• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO09103 | Free Trade and Globalisation: Boon or Bane for the Emerging World?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO09103 | Free Trade and Globalisation: Boon or Bane for the Emerging World?
    Wang Di, Ron Matthews

    20 October 2009

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    Globalisation, growth and equality are not always compatible. Income disparity amongst the peoples of the emerging world has become an issue of increasing concern, especially in the wake of the current global economic crisis.

    A RECENT World Bank report shows that anti-dumping, safeguard and other trade barriers are currently in vogue. This is despite the fact that state leaders vowed at the London G20 summit not to do so in the wake of the global economic crisis. The report warns that the present year-to-date pace of new safeguard investigations is likely to make 2009 the second most prolific year since the WTO’s 1995 inception. Not surprisingly, the surge in domestic protectionist pressures stems from the negative impacts of free trade on income disparity, as evidenced by worsening inequality in about two-thirds of countries between 1990 and 2005. Rising impoverishment of the poor, alongside the burgeoning largesse of the already rich, poses a major threat to global social harmony.

    Free Trade Theory Revisited

    The British economist, David Ricardo, propounded the seminal 19th century theory of comparative advantage. The overarching thrust of Ricardo’s thesis is that free trade is essential to maximise global economic welfare. This is achieved by rewarding ‘factors of production’ according to their productivity, thus allowing nations and individuals to exploit respective ‘comparative advantages’. Globalisation is a contemporary manifestation of free trade, promoting benefits that are ubiquitous, compelling, and incontrovertible. Globally, a stunning 135 million people escaped dire poverty between 1999 and 2004; this being more than the populations of Japan or Russia, with favourable impacts on more people, more quickly, than at any other time in history.

    A Growth-Equity Trade-Off?

    Although developing countries’ income levels have been catching up with rich countries in this globalisation era, income disparity is widening within nations and between individuals. Within- country income distribution has become worse virtually everywhere. In China, for instance, urban-to- rural household per capita income in 2004 was 3.2 times, and the coastal-to-inland GDP per capita was 2.4 times; these differentials being amongst the highest in the world. Moreover, China is but a microcosm of increasing global income disparities. For instance, over the past decade, inequality has increased in 13 out of 18 Asian countries.

    There are three explanations for free trade/globalisation failing to narrow country and global income inequalities.

    Firstly, the assumption of ‘perfect competition’ is an ideal, rather than a reality. Protectionist trade barriers (via import quotas and tariffs) and the under-cutting of competitive forces (through subsidies) creates ‘artificial’ comparative advantages, destroying free trade benefits, and imposing high costs on local consumers and developing country exporters, alike. The second explanation for the growth- equity paradox is that the search for comparative advantage is based on factor endowment.

    However, this development strategy can best be described as a ‘race to the bottom’ by poor economies. Emerging states seek to attract foreign direct investment (FDI) with promises of cheap labour and big competitive tax breaks, suppressing poverty wages, often below subsistence levels. As a consequence, the average wage of America’s top-ten trading partners fell between the 1980s and 1990s, somewhat tarnishing globalisation’s lustre.

    Finally, even if the international trade system runs exactly as theory suggests, the existing global financial architecture remains problematic. This is because it represents a division of labour favouring rich-country knowledge-intensive exporters, whilst emerging countries principally concentrate on exporting raw materials and low value-added goods. This ‘static’ comparative advantage obliges emerging countries to suffer from exclusive reliance on low value-added sectors, stunting their capacity to grow in a dynamic, transformational way.

    Second-Best Policy Solutions

    The danger of widening income disparities is that a tidal wave of rage against globalisation is building.

    Yet, the greatest threat to globalisation does not come from the awakening of working people in developing countries, and the poor in advanced ones. Perversely, this threat comes from the rich and powerful states failing to address the perceived and real deficiencies and ‘unfairness’ of the present international trading and financial system. Bubbling to the surface are the twin evils of protectionism and economic nationalism. The policy response has been to more equitably share the gains from globalisation. Some truly innovative policies have been introduced, such as the ‘Millennium Development Goals’, social safety nets, and a variety of humanitarian assistance programmes.

    For emerging countries, social policy is the ‘flip-side’ of an open economy. To avoid trading-off poverty reduction by chipping away at the benefits of globalisation, social policy should have a dual function: it must enhance social engagement in decision-making, but at the time same, give social direction to poverty reduction. Such a flexible, more socially responsible, approach to trade ‘and’ development enables anti-globalisation ‘radicals’ to obtain a legitimate voice in support of greater social enterprise.

    Accommodating Civil Society

    Moreover, organisations and charities aligned with the anti-globalisation movement, such as ATTAC (Association pour la taxation des transactions pour l’aide aux citoyens), should be entitled to participate in global conferences. Such fora would provide excellent opportunities for pushing advocacy goals in civil society and democratising global policy-making, hence compensating losers from globalisation. Violent protest, made worse by non-involved anarchist groupings, would thus, hopefully, give way to peaceful and constructive dialogue.

    Harmonious development demands the evolution of ‘social enterprise’. This should embroider ‘blended’ value objectives into mission statements, focusing on sustainable profit but not at the cost of social and environmental imperatives, so critical for securing poverty reduction. Social enterprises have already proven their worth in Europe and North America. They mitigate pressure towards income inequality and purge the corrupt practices that so often taint government intervention processes.

    In sum, then, free trade/globalisation is a crucial dynamic in poorer countries seeking development, but the excesses of capitalism need to be tempered by enhanced institutional and corporate responsibility.

    About the Authors

    Wang Di is a Research Analyst at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. Ron Matthews is Head of Graduate Studies at RSIS. He was formerly with Cranfield University, UK. 

    Categories: Commentaries / / Global

    Last updated on 09/10/2014

    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    Globalisation, growth and equality are not always compatible. Income disparity amongst the peoples of the emerging world has become an issue of increasing concern, especially in the wake of the current global economic crisis.

    A RECENT World Bank report shows that anti-dumping, safeguard and other trade barriers are currently in vogue. This is despite the fact that state leaders vowed at the London G20 summit not to do so in the wake of the global economic crisis. The report warns that the present year-to-date pace of new safeguard investigations is likely to make 2009 the second most prolific year since the WTO’s 1995 inception. Not surprisingly, the surge in domestic protectionist pressures stems from the negative impacts of free trade on income disparity, as evidenced by worsening inequality in about two-thirds of countries between 1990 and 2005. Rising impoverishment of the poor, alongside the burgeoning largesse of the already rich, poses a major threat to global social harmony.

    Free Trade Theory Revisited

    The British economist, David Ricardo, propounded the seminal 19th century theory of comparative advantage. The overarching thrust of Ricardo’s thesis is that free trade is essential to maximise global economic welfare. This is achieved by rewarding ‘factors of production’ according to their productivity, thus allowing nations and individuals to exploit respective ‘comparative advantages’. Globalisation is a contemporary manifestation of free trade, promoting benefits that are ubiquitous, compelling, and incontrovertible. Globally, a stunning 135 million people escaped dire poverty between 1999 and 2004; this being more than the populations of Japan or Russia, with favourable impacts on more people, more quickly, than at any other time in history.

    A Growth-Equity Trade-Off?

    Although developing countries’ income levels have been catching up with rich countries in this globalisation era, income disparity is widening within nations and between individuals. Within- country income distribution has become worse virtually everywhere. In China, for instance, urban-to- rural household per capita income in 2004 was 3.2 times, and the coastal-to-inland GDP per capita was 2.4 times; these differentials being amongst the highest in the world. Moreover, China is but a microcosm of increasing global income disparities. For instance, over the past decade, inequality has increased in 13 out of 18 Asian countries.

    There are three explanations for free trade/globalisation failing to narrow country and global income inequalities.

    Firstly, the assumption of ‘perfect competition’ is an ideal, rather than a reality. Protectionist trade barriers (via import quotas and tariffs) and the under-cutting of competitive forces (through subsidies) creates ‘artificial’ comparative advantages, destroying free trade benefits, and imposing high costs on local consumers and developing country exporters, alike. The second explanation for the growth- equity paradox is that the search for comparative advantage is based on factor endowment.

    However, this development strategy can best be described as a ‘race to the bottom’ by poor economies. Emerging states seek to attract foreign direct investment (FDI) with promises of cheap labour and big competitive tax breaks, suppressing poverty wages, often below subsistence levels. As a consequence, the average wage of America’s top-ten trading partners fell between the 1980s and 1990s, somewhat tarnishing globalisation’s lustre.

    Finally, even if the international trade system runs exactly as theory suggests, the existing global financial architecture remains problematic. This is because it represents a division of labour favouring rich-country knowledge-intensive exporters, whilst emerging countries principally concentrate on exporting raw materials and low value-added goods. This ‘static’ comparative advantage obliges emerging countries to suffer from exclusive reliance on low value-added sectors, stunting their capacity to grow in a dynamic, transformational way.

    Second-Best Policy Solutions

    The danger of widening income disparities is that a tidal wave of rage against globalisation is building.

    Yet, the greatest threat to globalisation does not come from the awakening of working people in developing countries, and the poor in advanced ones. Perversely, this threat comes from the rich and powerful states failing to address the perceived and real deficiencies and ‘unfairness’ of the present international trading and financial system. Bubbling to the surface are the twin evils of protectionism and economic nationalism. The policy response has been to more equitably share the gains from globalisation. Some truly innovative policies have been introduced, such as the ‘Millennium Development Goals’, social safety nets, and a variety of humanitarian assistance programmes.

    For emerging countries, social policy is the ‘flip-side’ of an open economy. To avoid trading-off poverty reduction by chipping away at the benefits of globalisation, social policy should have a dual function: it must enhance social engagement in decision-making, but at the time same, give social direction to poverty reduction. Such a flexible, more socially responsible, approach to trade ‘and’ development enables anti-globalisation ‘radicals’ to obtain a legitimate voice in support of greater social enterprise.

    Accommodating Civil Society

    Moreover, organisations and charities aligned with the anti-globalisation movement, such as ATTAC (Association pour la taxation des transactions pour l’aide aux citoyens), should be entitled to participate in global conferences. Such fora would provide excellent opportunities for pushing advocacy goals in civil society and democratising global policy-making, hence compensating losers from globalisation. Violent protest, made worse by non-involved anarchist groupings, would thus, hopefully, give way to peaceful and constructive dialogue.

    Harmonious development demands the evolution of ‘social enterprise’. This should embroider ‘blended’ value objectives into mission statements, focusing on sustainable profit but not at the cost of social and environmental imperatives, so critical for securing poverty reduction. Social enterprises have already proven their worth in Europe and North America. They mitigate pressure towards income inequality and purge the corrupt practices that so often taint government intervention processes.

    In sum, then, free trade/globalisation is a crucial dynamic in poorer countries seeking development, but the excesses of capitalism need to be tempered by enhanced institutional and corporate responsibility.

    About the Authors

    Wang Di is a Research Analyst at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. Ron Matthews is Head of Graduate Studies at RSIS. He was formerly with Cranfield University, UK. 

    Categories: Commentaries

    Last updated on 09/10/2014

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    CO09103 | Free Trade and Globalisation: Boon or Bane for the Emerging World?

    Commentary

    Globalisation, grow ...
    more info