• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Research @ RSIS
    • Other Programmes
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Information Sessions
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Cohesive Societies
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Research @ RSIS
      • Other Programmes
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Information Sessions
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • COVID-19 Resources
      • Cohesive Societies
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses (CTTA) – Volume 14 Issue 01
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses (CTTA) – Volume 14 Issue 01
    Kumar Ramakrishna, Kenneth Yeo, Rueben Ananthan Santhana Dass, Ahmad Saiful Rijal Bin Hassan, Kalicharan Veera Singam, Amresh Lavan Gunasingham

    03 January 2022

    download pdf
    Annual Threat Assessment

    In 2021, as the COVID-19 pandemic entered its second year, the terrorism landscape continued to occupy policy attention worldwide. Especially prominent was the US’ “strategic failure” in preventing the Taliban’s return to power in Afghanistan, which provided “a shot in the arm” for Islamist terror networks worldwide. Given Al Qaeda’s historic links with the Taliban, the former has arguably never been better positioned since Osama Bin Laden’s killing. Developments in Kabul also impacted the “geopolitical posture” of regional states, particularly neighbouring Pakistan. Similarly, Southeast Asian pro-Taliban-Al Qaeda networks such as Jemaah Islamiyah, drew the lesson that sheer perseverance in fighting a mighty enemy and divine intervention will likewise make them victorious as well.

    For the Islamic State and its affiliates worldwide, however, the Taliban victory presented a more complex threat picture. At one level, it generally represented a symbolic win for all Islamist extremist networks worldwide, including IS, because it resuscitated Islamist militants’ belief in jihad to establish an Islamic state, and then a global Muslim caliphate. Yet, in Afghanistan itself, IS appeared violently opposed to the Taliban and its Al Qaeda allies. IS responded to the Taliban victory by publicly questioning its Islamist legitimacy, charging the new Taliban is essentially in cahoots with the US. IS also declared itself the only group fighting to establish a caliphate, thereby deserving of the support of global jihadists. Around Southeast Asia, IS supporters also reacted negatively.

    Across the regions surveyed in this volume, in addition to the Taliban’s return and its ensuing impact, the evolving global violent extremist threat is assessed via the following major trends:  Operational Issues and Challenges for Islamist Militants; An Evolving Spectrum of Attack Modalities and Targets; Role of Women, Families and Youth;. Role of Ideological Ecosystems; The Evolving Extreme Right Threat; and  State Responses: A Mix of “Hard” and Soft Measures.

    A Taliban-ruled Afghanistan, with its vast ungoverned spaces, could potentially relapse into an Al Qaeda stronghold, attracting foreign fighters as well as some disaffected Taliban fighters. Such fears were reinforced by doubts concerning the Biden Administration’s plan for “over the horizon” drone attacks targeting the IS-Khorasan Province (IS-KP) affiliate in Afghanistan. For its part, IS-KP has developed a stronghold in the eastern province of Nangarhar, which could become a melting pot of radicalised individuals from the region as well as anti-Taliban groups.

    The continuing importance of cross-border and wider transnational links of Islamist terror networks was also observed throughout 2021, even as the pandemic-driven movement restrictions that has hampered inter-state and international movements largely flattened the curve of terrorism globally. Attack modalities also evolved globally, while lone-actor attacks persisted. In Indonesia, for example, bombings appeared to be the preferred modus operandi employed by pro-IS militant group. This was in contrast to stabbings and shootings in previous years.

    Further, women, families and youth assumed greater operational importance in Islamist terror networks over the past year. In Syria, for instance, ideologically indoctrinated pro-IS women within the Al-Hol refugee camp formed hesba (religious policing) units, violently imposing IS ideology upon former IS fighters’ wives who had denounced IS and were seeking to return to their countries of origin. Women also featured as actual combatants. In the Philippines, the pro-IS Sulu faction in Mindanao appeared to have groomed female suicide bombers, many reportedly the wives, widows or daughters of slain ASG leaders and fighters.

    With regards to youth, the pro-IS Neo-JMB in Bangladesh started recruiting children and teenagers into its ranks, mostly from Ahle Hadis/Salafi-dominated villages. In Europe, youth have also been targeted by the Extreme Right, possibly as the push online due to pandemic-related restrictions has provided a ripe environment them to be drawn towards extremist plotting, if not actual violence as yet. Additionally, the importance of ideological ecosystems propagating violent extremist narratives persisted in 2021. Such ecosystems included, amongst other elements, interconnected networks of social media and print platforms, strategic influencers or persons, as well as certain extremist organisational, educational and religious places.

    Finally, apart from the 6 January 2021 Capitol Hill riot in Washington, DC, that reportedly involved a number of “identifiably right-wing extremists” seeking to support former US President Donald Trump following his November 2020 election defeat, large-scale acts of violence emanating exclusively from the Extreme Right was limited in 2021. But arrests allegedly continued primarily in the US, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific, mostly Australia. Much of the violence was driven by anger against government lockdown measures and vaccination-related policies. Separately, worrying signs of the further mainstreaming of Buddhist Extremist-fuelled anti-Muslim sentiment was apparent in Myanmar and Sri Lanka, while in India there were innumerable incidents of Hindutva mobs continuing to target Muslim and Christian minorities.

    Overall, given the challenging transnational terrorism and extremism landscape in 2021, a blend of hard, short-term and softer medium to longer-term approaches to comprehensively deal with the full spectrum of the threat continue to be required.

    Categories: Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses /

    Last updated on 03/01/2022

    Annual Threat Assessment

    In 2021, as the COVID-19 pandemic entered its second year, the terrorism landscape continued to occupy policy attention worldwide. Especially prominent was the US’ “strategic failure” in preventing the Taliban’s return to power in Afghanistan, which provided “a shot in the arm” for Islamist terror networks worldwide. Given Al Qaeda’s historic links with the Taliban, the former has arguably never been better positioned since Osama Bin Laden’s killing. Developments in Kabul also impacted the “geopolitical posture” of regional states, particularly neighbouring Pakistan. Similarly, Southeast Asian pro-Taliban-Al Qaeda networks such as Jemaah Islamiyah, drew the lesson that sheer perseverance in fighting a mighty enemy and divine intervention will likewise make them victorious as well.

    For the Islamic State and its affiliates worldwide, however, the Taliban victory presented a more complex threat picture. At one level, it generally represented a symbolic win for all Islamist extremist networks worldwide, including IS, because it resuscitated Islamist militants’ belief in jihad to establish an Islamic state, and then a global Muslim caliphate. Yet, in Afghanistan itself, IS appeared violently opposed to the Taliban and its Al Qaeda allies. IS responded to the Taliban victory by publicly questioning its Islamist legitimacy, charging the new Taliban is essentially in cahoots with the US. IS also declared itself the only group fighting to establish a caliphate, thereby deserving of the support of global jihadists. Around Southeast Asia, IS supporters also reacted negatively.

    Across the regions surveyed in this volume, in addition to the Taliban’s return and its ensuing impact, the evolving global violent extremist threat is assessed via the following major trends:  Operational Issues and Challenges for Islamist Militants; An Evolving Spectrum of Attack Modalities and Targets; Role of Women, Families and Youth;. Role of Ideological Ecosystems; The Evolving Extreme Right Threat; and  State Responses: A Mix of “Hard” and Soft Measures.

    A Taliban-ruled Afghanistan, with its vast ungoverned spaces, could potentially relapse into an Al Qaeda stronghold, attracting foreign fighters as well as some disaffected Taliban fighters. Such fears were reinforced by doubts concerning the Biden Administration’s plan for “over the horizon” drone attacks targeting the IS-Khorasan Province (IS-KP) affiliate in Afghanistan. For its part, IS-KP has developed a stronghold in the eastern province of Nangarhar, which could become a melting pot of radicalised individuals from the region as well as anti-Taliban groups.

    The continuing importance of cross-border and wider transnational links of Islamist terror networks was also observed throughout 2021, even as the pandemic-driven movement restrictions that has hampered inter-state and international movements largely flattened the curve of terrorism globally. Attack modalities also evolved globally, while lone-actor attacks persisted. In Indonesia, for example, bombings appeared to be the preferred modus operandi employed by pro-IS militant group. This was in contrast to stabbings and shootings in previous years.

    Further, women, families and youth assumed greater operational importance in Islamist terror networks over the past year. In Syria, for instance, ideologically indoctrinated pro-IS women within the Al-Hol refugee camp formed hesba (religious policing) units, violently imposing IS ideology upon former IS fighters’ wives who had denounced IS and were seeking to return to their countries of origin. Women also featured as actual combatants. In the Philippines, the pro-IS Sulu faction in Mindanao appeared to have groomed female suicide bombers, many reportedly the wives, widows or daughters of slain ASG leaders and fighters.

    With regards to youth, the pro-IS Neo-JMB in Bangladesh started recruiting children and teenagers into its ranks, mostly from Ahle Hadis/Salafi-dominated villages. In Europe, youth have also been targeted by the Extreme Right, possibly as the push online due to pandemic-related restrictions has provided a ripe environment them to be drawn towards extremist plotting, if not actual violence as yet. Additionally, the importance of ideological ecosystems propagating violent extremist narratives persisted in 2021. Such ecosystems included, amongst other elements, interconnected networks of social media and print platforms, strategic influencers or persons, as well as certain extremist organisational, educational and religious places.

    Finally, apart from the 6 January 2021 Capitol Hill riot in Washington, DC, that reportedly involved a number of “identifiably right-wing extremists” seeking to support former US President Donald Trump following his November 2020 election defeat, large-scale acts of violence emanating exclusively from the Extreme Right was limited in 2021. But arrests allegedly continued primarily in the US, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific, mostly Australia. Much of the violence was driven by anger against government lockdown measures and vaccination-related policies. Separately, worrying signs of the further mainstreaming of Buddhist Extremist-fuelled anti-Muslim sentiment was apparent in Myanmar and Sri Lanka, while in India there were innumerable incidents of Hindutva mobs continuing to target Muslim and Christian minorities.

    Overall, given the challenging transnational terrorism and extremism landscape in 2021, a blend of hard, short-term and softer medium to longer-term approaches to comprehensively deal with the full spectrum of the threat continue to be required.

    Categories: Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses

    Last updated on 03/01/2022

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses (CTTA) – Volume 14 Issue 01

    In 2021, as the COVID-19 pandemic entered its second year, the terrorism landscape continued to occupy policy attention worldwide. Especia ...

    more info