• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Research @ RSIS
    • Other Programmes
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Information Sessions
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Cohesive Societies
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Research @ RSIS
      • Other Programmes
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Information Sessions
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • COVID-19 Resources
      • Cohesive Societies
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Mekong-Ganga in Indo-Pacific: Boosting Sub-Regional Ties?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO21177 | Mekong-Ganga in Indo-Pacific: Boosting Sub-Regional Ties?
    Nazia Hussain

    07 December 2021

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    In a crowded field of sub-regional frameworks operating in the Mekong, the Mekong-Ganga Cooperation (MGC) initiative continues to remain strategically relevant. It might benefit from exploring synergies with existing sub-regional cooperation initiatives and ASEAN.


    Source: Pixabay

    COMMENTARY

    THE 11TH Mekong-Ganga Cooperation (MGC) Foreign Ministers’ Meeting took place earlier this year with high level officials of the five Mekong countries – Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam – and India convening virtually to chart out the future course of the oldest sub-regional cooperation framework between Mekong countries and an external partner. Key issues on the agenda were medical cooperation in COVID-19 prevention and control; post-pandemic economic recovery through connectivity, infrastructure and manpower development; and sustainable management of water resources.

    As one of the many sub-regional frameworks to crop up in the geo-strategically important Mekong region, the MGC could have gone down the road to obscurity in a crowded field of 13 Mekong-related intergovernmental cooperation frameworks. However, what makes the MGC initiative particularly relevant now for all parties involved is the geopolitical reality of an evolving Indo-Pacific regional order where both India and the Mekong countries feature as prominent actors amid intensifying major power competition.

    Convergence of Strategic Interests

    Growing convergence of strategic interests in the Indo-Pacific and jostling for influence by external partners in the Mekong sub-region has provided New Delhi an impetus for adopting a tangible results-oriented approach towards MGC initiatives. India has launched 68 community-oriented projects worth US$3.4 million under the Quick Impact Projects (QIP) scheme during 2016-2020 — of which 38 projects have been completed and 30 other projects are under implementation.

    These short-term community-oriented QIPs aim to directly benefit the locals and are geared towards upgrading  the physical infrastructure as well as address social issues such as sanitation, water resource management, elementary education and women empowerment.

    The MGC’s active presence and implementation of projects in the Mekong thus far has fared better compared to other sub-regional groupings such as the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) which failed to generate interest and visibility in the first 20 years of its establishment.

    Climate change and hydrological conditions leading to unpredictable droughts and floods remain pressing challenges for the lower riparian Mekong states and for India along the Ganges basin. The MGC could consider cooperation between the Mekong River Commission and the National Ganga River Basin Authority for improved capacity in early forecasting and disaster management.

    Prioritising cooperation to address climate change and water resource management will go a long way for the MGC, particularly when Mekong countries have been lamenting the neglect of Mekong issues at regional-level forums owing to geopolitical considerations. India has agreed to fund seven water management projects at a cost of approximately US$350,000 in four Mekong Delta provinces which have long been facing severe saltwater intrusion and the consequent lack of freshwater for irrigation and drinking.

    Geopolitical Considerations

    There remains enough political will from MGC member countries to ensure the grouping’s continued relevance in the sub-region. From a foreign policy perspective, India aims to cultivate deeper relations with Mekong countries to advance its key foreign policy initiatives — the “Act East” and “neighbourhood first” policies.

    Drawing attention to India’s priorities vis-à-vis its eastern neighbours, Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar tweeted: “Much of India’s interests and relationships now lie to its East, a testimony of its ties with ASEAN.”

    From a domestic viewpoint, development and connectivity of India’s frontier north-eastern region requires transnational cooperation with ASEAN countries, particularly with its Mekong neighbours which share geographical and cultural proximity to India’s northeast. For example, the Kaladan Multi-modal Transit Transport Project jointly developed by India and Myanmar will enable sea access for India’s landlocked northeastern states via the Kaladan river in Myanmar.

    As the sub-region becomes a theatre of US-China rivalry, Mekong countries would want to effectively engage all external partners rather than face further consequences of being overly reliant on either of the big powers. India provides an alternative infrastructure development model as well as access to markets, and has extended a US$2 billion loan towards projects on developing water resources, infrastructure, digitalisation, rural electrification, irrigation, and education.

    In fact, the  11th MGC Foreign Ministers’ Meeting co-chaired by Cambodia, which was the most recent, was seen as a multilateral mechanism towards diversification of Cambodian foreign policy. Meanwhile, Mekong countries look to enhance security ties with India. Vietnam has been cultivating closer ties with New Delhi — the two countries conducted a joint naval exercise in the South China Sea earlier this year.

    Moreover, Thailand, Myanmar and India participated in a military exercise under the ambit of BIMSTEC that aimed to boost inter-operability among forces and exchange best practices in counter-terrorism.

    Exploring Synergies

    Amid calls for ASEAN to elevate Mekong issues on its agenda, sub-regional frameworks such as the MGC, BIMSTEC and the Ayeyawady-Chao Phraya-Mekong Economic Cooperation Strategy (ACMECS) could consider consolidating their often overlapping initiatives in the Mekong by exploring synergies with one another and with ASEAN. The ACMECS is a cooperation framework linking five ASEAN economies – Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam.

    For example, the proposed plan to extend the India-Myanmar-Thailand trilateral highway to Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam might be better served through collaborative efforts under the BIMSTEC Connectivity Master Plan and the Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity 2025. The project has lagged behind deadlines for years.

    Moreover, the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (AOIP) encourages potential synergies with sub-regional frameworks since it does not intend to create new mechanisms or replace existing ones.

    In any case, geopolitics of the Mekong is only getting more heated with the involvement of major powers and as the premier regional organisation in Southeast Asia, ASEAN might want to be more proactive in representing Mekong issues. Maybe ASEAN could start with paying attention to the impending 12th MGC Ministerial Meeting set to take place on the sidelines of the ASEAN Foreign Ministers’ Meeting in 2022.

    About the Author

    Nazia Hussain is a Senior Analyst with the Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS) at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / Regionalism and Multilateralism

    Last updated on 05/04/2022

    "Mekong-Ganga in Indo-Pacific: Boosting Sub-Regional Ties?" by Nazia Hussain
    In a crowded field of sub-regional frameworks operating in the Mekong, the Mekong-Ganga Cooperation (MGC) initiative continues to remain strategically relevant. It might benefit from exploring synergies with existing sub-regional cooperation initiatives and ASEAN.
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    In a crowded field of sub-regional frameworks operating in the Mekong, the Mekong-Ganga Cooperation (MGC) initiative continues to remain strategically relevant. It might benefit from exploring synergies with existing sub-regional cooperation initiatives and ASEAN.


    Source: Pixabay

    COMMENTARY

    THE 11TH Mekong-Ganga Cooperation (MGC) Foreign Ministers’ Meeting took place earlier this year with high level officials of the five Mekong countries – Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam – and India convening virtually to chart out the future course of the oldest sub-regional cooperation framework between Mekong countries and an external partner. Key issues on the agenda were medical cooperation in COVID-19 prevention and control; post-pandemic economic recovery through connectivity, infrastructure and manpower development; and sustainable management of water resources.

    As one of the many sub-regional frameworks to crop up in the geo-strategically important Mekong region, the MGC could have gone down the road to obscurity in a crowded field of 13 Mekong-related intergovernmental cooperation frameworks. However, what makes the MGC initiative particularly relevant now for all parties involved is the geopolitical reality of an evolving Indo-Pacific regional order where both India and the Mekong countries feature as prominent actors amid intensifying major power competition.

    Convergence of Strategic Interests

    Growing convergence of strategic interests in the Indo-Pacific and jostling for influence by external partners in the Mekong sub-region has provided New Delhi an impetus for adopting a tangible results-oriented approach towards MGC initiatives. India has launched 68 community-oriented projects worth US$3.4 million under the Quick Impact Projects (QIP) scheme during 2016-2020 — of which 38 projects have been completed and 30 other projects are under implementation.

    These short-term community-oriented QIPs aim to directly benefit the locals and are geared towards upgrading  the physical infrastructure as well as address social issues such as sanitation, water resource management, elementary education and women empowerment.

    The MGC’s active presence and implementation of projects in the Mekong thus far has fared better compared to other sub-regional groupings such as the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) which failed to generate interest and visibility in the first 20 years of its establishment.

    Climate change and hydrological conditions leading to unpredictable droughts and floods remain pressing challenges for the lower riparian Mekong states and for India along the Ganges basin. The MGC could consider cooperation between the Mekong River Commission and the National Ganga River Basin Authority for improved capacity in early forecasting and disaster management.

    Prioritising cooperation to address climate change and water resource management will go a long way for the MGC, particularly when Mekong countries have been lamenting the neglect of Mekong issues at regional-level forums owing to geopolitical considerations. India has agreed to fund seven water management projects at a cost of approximately US$350,000 in four Mekong Delta provinces which have long been facing severe saltwater intrusion and the consequent lack of freshwater for irrigation and drinking.

    Geopolitical Considerations

    There remains enough political will from MGC member countries to ensure the grouping’s continued relevance in the sub-region. From a foreign policy perspective, India aims to cultivate deeper relations with Mekong countries to advance its key foreign policy initiatives — the “Act East” and “neighbourhood first” policies.

    Drawing attention to India’s priorities vis-à-vis its eastern neighbours, Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar tweeted: “Much of India’s interests and relationships now lie to its East, a testimony of its ties with ASEAN.”

    From a domestic viewpoint, development and connectivity of India’s frontier north-eastern region requires transnational cooperation with ASEAN countries, particularly with its Mekong neighbours which share geographical and cultural proximity to India’s northeast. For example, the Kaladan Multi-modal Transit Transport Project jointly developed by India and Myanmar will enable sea access for India’s landlocked northeastern states via the Kaladan river in Myanmar.

    As the sub-region becomes a theatre of US-China rivalry, Mekong countries would want to effectively engage all external partners rather than face further consequences of being overly reliant on either of the big powers. India provides an alternative infrastructure development model as well as access to markets, and has extended a US$2 billion loan towards projects on developing water resources, infrastructure, digitalisation, rural electrification, irrigation, and education.

    In fact, the  11th MGC Foreign Ministers’ Meeting co-chaired by Cambodia, which was the most recent, was seen as a multilateral mechanism towards diversification of Cambodian foreign policy. Meanwhile, Mekong countries look to enhance security ties with India. Vietnam has been cultivating closer ties with New Delhi — the two countries conducted a joint naval exercise in the South China Sea earlier this year.

    Moreover, Thailand, Myanmar and India participated in a military exercise under the ambit of BIMSTEC that aimed to boost inter-operability among forces and exchange best practices in counter-terrorism.

    Exploring Synergies

    Amid calls for ASEAN to elevate Mekong issues on its agenda, sub-regional frameworks such as the MGC, BIMSTEC and the Ayeyawady-Chao Phraya-Mekong Economic Cooperation Strategy (ACMECS) could consider consolidating their often overlapping initiatives in the Mekong by exploring synergies with one another and with ASEAN. The ACMECS is a cooperation framework linking five ASEAN economies – Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam.

    For example, the proposed plan to extend the India-Myanmar-Thailand trilateral highway to Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam might be better served through collaborative efforts under the BIMSTEC Connectivity Master Plan and the Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity 2025. The project has lagged behind deadlines for years.

    Moreover, the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (AOIP) encourages potential synergies with sub-regional frameworks since it does not intend to create new mechanisms or replace existing ones.

    In any case, geopolitics of the Mekong is only getting more heated with the involvement of major powers and as the premier regional organisation in Southeast Asia, ASEAN might want to be more proactive in representing Mekong issues. Maybe ASEAN could start with paying attention to the impending 12th MGC Ministerial Meeting set to take place on the sidelines of the ASEAN Foreign Ministers’ Meeting in 2022.

    About the Author

    Nazia Hussain is a Senior Analyst with the Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS) at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / Regionalism and Multilateralism

    Last updated on 05/04/2022

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    Mekong-Ganga in Indo-Pacific: Boosting Sub-Regional Ties?

    SYNOPSIS

    In a crowded field of sub-regional frameworks operating in the Mekong, the Mekong-Ganga Cooperation (MGC) initiative continues to remain strategica ...
    more info