• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO09115 | Obama’s America: Why it is Likely to Endure in Asia
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO09115 | Obama’s America: Why it is Likely to Endure in Asia
    Deepak Nair

    17 November 2009

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    Two key underlying themes have predicated the discourses on Barack Obama’s visit to Asia. First, the US has weakened. Second, Asia has changed substantially. But contrary to conclusions of “irrevocable decline”, America still has an enduring role in Asia.

    America’s ‘decline’, Asia’s ‘confidence’

    THOSE WHO argue that the United States is in decline point to some compelling empirical evidence: a struggling economy, a discredited model of economic and social planning, and, of course, the apparent growth of China’s power.

    While these changes are beyond doubt, the implications are, however, debatable. An increasingly ubiquitous implication has been that Obama’s visit instantiates the irrevocably diminishing position of the US in Asia. This is seen, it is argued, in the visit’s accent on seeking growth and markets from Asia, an explicit willingness to accommodate the interests of China rather than contain it, and its difficulty in rebuilding troubled relations with allies like Japan.

    Despite the evidence that appeals to the logic of “irrevocable decline”, American power is likely to endure. Here, I refer not purely to America’s alliances and security guarantees to a host of Asian nations. A more plausible explanation for American power resides in an understanding of its position of being the Tertius in Asia.

    The US as the Tertius in Asia

    Writing in the early 20th century, the sociologist Georg Simmels elaborated on the Tertius Gaudens (literally, ‘the third who enjoys’). Simmels argued that the Tertius (the ‘third element, party or person’) acquires a position of power by virtue of its position within the group. The Tertius enjoys deep relations with each of the units, but the other units themselves don’t share a similar depth of association The thin bonds between the units is not necessarily a result of hostility (thought it often is); it arises from a lack of trust, a ‘mutual strangeness’ or even a ‘general differentiation’. Power, thus, arises from the advantageous position the Tertius occupies in a structured pattern of relations; in short, power is relational.

    Transposing this concept to Asian international politics demonstrates how the US has enjoyed the advantages of being a Tertius since the end of the Second World War. Disputes rooted in war, historical animosities, post-colonial state building, and specific territorial claims have bred mistrust among East Asian states. At the same time, these states have developed strong relations with the US through enmeshment in post-War economic institutions or through security relationships, partly to counter security dilemmas in their own neighbourhoods. ‘Hub and spokes’, thus, not only describes America’s relationship with the region in military and strategic terms, it also serves a metaphor for the nature of its relational power in the region.

    The Tertius in the Context of Obama’s Visit

    While Obama may have visited the region in a position of seeming weakness, the politics of the Tertius were not far from sight.

    In Southeast Asia, Obama’s visit and explicit gestures of commitment were welcomed by states that had hitherto actively articulated a discourse on American ‘neglect’ and had repeatedly questioned whether the Tertius was adequately committed to its unique position. Even though Southeast Asian states pursued a lucrative policy of engagement with China, at the same time, they repeatedly called the US to be engaged to counter China;s ‘charm offensive’ and ‘tight embrace’ of the region.

    Obama’s crucial diplomatic gestures during his stop in Singapore were a reaffirmation of the politics of the Tertius: in meeting ASEAN leaders, the US has asserted its interest in the region, has pragmatically chosen not to hold its relations with Southeast Asia hostage to its policy on Myanmar, and has enabled Southeast Asian states to leverage their relations with the Tertius as they simultaneously deal with China.

    Japan is the most crucial test for the Tertius Two key moves illustrate Japan’s ongoing reassessment of its alliance with the US.– the end of its refueling mission in support of allied forces in Afghanistan and a reconsideration of the 2006 Agreement on US military bases in Okinawa. However, it remains unclear if these measures represent anything substantive or are perhaps an attempt at operationalising the mandate of ‘change’ that had swept the Hatoyama government to power. Japan’s decision to pledge five billion yen for Afghanistan, and its increasingly consistent reiterations on the centrality of the US-Japan alliance reveal a policy that may not secure any substantive autonomy for Japan outside of its alliance.

    That America’s enjoyment of its Tertius position is also a product of the interests of other states is most clearly demonstrated by the recent experience of regionalism in East Asia. Simmels noted that the position of the Tertius disappears when the other elements become a unit or the object of dispute is resolved. In some respects, the attempts at regional identity building, especially exclusive East Asian identities that excluded the US, were attempts at forging such unity.

    East Asia’s Inherent Faultlines

    Yet, the failure of the ASEAN Plus Three to neatly evolve into the East Asia Summit -because of anxieties over growing Chinese leadership, and Japan and Australia’s more recent proposals for an Asian community that seek a formal role for the US – discloses how any such conjoining of units remains deeply implausible.

    Most importantly, the power of the Tertius depends less on the quantity of its power and more on its decisive position within the group. The power of the Vatican during the European state struggles through the Middle Ages, and of small parties in coalition politics are illustrative of the nature of such power. By implication, then, America’s Tertius position in Asia can endure regardless of the recession or a relative decline in its material power.

    Obama’s nine-day visit may not have accomplished substantive deals or goal-driven agreements, but it has effectively reaffirmed and strengthened America’s prospects of staying as the Tertius in Asia.

    About the Author

    Deepak Nair is a MacArthur Visiting Fellow at the Regionalism and Multilateralism Programme of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.. 

    Categories: Commentaries / International Politics and Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific

    Last updated on 09/10/2014

    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    Two key underlying themes have predicated the discourses on Barack Obama’s visit to Asia. First, the US has weakened. Second, Asia has changed substantially. But contrary to conclusions of “irrevocable decline”, America still has an enduring role in Asia.

    America’s ‘decline’, Asia’s ‘confidence’

    THOSE WHO argue that the United States is in decline point to some compelling empirical evidence: a struggling economy, a discredited model of economic and social planning, and, of course, the apparent growth of China’s power.

    While these changes are beyond doubt, the implications are, however, debatable. An increasingly ubiquitous implication has been that Obama’s visit instantiates the irrevocably diminishing position of the US in Asia. This is seen, it is argued, in the visit’s accent on seeking growth and markets from Asia, an explicit willingness to accommodate the interests of China rather than contain it, and its difficulty in rebuilding troubled relations with allies like Japan.

    Despite the evidence that appeals to the logic of “irrevocable decline”, American power is likely to endure. Here, I refer not purely to America’s alliances and security guarantees to a host of Asian nations. A more plausible explanation for American power resides in an understanding of its position of being the Tertius in Asia.

    The US as the Tertius in Asia

    Writing in the early 20th century, the sociologist Georg Simmels elaborated on the Tertius Gaudens (literally, ‘the third who enjoys’). Simmels argued that the Tertius (the ‘third element, party or person’) acquires a position of power by virtue of its position within the group. The Tertius enjoys deep relations with each of the units, but the other units themselves don’t share a similar depth of association The thin bonds between the units is not necessarily a result of hostility (thought it often is); it arises from a lack of trust, a ‘mutual strangeness’ or even a ‘general differentiation’. Power, thus, arises from the advantageous position the Tertius occupies in a structured pattern of relations; in short, power is relational.

    Transposing this concept to Asian international politics demonstrates how the US has enjoyed the advantages of being a Tertius since the end of the Second World War. Disputes rooted in war, historical animosities, post-colonial state building, and specific territorial claims have bred mistrust among East Asian states. At the same time, these states have developed strong relations with the US through enmeshment in post-War economic institutions or through security relationships, partly to counter security dilemmas in their own neighbourhoods. ‘Hub and spokes’, thus, not only describes America’s relationship with the region in military and strategic terms, it also serves a metaphor for the nature of its relational power in the region.

    The Tertius in the Context of Obama’s Visit

    While Obama may have visited the region in a position of seeming weakness, the politics of the Tertius were not far from sight.

    In Southeast Asia, Obama’s visit and explicit gestures of commitment were welcomed by states that had hitherto actively articulated a discourse on American ‘neglect’ and had repeatedly questioned whether the Tertius was adequately committed to its unique position. Even though Southeast Asian states pursued a lucrative policy of engagement with China, at the same time, they repeatedly called the US to be engaged to counter China;s ‘charm offensive’ and ‘tight embrace’ of the region.

    Obama’s crucial diplomatic gestures during his stop in Singapore were a reaffirmation of the politics of the Tertius: in meeting ASEAN leaders, the US has asserted its interest in the region, has pragmatically chosen not to hold its relations with Southeast Asia hostage to its policy on Myanmar, and has enabled Southeast Asian states to leverage their relations with the Tertius as they simultaneously deal with China.

    Japan is the most crucial test for the Tertius Two key moves illustrate Japan’s ongoing reassessment of its alliance with the US.– the end of its refueling mission in support of allied forces in Afghanistan and a reconsideration of the 2006 Agreement on US military bases in Okinawa. However, it remains unclear if these measures represent anything substantive or are perhaps an attempt at operationalising the mandate of ‘change’ that had swept the Hatoyama government to power. Japan’s decision to pledge five billion yen for Afghanistan, and its increasingly consistent reiterations on the centrality of the US-Japan alliance reveal a policy that may not secure any substantive autonomy for Japan outside of its alliance.

    That America’s enjoyment of its Tertius position is also a product of the interests of other states is most clearly demonstrated by the recent experience of regionalism in East Asia. Simmels noted that the position of the Tertius disappears when the other elements become a unit or the object of dispute is resolved. In some respects, the attempts at regional identity building, especially exclusive East Asian identities that excluded the US, were attempts at forging such unity.

    East Asia’s Inherent Faultlines

    Yet, the failure of the ASEAN Plus Three to neatly evolve into the East Asia Summit -because of anxieties over growing Chinese leadership, and Japan and Australia’s more recent proposals for an Asian community that seek a formal role for the US – discloses how any such conjoining of units remains deeply implausible.

    Most importantly, the power of the Tertius depends less on the quantity of its power and more on its decisive position within the group. The power of the Vatican during the European state struggles through the Middle Ages, and of small parties in coalition politics are illustrative of the nature of such power. By implication, then, America’s Tertius position in Asia can endure regardless of the recession or a relative decline in its material power.

    Obama’s nine-day visit may not have accomplished substantive deals or goal-driven agreements, but it has effectively reaffirmed and strengthened America’s prospects of staying as the Tertius in Asia.

    About the Author

    Deepak Nair is a MacArthur Visiting Fellow at the Regionalism and Multilateralism Programme of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.. 

    Categories: Commentaries / International Politics and Security

    Last updated on 09/10/2014

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    CO09115 | Obama’s America: Why it is Likely to Endure in Asia

    Commentary

    Two key underlying ...
    more info