• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO06076 | Mideast Conflict – A Silver Lining? Mixed Economic Impact Likely
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO06076 | Mideast Conflict – A Silver Lining? Mixed Economic Impact Likely
    Richard Carney

    03 August 2006

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    THE recent rise in violence in the Middle East, triggered by the Israeli- Hizbollah and Israeli-Palestinian conflicts, points to the likelihood of prolonged instability in the region. How could that ever be a cause for optimism?

    In the short-term, several negative effects on the world economy are likely. Oil prices increase whenever investors perceive an increased risk in its delivery; in this case, they are particularly worried about Iran getting dragged into the conflict, which could lead to the mining of the Straits of Hormuz. But even without Iranian participation, high oil prices remain a serious concern since it causes consumers to spend more on gas, leaving less money to spend on other things, and making the purchase of a new car especially unattractive. It also leads to higher prices on other goods as they become more expensive to manufacture and deliver. Consequently, consumers buy less.

    The same goes for business. They tend to make fewer purchases of energy- consuming machinery, and delay making other big-ticket expenditures. As a result, pressure builds for a recession.

    Impact on US economy

    At the moment, the United States economy is walking a tight rope between staying out of a recession, and keeping inflation under control. If Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke keeps interest rates high, or continues to raise them to keep inflation under control, he could push the US economy into recession. On the other hand, doing nothing, or lowering interest rates, could lead to intolerably high inflation, which is usually a worse sin. Recall that the outbreak of the Iran-Iraq war in 1980 preceded the 1981 recession, and the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in 1990 preceded the 1991 recession. So, the US economy is probably going to get worse before it gets better, and when the US economy gets the sniffles, the world economy usually catches cold too.

    Increasing and/or prolonged Middle East violence will also push gold prices and US bond prices higher since these are viewed as safe investments in times of uncertainty and when inflationary pressures mount. The stock market would also languish under such circumstances. For example, during the course of the Suez Crisis in 1956, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index dropped 5 percent.

    Thus, the short-term outlook for the world economy is quite bleak, indeed. But what about the long-term prospects?

    Unfortunately, or fortunately, US automakers are going to have an even tougher road ahead since they rely on the sales of SUVs to remain profitable. High gas prices are going to allow Toyota and Honda to trounce them even further.

    Upside of the Middle East crisis

    However, prolonged conflict in the Middle East creates several positive long- term opportunities for America, and the world. The worsening of the situation in the Middle East will help Democrats in their quest to win a majority of seats in the US Senate in this November’s mid-term elections. They may gain in two ways. One, voters will seek a change from the current Republican domination of government as a result of disaffection with Bush’s war in Iraq. Second, and perhaps even more importantly, because the health of the economy tends to have the biggest influence on voters at the ballot box, they will seek a change from the status quo, and vote for Democrats. This will give Senate Democrats the voting power they need, and the public support, to rein in Republican excesses.

    But of even greater long-term significance is the impact on the energy industry. With oil prices remaining intolerably high, alternative energies are looking increasingly attractive, and making more economic sense. Likely the biggest beneficiary will be nuclear power because it can provide large quantities of cheap electricity more reliably than other alternative energies, such as solar and wind power. Not only is it making more economic sense, but it is also politically and environmentally sensible too.

    High prices at the pump means consumers (voters) will support government funding for alternative energy sources, and will be more willing to overlook nuclear energy’s past transgressions (e.g., Chernobyl and Three Mile Island). Also, it gives the US greater control over its energy supplies since they will be domestically based, and not as reliant on foreign producers — an even more important security concern in this age of terrorism. This would be appealing to Republican voters concerned with national security, and may help to overcome resistance from the Republican-friendly oil industry. Further, support for nuclear power among the world’s largest oil consumers – the European Union, US, and China — could also generate lasting cooperation in energy research and in related matters of (inter)national security, and reduce tensions over access to oil. But if Democrats gain more political leverage in Congress, nuclear power has an even greater chance of success because of its environmental benefits.

    Nuclear Power

    Global warming poses an imminent danger according to scientists who study it – and as starkly portrayed in Al Gore’s recent movie, “An Inconvenient Truth”. Nuclear power offers an excellent option for generating the large amounts of cheap energy in a short period of time needed to reduce the imminent dangers of global warming. New technology also makes nuclear power plants much safer than the past, not to mention that the main reason for Chernobyl was that they took egregious shortcuts on safety design. There are problems with nuclear power, to be sure, such as disposal of the nuclear waste. But compared to the imminent problems of global warming, nuclear power is an increasingly attractive palliative.

    And, as some observers view it, insofar as money used to buy oil gets funneled to terrorist organizations, reliance upon nuclear power will slow this down. Thus, nuclear power is an increasingly attractive weapon in the war on terror, and in the battle against global warming. And we have the Middle East conflict to thank for this potentially positive inflection point.

    About the Author

    Richard Carney is an assistant professor in the International Political Economy programme at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, Nanyang Technological University. 

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / Middle East and North Africa (MENA)

    Last updated on 01/10/2015

    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    THE recent rise in violence in the Middle East, triggered by the Israeli- Hizbollah and Israeli-Palestinian conflicts, points to the likelihood of prolonged instability in the region. How could that ever be a cause for optimism?

    In the short-term, several negative effects on the world economy are likely. Oil prices increase whenever investors perceive an increased risk in its delivery; in this case, they are particularly worried about Iran getting dragged into the conflict, which could lead to the mining of the Straits of Hormuz. But even without Iranian participation, high oil prices remain a serious concern since it causes consumers to spend more on gas, leaving less money to spend on other things, and making the purchase of a new car especially unattractive. It also leads to higher prices on other goods as they become more expensive to manufacture and deliver. Consequently, consumers buy less.

    The same goes for business. They tend to make fewer purchases of energy- consuming machinery, and delay making other big-ticket expenditures. As a result, pressure builds for a recession.

    Impact on US economy

    At the moment, the United States economy is walking a tight rope between staying out of a recession, and keeping inflation under control. If Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke keeps interest rates high, or continues to raise them to keep inflation under control, he could push the US economy into recession. On the other hand, doing nothing, or lowering interest rates, could lead to intolerably high inflation, which is usually a worse sin. Recall that the outbreak of the Iran-Iraq war in 1980 preceded the 1981 recession, and the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in 1990 preceded the 1991 recession. So, the US economy is probably going to get worse before it gets better, and when the US economy gets the sniffles, the world economy usually catches cold too.

    Increasing and/or prolonged Middle East violence will also push gold prices and US bond prices higher since these are viewed as safe investments in times of uncertainty and when inflationary pressures mount. The stock market would also languish under such circumstances. For example, during the course of the Suez Crisis in 1956, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index dropped 5 percent.

    Thus, the short-term outlook for the world economy is quite bleak, indeed. But what about the long-term prospects?

    Unfortunately, or fortunately, US automakers are going to have an even tougher road ahead since they rely on the sales of SUVs to remain profitable. High gas prices are going to allow Toyota and Honda to trounce them even further.

    Upside of the Middle East crisis

    However, prolonged conflict in the Middle East creates several positive long- term opportunities for America, and the world. The worsening of the situation in the Middle East will help Democrats in their quest to win a majority of seats in the US Senate in this November’s mid-term elections. They may gain in two ways. One, voters will seek a change from the current Republican domination of government as a result of disaffection with Bush’s war in Iraq. Second, and perhaps even more importantly, because the health of the economy tends to have the biggest influence on voters at the ballot box, they will seek a change from the status quo, and vote for Democrats. This will give Senate Democrats the voting power they need, and the public support, to rein in Republican excesses.

    But of even greater long-term significance is the impact on the energy industry. With oil prices remaining intolerably high, alternative energies are looking increasingly attractive, and making more economic sense. Likely the biggest beneficiary will be nuclear power because it can provide large quantities of cheap electricity more reliably than other alternative energies, such as solar and wind power. Not only is it making more economic sense, but it is also politically and environmentally sensible too.

    High prices at the pump means consumers (voters) will support government funding for alternative energy sources, and will be more willing to overlook nuclear energy’s past transgressions (e.g., Chernobyl and Three Mile Island). Also, it gives the US greater control over its energy supplies since they will be domestically based, and not as reliant on foreign producers — an even more important security concern in this age of terrorism. This would be appealing to Republican voters concerned with national security, and may help to overcome resistance from the Republican-friendly oil industry. Further, support for nuclear power among the world’s largest oil consumers – the European Union, US, and China — could also generate lasting cooperation in energy research and in related matters of (inter)national security, and reduce tensions over access to oil. But if Democrats gain more political leverage in Congress, nuclear power has an even greater chance of success because of its environmental benefits.

    Nuclear Power

    Global warming poses an imminent danger according to scientists who study it – and as starkly portrayed in Al Gore’s recent movie, “An Inconvenient Truth”. Nuclear power offers an excellent option for generating the large amounts of cheap energy in a short period of time needed to reduce the imminent dangers of global warming. New technology also makes nuclear power plants much safer than the past, not to mention that the main reason for Chernobyl was that they took egregious shortcuts on safety design. There are problems with nuclear power, to be sure, such as disposal of the nuclear waste. But compared to the imminent problems of global warming, nuclear power is an increasingly attractive palliative.

    And, as some observers view it, insofar as money used to buy oil gets funneled to terrorist organizations, reliance upon nuclear power will slow this down. Thus, nuclear power is an increasingly attractive weapon in the war on terror, and in the battle against global warming. And we have the Middle East conflict to thank for this potentially positive inflection point.

    About the Author

    Richard Carney is an assistant professor in the International Political Economy programme at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, Nanyang Technological University. 

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies

    Last updated on 01/10/2015

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    CO06076 | Mideast Conflict – A Silver Lining? Mixed Economic Impact Likely

    Commentary

    THE recent rise in violence in the Middle East, triggered by the Israeli- Hizb ...
    more info