• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • COP26’s Dilemma: Sustainability vs Food Security?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO22029 | COP26’s Dilemma: Sustainability vs Food Security?
    Jose Ma. Luis P. Montesclaros

    23 March 2022

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    Ironically, amidst the push to “phase down” coal reliance, the world is seeing a “coal crunch” of rising coal/energy prices, with serious implications on fertilisers and food. Countries pursuing sustainability initiatives ignore these trade-offs at their own peril.

    farmer
    Source: Herbicide Farmer in Rice Field, Wuzefe, Pixabay

    COMMENTARY

    IN SEPTEMBER 2021, China’s National Development and Reform Commission issued a WeChat statement, encouraging “all localities… in ensuring the supply and price stability of domestic fertilisers in the coming period”. This came amidst China’s “coal crunch” of rising coal prices, which started to affect fertiliser supplies. The “crunch” has since spread to other countries within the region, including India and Indonesia. On 16March 2022, for instance, the Philippines’ Energy Secretary, warned consumers to brace for higher electricity prices.

    This increase in coal prices, which represents growing demand for coal relative to supplies, comes as ironical in light of the recent 26th UN Conference of Parties (COP26) in November 2021 which envisioned a “phasing down” of coal reliance. Data from the International Energy Agency shows that the utilisation of coal for electricity purposes increased by 9% in 2021, outpacing demand for low-carbon sources. As countries pursue sustainable objectives to mitigate the “crunch’s” impacts, there are perils of hastily pursuing green transitions, with a focus on food security implications.

    Sri Lanka’s “False Start” in Going Green

    Sri Lanka presents a cautionary tale in hastily sprinting towards sustainability objectives. Rather than focusing on increasing use of renewable energy sources, the country sought to reduce its reliance on chemical fertilisers, and become the world’s first completely organic farming nation in 2019. Towards this end, it banned the import of chemical fertilisers, pesticides and herbicides in April 2021.

    In theory, such an approach would alleviate demand for chemical fertilisers which are linked to coal, and also align with the ideals of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change of alleviating “nitrogen pollution” from the overuse of chemical fertilisers. In contrast, Sri Lanka faced a “food emergency” from failed crops and higher food prices, and ultimately, abandoned its policy in November 2021, after just seven months.

    The problem lay in the process of transition towards purely organic farming. A survey by Sri Lanka-based think-tank, Veritate Research, showed that 91% of farmers relied on chemical fertilisers for crop like rice, rubber/tea, other cereals, fruits and coconuts. By mid-2021, 44% of farmers experienced declines in harvests, and 85% expected reductions in future harvests. This came as a result of insufficient knowledge of correct methods of using alternatives to chemical fertilisers, which only 20% of farmers surveyed declaring having.

    To make matters worse, these outcomes coincided with the economic fallout from COVID-19. The country was facing a foreign exchange crisis, and fears of having insufficient currency reserves to import basic goods like food and medicine, causing further food price inflation. These were conditions surrounding Sri Lanka’s “false start” in its sprint towards organic agriculture. In fact, in January 2022, it agreed to pay over US$200 million in compensation to farmers whose crops failed.

    India: Food Trade-Offs to Clean Energy Pursuit

    Sri Lanka’s tale can serve as a warning to other countries, to “look first before jumping” into the sustainability bandwagon, since there are inherent trade-offs which need to be addressed through careful planning.

    This is relevant to India, which has aimed to be a net-zero country in carbon emissions by 2070. During a post-budget webinar, Prime Minister Modi shared that shifting towards renewable energy sources was indispensable to sustainable growth. Towards this end, India plans to double its production capacity for ethanol by 2025, as a renewable energy source that takes the place of coal.

    Again, in theory, this initiative aligns with the COP26 push towards renewable energy sources, while also helping the country to save on crude, and boosting farmers’ incomes from ethanol-related cash crops. India should tread carefully, however, since ethanol production utilises grains like rice and corn for raw materials.

    Given that cropland, water, and crop supplies are limited, the ethanol push comes with potential food security trade-offs, as it could divert away from food consumption.

    Additionally, the government plans on providing financial incentives to food producers who seek to make this transition. Some argue that such resources are better leveraged to increase food subsidies to make food affordable, in a country which is still struggling to lift a fairly large share of its population – about 15% – from undernourishment.

    Balancing Food Security and Sustainability Objectives

    The pursuit of sustainability objectives, of reducing carbon emissions and chemical fertiliser overuse, is in itself not a bad thing. In fact, a quick transition away from oil may be even more needed in the coming months, as the world may see an even tighter “crunch” in international markets owing to the invasion of Ukraine in late-February 2022.

    Yet, the road towards sustainability needs to be tread carefully, as shown by Sri Lanka’s failure and policy-reversal in becoming a purely organic farming country, and India’s much-debated push for increasing ethanol production. It is thus important for countries today to better understand the complexities surrounding such initiatives, before rushing towards them with big, public, policy statements.

    Sustainability objectives do not exist in a vacuum, but rather, within social and economic realities where there are trade-offs to their pursuit.

    About the Author

    Jose M.L. Montesclaros is a Research Fellow with the Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre), S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / Non-Traditional Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Global / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 23/03/2022

    comments powered by Disqus
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    Ironically, amidst the push to “phase down” coal reliance, the world is seeing a “coal crunch” of rising coal/energy prices, with serious implications on fertilisers and food. Countries pursuing sustainability initiatives ignore these trade-offs at their own peril.

    farmer
    Source: Herbicide Farmer in Rice Field, Wuzefe, Pixabay

    COMMENTARY

    IN SEPTEMBER 2021, China’s National Development and Reform Commission issued a WeChat statement, encouraging “all localities… in ensuring the supply and price stability of domestic fertilisers in the coming period”. This came amidst China’s “coal crunch” of rising coal prices, which started to affect fertiliser supplies. The “crunch” has since spread to other countries within the region, including India and Indonesia. On 16March 2022, for instance, the Philippines’ Energy Secretary, warned consumers to brace for higher electricity prices.

    This increase in coal prices, which represents growing demand for coal relative to supplies, comes as ironical in light of the recent 26th UN Conference of Parties (COP26) in November 2021 which envisioned a “phasing down” of coal reliance. Data from the International Energy Agency shows that the utilisation of coal for electricity purposes increased by 9% in 2021, outpacing demand for low-carbon sources. As countries pursue sustainable objectives to mitigate the “crunch’s” impacts, there are perils of hastily pursuing green transitions, with a focus on food security implications.

    Sri Lanka’s “False Start” in Going Green

    Sri Lanka presents a cautionary tale in hastily sprinting towards sustainability objectives. Rather than focusing on increasing use of renewable energy sources, the country sought to reduce its reliance on chemical fertilisers, and become the world’s first completely organic farming nation in 2019. Towards this end, it banned the import of chemical fertilisers, pesticides and herbicides in April 2021.

    In theory, such an approach would alleviate demand for chemical fertilisers which are linked to coal, and also align with the ideals of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change of alleviating “nitrogen pollution” from the overuse of chemical fertilisers. In contrast, Sri Lanka faced a “food emergency” from failed crops and higher food prices, and ultimately, abandoned its policy in November 2021, after just seven months.

    The problem lay in the process of transition towards purely organic farming. A survey by Sri Lanka-based think-tank, Veritate Research, showed that 91% of farmers relied on chemical fertilisers for crop like rice, rubber/tea, other cereals, fruits and coconuts. By mid-2021, 44% of farmers experienced declines in harvests, and 85% expected reductions in future harvests. This came as a result of insufficient knowledge of correct methods of using alternatives to chemical fertilisers, which only 20% of farmers surveyed declaring having.

    To make matters worse, these outcomes coincided with the economic fallout from COVID-19. The country was facing a foreign exchange crisis, and fears of having insufficient currency reserves to import basic goods like food and medicine, causing further food price inflation. These were conditions surrounding Sri Lanka’s “false start” in its sprint towards organic agriculture. In fact, in January 2022, it agreed to pay over US$200 million in compensation to farmers whose crops failed.

    India: Food Trade-Offs to Clean Energy Pursuit

    Sri Lanka’s tale can serve as a warning to other countries, to “look first before jumping” into the sustainability bandwagon, since there are inherent trade-offs which need to be addressed through careful planning.

    This is relevant to India, which has aimed to be a net-zero country in carbon emissions by 2070. During a post-budget webinar, Prime Minister Modi shared that shifting towards renewable energy sources was indispensable to sustainable growth. Towards this end, India plans to double its production capacity for ethanol by 2025, as a renewable energy source that takes the place of coal.

    Again, in theory, this initiative aligns with the COP26 push towards renewable energy sources, while also helping the country to save on crude, and boosting farmers’ incomes from ethanol-related cash crops. India should tread carefully, however, since ethanol production utilises grains like rice and corn for raw materials.

    Given that cropland, water, and crop supplies are limited, the ethanol push comes with potential food security trade-offs, as it could divert away from food consumption.

    Additionally, the government plans on providing financial incentives to food producers who seek to make this transition. Some argue that such resources are better leveraged to increase food subsidies to make food affordable, in a country which is still struggling to lift a fairly large share of its population – about 15% – from undernourishment.

    Balancing Food Security and Sustainability Objectives

    The pursuit of sustainability objectives, of reducing carbon emissions and chemical fertiliser overuse, is in itself not a bad thing. In fact, a quick transition away from oil may be even more needed in the coming months, as the world may see an even tighter “crunch” in international markets owing to the invasion of Ukraine in late-February 2022.

    Yet, the road towards sustainability needs to be tread carefully, as shown by Sri Lanka’s failure and policy-reversal in becoming a purely organic farming country, and India’s much-debated push for increasing ethanol production. It is thus important for countries today to better understand the complexities surrounding such initiatives, before rushing towards them with big, public, policy statements.

    Sustainability objectives do not exist in a vacuum, but rather, within social and economic realities where there are trade-offs to their pursuit.

    About the Author

    Jose M.L. Montesclaros is a Research Fellow with the Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre), S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / Non-Traditional Security

    Last updated on 23/03/2022

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    COP26’s Dilemma: Sustainability vs Food Security?

    SYNOPSIS

    Ironically, amidst the push to “phase down” coal reliance, the world is seeing a “coal crunch” of rising coal/energy prices, with serious implicati ...
    more info