• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • History in Digital Age: Why Military Professionals Need It
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO21085 | History in Digital Age: Why Military Professionals Need It
    Ong Wei Chong

    25 May 2021

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    History matters for the military professional. The overemphasis on pragmatism may however erode the fundamental value of inspiring the military professional as a lifelong learner.

    COMMENTARY

    IN 1961, the late Sir Michael Howard delivered a RUSI lecture on “The Use and Abuse of Military History”. The context of his lecture was important as it specifically addressed academic concerns of military history being used as a tool of ‘myth-making’.

    Like Plato, Howard believed that myths play a useful social function in preparing young soldiers for the realities of war. The creation of a romanticised image of the past in ‘myth-making’ to inspire and sustain action is not an abuse of history, but a different function from the critical examination of military history by an academic historian or strategic thinker.

    History as Stories that Connect

    In the case of Singapore, its Second World War history is perceived as a usable past that can be used to draw out stories and analogies that connect with the present. Singapore’s Second World War past, the battle and fall of Singapore to be precise, is an example where colonial war memory and remembrance co-exists alongside commemoration and nation-building lessons for an emergent nation-state.

    Central to this approach are the stories of wartime resistance and sacrifice that seek to connect the military values of Singapore’s colonial past to a present generation of military leaders that have not experienced war.

    Walking past the honour roll of SAFTI Military Institute, home of Singapore’s Officer Corps, an observer will be quick to spot a distinct difference from that of other military academies and colleges ─ an absence of names on the honour roll. The honour roll at SAFTI mirrors the Singapore Story of an ‘accidental nation’ that had to find its feet when independence was thrust on its shoulders in 1965.

    The Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) was created out of strategic necessity rather than a revolutionary warfighting past. It is perhaps understandable why Singapore’s Second World past remains a focal point for ‘war stories’ to inspire in the training of officer cadets and junior officers.

    This narrow focus that relies on stories of wartime heroism and in certain cases romanticism as inspiration however is different from using military history to develop what military historian Elliot Cohen describes as the ‘historical mind’ ─ ‘a way of thinking that uses history as a mode of inquiry and a framework for thinking about problems’. The ‘historical mind’ approach to military history is a utilitarian one that looks to the history of war and warfare as a guide to decision making.

    History Guiding Decision-making

    Rather than look to the past for myths that connect, the ‘historical mind’ is employed to educate strategic thinkers in the SAF at the mid-career level. An example is how the Malayan Campaign and the Battle of Singapore is taught at the Goh Keng Swee Command and Staff College (GKS CSC).

    Instead of learning stories of wartime heroism from Singapore’s WWII past, students of strategic studies at GKS CSC approach the usable past as an exercise in contextual decision-making that puts them in the shoes of key decision-makers who are required to examine the critical ‘what’, ‘how’ and ‘why’ questions.

    Dr Goh Keng Swee, Singapore’s first defence minister, is well remembered for his intellectual curiosity. His reading on defence matters spanned from military journals to the classics of strategy ─ Sun Tze, Clausewitz and Liddell Hart. Dr Goh would go so far as to send Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew ‘books and articles, sidelined and flagged, insisting that [the prime minister] must know enough to decide what [he] had to approve’.

    This approach lies at the heart of the Clausewitzian approach to military history. To use history as a guide to judgement. One that enables the military leader to refight campaigns and battles in all their ambiguity, contingency, danger and complexity. when students and makers of strategy look to historical examples to illuminate current predicaments, this is where the ‘historical mind’ meets the ‘strategic mind’. It offers the student strategist the prospects of ‘wisdom without tears’, insights without the costly sacrifice that a battlefield education might require.

    Looking to military history for a usable past to enhance strategic judgement is essential for the military professional. Its utility however can be limited when historical examples are misused. On the potential to use and abuse military history, Clausewitz warned:

    “Historical examples clarify everything and also provide the best kind of proof in the empirical sciences. This is particularly true of the art of war…Historical examples are, however, seldom used to such good effect…To teach the art of war entirely by historical examples…would be an achievement of the utmost value; but it would be more than the work of lifetime.”

    History in Lifelong Learning

    Before lifelong learning became a buzzword, Clausewitz was living it in the 19th Century. Just as the interpretation of Singapore’s military history is an ongoing process, it is crucial that Singapore’s military professionals embrace Clausewitz’s exhortation of lifelong learning in honing the ‘historical’ and ‘strategic mind’. It is a rigorous lifetime journey, not meant for the intellectual lazy, but the reward of clarifying the complexity of war far outweighs the effort.

    There is however one fundamental roadblock in this journey ─ career path demands and curriculum loading that reduces lifelong learning to an exhortation embraced by a selected few. This challenge is not particularly unique to Professional Military Education (PME) in Singapore.

    In the last decade, PME administrators and faculty have sought to find the right symbiotic balance between education, training, career-enhancement, curriculum load and rigour.

    The question of why history matters for the military profession stems from a central intellectual tradition of using history as a framework for problem solving and inquiry. How this common intellectual tradition manifests itself, however, is influenced and shaped by different norms and values. In the Singapore context, the Singaporean norm of pragmatism hangs heavily. That and the penchant for curriculum loading may impede the very creativity and curiosity that sustains lifelong learning.

    Singapore’s founding fathers such as Goh Keng Swee were intellectual giants and lifelong learners who were able to strike that balance between pragmatism, principles and inspiration in their decision-making.

    The overemphasis on pragmatism as a value in PME may have the detrimental effect of eroding the other fundamental value of PME ─ to inspire the military professional as a lifelong learner. Rather than look to Singapore’s colonial past, it may be more useful to rediscover examples in Singapore’s recent history of how its founding fathers created that balance between pragmatism, principles and inspiration.

    About the Author

    Ong Wei Chong is an Assistant Professor and Head of the National Security Studies Programme (NSSP) at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He has taught at the command and staff college, advanced school and officer cadet school levels at SAFTI Military Institute, Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / Singapore and Homeland Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Global / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 07/06/2021

    comments powered by Disqus
    "History in Digital Age: Why Military Professionals Need It" by Ong Wei Chong
    In this podcast, Ong Wei Chong, Assistant Professor and Head of the National Security Studies Programme (NSSP) at RSIS, shares why history matters for the military professional.
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    History matters for the military professional. The overemphasis on pragmatism may however erode the fundamental value of inspiring the military professional as a lifelong learner.

    COMMENTARY

    IN 1961, the late Sir Michael Howard delivered a RUSI lecture on “The Use and Abuse of Military History”. The context of his lecture was important as it specifically addressed academic concerns of military history being used as a tool of ‘myth-making’.

    Like Plato, Howard believed that myths play a useful social function in preparing young soldiers for the realities of war. The creation of a romanticised image of the past in ‘myth-making’ to inspire and sustain action is not an abuse of history, but a different function from the critical examination of military history by an academic historian or strategic thinker.

    History as Stories that Connect

    In the case of Singapore, its Second World War history is perceived as a usable past that can be used to draw out stories and analogies that connect with the present. Singapore’s Second World War past, the battle and fall of Singapore to be precise, is an example where colonial war memory and remembrance co-exists alongside commemoration and nation-building lessons for an emergent nation-state.

    Central to this approach are the stories of wartime resistance and sacrifice that seek to connect the military values of Singapore’s colonial past to a present generation of military leaders that have not experienced war.

    Walking past the honour roll of SAFTI Military Institute, home of Singapore’s Officer Corps, an observer will be quick to spot a distinct difference from that of other military academies and colleges ─ an absence of names on the honour roll. The honour roll at SAFTI mirrors the Singapore Story of an ‘accidental nation’ that had to find its feet when independence was thrust on its shoulders in 1965.

    The Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) was created out of strategic necessity rather than a revolutionary warfighting past. It is perhaps understandable why Singapore’s Second World past remains a focal point for ‘war stories’ to inspire in the training of officer cadets and junior officers.

    This narrow focus that relies on stories of wartime heroism and in certain cases romanticism as inspiration however is different from using military history to develop what military historian Elliot Cohen describes as the ‘historical mind’ ─ ‘a way of thinking that uses history as a mode of inquiry and a framework for thinking about problems’. The ‘historical mind’ approach to military history is a utilitarian one that looks to the history of war and warfare as a guide to decision making.

    History Guiding Decision-making

    Rather than look to the past for myths that connect, the ‘historical mind’ is employed to educate strategic thinkers in the SAF at the mid-career level. An example is how the Malayan Campaign and the Battle of Singapore is taught at the Goh Keng Swee Command and Staff College (GKS CSC).

    Instead of learning stories of wartime heroism from Singapore’s WWII past, students of strategic studies at GKS CSC approach the usable past as an exercise in contextual decision-making that puts them in the shoes of key decision-makers who are required to examine the critical ‘what’, ‘how’ and ‘why’ questions.

    Dr Goh Keng Swee, Singapore’s first defence minister, is well remembered for his intellectual curiosity. His reading on defence matters spanned from military journals to the classics of strategy ─ Sun Tze, Clausewitz and Liddell Hart. Dr Goh would go so far as to send Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew ‘books and articles, sidelined and flagged, insisting that [the prime minister] must know enough to decide what [he] had to approve’.

    This approach lies at the heart of the Clausewitzian approach to military history. To use history as a guide to judgement. One that enables the military leader to refight campaigns and battles in all their ambiguity, contingency, danger and complexity. when students and makers of strategy look to historical examples to illuminate current predicaments, this is where the ‘historical mind’ meets the ‘strategic mind’. It offers the student strategist the prospects of ‘wisdom without tears’, insights without the costly sacrifice that a battlefield education might require.

    Looking to military history for a usable past to enhance strategic judgement is essential for the military professional. Its utility however can be limited when historical examples are misused. On the potential to use and abuse military history, Clausewitz warned:

    “Historical examples clarify everything and also provide the best kind of proof in the empirical sciences. This is particularly true of the art of war…Historical examples are, however, seldom used to such good effect…To teach the art of war entirely by historical examples…would be an achievement of the utmost value; but it would be more than the work of lifetime.”

    History in Lifelong Learning

    Before lifelong learning became a buzzword, Clausewitz was living it in the 19th Century. Just as the interpretation of Singapore’s military history is an ongoing process, it is crucial that Singapore’s military professionals embrace Clausewitz’s exhortation of lifelong learning in honing the ‘historical’ and ‘strategic mind’. It is a rigorous lifetime journey, not meant for the intellectual lazy, but the reward of clarifying the complexity of war far outweighs the effort.

    There is however one fundamental roadblock in this journey ─ career path demands and curriculum loading that reduces lifelong learning to an exhortation embraced by a selected few. This challenge is not particularly unique to Professional Military Education (PME) in Singapore.

    In the last decade, PME administrators and faculty have sought to find the right symbiotic balance between education, training, career-enhancement, curriculum load and rigour.

    The question of why history matters for the military profession stems from a central intellectual tradition of using history as a framework for problem solving and inquiry. How this common intellectual tradition manifests itself, however, is influenced and shaped by different norms and values. In the Singapore context, the Singaporean norm of pragmatism hangs heavily. That and the penchant for curriculum loading may impede the very creativity and curiosity that sustains lifelong learning.

    Singapore’s founding fathers such as Goh Keng Swee were intellectual giants and lifelong learners who were able to strike that balance between pragmatism, principles and inspiration in their decision-making.

    The overemphasis on pragmatism as a value in PME may have the detrimental effect of eroding the other fundamental value of PME ─ to inspire the military professional as a lifelong learner. Rather than look to Singapore’s colonial past, it may be more useful to rediscover examples in Singapore’s recent history of how its founding fathers created that balance between pragmatism, principles and inspiration.

    About the Author

    Ong Wei Chong is an Assistant Professor and Head of the National Security Studies Programme (NSSP) at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He has taught at the command and staff college, advanced school and officer cadet school levels at SAFTI Military Institute, Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / Singapore and Homeland Security

    Last updated on 07/06/2021

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    History in Digital Age: Why Military Professionals Need It

    SYNOPSIS

    History matters for the military professional. The overemphasis on pragmatism may however erode the fundamental value of inspiring the military pro ...
    more info