with its nearest neighbours China, India and Thailand. None of them has participated in Western efforts to impose sanctions on the country. Myanmar would need to surpass North Korean ballistics missile capabilities to pose even a remote threat to US facilities.

    ASEAN has always prided itself on its inclusive character. In the Southeast Asian fashion, it has been reluctant to respond negatively, especially to turn down initiatives from outside the region. The time has come for ASEAN to do so in Hanoi.

    About the Author

    Barry Desker is Dean of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. 

    Categories: Commentaries / Regionalism and Multilateralism

    Last updated on 10/10/2014

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info