• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO08132 | Change Without Changing: Obama’s Gate-keeper in Defence
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO08132 | Change Without Changing: Obama’s Gate-keeper in Defence
    William Thomas

    11 December 2008

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    President-elect Barack Obama’s decision to keep Robert Gates as the United States Secretary of Defence sends the right message to America’s partners and will benefit its military. Secretary Gates’ leadership and vision will facilitate a smooth presidential transition and should allow the new president to more easily set in motion some important long-range plans.

    MUCH OF Barack Obama’s presidential campaign was spent convincing voters he had the ability to serve as commander-in-chief. This is an important consideration given that the United States is involved in two major wars and plenty of smaller operations. By the end of the campaign, however, the public’s attention had shifted to the economy. Now the time has come to refocus his attention on national security affairs.

    The recent announcement of Robert Gates’ agreement to continue as Secretary of Defence is a major step in addressing immediate concerns while setting the stage for dealing with long-range issues. In his two years as Secretary of Defence under President Bush, Dr. Gates has brought fresh ideas and a firm but fair leadership style to the Department of Defence while also providing insightful military advice to the president. Now that he is staying on, the Obama administration will be the better for it.

    Leadership

    We should remember that Cabinet members are also responsible for the day-to-day leadership of their departments. As director of the CIA and, later, as president of Texas A&M University, Secretary Gates exhibited the ability to lead very large, and very different, organizations. At the Department of Defence he has reopened lines of communication that had been stifled in recent years.

    He acknowledges and uses the expertise of experienced military and civilian leaders and is willing to listen to different points of view, while never abandoning his own responsibility to make the final decision. During the last year, he has also shown the willingness to hold senior officials accountable for what he considers to be failures in leadership. As unsettling as it can be to remove senior leaders from their positions, it has earned him the respect of many military and civilian personnel who prefer to see those leaders held to high standards.

    Vision

    Secretary Gates has a sense of what is necessary for the future. This is not only with regard to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but also for the US’ role in the world and the long-term effects of the current conflicts on the health and strength of the military. In the face of strong institutional resistance he continues to push the military services to address the needs of the current, and likely future, conflicts rather than feeding their sense of “last war-itis”. He has called for inter-agency partnerships to meet the demands of modern conflicts and has openly advocated increased funding for the State Department, an uncommon position for a Secretary of Defence.

    He has acknowledged the strains on the military resulting from operations overseas and has identified immediate fixes, such as shortened combat tours, as well as measures addressing long-term reconstitution of military capabilities. He worked with senior military leaders to build a better counterinsurgency plan for Iraq and is refocusing US efforts on Afghanistan. For two years he has been a voice of reason in unreasonable situations, and is well-positioned to put plans in motion before finally departing once again from government service.

    International Relations

    As the Obama administration seeks to repair relations with other countries, it will help to have senior members of its foreign policy team who have good reputations abroad. While President-elect Obama may still have to prove himself internationally, Secretary Gates does not. This will give the new administration a headstart on strengthening American friendships abroad. At this year’s Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, for example, he strongly reaffirmed America’s identity as “a Pacific nation with an enduring role in Asia”.

    In that same speech he discussed the evolving interaction between the US and Asia and explained how he expected it would continue under a new presidential administration — a prediction he is now in a position to help carry out. He has been well received by allies and partners who see an open-minded and pragmatic official leading the Department of Defence. International leaders may not always agree with him but they do hear him out and consider his views. A new, untested Secretary of Defence would have to earn the trust and respect that Secretary Gates already has.

    Change

    Following some of his earlier Cabinet nominations, President-elect Obama was criticized (mostly, it should be noted, by Republicans) for bringing “Washington insiders” back to town — a potential contradiction of the “Change” message he championed during his campaign. Certainly, keeping a senior leader like Secretary Gates in position seems to reinforce that perception. But a change in the direction of the government does not always require a change in current personnel. During the last two years, Secretary Gates has already shown a desire for a different direction from the first six years of the Bush administration.

    While trying new approaches in Iraq and Afghanistan, he has also worked closer with America’s NATO allies and has increased the US’ security cooperation with Southeast Asian countries. It would make no sense to replace someone who is already looking in the same direction as the new president. The fact that Secretary Gates is a Republican also suggests Mr. Obama’s desire to reach across party lines is genuine. Bringing someone from the other party into such an important position in the Cabinet is something we have not seen since President Bill Clinton appointed William Cohen as his Secretary of Defence.

    Neither President-elect Obama nor Secretary Gates will say how long they expect him to remain in this position; Dr. Gates has reportedly said only that it will be “under four years”. What is important is having him in the administration at the beginning, not only to facilitate the first wartime presidential transition in 40 years, but also to start some important processes for the new administration.

    Once those processes have begun, perhaps Dr. Gates will return to the academic world, or maybe even to a well-deserved retirement. The important thing for Asia is that he will be here for now.

    As Secretary of Defence, Gates has ensured the US military does not get so distracted by events in Iraq and Afghanistan that it neglects its relationships throughout the Asia-Pacific region. He has worked to enhance American cooperation with Asian nations in such missions as counterterrorism, maritime security, disaster response, and counter-proliferation. He has also reinvigorated bilateral ties and enhanced multilateral relationships in the face of evolving political situations and emerging security threats.

    Political and military leaders throughout Asia have learned that Secretary Gates is a man with whom they can easily work. His continued presence in Washington may allow those leaders to feel that, when change comes, the changes in US-Asia relationships are more likely to be positive than negative.

    About the Author

    William Thomas is a Visiting Senior Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, where he teaches American national security policy. He previously taught political science and strategic studies at the United States Air Force Academy, and was Deputy Director of the Air Force Institute for National Security Studies. 

    Categories: Commentaries / / Americas

    Last updated on 08/10/2014

    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    President-elect Barack Obama’s decision to keep Robert Gates as the United States Secretary of Defence sends the right message to America’s partners and will benefit its military. Secretary Gates’ leadership and vision will facilitate a smooth presidential transition and should allow the new president to more easily set in motion some important long-range plans.

    MUCH OF Barack Obama’s presidential campaign was spent convincing voters he had the ability to serve as commander-in-chief. This is an important consideration given that the United States is involved in two major wars and plenty of smaller operations. By the end of the campaign, however, the public’s attention had shifted to the economy. Now the time has come to refocus his attention on national security affairs.

    The recent announcement of Robert Gates’ agreement to continue as Secretary of Defence is a major step in addressing immediate concerns while setting the stage for dealing with long-range issues. In his two years as Secretary of Defence under President Bush, Dr. Gates has brought fresh ideas and a firm but fair leadership style to the Department of Defence while also providing insightful military advice to the president. Now that he is staying on, the Obama administration will be the better for it.

    Leadership

    We should remember that Cabinet members are also responsible for the day-to-day leadership of their departments. As director of the CIA and, later, as president of Texas A&M University, Secretary Gates exhibited the ability to lead very large, and very different, organizations. At the Department of Defence he has reopened lines of communication that had been stifled in recent years.

    He acknowledges and uses the expertise of experienced military and civilian leaders and is willing to listen to different points of view, while never abandoning his own responsibility to make the final decision. During the last year, he has also shown the willingness to hold senior officials accountable for what he considers to be failures in leadership. As unsettling as it can be to remove senior leaders from their positions, it has earned him the respect of many military and civilian personnel who prefer to see those leaders held to high standards.

    Vision

    Secretary Gates has a sense of what is necessary for the future. This is not only with regard to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but also for the US’ role in the world and the long-term effects of the current conflicts on the health and strength of the military. In the face of strong institutional resistance he continues to push the military services to address the needs of the current, and likely future, conflicts rather than feeding their sense of “last war-itis”. He has called for inter-agency partnerships to meet the demands of modern conflicts and has openly advocated increased funding for the State Department, an uncommon position for a Secretary of Defence.

    He has acknowledged the strains on the military resulting from operations overseas and has identified immediate fixes, such as shortened combat tours, as well as measures addressing long-term reconstitution of military capabilities. He worked with senior military leaders to build a better counterinsurgency plan for Iraq and is refocusing US efforts on Afghanistan. For two years he has been a voice of reason in unreasonable situations, and is well-positioned to put plans in motion before finally departing once again from government service.

    International Relations

    As the Obama administration seeks to repair relations with other countries, it will help to have senior members of its foreign policy team who have good reputations abroad. While President-elect Obama may still have to prove himself internationally, Secretary Gates does not. This will give the new administration a headstart on strengthening American friendships abroad. At this year’s Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, for example, he strongly reaffirmed America’s identity as “a Pacific nation with an enduring role in Asia”.

    In that same speech he discussed the evolving interaction between the US and Asia and explained how he expected it would continue under a new presidential administration — a prediction he is now in a position to help carry out. He has been well received by allies and partners who see an open-minded and pragmatic official leading the Department of Defence. International leaders may not always agree with him but they do hear him out and consider his views. A new, untested Secretary of Defence would have to earn the trust and respect that Secretary Gates already has.

    Change

    Following some of his earlier Cabinet nominations, President-elect Obama was criticized (mostly, it should be noted, by Republicans) for bringing “Washington insiders” back to town — a potential contradiction of the “Change” message he championed during his campaign. Certainly, keeping a senior leader like Secretary Gates in position seems to reinforce that perception. But a change in the direction of the government does not always require a change in current personnel. During the last two years, Secretary Gates has already shown a desire for a different direction from the first six years of the Bush administration.

    While trying new approaches in Iraq and Afghanistan, he has also worked closer with America’s NATO allies and has increased the US’ security cooperation with Southeast Asian countries. It would make no sense to replace someone who is already looking in the same direction as the new president. The fact that Secretary Gates is a Republican also suggests Mr. Obama’s desire to reach across party lines is genuine. Bringing someone from the other party into such an important position in the Cabinet is something we have not seen since President Bill Clinton appointed William Cohen as his Secretary of Defence.

    Neither President-elect Obama nor Secretary Gates will say how long they expect him to remain in this position; Dr. Gates has reportedly said only that it will be “under four years”. What is important is having him in the administration at the beginning, not only to facilitate the first wartime presidential transition in 40 years, but also to start some important processes for the new administration.

    Once those processes have begun, perhaps Dr. Gates will return to the academic world, or maybe even to a well-deserved retirement. The important thing for Asia is that he will be here for now.

    As Secretary of Defence, Gates has ensured the US military does not get so distracted by events in Iraq and Afghanistan that it neglects its relationships throughout the Asia-Pacific region. He has worked to enhance American cooperation with Asian nations in such missions as counterterrorism, maritime security, disaster response, and counter-proliferation. He has also reinvigorated bilateral ties and enhanced multilateral relationships in the face of evolving political situations and emerging security threats.

    Political and military leaders throughout Asia have learned that Secretary Gates is a man with whom they can easily work. His continued presence in Washington may allow those leaders to feel that, when change comes, the changes in US-Asia relationships are more likely to be positive than negative.

    About the Author

    William Thomas is a Visiting Senior Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, where he teaches American national security policy. He previously taught political science and strategic studies at the United States Air Force Academy, and was Deputy Director of the Air Force Institute for National Security Studies. 

    Categories: Commentaries

    Last updated on 08/10/2014

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    CO08132 | Change Without Changing: Obama’s Gate-keeper in Defence

    Commentary

    President-elect Bar ...
    more info