• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Total Defence in Action – Singapore’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO23022 | Total Defence in Action – Singapore’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Sarah Soh

    10 February 2023

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    Singapore’s Total Defence framework has helped to rally the country and facilitated a whole-of-country response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The wide-ranging and multi-sectoral effects brought about by the pandemic underscores Singapore’s need for a coordinated, cross-domain response to national security threats. Total Defence remains salient and critical to Singapore’s national defence posture.

    230210 CO23022 Total Defence in Action Singapores Response to the COVID19 Pandemic
    Source: Wikimedia

    COMMENTARY

    Singapore adopted Total Defence as its whole-of-country defence framework in 1984. Adapted from the comprehensive defence strategies of countries like Switzerland and Sweden, Singapore’s Total Defence comprised five distinct but interrelated pillars – Military Defence, Civil Defence, Economic Defence, Social Defence, and Psychological Defence. Digital Defence was added in 2019 to reflect the expansion of Singapore’s national security domains to include cyberspace.

    Whilst the international and domestic threat environments have undergone tremendous changes since its inception, Total Defence has remained a viable national defence doctrine. The application of Total Defence has enabled Singapore to coordinate an effective whole-of-country response to the most recent non-conventional security threat to have confronted the nation, the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Military Defence

    The Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) defended the nation against an “invisible enemy” by providing critical support to various agencies tasked with managing pandemic-related exigencies. SAF personnel assisted the Ministry of Health with call centre operations and contact tracing, and the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) with Stay-Home Notice (SHN) enforcement efforts. SAF officers also led some of the inter-agency support teams deployed to migrant worker dormitories as part of the Ministry of Manpower’s containment measures. Additionally, six SAF camps were repurposed into temporary community recovery facilities for migrant workers as part of a broader strategy to augment healthcare capacity, marking the first time that SAF infrastructures were utilised as part of Singapore’s national contingency response.

    Civil Defence

    Alongside medical and healthcare workers, Singapore’s Home Team assumed frontline duties in Singapore’s COVID-19 pandemic response. Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) personnel assisted ICA colleagues with temperature screening at border checkpoints and carried out swab tests at Government Quarantine Facilities. SCDF first responders attended to the rise in demand for COVID-19 related emergency medical services, working continually to convey patients to hospitals whilst still attending to day-to-day medical emergencies. Officers from the ICA, Singapore Prison Service, Central Narcotics Bureau, and the Singapore Police Force joined the inter-agency support teams deployed to migrant worker dormitories to oversee the daily needs of workers.

    Economic Defence

    The government and various public agencies undertook measures to promote economic resilience during the pandemic. As the pandemic upended global supply chains and disrupted the supply of food and necessities, the Food Emergency Authority collaborated with the Singapore Food Agency and industry partners to find ways to diversify Singapore’s food sources. To ensure that businesses remained resilient and adaptive to changes brought about by the pandemic, several initiatives such as the Productivity Solutions Grant and the Singapore E-Commerce Programme were implemented to help companies (particularly SMEs) make the transition to digitalisation. Despite the gloomy economic outlook, the COVID-19 pandemic brought out the best in some corporate entities. Some companies stayed resilient by pivoting to new ventures. Other companies demonstrated support for others by opting to either return or donate their Jobs Support Scheme (JSS) government payouts, with some even pledging to decline future JSS payments.

    Social Defence

    Singaporeans demonstrated solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic by complying with government regulations and banding together to extend help to those in need. In adhering to mask-wearing and safe-distancing guidelines, Singaporeans undertook socially responsible actions to help limit the spread of COVID-19. There were also numerous examples of ground-up initiatives organised by individuals and social groups to help different segments of the population cope with the pandemic’s adverse effects. Such spontaneous acts of support addressed some of the gaps in care for communities in need. More importantly, they helped strengthen social cohesion and resilience during a time of crisis.

    Psychological Defence

    Singapore’s psychological defence was demonstrated on three levels. First, at the political leadership level, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s addresses to the nation and regular press conferences held by the Multi-Ministry Task Force, particularly during the initial phase of the pandemic, provided assurance and direction for the public at a time when fears and uncertainties were compounded by competing media discourses. Second, at the whole-of-government level, ministries and public agencies worked collaboratively to tackle issues brought about by the pandemic, fostering a sense of collective unity. Third, collective unity was further reinforced at the societal level as Singaporeans came together to offer care and assistance to vulnerable communities through various grassroots initiatives.

    Digital Defence

    Singapore adopted a two-pronged approach to curb the spread of falsehoods and misinformation during the pandemic. Under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA), correction orders were issued to individuals and websites who had propagated erroneous information online. At the same time, efforts were made to ensure that information pertaining to the pandemic and vaccines were communicated to the public in an efficient and timely manner. The government regularly published articles, resources, and policy updates on its Gov.sg website. Official accounts were set up on social media platforms such as Telegram, Twitter, and WhatsApp so that subscribers could easily access information on-the-go. Public-private collaboration could also be observed as the government enlisted the help of internet service providers like Singtel and Starhub to disseminate and reinforce critical COVID-19 messages to the public.

    Policy Implications

    First, Total Defence retains salience in Singapore’s contemporary security context and is vital to its national defence. Singapore’s COVID-19 pandemic experience has shown that Total Defence is a viable framework for facilitating a coordinated, multi-domain response to a non-conventional security threat. In fact, the persistence of non-conventional security threats (in the form of pandemics, amongst others) and the advent of hybrid wars mean that Singapore must continue to adopt a comprehensive and multi-dimensional approach to defence and national security, which is encapsulated by Total Defence.

    Second, coordination and collaboration are key to the effective application of Total Defence. The forging and strengthening of collaborative partnerships (i.e., government-to-government, public-to-private, private-to-private) for crisis management are integral to Total Defence capacity-building and should be developed in times of normalcy. This will help bolster Singapore’s national preparedness and responsiveness to future crises.

    Third, the application of Total Defence to a current national crisis provides an avenue for the Total Defence narrative to be recontextualised for young Singaporeans. The challenge of maintaining Total Defence’s relevance for a younger generation is a perennial one. The immediacy of the on-going COVID-19 pandemic presents an opportunity for young Singaporeans to understand Total Defence as “lived” experience rather than a set of ideals or principles imposed from top-down. Amplifying the role of Total Defence in Singapore’s fight against COVID-19 and incorporating it into the larger Total Defence narrative will help to generate greater mindshare and heartshare for the concept among young Singaporeans.

    About the Author

    Sarah Soh is Associate Research Fellow with the National Security Studies Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / Non-Traditional Security / Singapore and Homeland Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Global / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 10/02/2023

    comments powered by Disqus
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    Singapore’s Total Defence framework has helped to rally the country and facilitated a whole-of-country response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The wide-ranging and multi-sectoral effects brought about by the pandemic underscores Singapore’s need for a coordinated, cross-domain response to national security threats. Total Defence remains salient and critical to Singapore’s national defence posture.

    230210 CO23022 Total Defence in Action Singapores Response to the COVID19 Pandemic
    Source: Wikimedia

    COMMENTARY

    Singapore adopted Total Defence as its whole-of-country defence framework in 1984. Adapted from the comprehensive defence strategies of countries like Switzerland and Sweden, Singapore’s Total Defence comprised five distinct but interrelated pillars – Military Defence, Civil Defence, Economic Defence, Social Defence, and Psychological Defence. Digital Defence was added in 2019 to reflect the expansion of Singapore’s national security domains to include cyberspace.

    Whilst the international and domestic threat environments have undergone tremendous changes since its inception, Total Defence has remained a viable national defence doctrine. The application of Total Defence has enabled Singapore to coordinate an effective whole-of-country response to the most recent non-conventional security threat to have confronted the nation, the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Military Defence

    The Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) defended the nation against an “invisible enemy” by providing critical support to various agencies tasked with managing pandemic-related exigencies. SAF personnel assisted the Ministry of Health with call centre operations and contact tracing, and the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) with Stay-Home Notice (SHN) enforcement efforts. SAF officers also led some of the inter-agency support teams deployed to migrant worker dormitories as part of the Ministry of Manpower’s containment measures. Additionally, six SAF camps were repurposed into temporary community recovery facilities for migrant workers as part of a broader strategy to augment healthcare capacity, marking the first time that SAF infrastructures were utilised as part of Singapore’s national contingency response.

    Civil Defence

    Alongside medical and healthcare workers, Singapore’s Home Team assumed frontline duties in Singapore’s COVID-19 pandemic response. Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) personnel assisted ICA colleagues with temperature screening at border checkpoints and carried out swab tests at Government Quarantine Facilities. SCDF first responders attended to the rise in demand for COVID-19 related emergency medical services, working continually to convey patients to hospitals whilst still attending to day-to-day medical emergencies. Officers from the ICA, Singapore Prison Service, Central Narcotics Bureau, and the Singapore Police Force joined the inter-agency support teams deployed to migrant worker dormitories to oversee the daily needs of workers.

    Economic Defence

    The government and various public agencies undertook measures to promote economic resilience during the pandemic. As the pandemic upended global supply chains and disrupted the supply of food and necessities, the Food Emergency Authority collaborated with the Singapore Food Agency and industry partners to find ways to diversify Singapore’s food sources. To ensure that businesses remained resilient and adaptive to changes brought about by the pandemic, several initiatives such as the Productivity Solutions Grant and the Singapore E-Commerce Programme were implemented to help companies (particularly SMEs) make the transition to digitalisation. Despite the gloomy economic outlook, the COVID-19 pandemic brought out the best in some corporate entities. Some companies stayed resilient by pivoting to new ventures. Other companies demonstrated support for others by opting to either return or donate their Jobs Support Scheme (JSS) government payouts, with some even pledging to decline future JSS payments.

    Social Defence

    Singaporeans demonstrated solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic by complying with government regulations and banding together to extend help to those in need. In adhering to mask-wearing and safe-distancing guidelines, Singaporeans undertook socially responsible actions to help limit the spread of COVID-19. There were also numerous examples of ground-up initiatives organised by individuals and social groups to help different segments of the population cope with the pandemic’s adverse effects. Such spontaneous acts of support addressed some of the gaps in care for communities in need. More importantly, they helped strengthen social cohesion and resilience during a time of crisis.

    Psychological Defence

    Singapore’s psychological defence was demonstrated on three levels. First, at the political leadership level, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s addresses to the nation and regular press conferences held by the Multi-Ministry Task Force, particularly during the initial phase of the pandemic, provided assurance and direction for the public at a time when fears and uncertainties were compounded by competing media discourses. Second, at the whole-of-government level, ministries and public agencies worked collaboratively to tackle issues brought about by the pandemic, fostering a sense of collective unity. Third, collective unity was further reinforced at the societal level as Singaporeans came together to offer care and assistance to vulnerable communities through various grassroots initiatives.

    Digital Defence

    Singapore adopted a two-pronged approach to curb the spread of falsehoods and misinformation during the pandemic. Under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA), correction orders were issued to individuals and websites who had propagated erroneous information online. At the same time, efforts were made to ensure that information pertaining to the pandemic and vaccines were communicated to the public in an efficient and timely manner. The government regularly published articles, resources, and policy updates on its Gov.sg website. Official accounts were set up on social media platforms such as Telegram, Twitter, and WhatsApp so that subscribers could easily access information on-the-go. Public-private collaboration could also be observed as the government enlisted the help of internet service providers like Singtel and Starhub to disseminate and reinforce critical COVID-19 messages to the public.

    Policy Implications

    First, Total Defence retains salience in Singapore’s contemporary security context and is vital to its national defence. Singapore’s COVID-19 pandemic experience has shown that Total Defence is a viable framework for facilitating a coordinated, multi-domain response to a non-conventional security threat. In fact, the persistence of non-conventional security threats (in the form of pandemics, amongst others) and the advent of hybrid wars mean that Singapore must continue to adopt a comprehensive and multi-dimensional approach to defence and national security, which is encapsulated by Total Defence.

    Second, coordination and collaboration are key to the effective application of Total Defence. The forging and strengthening of collaborative partnerships (i.e., government-to-government, public-to-private, private-to-private) for crisis management are integral to Total Defence capacity-building and should be developed in times of normalcy. This will help bolster Singapore’s national preparedness and responsiveness to future crises.

    Third, the application of Total Defence to a current national crisis provides an avenue for the Total Defence narrative to be recontextualised for young Singaporeans. The challenge of maintaining Total Defence’s relevance for a younger generation is a perennial one. The immediacy of the on-going COVID-19 pandemic presents an opportunity for young Singaporeans to understand Total Defence as “lived” experience rather than a set of ideals or principles imposed from top-down. Amplifying the role of Total Defence in Singapore’s fight against COVID-19 and incorporating it into the larger Total Defence narrative will help to generate greater mindshare and heartshare for the concept among young Singaporeans.

    About the Author

    Sarah Soh is Associate Research Fellow with the National Security Studies Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / Non-Traditional Security / Singapore and Homeland Security

    Last updated on 10/02/2023

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    Total Defence in Action – Singapore’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

    SYNOPSIS

    Singapore’s Total Defence framework has helped to rally the country and facilitated a whole-of-country response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The wide- ...
    more info