• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • WTO in Limbo: Urgent Need for New Director-General
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO20203 | WTO in Limbo: Urgent Need for New Director-General
    Kaewkamol Pitakdumrongkit

    26 November 2020

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    WTO members should choose the WTO director-general very soon as major issues remain to be tackled. As the world organisation is purposed to advance global trade governance, it cannot afford to be in limbo for long.


    Source: Unsplash

    COMMENTARY

    2020 IS not a good year for the World Trade Organisation (WTO). The institution is struggling to remain important and relevant in global trade governance. Concerning dispute settlement, the Appellate Body has ceased to function since December 2019. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused the postponement of the bi-annual Ministerial Conference which could have provided an opportunity for the members to alleviate their tensions and conflicts.

    Moreover, the rise of trade megadeals namely the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) tempts some observers to believe that trading blocs will eclipse WTO and become new key players advancing global trade.

    Enter WTO-Plus Blocs: New WTO Chief Needed

    Entering into force on 30 December 2018, CPTPP is an agreement among 11 parties representing 13.5 per cent of the world’s goods trade. It is dubbed a “WTO-Plus” deal because some rules governing services trade and labour and environmental standards are more advanced than those of the WTO’s. RCEP, which was signed by 15 countries on 15 November 2020, is the world’s biggest trading bloc to date.

    While critics contend that the pact still awaits ratification from the signatories before being activated, the fact that RCEP covers about 30 per cent of the global GDP and 30 per cent of the world’s population signifies its potential to shape the future landscape of international commerce.

    Furthermore, the stepping down of the director-general (DG) Roberto Azevêdo added another blow to WTO. Such move has made the organisation leaderless. Several nations see a need to elect the next chief soon. For instance, the Global Governance Group (3G) – an informal grouping of 30 nations convened by Singapore – released a statement urging all WTO parties “to work together to expeditiously complete the selection and appointment of a new WTO director-general in accordance with the agreed rules and procedures”.

    Why is a new DG needed? The main reason is that WTO needs a chief to help facilitate trade discussions and negotiations. Hence, the DG’s influence largely emerges from the DG’s soft skills. For instance, his ability to leverage on the networks of experts, businesses, and officials as well as ability to persuade conflicting parties to find a common ground can make or break the negotiation.

    Also, the chief may have access to certain knowledge such as members’ interests. It can use the information to help members reconcile their different preferences and arrive at an agreed outcome. Additionally, presiding over some major gatherings, the DG can control the meeting’s pace, the framing of issues, and the structure of the debates over certain matters. These elements can also determine whether the talks would ultimately succeed or fail.

    Challenges Facing Next DG

    Whoever becomes the next chief will have to use the above skills to tackle the following burning issues: In the areas of trade negotiation and liberalisation, the DG should convince the members to rely on certain FTAs as a template for crafting WTO’s rules. History teaches us that such arrangements can be beneficial to global trade governance.

    For example, some terms of the North America Free Trade Agreement (now renamed as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) were later adopted at the WTO and hence shaped the WTO’s rules concerning investment, trade in services, and intellectual property rights.

    Regarding dispute settlement, the chief should urge the members to adopt the Walker Principles aimed at salvaging the appeal process by directly addressing the US’ concerns. For example, the Principles ensure that facts are not subject to appeals, the Appellate Body makes the verdict within 90 days, and the entity’s decision does not add to the members obligations and strip away their rights as provided by WTO.

    As far as transparency is concerned, the new DG should play an active role in collaborating with other international organisations especially the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) to come up with an agreed definition of a “developing nation”.

    Doing so would help address the contentious issue of special and differential treatment (SDT) as some members intentionally self-select their developing country status to take advantage of SDT. The definition will improve transparency, enabling WTO to better monitor member’s compliance and detect non-compliers.

    Now for Biden’s Move

    At the time of writing, Singapore, as the 3G’s convener, had been invited to attend the virtual G-20 Summit on 22-23 November which was hosted by Saudi Arabia. Free trade supporters were hoping that the world’s leaders would use this Summit as a venue to convince one another to speed up the selection process.

    Yet, the world may have to wait until US president-elect Joe Biden is sworn into office in January 2021. As the new American administration is speculated to be more willing to pursue multilateralism and cooperate with partners and allies, the DG selection will likely be finalised not long after the US government is installed.

    In sum, the WTO members should finish selecting a new DG very soon as many burning issues remain to be tackled. As the world organisation is purposed to advance global trade governance, it cannot afford to be in limbo for long.

    About the Author

    Kaewkamol Karen Pitakdumrongkit is Assistant Professor and Deputy Head of the Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS), S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / Regionalism and Multilateralism / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Global / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 27/11/2020

    comments powered by Disqus
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    WTO members should choose the WTO director-general very soon as major issues remain to be tackled. As the world organisation is purposed to advance global trade governance, it cannot afford to be in limbo for long.


    Source: Unsplash

    COMMENTARY

    2020 IS not a good year for the World Trade Organisation (WTO). The institution is struggling to remain important and relevant in global trade governance. Concerning dispute settlement, the Appellate Body has ceased to function since December 2019. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused the postponement of the bi-annual Ministerial Conference which could have provided an opportunity for the members to alleviate their tensions and conflicts.

    Moreover, the rise of trade megadeals namely the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) tempts some observers to believe that trading blocs will eclipse WTO and become new key players advancing global trade.

    Enter WTO-Plus Blocs: New WTO Chief Needed

    Entering into force on 30 December 2018, CPTPP is an agreement among 11 parties representing 13.5 per cent of the world’s goods trade. It is dubbed a “WTO-Plus” deal because some rules governing services trade and labour and environmental standards are more advanced than those of the WTO’s. RCEP, which was signed by 15 countries on 15 November 2020, is the world’s biggest trading bloc to date.

    While critics contend that the pact still awaits ratification from the signatories before being activated, the fact that RCEP covers about 30 per cent of the global GDP and 30 per cent of the world’s population signifies its potential to shape the future landscape of international commerce.

    Furthermore, the stepping down of the director-general (DG) Roberto Azevêdo added another blow to WTO. Such move has made the organisation leaderless. Several nations see a need to elect the next chief soon. For instance, the Global Governance Group (3G) – an informal grouping of 30 nations convened by Singapore – released a statement urging all WTO parties “to work together to expeditiously complete the selection and appointment of a new WTO director-general in accordance with the agreed rules and procedures”.

    Why is a new DG needed? The main reason is that WTO needs a chief to help facilitate trade discussions and negotiations. Hence, the DG’s influence largely emerges from the DG’s soft skills. For instance, his ability to leverage on the networks of experts, businesses, and officials as well as ability to persuade conflicting parties to find a common ground can make or break the negotiation.

    Also, the chief may have access to certain knowledge such as members’ interests. It can use the information to help members reconcile their different preferences and arrive at an agreed outcome. Additionally, presiding over some major gatherings, the DG can control the meeting’s pace, the framing of issues, and the structure of the debates over certain matters. These elements can also determine whether the talks would ultimately succeed or fail.

    Challenges Facing Next DG

    Whoever becomes the next chief will have to use the above skills to tackle the following burning issues: In the areas of trade negotiation and liberalisation, the DG should convince the members to rely on certain FTAs as a template for crafting WTO’s rules. History teaches us that such arrangements can be beneficial to global trade governance.

    For example, some terms of the North America Free Trade Agreement (now renamed as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) were later adopted at the WTO and hence shaped the WTO’s rules concerning investment, trade in services, and intellectual property rights.

    Regarding dispute settlement, the chief should urge the members to adopt the Walker Principles aimed at salvaging the appeal process by directly addressing the US’ concerns. For example, the Principles ensure that facts are not subject to appeals, the Appellate Body makes the verdict within 90 days, and the entity’s decision does not add to the members obligations and strip away their rights as provided by WTO.

    As far as transparency is concerned, the new DG should play an active role in collaborating with other international organisations especially the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) to come up with an agreed definition of a “developing nation”.

    Doing so would help address the contentious issue of special and differential treatment (SDT) as some members intentionally self-select their developing country status to take advantage of SDT. The definition will improve transparency, enabling WTO to better monitor member’s compliance and detect non-compliers.

    Now for Biden’s Move

    At the time of writing, Singapore, as the 3G’s convener, had been invited to attend the virtual G-20 Summit on 22-23 November which was hosted by Saudi Arabia. Free trade supporters were hoping that the world’s leaders would use this Summit as a venue to convince one another to speed up the selection process.

    Yet, the world may have to wait until US president-elect Joe Biden is sworn into office in January 2021. As the new American administration is speculated to be more willing to pursue multilateralism and cooperate with partners and allies, the DG selection will likely be finalised not long after the US government is installed.

    In sum, the WTO members should finish selecting a new DG very soon as many burning issues remain to be tackled. As the world organisation is purposed to advance global trade governance, it cannot afford to be in limbo for long.

    About the Author

    Kaewkamol Karen Pitakdumrongkit is Assistant Professor and Deputy Head of the Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS), S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / Regionalism and Multilateralism

    Last updated on 27/11/2020

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    WTO in Limbo: Urgent Need for New Director-General

    SYNOPSIS

    WTO members should choose the WTO director-general very soon as major issues remain to be tackled. As the world organisation is purposed to advance ...
    more info