• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Building the Silk Road Economic Belt: Problems and Priorities in Central Asia
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    Building the Silk Road Economic Belt: Problems and Priorities in Central Asia
    Zhang Hongzhou

    18 May 2015

    download pdf

    Executive Summary

    Central Asia occupies the centrepiece of China’s Silk RoadEconomic Belt (SREB) initiative. Yet, reviving the Silk Road in Central Asia will not be easy and the geopolitical challenges will be the biggest hurdle to building the SREB in the region. The idea of Central Asia as a regional grouping in political and security terms is almost non-existent and Central Asian countries remain widely divided with serious internal conflicts caused by unresolved boundary, water and energy disputes, regional rivalry, deep mistrust and differences in political, diplomatic and security policies. Also, there is an on-going big power game in Central Asia. In recent years, while better trade and investment ties with all five Central Asian countries boosted China’s economic influence in Central Asia, China is still far from being a dominant force in Central Asian affairs because of the influence of Russia and, to a lesser extent, the United States. In the near to medium term, China still cannot compete with Russia which had a significant head start in the region.

    In terms of responses to China’s SREB, Central Asian countries are excited about economic opportunities that China’s SREB brings, but at the same time, wary of the geopolitical implications of China’s expanding economic influence in the region. Similarly, Russia has mixed feelings towards China’s SREB. Given Moscow-centred economic and political integration projects such as EEU and CSTO, Moscow is not likely to support the SREB project in Central Asia. In contrast, as U.S. influence wanes in Central Asia, the United States is less concerned even though the SREB is in direct competition with its New Silk Road Project and seems to be adopting an open attitude towards the SREB. Against this economic and geopolitical backdrop in Central Asia, this paper suggests that China needs to pay attention to the following aspects in building the SREB.

    First, building the SREB should be a gradual and incremental process.Deeply rooted internal conflicts in Central Asia as well as the presence of big powers in the region can block China’s efforts to build the SREB. Social instability, poverty, corruption, leadership transition, and social conflicts pose high risks and uncertainty to the Chinese investment. Thus, both China’s central and local governments need to understand that being eager for quick success might lead to political backlash and a careful and incremental approach is needed. It is better to build momentum with smaller projects first and seek the opportunity to connect the “dots” at a later phase.

    Second, a bilateral approach is preferred.Instead of focusing on grand-scale projects involving many countries, China should adopt a bilateral approach by engaging in economic, social, cultural and even political and security cooperation with individual Central Asian countries. In this way, policies can be customised for individual countries, taking into account country-specific interests and limitations.

    Third, agricultural cooperation offers huge potential. Unlike energy investment which largely benefits the Central Asian elites, agricultural cooperation has the potential of bringing wider economic benefits to ordinary people. Given the food insecurity in Central Asia, Chinese financial investment, agricultural R&D and technology will ensure regional food supply and enhance regional stability. In addition, agricultural modernisation will help keep regional water conflicts under control.

    Fourth, to finance projects under the framework of the “One Belt, One Road” initiative, China introduced two key financial instruments—the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) and the 40 billion dollar Silk Road Fund. As far as funding projects in Central Asia is concerned, the Silk Road Fund is the better financial instrument.

    Fifth, in the long run, China needs to integrate Central Asia into the Pan Asia Production Network. To overcome challenges to the Sino-Central Asian economic cooperation, economic restructuring of Central Asian countries and China’s western provinces is needed to build a regional supply chain to minimise direct competition.

    About the Author

    Zhang Hongzhou is an Associate Research Fellow with the China Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. His main research interests include China and regional resources (food, water and energy) security, agricultural and rural development, fishing policy and maritime security. He has contributed papers to peer reviewed journals such as the Pacific Review, Harvard Asia Quarterly, Copenhagen Journal of Asia Studies, the ISPI Analysis and Southeast Asia Studies, edited volumes and international conferences. He has also contributed Op-Ed articles to newspapers and magazines in the Asia-Pacific, such as the YaleGlobal Online, the Diplomat, ChinaDialogue, the Global Times, Today, Lianhe Zaobao, the Nation and others.

    The author would like to thank Mr Arthur Guschin for his help and comments on the paper.

    Categories: Policy Reports / Conflict and Stability / International Political Economy / International Politics and Security / Regionalism and Multilateralism / Central Asia / East Asia and Asia Pacific

    Last updated on 18/05/2015

    Executive Summary

    Central Asia occupies the centrepiece of China’s Silk RoadEconomic Belt (SREB) initiative. Yet, reviving the Silk Road in Central Asia will not be easy and the geopolitical challenges will be the biggest hurdle to building the SREB in the region. The idea of Central Asia as a regional grouping in political and security terms is almost non-existent and Central Asian countries remain widely divided with serious internal conflicts caused by unresolved boundary, water and energy disputes, regional rivalry, deep mistrust and differences in political, diplomatic and security policies. Also, there is an on-going big power game in Central Asia. In recent years, while better trade and investment ties with all five Central Asian countries boosted China’s economic influence in Central Asia, China is still far from being a dominant force in Central Asian affairs because of the influence of Russia and, to a lesser extent, the United States. In the near to medium term, China still cannot compete with Russia which had a significant head start in the region.

    In terms of responses to China’s SREB, Central Asian countries are excited about economic opportunities that China’s SREB brings, but at the same time, wary of the geopolitical implications of China’s expanding economic influence in the region. Similarly, Russia has mixed feelings towards China’s SREB. Given Moscow-centred economic and political integration projects such as EEU and CSTO, Moscow is not likely to support the SREB project in Central Asia. In contrast, as U.S. influence wanes in Central Asia, the United States is less concerned even though the SREB is in direct competition with its New Silk Road Project and seems to be adopting an open attitude towards the SREB. Against this economic and geopolitical backdrop in Central Asia, this paper suggests that China needs to pay attention to the following aspects in building the SREB.

    First, building the SREB should be a gradual and incremental process.Deeply rooted internal conflicts in Central Asia as well as the presence of big powers in the region can block China’s efforts to build the SREB. Social instability, poverty, corruption, leadership transition, and social conflicts pose high risks and uncertainty to the Chinese investment. Thus, both China’s central and local governments need to understand that being eager for quick success might lead to political backlash and a careful and incremental approach is needed. It is better to build momentum with smaller projects first and seek the opportunity to connect the “dots” at a later phase.

    Second, a bilateral approach is preferred.Instead of focusing on grand-scale projects involving many countries, China should adopt a bilateral approach by engaging in economic, social, cultural and even political and security cooperation with individual Central Asian countries. In this way, policies can be customised for individual countries, taking into account country-specific interests and limitations.

    Third, agricultural cooperation offers huge potential. Unlike energy investment which largely benefits the Central Asian elites, agricultural cooperation has the potential of bringing wider economic benefits to ordinary people. Given the food insecurity in Central Asia, Chinese financial investment, agricultural R&D and technology will ensure regional food supply and enhance regional stability. In addition, agricultural modernisation will help keep regional water conflicts under control.

    Fourth, to finance projects under the framework of the “One Belt, One Road” initiative, China introduced two key financial instruments—the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) and the 40 billion dollar Silk Road Fund. As far as funding projects in Central Asia is concerned, the Silk Road Fund is the better financial instrument.

    Fifth, in the long run, China needs to integrate Central Asia into the Pan Asia Production Network. To overcome challenges to the Sino-Central Asian economic cooperation, economic restructuring of Central Asian countries and China’s western provinces is needed to build a regional supply chain to minimise direct competition.

    About the Author

    Zhang Hongzhou is an Associate Research Fellow with the China Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. His main research interests include China and regional resources (food, water and energy) security, agricultural and rural development, fishing policy and maritime security. He has contributed papers to peer reviewed journals such as the Pacific Review, Harvard Asia Quarterly, Copenhagen Journal of Asia Studies, the ISPI Analysis and Southeast Asia Studies, edited volumes and international conferences. He has also contributed Op-Ed articles to newspapers and magazines in the Asia-Pacific, such as the YaleGlobal Online, the Diplomat, ChinaDialogue, the Global Times, Today, Lianhe Zaobao, the Nation and others.

    The author would like to thank Mr Arthur Guschin for his help and comments on the paper.

    Categories: Policy Reports / Conflict and Stability / International Political Economy / International Politics and Security / Regionalism and Multilateralism

    Last updated on 18/05/2015

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    Building the Silk Road Economic Belt: Problems and Priorities in Central Asia

    Executive Summary

    Central Asia occupies the centrepiece of China’s Silk RoadEconomic Belt (SREB) initiative. Yet, reviving the Silk Road in Ce ...
    more info