• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Is India a Responsible Nuclear Power?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    Is India a Responsible Nuclear Power?
    Kate Sullivan

    24 March 2014

    download pdf

    Executive Summary

    This policy report addresses the central question: is India a responsible nuclear power? It does so in two, inter-related ways. First, it asks whether India’s nuclear behaviour is commensurate with what we might expect of a responsible nuclear power. Second, it asks to what extent India has been accepted as a responsible nuclear power by different groups of states within the international community.

    The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is considered the prime institutional benchmark for ascertaining whether nuclear and non-nuclear weapon states uphold their respective responsibilities. Yet it is difficult to measure India against the norms of nuclear responsibility contained within the Treaty because India remains a non-signatory. Moreover, there are other dimensions to nuclear responsibility that require consideration, such as the security and safety of nuclear materials and activities, as well as national pronouncements and policies related to nuclear strategy. India’s record when it comes to observable and measurable benchmarks of nuclear behaviour is a mixed, but increasingly positive one. Among its strengths are its compliance with significant parts of the NPT, and its declaratory policy on nuclear strategy, which centres on restraint. But India’s standards of nuclear security and safety are the weakest element of its credentials as a nuclear responsible.

    An analysis of India’s nuclear behaviour, however, says little about the extent to which India has been accepted as a responsible nuclear power by different states within the international community. Despite committing a major act of proliferation in 1998 by conducting five nuclear tests, India was labelled ‘a responsible state’ by the United States in 2005. The two countries signed the Indo-U.S. Civil Nuclear Cooperation Agreement in 2006, which was endorsed two years later by the 45 members of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), a multi-national body that regulates the terms of global civil nuclear trade. This paved the way for the United States, France, Russia and six other countries to sign civil nuclear trading agreements with India.

    India has thus succeeded in winning a limited degree of recognition as a nuclear power from the international community. This recognition is evident in India’s status as the only nuclear possessor state and non-NPT signatory permitted to engage in civil nuclear trade with other states. However, the majority of states within the international community remain resistant to India’s status outside the NPT and in opposition to India’s access to civil nuclear trade as an NPT non-signatory.

    The degree to which India’s responsible nuclear status will be recognised more universally will depend on the extent to which India becomes successfully incorporated into key institutions of the global non-proliferation regime. There remain, however, significant institutional and political hurdles. Among these are the absence of a space for India within the NPT as it currently stands, and the continued resistance from a number of countries, in particular China, to the recognition of India as a legitimate nuclear possessor state outside the NPT. In regard to these challenges, the following policy recommendations may be considered:

    1. Appeals for India to join the NPT should be deferred, at least for the foreseeable future. India’s nuclear status outside the NPT no longer poses the same challenge to the non-proliferation regime that it once did. This is because its quest for the status of a nuclear responsible has served to encourage responsible nuclear behaviour and will likely do so into the future. Joining the Treaty is less important than compliance with the Treaty.
    2. India’s bid for membership in a number of multilateral regimes linked to the NPT regime should be encouraged and should not carry a prerequisite of NPT membership. India’s ambitions to join these regimes are encouraging it to establish and implement more stringent export guidelines at the domestic level.
    3. China’s opposition to the recognition of India as a legitimate nuclear possessor state should be tempered if China does not wish to appear as an outsider to growing consensus on the inclusion of India within important components of the non-proliferation regime.
    4. India should strengthen its own non-proliferation commitments by contributing to negotiations towards a Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty (FMCT), implementing strengthened export controls, and improving the safety and security of its nuclear materials and facilities, in particular by reforming its nuclear regulatory agency.
    5. India might also consider its wider image and how universal support for its nuclear status can be strengthened through, for example, proactive steps towards global nuclear disarmament.

    About the Author

    Kate Sullivan is Lecturer in Modern Indian Studies at the University of Oxford’s School of Interdisciplinary Area Studies and Research Fellow at Wolfson College, Oxford. She holds an MA in the Political Science of South Asia from the University of Heidelberg and a PhD in Political Science and International Relations from The Australian National University. Her research focuses on Indian conceptions of greatness in world politics, the history and identity of India’s Foreign Service, and India’s nuclear politics. She is currently preparing an edited volume, World Perspectives on India’s Global Role for Palgrave Macmillan.

    Categories: Policy Reports /

    Last updated on 26/11/2014

    Executive Summary

    This policy report addresses the central question: is India a responsible nuclear power? It does so in two, inter-related ways. First, it asks whether India’s nuclear behaviour is commensurate with what we might expect of a responsible nuclear power. Second, it asks to what extent India has been accepted as a responsible nuclear power by different groups of states within the international community.

    The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is considered the prime institutional benchmark for ascertaining whether nuclear and non-nuclear weapon states uphold their respective responsibilities. Yet it is difficult to measure India against the norms of nuclear responsibility contained within the Treaty because India remains a non-signatory. Moreover, there are other dimensions to nuclear responsibility that require consideration, such as the security and safety of nuclear materials and activities, as well as national pronouncements and policies related to nuclear strategy. India’s record when it comes to observable and measurable benchmarks of nuclear behaviour is a mixed, but increasingly positive one. Among its strengths are its compliance with significant parts of the NPT, and its declaratory policy on nuclear strategy, which centres on restraint. But India’s standards of nuclear security and safety are the weakest element of its credentials as a nuclear responsible.

    An analysis of India’s nuclear behaviour, however, says little about the extent to which India has been accepted as a responsible nuclear power by different states within the international community. Despite committing a major act of proliferation in 1998 by conducting five nuclear tests, India was labelled ‘a responsible state’ by the United States in 2005. The two countries signed the Indo-U.S. Civil Nuclear Cooperation Agreement in 2006, which was endorsed two years later by the 45 members of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), a multi-national body that regulates the terms of global civil nuclear trade. This paved the way for the United States, France, Russia and six other countries to sign civil nuclear trading agreements with India.

    India has thus succeeded in winning a limited degree of recognition as a nuclear power from the international community. This recognition is evident in India’s status as the only nuclear possessor state and non-NPT signatory permitted to engage in civil nuclear trade with other states. However, the majority of states within the international community remain resistant to India’s status outside the NPT and in opposition to India’s access to civil nuclear trade as an NPT non-signatory.

    The degree to which India’s responsible nuclear status will be recognised more universally will depend on the extent to which India becomes successfully incorporated into key institutions of the global non-proliferation regime. There remain, however, significant institutional and political hurdles. Among these are the absence of a space for India within the NPT as it currently stands, and the continued resistance from a number of countries, in particular China, to the recognition of India as a legitimate nuclear possessor state outside the NPT. In regard to these challenges, the following policy recommendations may be considered:

    1. Appeals for India to join the NPT should be deferred, at least for the foreseeable future. India’s nuclear status outside the NPT no longer poses the same challenge to the non-proliferation regime that it once did. This is because its quest for the status of a nuclear responsible has served to encourage responsible nuclear behaviour and will likely do so into the future. Joining the Treaty is less important than compliance with the Treaty.
    2. India’s bid for membership in a number of multilateral regimes linked to the NPT regime should be encouraged and should not carry a prerequisite of NPT membership. India’s ambitions to join these regimes are encouraging it to establish and implement more stringent export guidelines at the domestic level.
    3. China’s opposition to the recognition of India as a legitimate nuclear possessor state should be tempered if China does not wish to appear as an outsider to growing consensus on the inclusion of India within important components of the non-proliferation regime.
    4. India should strengthen its own non-proliferation commitments by contributing to negotiations towards a Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty (FMCT), implementing strengthened export controls, and improving the safety and security of its nuclear materials and facilities, in particular by reforming its nuclear regulatory agency.
    5. India might also consider its wider image and how universal support for its nuclear status can be strengthened through, for example, proactive steps towards global nuclear disarmament.

    About the Author

    Kate Sullivan is Lecturer in Modern Indian Studies at the University of Oxford’s School of Interdisciplinary Area Studies and Research Fellow at Wolfson College, Oxford. She holds an MA in the Political Science of South Asia from the University of Heidelberg and a PhD in Political Science and International Relations from The Australian National University. Her research focuses on Indian conceptions of greatness in world politics, the history and identity of India’s Foreign Service, and India’s nuclear politics. She is currently preparing an edited volume, World Perspectives on India’s Global Role for Palgrave Macmillan.

    Categories: Policy Reports

    Last updated on 26/11/2014

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    more info