• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • China’s ‘Friendly Backyard’ Vision: Can It Win Over SE Asia?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO21167 | China’s ‘Friendly Backyard’ Vision: Can It Win Over SE Asia?
    Tsjeng Zhizhao Henrick

    16 November 2021

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    China’s vision for regional cooperation with Southeast Asia is to create a “friendly backyard” which can best serve its geopolitical interests. However, ASEAN’s response has been divided, and with the reality of the China-United States rivalry in the region, China’s vision will not be realised in the short to medium term.

    Will China have the ASEAN states pinned down in division

    Will China have the ASEAN states pinned down in division?: Photo by Unsplash

    COMMENTARY

    AS CHINA and ASEAN celebrate their 30th anniversary of dialogue relations this year, China ramped up its engagement with the Southeast Asian regional grouping. On 7 June 2021, the Special ASEAN-China Foreign Ministers’ Meeting in Celebration of the 30th Anniversary of the Dialogue Relations was held in Chongqing.

    The economic dimension of ASEAN-China relations was made clear during the 18th China-ASEAN Expo and China-ASEAN Business and Investment Summit, which commenced on 10 September. Significantly, the summit was themed “sharing opportunities created by the new land-sea corridor, building the China-ASEAN community with a shared future”.

    China’s Vision: A Friendly Backyard

    China has been using slogans to express its foreign policy directions. The most notable one is “community with a shared future”, with Chinese President Xi Jinping mentioning it during his speech at the centenary of the foundation of the Communist Party of China (CPC). Given the use of the phrase in the theme of the China-ASEAN Business and Investment Summit, it is clear that the phrase is targeted particularly at Southeast Asia.

    Clearly, China’s vision of its cooperation with ASEAN has a strong economic dimension. China has vigorously promoted infrastructure investment into Southeast Asia through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Chinese investment in Southeast Asia remained steady between 10 to 30% of total BRI investment from 2014 to 2019. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, this percentage jumped to 36% in 2020 – even though total global BRI investment dropped sharply.

    In more recent years, China has also ramped up security cooperation with ASEAN, including the first China-ASEAN military exercise in 2018, as well as some form of bilateral military or law enforcement exercises with each individual ASEAN member state. Deploying both economic relations and increasing defence and security ties to deepen relations with Southeast Asian countries, China envisions turning the region into a “friendly backyard” more aligned towards its economic and geopolitical interests.

    Yet another key target of China’s vision is regional US military and economic, influence. Chinese actions in Southeast Asia are aimed at reducing United States influence in the region, so that Southeast Asian states, or even ASEAN itself, will never be used by the US or other hostile external powers to counter China’s regional influence.

    Most importantly, the number of multilateral partnerships which, from the point of view of Beijing, are targeted against a rising China is steadily growing. Frameworks like the Indo-Pacific concept and the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) have only heightened China’s fears of encirclement by hostile external powers. The most recent is the newly minted Australia-United Kingdom-United States (AUKUS) defence pact, which China has denounced.

    ASEAN’s Divided Response

    ASEAN countries do not have a coherent, let alone unified, stance about how to address mounting Chinese influence in a comprehensive and strategic manner. They generally welcome Chinese economic ties which have proven beneficial for their economic development. In particular, Laos and Cambodia, both recipients of large amounts of Chinese investment and financial aid, have progressively moved closer to Beijing as its influence on their economies has increased.

    However, not every ASEAN member state is fully on board with burgeoning Chinese influence in their respective countries. Other ASEAN countries, notably Vietnam, the Philippines, and Malaysia, have territorial spats with China over the South China Sea, with incidents in disputed areas causing tensions to flare up. These have undermined China’s efforts to reassure Southeast Asian nations, particularly South China Sea claimants, of China’s peaceful intentions.

    ASEAN countries are also divided on how to deal with the wider China-US rivalry. This is best encapsulated by the divergent responses of ASEAN countries towards AUKUS. Nonetheless, a divided ASEAN may not necessarily best serve Chinese interests.

    Certain ASEAN countries still prefer that the US maintains its military presence in Southeast Asia, or seek to balance their relations between Washington and Beijing. This means, from Beijing’s perspective, that a part of Southeast Asia could potentially still be used by the US to counter China’s regional influence.

    China’s vision of a “friendly backyard” free of US influence would simply be impossible in the short to medium term. A divided ASEAN, however, could help China by ensuring that ASEAN will never be able to form a cohesive bloc that acts against Beijing’s interests in the region.

    China’s strategy: Keep ASEAN Divided

    Rather than turning the whole of ASEAN into its “friendly backyard”, China has been ensuring that ASEAN remains divided, and sowing more divisions whenever it can. Beijing has done this by focusing on improving its relations with countries that are relatively more dependent on Chinese economic clout, while behaving assertively whenever any state conducts actions deemed to be detrimental to Chinese interests.

    The combination of both approaches is most evident in Malaysia, where Chinese economic largesse has resulted in Putrajaya being relatively more muted on the South China Sea issue except more recently, precisely due to assertive Chinese actions in Malaysia’s claimed Exclusive Economic Zone off the coast of Sarawak and Sabah.

    China’s strategy has been under way for years. In 2012, ASEAN’s failure to issue a joint declaration in the ASEAN Foreign Ministers’ Meeting was reportedly the result of Chinese pressure on Cambodia, the ASEAN Chair that year, to scuttle any joint declaration that mentions the South China Sea.

    Phnom Penh’s approach towards ASEAN as next year’s ASEAN Chair remains to be seen, including whether the reputational costs incurred for its actions in 2012 would temper its approach. Meanwhile, Chinese economic influence over Laos has also been mounting, but Laos appears to balance its China economic ties with partnerships from other countries like Vietnam.

    More Undercurrents to Come?

    To this day, ASEAN remains divided over how to deal with increasing Chinese influence and power in the region. ASEAN can only expect greater pressure from China to align more closely with Beijing’s interests, while more efforts are made to sow division to prevent it from becoming a cohesive bloc that acts against its interests. This means that ASEAN will find it increasingly challenging to come to a consensus on how to engage China.

    Even where economic engagement is concerned, ASEAN countries will face the reality that Chinese economic influence likely comes with political strings attached. This brings risks to ASEAN unity, and by extension, ASEAN centrality. ASEAN must therefore carefully navigate these geopolitical undercurrents in the coming years.

    About the Author

    Henrick Tsjeng is Associate Research Fellow at the Regional Security Architecture Programme, Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS), S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. A version of this was published in IDSS Paper.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / International Politics and Security / Maritime Security / Regionalism and Multilateralism / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Global / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 16/11/2021

    comments powered by Disqus
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    China’s vision for regional cooperation with Southeast Asia is to create a “friendly backyard” which can best serve its geopolitical interests. However, ASEAN’s response has been divided, and with the reality of the China-United States rivalry in the region, China’s vision will not be realised in the short to medium term.

    Will China have the ASEAN states pinned down in division

    Will China have the ASEAN states pinned down in division?: Photo by Unsplash

    COMMENTARY

    AS CHINA and ASEAN celebrate their 30th anniversary of dialogue relations this year, China ramped up its engagement with the Southeast Asian regional grouping. On 7 June 2021, the Special ASEAN-China Foreign Ministers’ Meeting in Celebration of the 30th Anniversary of the Dialogue Relations was held in Chongqing.

    The economic dimension of ASEAN-China relations was made clear during the 18th China-ASEAN Expo and China-ASEAN Business and Investment Summit, which commenced on 10 September. Significantly, the summit was themed “sharing opportunities created by the new land-sea corridor, building the China-ASEAN community with a shared future”.

    China’s Vision: A Friendly Backyard

    China has been using slogans to express its foreign policy directions. The most notable one is “community with a shared future”, with Chinese President Xi Jinping mentioning it during his speech at the centenary of the foundation of the Communist Party of China (CPC). Given the use of the phrase in the theme of the China-ASEAN Business and Investment Summit, it is clear that the phrase is targeted particularly at Southeast Asia.

    Clearly, China’s vision of its cooperation with ASEAN has a strong economic dimension. China has vigorously promoted infrastructure investment into Southeast Asia through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Chinese investment in Southeast Asia remained steady between 10 to 30% of total BRI investment from 2014 to 2019. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, this percentage jumped to 36% in 2020 – even though total global BRI investment dropped sharply.

    In more recent years, China has also ramped up security cooperation with ASEAN, including the first China-ASEAN military exercise in 2018, as well as some form of bilateral military or law enforcement exercises with each individual ASEAN member state. Deploying both economic relations and increasing defence and security ties to deepen relations with Southeast Asian countries, China envisions turning the region into a “friendly backyard” more aligned towards its economic and geopolitical interests.

    Yet another key target of China’s vision is regional US military and economic, influence. Chinese actions in Southeast Asia are aimed at reducing United States influence in the region, so that Southeast Asian states, or even ASEAN itself, will never be used by the US or other hostile external powers to counter China’s regional influence.

    Most importantly, the number of multilateral partnerships which, from the point of view of Beijing, are targeted against a rising China is steadily growing. Frameworks like the Indo-Pacific concept and the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) have only heightened China’s fears of encirclement by hostile external powers. The most recent is the newly minted Australia-United Kingdom-United States (AUKUS) defence pact, which China has denounced.

    ASEAN’s Divided Response

    ASEAN countries do not have a coherent, let alone unified, stance about how to address mounting Chinese influence in a comprehensive and strategic manner. They generally welcome Chinese economic ties which have proven beneficial for their economic development. In particular, Laos and Cambodia, both recipients of large amounts of Chinese investment and financial aid, have progressively moved closer to Beijing as its influence on their economies has increased.

    However, not every ASEAN member state is fully on board with burgeoning Chinese influence in their respective countries. Other ASEAN countries, notably Vietnam, the Philippines, and Malaysia, have territorial spats with China over the South China Sea, with incidents in disputed areas causing tensions to flare up. These have undermined China’s efforts to reassure Southeast Asian nations, particularly South China Sea claimants, of China’s peaceful intentions.

    ASEAN countries are also divided on how to deal with the wider China-US rivalry. This is best encapsulated by the divergent responses of ASEAN countries towards AUKUS. Nonetheless, a divided ASEAN may not necessarily best serve Chinese interests.

    Certain ASEAN countries still prefer that the US maintains its military presence in Southeast Asia, or seek to balance their relations between Washington and Beijing. This means, from Beijing’s perspective, that a part of Southeast Asia could potentially still be used by the US to counter China’s regional influence.

    China’s vision of a “friendly backyard” free of US influence would simply be impossible in the short to medium term. A divided ASEAN, however, could help China by ensuring that ASEAN will never be able to form a cohesive bloc that acts against Beijing’s interests in the region.

    China’s strategy: Keep ASEAN Divided

    Rather than turning the whole of ASEAN into its “friendly backyard”, China has been ensuring that ASEAN remains divided, and sowing more divisions whenever it can. Beijing has done this by focusing on improving its relations with countries that are relatively more dependent on Chinese economic clout, while behaving assertively whenever any state conducts actions deemed to be detrimental to Chinese interests.

    The combination of both approaches is most evident in Malaysia, where Chinese economic largesse has resulted in Putrajaya being relatively more muted on the South China Sea issue except more recently, precisely due to assertive Chinese actions in Malaysia’s claimed Exclusive Economic Zone off the coast of Sarawak and Sabah.

    China’s strategy has been under way for years. In 2012, ASEAN’s failure to issue a joint declaration in the ASEAN Foreign Ministers’ Meeting was reportedly the result of Chinese pressure on Cambodia, the ASEAN Chair that year, to scuttle any joint declaration that mentions the South China Sea.

    Phnom Penh’s approach towards ASEAN as next year’s ASEAN Chair remains to be seen, including whether the reputational costs incurred for its actions in 2012 would temper its approach. Meanwhile, Chinese economic influence over Laos has also been mounting, but Laos appears to balance its China economic ties with partnerships from other countries like Vietnam.

    More Undercurrents to Come?

    To this day, ASEAN remains divided over how to deal with increasing Chinese influence and power in the region. ASEAN can only expect greater pressure from China to align more closely with Beijing’s interests, while more efforts are made to sow division to prevent it from becoming a cohesive bloc that acts against its interests. This means that ASEAN will find it increasingly challenging to come to a consensus on how to engage China.

    Even where economic engagement is concerned, ASEAN countries will face the reality that Chinese economic influence likely comes with political strings attached. This brings risks to ASEAN unity, and by extension, ASEAN centrality. ASEAN must therefore carefully navigate these geopolitical undercurrents in the coming years.

    About the Author

    Henrick Tsjeng is Associate Research Fellow at the Regional Security Architecture Programme, Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS), S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. A version of this was published in IDSS Paper.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / International Politics and Security / Maritime Security / Regionalism and Multilateralism

    Last updated on 16/11/2021

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    China’s ‘Friendly Backyard’ Vision: Can It Win Over SE Asia?

    SYNOPSIS

    China’s vision for regional cooperation with Southeast Asia is to create a “friendly backyard” which can best serve its geopolitical interests. How ...
    more info