• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO10045 | Bracing For Impact: Fifth-Generation Jet Fighter Programmes in Asia
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO10045 | Bracing For Impact: Fifth-Generation Jet Fighter Programmes in Asia
    Curie Maharani, Collin Koh Swee Lean

    04 May 2010

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    Four major regional powers in Asia – China, India, Japan and South Korea – seek to acquire fifth- generation (5G) jet fighters in less than ten years’ time. The security implications of this air power race would go beyond the Sino-Indian arms dynamics.

    THE 5G fighter jet, a term coined by the Russians, refers to a new advent of fifth generation fighter jets. It combines advanced very-low observable (VLO) stealth with integrated information and sensor fusion network. This combination interfaces with a range of precision-weapon capabilities to derive new fighting agility, reliability, ease of maintenance and deployment.

    Currently, only two 5G fighters fly in the world: the American F-22 Raptor and the Russian PAK FA. The American F-35 Lightning II, the next-generation strike fighter which Singapore has an eye on, remains under development. The F-22, which entered service in 2006 at over US$150 million apiece, testifies to US air power dominance. While attention to date has been focused on the West, interestingly most of the other countries with the desire to have their own indigenous 5G jet fighter programmes are found in Asia, namely China, India, Japan and South Korea.

    The Asian 5G Jet Fighter Race

    The Asian encounter with indigenous 5G jet fighter programmes began with Tokyo’s decision, after Washington’s refusal to sell it F-22s, to develop an indigenous demonstrator called ATD-X Shinshin in July 2007. This aircraft, comparable to the Saab Gripen in size and US F-22 in technology, was conceived in 1990. However, it was primarily intended to raise Japan’s bargaining position vis-a-vis the US instead of catalysing indigenous fighter production. The scheduled maiden flight of ATD-X in 2011 is likely imperilled by drastic budget cuts.

    South Korea also possesses its own 5G jet fighter programme, known as the KFX Boramae – a controversial US$13 billion-project initiated in 2001. The first units of the planned 120 aircraft are scheduled to enter service in 2017 but this plan has been stifled by technical and fiscal difficulties. With only a modest track record of licence-producing Lockheed Martin’s F-16 and co-producing with it the T-50 advanced jet trainer, Korea Aerospace Industries possesses only 63% of the requisite technological capacity for KFX. As South Korea seeks international partnership, the program me remains stuck at the feasibility stage with little progress forward.

    China is known to have a 5G jet fighter programme referred to as J-XX/J-12. While little of it is known, J-XX reportedly embeds design features similar to the F-22’s. However, the extent of its developmental progress remains to be seen. Having demonstrated remarkable technological prowess with the J-10 and J-11 fighters, and boasting over 100 variously-sized enterprises involved in its aviation industry, China is certainly a rising aerospace player to be reckoned with.

    In February 2010, India inked a deal with Russia to co-develop the PAK FA, dubbed ‘Raptorski’, for its Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA) programme. Like South Korea, India envisages the first of its 5G jet fighters to be operational by 2017. Unlike South Korea, however, India enjoys the benefit of riding on Russia’s success with the PAK FA, of which 70% of its technological content has been fulfilled by Sukhoi. With India throwing the financial weight behind Russia’s technical expertise, the bilateral 5G jet fighter collaboration may well blossom.

    Clash of Two Titans

    Out of this stable of four Asian 5G jet fighter players, only two – China and India – appear to be forging ahead while the Japanese and South Korean programmes languished for want of funding and/or technological expertise. With the experience of producing fourth-generation J-10, China possesses a reasonable margin of success in realising its J-XX programme despite the possible lack of any forthcoming Russian help (due to intellectual property concerns) and before the Western arms embargo is lifted. India, despite its lack of technical expertise, is able to leverage on the Russian PAK FA.

    For long India has lagged behind China in defence self-sufficiency, especially in aerospace sector. The FGFA programme, a potential beneficiary of the PAK FA’s success, might allow India to supersede China in putting a 5G jet fighter in service. Therein lies the potential risk: the longstanding animosity between China and India means that India’s success could spur increased effort by Beijing to keep pace with its own J-XX programme. That is not all, however.

    The potential spillovers beyond the Sino-Indian dynamics could not be ignored. China’s countervailing measures might spur Japan’s efforts with its ATD-X, especially if the latter is unable to secure the F-22 or F-35 to replace its aging F-4EJ (and even F-15J/DJ) fleet to counter the rising Chinese air power. Japan’s ATD-X might be further catalysed if South Korea is able to secure much- needed international partnership to accelerate its KFX programme. Anticipated progress with the ATD-X could create more incentives for China to hasten its J-XX programme, thereafter feeding back into Indian countermeasures in a classical security dilemma.

    The broader security implications for Asia may have been a factor for countries with interest in this development. Singapore is already a participant in the F-35 programme (with possible procurement plans to replace the venerable F-5S/T fleet), while Vietnam is reportedly interested in the PAK FA. The 5G jet fighter race, if spun out of control, could encourage other regional states to acquire similar capabilities.

    Beyond Geopolitics, Money Matters

    No doubt Asia has managed to emerge from the economic crisis in better shape than the West. Still, the financial and technical hurdles associated with such complex programmes as an indigenous jet fighter (and a 5G one at that) should not be underestimated. The Obama administration’s decision to halt the F-22 production demonstrates the intractability of cost matters even a superpower cannot escape from. While the 5G jet fighter competition might spur domestic technological progress and self-sufficiency, the fiscal and technological risks involved are probably as significant.

    Security considerations might not be the singular driving force behind 5G jet fighter programmes in Asia. Factors such as prestige might inspire such projects. Without financial, technical and real operational needs being given proper deliberations, regional 5G jet fighter programmes pursued out of sheer impulse could potentially heighten fiscal risks. This is particularly so in the case of bad debts incurred for projects that go wrong. Therefore, 5G jet fighter programmes in Asia need to be pursued with moderation and restraint for both domestic and geopolitical purposes.

    About the Authors

    Curie Maharani and Koh Swee Lean Collin are associate research fellow and research analyst at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. Both are doctoral candidates respectively at Cransfield University and RSIS. 

    Categories: Commentaries / International Politics and Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific

    Last updated on 10/10/2014

    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    Four major regional powers in Asia – China, India, Japan and South Korea – seek to acquire fifth- generation (5G) jet fighters in less than ten years’ time. The security implications of this air power race would go beyond the Sino-Indian arms dynamics.

    THE 5G fighter jet, a term coined by the Russians, refers to a new advent of fifth generation fighter jets. It combines advanced very-low observable (VLO) stealth with integrated information and sensor fusion network. This combination interfaces with a range of precision-weapon capabilities to derive new fighting agility, reliability, ease of maintenance and deployment.

    Currently, only two 5G fighters fly in the world: the American F-22 Raptor and the Russian PAK FA. The American F-35 Lightning II, the next-generation strike fighter which Singapore has an eye on, remains under development. The F-22, which entered service in 2006 at over US$150 million apiece, testifies to US air power dominance. While attention to date has been focused on the West, interestingly most of the other countries with the desire to have their own indigenous 5G jet fighter programmes are found in Asia, namely China, India, Japan and South Korea.

    The Asian 5G Jet Fighter Race

    The Asian encounter with indigenous 5G jet fighter programmes began with Tokyo’s decision, after Washington’s refusal to sell it F-22s, to develop an indigenous demonstrator called ATD-X Shinshin in July 2007. This aircraft, comparable to the Saab Gripen in size and US F-22 in technology, was conceived in 1990. However, it was primarily intended to raise Japan’s bargaining position vis-a-vis the US instead of catalysing indigenous fighter production. The scheduled maiden flight of ATD-X in 2011 is likely imperilled by drastic budget cuts.

    South Korea also possesses its own 5G jet fighter programme, known as the KFX Boramae – a controversial US$13 billion-project initiated in 2001. The first units of the planned 120 aircraft are scheduled to enter service in 2017 but this plan has been stifled by technical and fiscal difficulties. With only a modest track record of licence-producing Lockheed Martin’s F-16 and co-producing with it the T-50 advanced jet trainer, Korea Aerospace Industries possesses only 63% of the requisite technological capacity for KFX. As South Korea seeks international partnership, the program me remains stuck at the feasibility stage with little progress forward.

    China is known to have a 5G jet fighter programme referred to as J-XX/J-12. While little of it is known, J-XX reportedly embeds design features similar to the F-22’s. However, the extent of its developmental progress remains to be seen. Having demonstrated remarkable technological prowess with the J-10 and J-11 fighters, and boasting over 100 variously-sized enterprises involved in its aviation industry, China is certainly a rising aerospace player to be reckoned with.

    In February 2010, India inked a deal with Russia to co-develop the PAK FA, dubbed ‘Raptorski’, for its Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA) programme. Like South Korea, India envisages the first of its 5G jet fighters to be operational by 2017. Unlike South Korea, however, India enjoys the benefit of riding on Russia’s success with the PAK FA, of which 70% of its technological content has been fulfilled by Sukhoi. With India throwing the financial weight behind Russia’s technical expertise, the bilateral 5G jet fighter collaboration may well blossom.

    Clash of Two Titans

    Out of this stable of four Asian 5G jet fighter players, only two – China and India – appear to be forging ahead while the Japanese and South Korean programmes languished for want of funding and/or technological expertise. With the experience of producing fourth-generation J-10, China possesses a reasonable margin of success in realising its J-XX programme despite the possible lack of any forthcoming Russian help (due to intellectual property concerns) and before the Western arms embargo is lifted. India, despite its lack of technical expertise, is able to leverage on the Russian PAK FA.

    For long India has lagged behind China in defence self-sufficiency, especially in aerospace sector. The FGFA programme, a potential beneficiary of the PAK FA’s success, might allow India to supersede China in putting a 5G jet fighter in service. Therein lies the potential risk: the longstanding animosity between China and India means that India’s success could spur increased effort by Beijing to keep pace with its own J-XX programme. That is not all, however.

    The potential spillovers beyond the Sino-Indian dynamics could not be ignored. China’s countervailing measures might spur Japan’s efforts with its ATD-X, especially if the latter is unable to secure the F-22 or F-35 to replace its aging F-4EJ (and even F-15J/DJ) fleet to counter the rising Chinese air power. Japan’s ATD-X might be further catalysed if South Korea is able to secure much- needed international partnership to accelerate its KFX programme. Anticipated progress with the ATD-X could create more incentives for China to hasten its J-XX programme, thereafter feeding back into Indian countermeasures in a classical security dilemma.

    The broader security implications for Asia may have been a factor for countries with interest in this development. Singapore is already a participant in the F-35 programme (with possible procurement plans to replace the venerable F-5S/T fleet), while Vietnam is reportedly interested in the PAK FA. The 5G jet fighter race, if spun out of control, could encourage other regional states to acquire similar capabilities.

    Beyond Geopolitics, Money Matters

    No doubt Asia has managed to emerge from the economic crisis in better shape than the West. Still, the financial and technical hurdles associated with such complex programmes as an indigenous jet fighter (and a 5G one at that) should not be underestimated. The Obama administration’s decision to halt the F-22 production demonstrates the intractability of cost matters even a superpower cannot escape from. While the 5G jet fighter competition might spur domestic technological progress and self-sufficiency, the fiscal and technological risks involved are probably as significant.

    Security considerations might not be the singular driving force behind 5G jet fighter programmes in Asia. Factors such as prestige might inspire such projects. Without financial, technical and real operational needs being given proper deliberations, regional 5G jet fighter programmes pursued out of sheer impulse could potentially heighten fiscal risks. This is particularly so in the case of bad debts incurred for projects that go wrong. Therefore, 5G jet fighter programmes in Asia need to be pursued with moderation and restraint for both domestic and geopolitical purposes.

    About the Authors

    Curie Maharani and Koh Swee Lean Collin are associate research fellow and research analyst at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. Both are doctoral candidates respectively at Cransfield University and RSIS. 

    Categories: Commentaries / International Politics and Security

    Last updated on 10/10/2014

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    CO10045 | Bracing For Impact: Fifth-Generation Jet Fighter Programmes in Asia

    Commentary

    Four major regional ...
    more info