• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Cohesive Societies
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Cohesive Societies
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • COVID-19 Resources
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO14150 | Indonesia’s Future Elections: Will Social Media Forecasts Determine Outcome?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO14150 | Indonesia’s Future Elections: Will Social Media Forecasts Determine Outcome?
    Jennifer Yang Hui

    30 July 2014

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Synopsis

    Social media forecasts achieved highly accurate results in the 2014 Indonesian presidential elections. Will predictive analytics play a greater role in future electoral outcomes in Indonesia?

    Commentary

    IN THE midst of dispute over the quick count results for the 2014 Indonesian presidential elections, which were corroborated by the final results, a separate phenomenon was emerging: the forecast of election results through analysis of social media sentiment.

    In this respect Indonesia is following the trend in other countries, where the relationship between online sentiment and electoral outcomes had been studied. Social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook had been tracked in order to find out voter sentiment in elections such as the 2014 general elections in India, 2012 presidential elections in the United States and 2010 federal elections in Germany. It had been found that social media is a platform for political discussion and reflection of voter preferences similar to traditional election polls.

    Dawn of social media forecast

    In the case of Indonesia, the Jakarta gubernatorial elections in 2012 was the earliest instance where social media predictive analytics were used to gauge voter sentiment. Most opinion polls had predicted that the pair of Fauzi Bowo (Foke) and Nachrowi Ramli (Nara) would win the election, only to be proven wrong by the victory of Joko Widodo (Jokowi) and Basuki Tjahaja Purnama (Ahok).

    To recap, the Foke-Nara pair won only 34% of the vote in the first round of the elections, compared to Jokowi-Ahok’s 42.6%. In the second round of elections, Jokowi-Ahok managed to secure 53.8% of the votes against Foke-Nara’s 46.2%. The event raised doubts among some quarters about the methodology employed by traditional opinion polls.

    In tandem with the work of the opinion polls several independent social media consultancy firms analysed the results of Internet chatter and used algorithms to predict the winner of the elections. For instance, Provetic, a Jakarta-based data consultancy, saw online conversations as reliable predictors of local-level elections. Provetic analyses from April to July 2012 noted that during the 2012 gubernatorial election, the percentage of people talking about the different candidates on social media correlated very closely with the actual results.

    Twitter buzz around the Jakarta gubernatorial election showed a strong correlation with the first round of voting: Jokowi-Ahok (40%), Foke-Nara (33%). A separate social media consultancy company, Politicawave predicted a Jokowi-Ahok victory with 40.6% of the votes in round one and 53.9% in the second round. These results corroborated very closely the actual election results.

    First nation-wide social media forecast

    The latest presidential election was the first time that the social media predictive analytics were being employed on a nation-wide scale. Social media platforms had reported vast amount of online interaction related to the elections held on 9 July 2014. For example, Facebook reported more than 200 million posts, comments, shares and likes related to the presidential race. By voting day, Twitter had recorded more than 850,000 conversations about Prabowo and more than one million tweets related to Jokowi.

    The micro-blogging site had earlier noted that there had been close to 95 million tweets about the Indonesian elections since the beginning of the year. Given the large amount of election-related online interactions, the role of social media forecasts in the recent presidential election deserves a closer examination.

    In the Indonesian presidential election, the final results announced by the General Elections Commission on 22 July 2014 (Jokowi-Kalla pair winning 53.2% of the votes and Prabowo-Hatta pair with 46.9% of the votes) corroborated very closely social media predictions. For example, Politicawave had predicted a Jokowi-Kalla victory of 53.8% on 8 July 2014. The company also believed that Prabowo-Hatta would achieve 46.2% of the votes.

    Social media forecast results have also been very close to quick counts results conducted by poll companies that have passed the audit conducted by the Indonesian Association for Public Opinion (Persepi). The results released by polling firms such as Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) (Prabowo 48.1%, Jokowi 51.9%), Indikator Politik Indonesia (Prabowo 47%, Jokowi 53%), Saiful Mujani Research and Consulting (Prabowo 47.1% and Jokowi 53%), Lingkaran Survei Indonesia (Prabowo 46.4%, Jokowi 53.4%) showed a likely victory for Jokowi as well.

    All these showed that social media forecast were generally in agreement with the official results and polling firms that have been cleared by Persepi. The success called for closer examination into the role of social media forecast in future elections in Indonesia.

    Forecast in future Indonesian elections

    With the success of predictive analytics and higher digital literacy, social media forecast will likely play a greater role in future elections in Indonesia. Several questions may be posed with regards to this development.

    Firstly, will social media forecast continue to be an alternative way of electoral prediction? Is there a possibility of it becoming the mainstream way of predicting election results? Or, more likely, will it be a complementary form of analysis in future elections in Indonesia?

    In any case, it is almost certain that there will be more players in the game of social media forecasts in upcoming elections. In view of this scenario, will social media forecasts undergo similar calls for rigour in terms of  their research methods and public accountability in future elections?

    About the Author

    Jennifer Yang Hui is an Associate Research Fellow at the Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS), a constituent unit of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.

    Categories: Commentaries / Conflict and Stability / Country and Region Studies / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 05/09/2014

    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Synopsis

    Social media forecasts achieved highly accurate results in the 2014 Indonesian presidential elections. Will predictive analytics play a greater role in future electoral outcomes in Indonesia?

    Commentary

    IN THE midst of dispute over the quick count results for the 2014 Indonesian presidential elections, which were corroborated by the final results, a separate phenomenon was emerging: the forecast of election results through analysis of social media sentiment.

    In this respect Indonesia is following the trend in other countries, where the relationship between online sentiment and electoral outcomes had been studied. Social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook had been tracked in order to find out voter sentiment in elections such as the 2014 general elections in India, 2012 presidential elections in the United States and 2010 federal elections in Germany. It had been found that social media is a platform for political discussion and reflection of voter preferences similar to traditional election polls.

    Dawn of social media forecast

    In the case of Indonesia, the Jakarta gubernatorial elections in 2012 was the earliest instance where social media predictive analytics were used to gauge voter sentiment. Most opinion polls had predicted that the pair of Fauzi Bowo (Foke) and Nachrowi Ramli (Nara) would win the election, only to be proven wrong by the victory of Joko Widodo (Jokowi) and Basuki Tjahaja Purnama (Ahok).

    To recap, the Foke-Nara pair won only 34% of the vote in the first round of the elections, compared to Jokowi-Ahok’s 42.6%. In the second round of elections, Jokowi-Ahok managed to secure 53.8% of the votes against Foke-Nara’s 46.2%. The event raised doubts among some quarters about the methodology employed by traditional opinion polls.

    In tandem with the work of the opinion polls several independent social media consultancy firms analysed the results of Internet chatter and used algorithms to predict the winner of the elections. For instance, Provetic, a Jakarta-based data consultancy, saw online conversations as reliable predictors of local-level elections. Provetic analyses from April to July 2012 noted that during the 2012 gubernatorial election, the percentage of people talking about the different candidates on social media correlated very closely with the actual results.

    Twitter buzz around the Jakarta gubernatorial election showed a strong correlation with the first round of voting: Jokowi-Ahok (40%), Foke-Nara (33%). A separate social media consultancy company, Politicawave predicted a Jokowi-Ahok victory with 40.6% of the votes in round one and 53.9% in the second round. These results corroborated very closely the actual election results.

    First nation-wide social media forecast

    The latest presidential election was the first time that the social media predictive analytics were being employed on a nation-wide scale. Social media platforms had reported vast amount of online interaction related to the elections held on 9 July 2014. For example, Facebook reported more than 200 million posts, comments, shares and likes related to the presidential race. By voting day, Twitter had recorded more than 850,000 conversations about Prabowo and more than one million tweets related to Jokowi.

    The micro-blogging site had earlier noted that there had been close to 95 million tweets about the Indonesian elections since the beginning of the year. Given the large amount of election-related online interactions, the role of social media forecasts in the recent presidential election deserves a closer examination.

    In the Indonesian presidential election, the final results announced by the General Elections Commission on 22 July 2014 (Jokowi-Kalla pair winning 53.2% of the votes and Prabowo-Hatta pair with 46.9% of the votes) corroborated very closely social media predictions. For example, Politicawave had predicted a Jokowi-Kalla victory of 53.8% on 8 July 2014. The company also believed that Prabowo-Hatta would achieve 46.2% of the votes.

    Social media forecast results have also been very close to quick counts results conducted by poll companies that have passed the audit conducted by the Indonesian Association for Public Opinion (Persepi). The results released by polling firms such as Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) (Prabowo 48.1%, Jokowi 51.9%), Indikator Politik Indonesia (Prabowo 47%, Jokowi 53%), Saiful Mujani Research and Consulting (Prabowo 47.1% and Jokowi 53%), Lingkaran Survei Indonesia (Prabowo 46.4%, Jokowi 53.4%) showed a likely victory for Jokowi as well.

    All these showed that social media forecast were generally in agreement with the official results and polling firms that have been cleared by Persepi. The success called for closer examination into the role of social media forecast in future elections in Indonesia.

    Forecast in future Indonesian elections

    With the success of predictive analytics and higher digital literacy, social media forecast will likely play a greater role in future elections in Indonesia. Several questions may be posed with regards to this development.

    Firstly, will social media forecast continue to be an alternative way of electoral prediction? Is there a possibility of it becoming the mainstream way of predicting election results? Or, more likely, will it be a complementary form of analysis in future elections in Indonesia?

    In any case, it is almost certain that there will be more players in the game of social media forecasts in upcoming elections. In view of this scenario, will social media forecasts undergo similar calls for rigour in terms of  their research methods and public accountability in future elections?

    About the Author

    Jennifer Yang Hui is an Associate Research Fellow at the Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS), a constituent unit of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.

    Categories: Commentaries / Conflict and Stability / Country and Region Studies

    Last updated on 05/09/2014

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    CO14150 | Indonesia’s Future Elections: Will Social Media Forecasts Determine Outcome?

    Synopsis

    Social media forecasts achieved highly accurate results in the 2014 Indonesian presidential elections. Will predictive analytics play a greater role in ...
    more info