• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Research @ RSIS
    • Other Programmes
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Information Sessions
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Cohesive Societies
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Research @ RSIS
      • Other Programmes
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Information Sessions
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • COVID-19 Resources
      • Cohesive Societies
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Weaponising Migrants: Belarusian Blackmail and Multilateralism
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO21170 | Weaponising Migrants: Belarusian Blackmail and Multilateralism
    Frederick Kliem

    22 November 2021

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due recognition to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Mr Yang Razali Kassim, Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected]

    SYNOPSIS

    The Belarusian dictator Lukashenko is currently launching a hybrid attack on the European Union by sending migrants to the EU border. This method is as old as it is cynical. The biggest problem is that hostile actors can so easily undermine multilateralism.


    Source: Situation at the Poland-Belarus border, Kancelaria Premiera, flickr, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

    COMMENTARY

    THE IMAGES are tragic. Thousands of Middle Eastern and African migrants are trapped in no-man’s-land between Poland and Belarus, Europe’s last dictatorship under the leadership of President Alexander Lukashenko.

    Belarus proactively recruits hopeful migrants by granting special visas and flying them to Minsk from various places of origin only to then arrange transport to the poorly fortified border with Poland and Europe’s border-free Schengen Area.

    Migration as a Weapon

    Polish authorities have responded with emergency laws that allow so-called pushbacks — illegal expulsion of asylum seekers without due process. Thousands of national police and military personnel patrol the area, with EU support.

    Unable to return to Belarus, where migrants are denied re-entry, the people are stuck in between. This is never a comfortable situation; in Eastern Europe’s harsh Winter months, it is costing lives.

    The EU, especially Germany and Poland, are blaming Lukashenko for a cynical strategy of using human beings as weapons to both retaliate against European sanctions and demonstrate his leverage. This is neither the first time the plight of hopeful refugees is being abused this way, nor is Lukashenko the only one who has ever exploited European fears of mass-migration.

    Migration is precisely where the EU is at its most vulnerable, not only since the 2015 refugee crisis. Societal divisions, the rise of the far-right, and many intra-EU political conflicts are the result of, at least severely exacerbated by, Europe’s mismanagement of migration.

    Exploiting Europe’s & Multilateralism’s Weakness

    No other policy area lends itself as much to exposing and exploiting Europe’s dilemma: a normative and legalistic identity must respect human rights, especially the right to asylum, and due process; yet the nature of European integration and its guaranteed rights and economic security for individuals make it not only an attractive migration destination but also a highly fragile polity.

    Current pushbacks, walls and barbed wire along the border with Belarus brutally visualise this predicament, and it is precisely these images that Lukashenko’s perfidious strategy seeks.

    The fault does not lie with the migrants seeking a better life for their families. Likewise, Polish authorities are unfairly accused of breaking international law. Securing the EU’s external borders is a necessary, indeed an honourable task. But these are only patchwork attempts at tackling the symptoms.

    It is ironic and devastating to watch dictators and strongmen succeed at bullying the EU. But their ability to create such images does not speak to their power as much as it speaks to multilateralism’s weaknesses. Despite decades of deep integration and trust-building, national disagreements still prevent the EU from producing a functioning migration regime.

    Multilateralism is innately disadvantaged by a consensus imperative. Multilateral policy decisions are imperfect compromises among diverse, sometimes competing national interests.

    Even if consensus is reached, the process is slow and tedious, and populist nationalists often blame multilateralism to gloss over domestic failures or play to nationalist instincts. This creates divisions, weakens multilateral legitimacy, and it opens space for external interference.

    Multilateral Resilience

    Lukashenko’s attack is particularly perfidious, but all organisations of regional integration, indeed multilateralism as such, are under threat from malign external actors seeking to create and exploit inter-governmental and intra-societal divisions to advance their strategic interest.

    “Divide and conquer” strengthens those actors, who do not seek partnerships and cooperation but dominance and zero-sum advantages.

    Freshwater cut-offs at transboundary rivers, strategic investments in lesser developed economies, sending ethnic minorities or refugees to particularly vulnerable countries — the possibilities of hybrid attacks to undermine multilateralism are endless, and it is easy to identify possible equivalents in Asia.

    As far as Lukashenko — and illegal migration in general — are concerned, fortifying Europe is necessary, but not sufficient. Brussels must react with harsh sanctions and under no circumstances bow to Belarusian blackmail.

    More importantly, the EU must increase its resilience by respecting its own principles meticulously, and by devising a functioning migration regime that both secures borders and respects Europe’s humanistic identity. Lastly, Brussels must engage a multitude of partners who indirectly make Lukashenko’s attack on Europe possible — the countries of origin, airlines, etc.

    Best Defence: More Not Less Multilateralism

    This is something of a blueprint for enhancing the resilience of all multilateral processes and institutions against malign external influence.

    The best defence is not securitisation, which only leads to legitimisation of martial responses in the name of national defence and erodes precisely those principles and values that make multilateralism strong. The best defence is not less multilateralism but more.

    The key to neutralising external attacks on the integrity of multilateralism is to engage others and have legal processes in place for contingencies. Multilateralism’s comparative advantage are multidimensional relationships and the facilitation of dialogue and trust-building to mediate estrangement.

    Multilateralism is inclusive and respects all countries’ needs by finding a modus operandi of reciprocal trade-offs. Diversification of partnerships offers not only multiple avenues to assert leverage, but it also offers alternatives, thereby reducing one-dimensional dependencies.

    Unity Against Unilateral Coercion

    The confidence to do so rests with the trust in mutually agreed procedures and standards, followed by all. The less flexible and wavering these are, the stronger the unity. Clichéd but true, the strength of multilateralism is the belief that unity and reliable, legalistic process create strength through cooperation. This means often tedious processes but is the best guard against unilateral coercion.

    What is needed is a clear demonstration of multilateralism’s resilience, that regional organisations can manage and respond to external division tactics. This applies to the EU as much as to other organisations under pressure from those who seek to weaken them.

    About the Author

    Frederick Kliem is a Research Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / Non-Traditional Security / Regionalism and Multilateralism / Singapore and Homeland Security

    Last updated on 22/11/2021

    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due recognition to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Mr Yang Razali Kassim, Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected]

    SYNOPSIS

    The Belarusian dictator Lukashenko is currently launching a hybrid attack on the European Union by sending migrants to the EU border. This method is as old as it is cynical. The biggest problem is that hostile actors can so easily undermine multilateralism.


    Source: Situation at the Poland-Belarus border, Kancelaria Premiera, flickr, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

    COMMENTARY

    THE IMAGES are tragic. Thousands of Middle Eastern and African migrants are trapped in no-man’s-land between Poland and Belarus, Europe’s last dictatorship under the leadership of President Alexander Lukashenko.

    Belarus proactively recruits hopeful migrants by granting special visas and flying them to Minsk from various places of origin only to then arrange transport to the poorly fortified border with Poland and Europe’s border-free Schengen Area.

    Migration as a Weapon

    Polish authorities have responded with emergency laws that allow so-called pushbacks — illegal expulsion of asylum seekers without due process. Thousands of national police and military personnel patrol the area, with EU support.

    Unable to return to Belarus, where migrants are denied re-entry, the people are stuck in between. This is never a comfortable situation; in Eastern Europe’s harsh Winter months, it is costing lives.

    The EU, especially Germany and Poland, are blaming Lukashenko for a cynical strategy of using human beings as weapons to both retaliate against European sanctions and demonstrate his leverage. This is neither the first time the plight of hopeful refugees is being abused this way, nor is Lukashenko the only one who has ever exploited European fears of mass-migration.

    Migration is precisely where the EU is at its most vulnerable, not only since the 2015 refugee crisis. Societal divisions, the rise of the far-right, and many intra-EU political conflicts are the result of, at least severely exacerbated by, Europe’s mismanagement of migration.

    Exploiting Europe’s & Multilateralism’s Weakness

    No other policy area lends itself as much to exposing and exploiting Europe’s dilemma: a normative and legalistic identity must respect human rights, especially the right to asylum, and due process; yet the nature of European integration and its guaranteed rights and economic security for individuals make it not only an attractive migration destination but also a highly fragile polity.

    Current pushbacks, walls and barbed wire along the border with Belarus brutally visualise this predicament, and it is precisely these images that Lukashenko’s perfidious strategy seeks.

    The fault does not lie with the migrants seeking a better life for their families. Likewise, Polish authorities are unfairly accused of breaking international law. Securing the EU’s external borders is a necessary, indeed an honourable task. But these are only patchwork attempts at tackling the symptoms.

    It is ironic and devastating to watch dictators and strongmen succeed at bullying the EU. But their ability to create such images does not speak to their power as much as it speaks to multilateralism’s weaknesses. Despite decades of deep integration and trust-building, national disagreements still prevent the EU from producing a functioning migration regime.

    Multilateralism is innately disadvantaged by a consensus imperative. Multilateral policy decisions are imperfect compromises among diverse, sometimes competing national interests.

    Even if consensus is reached, the process is slow and tedious, and populist nationalists often blame multilateralism to gloss over domestic failures or play to nationalist instincts. This creates divisions, weakens multilateral legitimacy, and it opens space for external interference.

    Multilateral Resilience

    Lukashenko’s attack is particularly perfidious, but all organisations of regional integration, indeed multilateralism as such, are under threat from malign external actors seeking to create and exploit inter-governmental and intra-societal divisions to advance their strategic interest.

    “Divide and conquer” strengthens those actors, who do not seek partnerships and cooperation but dominance and zero-sum advantages.

    Freshwater cut-offs at transboundary rivers, strategic investments in lesser developed economies, sending ethnic minorities or refugees to particularly vulnerable countries — the possibilities of hybrid attacks to undermine multilateralism are endless, and it is easy to identify possible equivalents in Asia.

    As far as Lukashenko — and illegal migration in general — are concerned, fortifying Europe is necessary, but not sufficient. Brussels must react with harsh sanctions and under no circumstances bow to Belarusian blackmail.

    More importantly, the EU must increase its resilience by respecting its own principles meticulously, and by devising a functioning migration regime that both secures borders and respects Europe’s humanistic identity. Lastly, Brussels must engage a multitude of partners who indirectly make Lukashenko’s attack on Europe possible — the countries of origin, airlines, etc.

    Best Defence: More Not Less Multilateralism

    This is something of a blueprint for enhancing the resilience of all multilateral processes and institutions against malign external influence.

    The best defence is not securitisation, which only leads to legitimisation of martial responses in the name of national defence and erodes precisely those principles and values that make multilateralism strong. The best defence is not less multilateralism but more.

    The key to neutralising external attacks on the integrity of multilateralism is to engage others and have legal processes in place for contingencies. Multilateralism’s comparative advantage are multidimensional relationships and the facilitation of dialogue and trust-building to mediate estrangement.

    Multilateralism is inclusive and respects all countries’ needs by finding a modus operandi of reciprocal trade-offs. Diversification of partnerships offers not only multiple avenues to assert leverage, but it also offers alternatives, thereby reducing one-dimensional dependencies.

    Unity Against Unilateral Coercion

    The confidence to do so rests with the trust in mutually agreed procedures and standards, followed by all. The less flexible and wavering these are, the stronger the unity. Clichéd but true, the strength of multilateralism is the belief that unity and reliable, legalistic process create strength through cooperation. This means often tedious processes but is the best guard against unilateral coercion.

    What is needed is a clear demonstration of multilateralism’s resilience, that regional organisations can manage and respond to external division tactics. This applies to the EU as much as to other organisations under pressure from those who seek to weaken them.

    About the Author

    Frederick Kliem is a Research Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / Non-Traditional Security / Regionalism and Multilateralism / Singapore and Homeland Security

    Last updated on 22/11/2021

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    Weaponising Migrants: Belarusian Blackmail and Multilateralism

    SYNOPSIS

    The Belarusian dictator Lukashenko is currently launching a hybrid attack on the European Union by sending migrants to the EU border. This method i ...
    more info