• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • The Emergence of JI’s Political Front
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO21176 | The Emergence of JI’s Political Front
    Vidia Arianti, Unaesah Rahmah

    06 December 2021

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    Two decades since it was first discovered, despite a crackdown by the authorities in the region, JI continues to show its resilience, developing a political arm as a hybrid organisation.


    Source: Andylala Waluyo (VOA), Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

    COMMENTARY

    THE AUTHORITIES in Indonesia recently arrested Farid Ahmad Okbah, a member of Jemaah Islamiyah’s (JI) consultative council; he is also the chairman of Partai Dakwah Rakyat Indonesia, PDRI (Indonesian People’s Dakwah Party). This move reveals the existence of a newly established JI political front, an addition to its traditional fronts of dakwah (religious outreach) and armed jihad (military struggle).

    Also arrested in November was Ahmad Zain An-Najah, a member of the fatwa commission of Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI), or Indonesia Ulama Council, the nation’s top Islamic clerical body. The two men, along with a third man arrested, have been accused of raising funds for JI. Established in 1993, JI aspires to create an Islamic state in Indonesia through its two-pronged strategy of dakwah and armed jihad.

    JI’s Transformation into a Hybrid Body

    Over the last few years, Indonesia’s anti-terror police force Detachment 88 has gradually crippled both these fronts, starting with JI’s military wing.

    Since 2012, JI’s military activities ranged from construction of several underground bunkers and the production of home-made weapons, to deploying their members to train and fight with several Syria-based rebel groups (including preparing members’ pre-deployment training) as well as planning attacks.

    The crackdown on JI’s dakwah arm (social activities including charity work) has also intensified since late last year, which included the arrest of some JI clerics.

    The arrest of Farid in November, however, confirms some observers’ assessment that JI has been transformed into a hybrid militant organisation which now incorporates the political element. How did this come about and what does this mean?

    Political Consolidation

    Under the leadership of Para Wijayanto, who led JI from 2009 to 2019, JI launched a political component named tamkin siyasi (political consolidation) as one of its strategies, as revealed in the court documents of several convicted key JI leaders.

    Tamkin siyasi, formalised in 2016, is built from JI’s existing social programmes — dakwah and education — and aims to cultivate the sympathy of Indonesian Muslims by winning their hearts and minds.

    Tamkin siyasi is part of a larger strategi tamkin (tamkin strategy), which emphasises the methodical acquisition and consolidation of influence over territory and to build community support.

    The development of JI’s tamkin siyasi reflects the group’s dichotomous and pragmatic stance over time as it attempts to sustain its struggle vis-à-vis its historical anti-democracy position, which it decries as a man-made system.

    Engagement With Political Parties

    An important component of tamkin siyasi is its stance on and engagement with political parties, which is best reflected in three phases. The first phase was prior to 2016, when JI members were banned from taking part in elections, including members not being allowed to vote.

    The transition towards JI’s encouragement to vote was hinted at in 2015, when JI’s senior advisory board member Abu Rusydan stated that the mujahidin (jihadi fighters) should build a relationship with the parliament even though the latter is perceived not to be in line with sharia (Islamic law).

    The second phase was from 2016 to 2019, when JI members were urged to refrain from voting for the incumbent President Joko Widodo. Core to this phase was JI’s strategy called istinzaf, defined as undermining and criticising the Indonesian government.

    JI’s narrative, as reflected in the public statements of its clerics in social media prior to the 2019 Indonesian elections, urged Muslims to vote for a parliamentary member candidate who could ensure that Muslims’ interests were met.

    The third phase is marked by JI’s attempt to establish, control or infiltrate a political party, exemplified by the involvement of Farid in the PDRI in May 2021.

    Preparing for the 2024 Election?

    However, with only two provincial branches in Banten and East Java, PDRI will face a significant hurdle to contest in the 2024 general election that requires a new party to have branches in all provinces and 75 per cent of all districts and municipalities.

    Whilst starting a new party is easy, Indonesia’s regulatory framework for elections and political parties employs entry barriers that make it extremely difficult for new parties to contest in general elections. These will require substantial financial resources, which PDRI seems to be lacking.

    What’s key, though, is that the PDRI marks JI’s transformation towards a hybrid militant organisation, to complement its social and military fronts.

    In this regard, the path is modelled after Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood and Lebanon’s Hizbollah — both of which have set up their respective political parties and ventured successfully into local politics.

    What Next?

    Currently, JI’s political path is still very much at the infancy stage. It is important to note that JI continues to exercise the tandzim sirri principle, that is, operating as a secret organisation, whereby members do not divulge their association publicly.

    This raises the possibility that individuals and parties who have engaged with PDRI and non-JI elements within the party itself might not be aware that Farid is a member of JI’s consultative council and personal advisor of JI’s leader Para Wijayanto.

    At this juncture, there are at least two conflicting scenarios. First, JI may suspend its activities in PDRI. According to JI’s counter-intelligence strategy TAS TOS, an abbreviation for Total Amniah Sistem dan Total Solution (total security system and total solution), JI’s utmost goal is to secure the safety of its members and evade arrest. Pulling out from PDRI may meet this objective.

    Secondly, the tandzim sirri principle, which protects against the disclosure of JI membership, could allow (unidentified) JI members to continue to act as a pressure group in organised circles.

    Putting a Brake on JI

    The supporters of Farid, along with other arrested JI clerics, Hanung Al-Hamat and Ahmad Zain An-Najah, have initiated the hashtags #BebaskanUlama (Free the Islamic Scholars) and #BubarkanDensus88 (Dismantle Detachment 88).

    JI’s track record in shaping public opinion should not be underestimated as it indirectly managed to put pressure on the authorities to investigate the unlawful killing of a JI member Siyono during a police raid in 2016.

    Indonesian police’s decisive action on JI’s newly established political wing, while still at its premature stage, may put the brakes on JI’s full transformation into a hybrid militant organisation with its considered entry into Indonesia’s politics.

    What bears watching is how JI, ever resilient in nature, will recalibrate its holistic strategies, while keeping an eye on its long-term Islamic state aspirations.

    About the Authors

    V. Arianti and Unaesah Rahmah are associate research fellow and research analyst respectively at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. An earlier version appeared in TODAY on 1 Dec 2021.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / Regionalism and Multilateralism / Religion in Contemporary Society / Terrorism Studies / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Global / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 07/12/2021

    comments powered by Disqus
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    Two decades since it was first discovered, despite a crackdown by the authorities in the region, JI continues to show its resilience, developing a political arm as a hybrid organisation.


    Source: Andylala Waluyo (VOA), Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

    COMMENTARY

    THE AUTHORITIES in Indonesia recently arrested Farid Ahmad Okbah, a member of Jemaah Islamiyah’s (JI) consultative council; he is also the chairman of Partai Dakwah Rakyat Indonesia, PDRI (Indonesian People’s Dakwah Party). This move reveals the existence of a newly established JI political front, an addition to its traditional fronts of dakwah (religious outreach) and armed jihad (military struggle).

    Also arrested in November was Ahmad Zain An-Najah, a member of the fatwa commission of Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI), or Indonesia Ulama Council, the nation’s top Islamic clerical body. The two men, along with a third man arrested, have been accused of raising funds for JI. Established in 1993, JI aspires to create an Islamic state in Indonesia through its two-pronged strategy of dakwah and armed jihad.

    JI’s Transformation into a Hybrid Body

    Over the last few years, Indonesia’s anti-terror police force Detachment 88 has gradually crippled both these fronts, starting with JI’s military wing.

    Since 2012, JI’s military activities ranged from construction of several underground bunkers and the production of home-made weapons, to deploying their members to train and fight with several Syria-based rebel groups (including preparing members’ pre-deployment training) as well as planning attacks.

    The crackdown on JI’s dakwah arm (social activities including charity work) has also intensified since late last year, which included the arrest of some JI clerics.

    The arrest of Farid in November, however, confirms some observers’ assessment that JI has been transformed into a hybrid militant organisation which now incorporates the political element. How did this come about and what does this mean?

    Political Consolidation

    Under the leadership of Para Wijayanto, who led JI from 2009 to 2019, JI launched a political component named tamkin siyasi (political consolidation) as one of its strategies, as revealed in the court documents of several convicted key JI leaders.

    Tamkin siyasi, formalised in 2016, is built from JI’s existing social programmes — dakwah and education — and aims to cultivate the sympathy of Indonesian Muslims by winning their hearts and minds.

    Tamkin siyasi is part of a larger strategi tamkin (tamkin strategy), which emphasises the methodical acquisition and consolidation of influence over territory and to build community support.

    The development of JI’s tamkin siyasi reflects the group’s dichotomous and pragmatic stance over time as it attempts to sustain its struggle vis-à-vis its historical anti-democracy position, which it decries as a man-made system.

    Engagement With Political Parties

    An important component of tamkin siyasi is its stance on and engagement with political parties, which is best reflected in three phases. The first phase was prior to 2016, when JI members were banned from taking part in elections, including members not being allowed to vote.

    The transition towards JI’s encouragement to vote was hinted at in 2015, when JI’s senior advisory board member Abu Rusydan stated that the mujahidin (jihadi fighters) should build a relationship with the parliament even though the latter is perceived not to be in line with sharia (Islamic law).

    The second phase was from 2016 to 2019, when JI members were urged to refrain from voting for the incumbent President Joko Widodo. Core to this phase was JI’s strategy called istinzaf, defined as undermining and criticising the Indonesian government.

    JI’s narrative, as reflected in the public statements of its clerics in social media prior to the 2019 Indonesian elections, urged Muslims to vote for a parliamentary member candidate who could ensure that Muslims’ interests were met.

    The third phase is marked by JI’s attempt to establish, control or infiltrate a political party, exemplified by the involvement of Farid in the PDRI in May 2021.

    Preparing for the 2024 Election?

    However, with only two provincial branches in Banten and East Java, PDRI will face a significant hurdle to contest in the 2024 general election that requires a new party to have branches in all provinces and 75 per cent of all districts and municipalities.

    Whilst starting a new party is easy, Indonesia’s regulatory framework for elections and political parties employs entry barriers that make it extremely difficult for new parties to contest in general elections. These will require substantial financial resources, which PDRI seems to be lacking.

    What’s key, though, is that the PDRI marks JI’s transformation towards a hybrid militant organisation, to complement its social and military fronts.

    In this regard, the path is modelled after Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood and Lebanon’s Hizbollah — both of which have set up their respective political parties and ventured successfully into local politics.

    What Next?

    Currently, JI’s political path is still very much at the infancy stage. It is important to note that JI continues to exercise the tandzim sirri principle, that is, operating as a secret organisation, whereby members do not divulge their association publicly.

    This raises the possibility that individuals and parties who have engaged with PDRI and non-JI elements within the party itself might not be aware that Farid is a member of JI’s consultative council and personal advisor of JI’s leader Para Wijayanto.

    At this juncture, there are at least two conflicting scenarios. First, JI may suspend its activities in PDRI. According to JI’s counter-intelligence strategy TAS TOS, an abbreviation for Total Amniah Sistem dan Total Solution (total security system and total solution), JI’s utmost goal is to secure the safety of its members and evade arrest. Pulling out from PDRI may meet this objective.

    Secondly, the tandzim sirri principle, which protects against the disclosure of JI membership, could allow (unidentified) JI members to continue to act as a pressure group in organised circles.

    Putting a Brake on JI

    The supporters of Farid, along with other arrested JI clerics, Hanung Al-Hamat and Ahmad Zain An-Najah, have initiated the hashtags #BebaskanUlama (Free the Islamic Scholars) and #BubarkanDensus88 (Dismantle Detachment 88).

    JI’s track record in shaping public opinion should not be underestimated as it indirectly managed to put pressure on the authorities to investigate the unlawful killing of a JI member Siyono during a police raid in 2016.

    Indonesian police’s decisive action on JI’s newly established political wing, while still at its premature stage, may put the brakes on JI’s full transformation into a hybrid militant organisation with its considered entry into Indonesia’s politics.

    What bears watching is how JI, ever resilient in nature, will recalibrate its holistic strategies, while keeping an eye on its long-term Islamic state aspirations.

    About the Authors

    V. Arianti and Unaesah Rahmah are associate research fellow and research analyst respectively at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. An earlier version appeared in TODAY on 1 Dec 2021.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / Regionalism and Multilateralism / Religion in Contemporary Society / Terrorism Studies

    Last updated on 07/12/2021

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    The Emergence of JI’s Political Front

    SYNOPSIS

    Two decades since it was first discovered, despite a crackdown by the authorities in the region, JI continues to show its resilience, developing a ...
    more info