• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Cohesive Societies
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Cohesive Societies
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • COVID-19 Resources
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO10061 | Fall of Hatoyama: What Went Wrong?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO10061 | Fall of Hatoyama: What Went Wrong?
    Joshy M. Paul

    15 June 2010

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    The main reason for the resignation of Japanese Prime Minister Hatoyama was his inept handling of an important component of the Japan-US security pact, a US air station in Okinawa. He should have focused on domestic issues first and aimed to win the Upper House election in July to implement his vision.

    After barely nine months at the helm, Yukio Hatoyama has resigned as Prime Minister of Japan on June 1. Ichiro Ozawa who was the general secretary of the ruling Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) also relinquished his position. There were two main reasons for his resignation: his failure to keep his promise to relocate the US Marine Corps Air Station from Futenma, Okinawa, and a political funds scandal that included his mother’s provision of some ¥1.26 billion to him over the years. The immediate reason, however, was his botched handling of the Futenma airbase issue. During the election last August, Hatoyama had pledged to shift the airbase out of Okinawa prefecture — and if possible out of Japan –by May this year.

    The 2006 Agreement

    The United States and the previous Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) government signed an agreement in 2006 after 13 years of negotiation that stipulated shifting the Futenma Air Station from the current location to the less populated Henoko at Nago city in Northern Okinawa. Further both countries had agreed to relocate 8000 Marines and their dependants to Guam by 2014. The Japanese government would pay US$6.09 billion towards the Guam transfer cost. This would eventually reduce the Marines in Okinawa by nearly a half. Currently more than half of the total of 47,000 American troops based in Japan are located in Okinawa.

    The 2006 plan was endorsed on May 28 in a joint statement signed by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defence Secretary Robert Gates and their Japanese counterparts, Foreign Minister Katsuya Okada and Defence Minister Toshimi Kitazawa. According to the statement, some of the training facilities were to be relocated to Tokunoshima, a small island some 200 kilometers northeast of Okinawa, which was originally proposed by Hatoyama as a new location for the Futenma airbase.

    In fact, Hatoyama had failed to check the voices opposed to the US military presence in Okinawa. He was planning to split the Futenma functions by keeping a helicopter pad in the new site of Henko while constructing a larger airfield at Tokunoshima. Foreign Minister Okada, however, argued for a merger of the Futenma facilities with those at the US Air Force base at Kadena on a 15-year lease . On the other hand, Defence Minister Kitazawa was for the implementation of the 2006 plan in spirit, while Okinawa governor Hirokasu kept a low profile when the base issue flared up.

    However, right from the beginning the US administration stood firmly by the 2006 agreement and strongly opposed splitting the Futenma airbase. According to the US any distance beyond 200 kilometres from the land station to the airfield would cause operational difficulty; it insisted that the two stations be close enough to enable them to react swiftly in contingency operations. The helicopter unit at Futenma is used to transport marines stationed at Okinawa Camp Hansen and Camp Schwab. During his visit to Washington to attend the recent nuclear summit, Hatoyama failed to secure a one- on-one meeting with President Barack Obama; he got just about 10 minutes during dinner along with other dignitaries, though he sat next to Obama.

    The bungled handling of the issue saw Hatoyama’s popularity rating plummet from roughly 70 percent to less than 20 percent, possibly triggering the decision to resign. Hatoyama’s backtracking from his campaign pledge also created cracks in the coalition government. The leader of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and Consumer Affairs Minister Mizuho Fukushima was relieved of her post because she refused to abide by the cabinet decision accepting the 2006 plan. SDP had been more vocal against the US military presence in Japan.

    Factors behind Acceptance of 2006 Plan

    There were four major reasons why Hatoyama was forced to continue with the 2006 plan. Firstly, keeping the US-Japan security alliance was of prime importance for any government in Japan. Okinawa is the focal point of the security pact between the US and Japan which has guaranteed the security of Northeast Asia since World War II. At the same time it stands at an important location close to the flashpoints of North Korea and Taiwan.

    Secondly, the Cheonan incident compelled Japan to comply with the demands of the US. The South Korean naval ship Cheonan was sunk purportedly by a North Korean torpedo on March 26. The issue became more complicated when China was reluctant to accept the findings of the investigation conducted by a multinational Joint Civilian Military Investigation group. The Cheonan incident has since created confusion and anxiety in the region. In a way, Japan’s option was limited as it had to fall back on the Japan-US security system.

    Thirdly, the current economic condition of Japan did not allow it to substitute the US security umbrella system with indigenous capabilities should the security pact be broken. It is reported that Japan’s actual economic growth for the next five years may barely exceed 1.0 per cent per annum which leaves little margin for Tokyo to build a defence infrastructure through tax revenues. A political magazine Se’taku warned in February that if the alliance with the US collapsed, then Japan “would have to increase its 5 trillion yen defence budget to 10 per cent annually for the next 10 years.”

    Fourthly, Japan will have a series of elections in the second half of 2010 — an Upper House election in July; the Nago municipal city election in September and the Okinawa Governor’s election in November. The Upper House election is an important one as DPJ has to prove that the result of the 2009 was not an aberration while it needs to secure a comfortable majority in both houses of parliament. A prolonged dithering and uncertainty over Futenma would derail DPJ’s chance for victory in the July Upper House elections.

    Ever since his election as prime minister over eight months ago, Hatoyama had focused on a difficult, albeit achievable foreign policy issue of Futenma. Instead, he should have concentrated on domestic issues like the economy and environment and winning the Upper house elections. Had he pushed the airbase issue more gradually, he could have saved his premiership.

    About the Author

    Joshy M. Paul is MacArthur Visiting Associate Fellow at the Multilateralism and Regionalism programme of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. He is also Associate Fellow at the National Maritime Foundation, New Delhi. 

    Categories: Commentaries / International Politics and Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific

    Last updated on 10/10/2014

    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    The main reason for the resignation of Japanese Prime Minister Hatoyama was his inept handling of an important component of the Japan-US security pact, a US air station in Okinawa. He should have focused on domestic issues first and aimed to win the Upper House election in July to implement his vision.

    After barely nine months at the helm, Yukio Hatoyama has resigned as Prime Minister of Japan on June 1. Ichiro Ozawa who was the general secretary of the ruling Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) also relinquished his position. There were two main reasons for his resignation: his failure to keep his promise to relocate the US Marine Corps Air Station from Futenma, Okinawa, and a political funds scandal that included his mother’s provision of some ¥1.26 billion to him over the years. The immediate reason, however, was his botched handling of the Futenma airbase issue. During the election last August, Hatoyama had pledged to shift the airbase out of Okinawa prefecture — and if possible out of Japan –by May this year.

    The 2006 Agreement

    The United States and the previous Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) government signed an agreement in 2006 after 13 years of negotiation that stipulated shifting the Futenma Air Station from the current location to the less populated Henoko at Nago city in Northern Okinawa. Further both countries had agreed to relocate 8000 Marines and their dependants to Guam by 2014. The Japanese government would pay US$6.09 billion towards the Guam transfer cost. This would eventually reduce the Marines in Okinawa by nearly a half. Currently more than half of the total of 47,000 American troops based in Japan are located in Okinawa.

    The 2006 plan was endorsed on May 28 in a joint statement signed by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defence Secretary Robert Gates and their Japanese counterparts, Foreign Minister Katsuya Okada and Defence Minister Toshimi Kitazawa. According to the statement, some of the training facilities were to be relocated to Tokunoshima, a small island some 200 kilometers northeast of Okinawa, which was originally proposed by Hatoyama as a new location for the Futenma airbase.

    In fact, Hatoyama had failed to check the voices opposed to the US military presence in Okinawa. He was planning to split the Futenma functions by keeping a helicopter pad in the new site of Henko while constructing a larger airfield at Tokunoshima. Foreign Minister Okada, however, argued for a merger of the Futenma facilities with those at the US Air Force base at Kadena on a 15-year lease . On the other hand, Defence Minister Kitazawa was for the implementation of the 2006 plan in spirit, while Okinawa governor Hirokasu kept a low profile when the base issue flared up.

    However, right from the beginning the US administration stood firmly by the 2006 agreement and strongly opposed splitting the Futenma airbase. According to the US any distance beyond 200 kilometres from the land station to the airfield would cause operational difficulty; it insisted that the two stations be close enough to enable them to react swiftly in contingency operations. The helicopter unit at Futenma is used to transport marines stationed at Okinawa Camp Hansen and Camp Schwab. During his visit to Washington to attend the recent nuclear summit, Hatoyama failed to secure a one- on-one meeting with President Barack Obama; he got just about 10 minutes during dinner along with other dignitaries, though he sat next to Obama.

    The bungled handling of the issue saw Hatoyama’s popularity rating plummet from roughly 70 percent to less than 20 percent, possibly triggering the decision to resign. Hatoyama’s backtracking from his campaign pledge also created cracks in the coalition government. The leader of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and Consumer Affairs Minister Mizuho Fukushima was relieved of her post because she refused to abide by the cabinet decision accepting the 2006 plan. SDP had been more vocal against the US military presence in Japan.

    Factors behind Acceptance of 2006 Plan

    There were four major reasons why Hatoyama was forced to continue with the 2006 plan. Firstly, keeping the US-Japan security alliance was of prime importance for any government in Japan. Okinawa is the focal point of the security pact between the US and Japan which has guaranteed the security of Northeast Asia since World War II. At the same time it stands at an important location close to the flashpoints of North Korea and Taiwan.

    Secondly, the Cheonan incident compelled Japan to comply with the demands of the US. The South Korean naval ship Cheonan was sunk purportedly by a North Korean torpedo on March 26. The issue became more complicated when China was reluctant to accept the findings of the investigation conducted by a multinational Joint Civilian Military Investigation group. The Cheonan incident has since created confusion and anxiety in the region. In a way, Japan’s option was limited as it had to fall back on the Japan-US security system.

    Thirdly, the current economic condition of Japan did not allow it to substitute the US security umbrella system with indigenous capabilities should the security pact be broken. It is reported that Japan’s actual economic growth for the next five years may barely exceed 1.0 per cent per annum which leaves little margin for Tokyo to build a defence infrastructure through tax revenues. A political magazine Se’taku warned in February that if the alliance with the US collapsed, then Japan “would have to increase its 5 trillion yen defence budget to 10 per cent annually for the next 10 years.”

    Fourthly, Japan will have a series of elections in the second half of 2010 — an Upper House election in July; the Nago municipal city election in September and the Okinawa Governor’s election in November. The Upper House election is an important one as DPJ has to prove that the result of the 2009 was not an aberration while it needs to secure a comfortable majority in both houses of parliament. A prolonged dithering and uncertainty over Futenma would derail DPJ’s chance for victory in the July Upper House elections.

    Ever since his election as prime minister over eight months ago, Hatoyama had focused on a difficult, albeit achievable foreign policy issue of Futenma. Instead, he should have concentrated on domestic issues like the economy and environment and winning the Upper house elections. Had he pushed the airbase issue more gradually, he could have saved his premiership.

    About the Author

    Joshy M. Paul is MacArthur Visiting Associate Fellow at the Multilateralism and Regionalism programme of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. He is also Associate Fellow at the National Maritime Foundation, New Delhi. 

    Categories: Commentaries / International Politics and Security

    Last updated on 10/10/2014

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    CO10061 | Fall of Hatoyama: What Went Wrong?

    Commentary

    The main reason for ...
    more info