Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS Newsletter
Other Research
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Alumni & Networks
Alumni
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
Commentaries
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
IDSS Paper
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
RSIS Publications for the Year
Glossary of Abbreviations
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
External Publications for the Year
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
Media
2024 Indonesia Elections
Great Powers
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
Media Mentions
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Future Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSIS Newsletter
      Other ResearchScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to Apply
      Financial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      AlumniAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)SRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersCommentariesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsIDSS PaperInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking PapersRSIS Publications for the Year
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-EdsExternal Publications for the Year
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      2024 Indonesia ElectionsGreat PowersSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesMedia Mentions
      News ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • NTS Bulletin April 2016
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    NTS Bulletin April 2016

    14 April 2016

    download pdf

    On February 1st 2016, World Health Organization Director General, Dr. Margaret Chan declared an international public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) on the Zika virus. She called Zika an “extraordinary event” that warranted coordinated international response to minimize the threat in affected countries and reduce the risk of international spread. To date, Zika has been documented in over 59 countries, and most recently in Vietnam, posing an imminent public health threat to Southeast Asia.

    Zika, so what?

    Zika can be sexually transmitted but it is primarily spread through the Aeges aegypti mosquito – the same mosquito carrying dengue, yellow fever, and chikungunya. However, other types of mosquitoes like the Aedes albopictus are believed to be contributing to the spread as well. Only a certain percentage of Zika-affected patients exhibit symptoms. Thus, it is a barely visible virus that is harmless to some but detrimental to others. Though not yet scientifically proven, doctors have asserted strong links between Zika, Guillan-Barre Syndrome, and microcephaly. This elusive virus will arguably have consequential risks to affected countries and the international community.

    Political risk

    At global level, Dr. Chan’s swift declaration of Zika as a PHEIC, framed the virus as a security risk that carries implications for public health beyond the affected State’s borders. Moreover, declaring a PHEIC denotes a requirement for international action, encouraging states to work together to limit spread. The task at hand remains for international collaboration to not only contain the virus but to also develop a vaccine. Immediate action now, could counter the expected spread this El Niño year, as changes in climate will alter behaviors and lifespans of affected mosquitoes. Consequently, leaving humans more exposed to them.
    At transnational level, not being able to address Zika may incur the political risk of hindered relations amongst neighboring states. Lack of coordination amongst porous landlocked nations may result in increased spread. Monitoring of borders and health checks at airports are merely two ways of tracking Zika.

    Social risk

    The biggest social risk brought on by Zika is to affected communities themselves. The outbreaks stemming from highly urbanized cities in Brazil started in marginalized communities or in the favelas jam-packed between the urban sprawl. In such areas, underprivileged populations have little education on disease, poor sanitation standards, and limited, if any access to contraception. Thus making such areas the perfect breeding grounds. Given this, already marginalized communities further risk disruption to their social landscape as Zika could virtually cripple the productivity of families. There is arguably a dire need for local and community-based organizations to tap in to such communities. A simple change in behavioral patterns such as wearing insect repellant and sleeping under mosquito nets could save lives.

    Economic risk

    Zika poses significant economic risks to the affected and their families. Raising children with microcephaly have escalating economic costs depending on the degree of severity of the disease. This is significant for poorer families who may find these costs impossible to bear. Moreover, studies show that caring for children with disabilities have made middle-income families significantly poorer. That said, caring for children with microcephaly would lead to substantial pressure on national healthcare systems that are already grappling with financial cutbacks. In estimating how much Zika will cost the international community, it is simply imperative to recall the words of Dr Chan: “The more we know, the worse things look”, and the worse things look, economic costs are likely to skyrocket.

    Is Southeast Asia ready for Zika?

    Since 2010, several cases of Zika have been recorded within ASEAN. However, with the first case in Vietnam this week, ASEAN nations need to be on high alert. The subtropical nature of ASEAN countries and its densely packed mega-cities make it an ideal area for Zika mosquitoes to thrive. Moreover, easy mobility and low travel restrictions within the region further promulgate the threat of spread of Zika.
    ASEAN member states need to begin collaboration on Zika before an outbreak strikes. A statement from the Secretary-General framing the security threat of Zika to the region would kick start the collaborative effort and thereby mobilize the representatives in the ASEAN Working Group on Pandemic Preparedness and Response (APWGPPR).

    Categories: Bulletins and Newsletters / Non-Traditional Security / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 14/04/2016

    On February 1st 2016, World Health Organization Director General, Dr. Margaret Chan declared an international public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) on the Zika virus. She called Zika an “extraordinary event” that warranted coordinated international response to minimize the threat in affected countries and reduce the risk of international spread. To date, Zika has been documented in over 59 countries, and most recently in Vietnam, posing an imminent public health threat to Southeast Asia.

    Zika, so what?

    Zika can be sexually transmitted but it is primarily spread through the Aeges aegypti mosquito – the same mosquito carrying dengue, yellow fever, and chikungunya. However, other types of mosquitoes like the Aedes albopictus are believed to be contributing to the spread as well. Only a certain percentage of Zika-affected patients exhibit symptoms. Thus, it is a barely visible virus that is harmless to some but detrimental to others. Though not yet scientifically proven, doctors have asserted strong links between Zika, Guillan-Barre Syndrome, and microcephaly. This elusive virus will arguably have consequential risks to affected countries and the international community.

    Political risk

    At global level, Dr. Chan’s swift declaration of Zika as a PHEIC, framed the virus as a security risk that carries implications for public health beyond the affected State’s borders. Moreover, declaring a PHEIC denotes a requirement for international action, encouraging states to work together to limit spread. The task at hand remains for international collaboration to not only contain the virus but to also develop a vaccine. Immediate action now, could counter the expected spread this El Niño year, as changes in climate will alter behaviors and lifespans of affected mosquitoes. Consequently, leaving humans more exposed to them.
    At transnational level, not being able to address Zika may incur the political risk of hindered relations amongst neighboring states. Lack of coordination amongst porous landlocked nations may result in increased spread. Monitoring of borders and health checks at airports are merely two ways of tracking Zika.

    Social risk

    The biggest social risk brought on by Zika is to affected communities themselves. The outbreaks stemming from highly urbanized cities in Brazil started in marginalized communities or in the favelas jam-packed between the urban sprawl. In such areas, underprivileged populations have little education on disease, poor sanitation standards, and limited, if any access to contraception. Thus making such areas the perfect breeding grounds. Given this, already marginalized communities further risk disruption to their social landscape as Zika could virtually cripple the productivity of families. There is arguably a dire need for local and community-based organizations to tap in to such communities. A simple change in behavioral patterns such as wearing insect repellant and sleeping under mosquito nets could save lives.

    Economic risk

    Zika poses significant economic risks to the affected and their families. Raising children with microcephaly have escalating economic costs depending on the degree of severity of the disease. This is significant for poorer families who may find these costs impossible to bear. Moreover, studies show that caring for children with disabilities have made middle-income families significantly poorer. That said, caring for children with microcephaly would lead to substantial pressure on national healthcare systems that are already grappling with financial cutbacks. In estimating how much Zika will cost the international community, it is simply imperative to recall the words of Dr Chan: “The more we know, the worse things look”, and the worse things look, economic costs are likely to skyrocket.

    Is Southeast Asia ready for Zika?

    Since 2010, several cases of Zika have been recorded within ASEAN. However, with the first case in Vietnam this week, ASEAN nations need to be on high alert. The subtropical nature of ASEAN countries and its densely packed mega-cities make it an ideal area for Zika mosquitoes to thrive. Moreover, easy mobility and low travel restrictions within the region further promulgate the threat of spread of Zika.
    ASEAN member states need to begin collaboration on Zika before an outbreak strikes. A statement from the Secretary-General framing the security threat of Zika to the region would kick start the collaborative effort and thereby mobilize the representatives in the ASEAN Working Group on Pandemic Preparedness and Response (APWGPPR).

    Categories: Bulletins and Newsletters / Non-Traditional Security

    Last updated on 14/04/2016

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info