• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO09111 | APEC at 20: Old Promises, New Challenges
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO09111 | APEC at 20: Old Promises, New Challenges
    Barry Desker

    11 November 2009

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    As APEC leaders convene for the Singapore summit this week, there is one question that needs to be asked: Can the consensual, inclusive norm that has propelled APEC be the driving force to bind regional groupings together?

    THIS WEEK’S APEC Leaders Meeting in Singapore marks the 20th anniversary of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum. Critics of APEC have highlighted the lack of progress in promoting regional economic integration and the failure of its efforts at voluntary sectoral liberalisation. They doubt that its ambition of free trade across the APEC region will be achieved by 2020. The APEC summit is remembered by them more for the attire of the leaders than for the substantive pronouncements of the meeting. APEC is seen as a talk shop with few concrete benefits, unlike NAFTA or the European Union with their strong legal institutions and clearly defined rules.

    APEC’s Forgotten Role

    However, this negative assessment ignores the dynamic growth that has occurred in the East Asian region over the past 20 years. The rapid recovery of East Asia during the current global financial and economic crisis bears testimony to the emerging shift in global economic power from West to East. Trans-Pacific trade and investment is now far more significant than trade and investment across the Atlantic. The regular meetings of leaders at APEC have facilitated this global adjustment as well as created an informal web of relationships within East Asia and across the Pacific. Even if APEC’s developed members do not meet the Bogor 2010 goals next year, loosely structured cooperation through APEC has enabled East Asia to emerge as the fastest growing region in the world over the past two decades.

    APEC’s role in promoting trade liberalisation tends to be forgotten. China’s participation in APEC since 1991 provided the impetus for Chinese unilateral liberalisation. It was a valuable learning experience prior to China’s accession to the World Trade Organisation (WTO). APEC served as a template for China’s ‘early harvest’ concessions to the ASEAN states during the China-ASEAN FTA negotiations. APEC also provided the leadership for the WTO Information Technology Agreement (ITA) of 1996. The ITA facilitated the elimination of customs duties on computers, telecommunications products, semi-conductors, semi-conductor manufacturing equipment and scientific equipment. The significance of the electronics manufacturing sector for East Asia meant that the ITA had a greater trade liberalising impact than many of the bilateral FTAs that have been signed in recent years. APEC is now embarking on reducing non-tariff barriers to trade, which offers potentially the greatest gains to the trading community.

    APEC and Political Issues

    While APEC initiatives on multilateral trade liberalisation have stalled, recent summits have been marked by useful consultations on political issues. APEC discussed East Timor in 1999, terrorism since 2001 and is now involved in exchanges on “trade-related” security issues such as supply chain security, maritime security, energy and environmental wellbeing. Here APEC seems to be entering ground covered by the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). It is time for rationalisation of the work covered by APEC and the ARF.

    It would be beneficial to hold back-to-back summits of APEC and the ARF when an ARF member hosts the APEC Leaders Meeting. Such a move is likely to win Chinese support. Back-to-back APEC/ARF summits would mean that APEC would focus on economic cooperation while the ARF would be the apex regional security institution. As Taiwan attends APEC meetings as ‘Chinese Taipei’, it would be included in regional economic institution building but excluded from major regional security dialogues.

    The vision which should underpin our efforts to re-think the relationship between APEC and the ARF is founded on a critical need. We need institutions that can bind the United States — the sole superpower — and rising powers such as China within a framework that allows representation and participation by medium powers and smaller states in the region. Such inclusive institutions can serve as the basis for the emergence of a growing sense of regional identity and increased contacts among decision-makers in the Asia-Pacific.

    Alternative View

    An alternative view is that regional economic and security affairs should be shaped by the more powerful states in the Asia-Pacific. A paper at a recent Pacific Economic Cooperation Council (PECC) conference in Singapore called for a G-10 comprising the Asia-Pacific members of the G-20 which would be at the apex of Asia-Pacific decision-making. Proponents of this grouping argue that effectiveness matters much more than broad representation. However, the turn to a concert of powers reminds me more of the 19th century than a 21st century response to the challenge of creating regional order.

    One of the strengths of APEC is that its practices have been shaped by the norms and values of the ASEAN states that played a critical role in establishing APEC and the ARF. The ASEAN approach emphasised consultation, consensus decision-making and an inclusive approach to regional institution- building.

    The opportunities for informal exchanges and consensual decision-making in APEC could help to ensure that the concerns of both Western as well as Asian states are reflected in the evolving regional order. We need to recognise that there are divergent norms and values present in international society and that those differences could lead to possible conflict. Inclusive institutions such as APEC could serve as harbingers of cooperation on a larger scale.

    About the Author

    Barry Desker is Dean of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.

    Categories: Commentaries / International Politics and Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific

    Last updated on 09/10/2014

    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    As APEC leaders convene for the Singapore summit this week, there is one question that needs to be asked: Can the consensual, inclusive norm that has propelled APEC be the driving force to bind regional groupings together?

    THIS WEEK’S APEC Leaders Meeting in Singapore marks the 20th anniversary of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum. Critics of APEC have highlighted the lack of progress in promoting regional economic integration and the failure of its efforts at voluntary sectoral liberalisation. They doubt that its ambition of free trade across the APEC region will be achieved by 2020. The APEC summit is remembered by them more for the attire of the leaders than for the substantive pronouncements of the meeting. APEC is seen as a talk shop with few concrete benefits, unlike NAFTA or the European Union with their strong legal institutions and clearly defined rules.

    APEC’s Forgotten Role

    However, this negative assessment ignores the dynamic growth that has occurred in the East Asian region over the past 20 years. The rapid recovery of East Asia during the current global financial and economic crisis bears testimony to the emerging shift in global economic power from West to East. Trans-Pacific trade and investment is now far more significant than trade and investment across the Atlantic. The regular meetings of leaders at APEC have facilitated this global adjustment as well as created an informal web of relationships within East Asia and across the Pacific. Even if APEC’s developed members do not meet the Bogor 2010 goals next year, loosely structured cooperation through APEC has enabled East Asia to emerge as the fastest growing region in the world over the past two decades.

    APEC’s role in promoting trade liberalisation tends to be forgotten. China’s participation in APEC since 1991 provided the impetus for Chinese unilateral liberalisation. It was a valuable learning experience prior to China’s accession to the World Trade Organisation (WTO). APEC served as a template for China’s ‘early harvest’ concessions to the ASEAN states during the China-ASEAN FTA negotiations. APEC also provided the leadership for the WTO Information Technology Agreement (ITA) of 1996. The ITA facilitated the elimination of customs duties on computers, telecommunications products, semi-conductors, semi-conductor manufacturing equipment and scientific equipment. The significance of the electronics manufacturing sector for East Asia meant that the ITA had a greater trade liberalising impact than many of the bilateral FTAs that have been signed in recent years. APEC is now embarking on reducing non-tariff barriers to trade, which offers potentially the greatest gains to the trading community.

    APEC and Political Issues

    While APEC initiatives on multilateral trade liberalisation have stalled, recent summits have been marked by useful consultations on political issues. APEC discussed East Timor in 1999, terrorism since 2001 and is now involved in exchanges on “trade-related” security issues such as supply chain security, maritime security, energy and environmental wellbeing. Here APEC seems to be entering ground covered by the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). It is time for rationalisation of the work covered by APEC and the ARF.

    It would be beneficial to hold back-to-back summits of APEC and the ARF when an ARF member hosts the APEC Leaders Meeting. Such a move is likely to win Chinese support. Back-to-back APEC/ARF summits would mean that APEC would focus on economic cooperation while the ARF would be the apex regional security institution. As Taiwan attends APEC meetings as ‘Chinese Taipei’, it would be included in regional economic institution building but excluded from major regional security dialogues.

    The vision which should underpin our efforts to re-think the relationship between APEC and the ARF is founded on a critical need. We need institutions that can bind the United States — the sole superpower — and rising powers such as China within a framework that allows representation and participation by medium powers and smaller states in the region. Such inclusive institutions can serve as the basis for the emergence of a growing sense of regional identity and increased contacts among decision-makers in the Asia-Pacific.

    Alternative View

    An alternative view is that regional economic and security affairs should be shaped by the more powerful states in the Asia-Pacific. A paper at a recent Pacific Economic Cooperation Council (PECC) conference in Singapore called for a G-10 comprising the Asia-Pacific members of the G-20 which would be at the apex of Asia-Pacific decision-making. Proponents of this grouping argue that effectiveness matters much more than broad representation. However, the turn to a concert of powers reminds me more of the 19th century than a 21st century response to the challenge of creating regional order.

    One of the strengths of APEC is that its practices have been shaped by the norms and values of the ASEAN states that played a critical role in establishing APEC and the ARF. The ASEAN approach emphasised consultation, consensus decision-making and an inclusive approach to regional institution- building.

    The opportunities for informal exchanges and consensual decision-making in APEC could help to ensure that the concerns of both Western as well as Asian states are reflected in the evolving regional order. We need to recognise that there are divergent norms and values present in international society and that those differences could lead to possible conflict. Inclusive institutions such as APEC could serve as harbingers of cooperation on a larger scale.

    About the Author

    Barry Desker is Dean of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.

    Categories: Commentaries / International Politics and Security

    Last updated on 09/10/2014

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    CO09111 | APEC at 20: Old Promises, New Challenges

    Commentary

    As APEC leaders con ...
    more info