• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Cohesive Societies
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Cohesive Societies
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • COVID-19 Resources
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO06010 | Learning from Cartoons The Globalisation of Free Speech
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO06010 | Learning from Cartoons The Globalisation of Free Speech
    Norman Vasu

    08 February 2006

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    THE anger and violence generated by the publication of twelve cartoons representing the Prophet Muhammad in a crude and unfavourable light has led to several polemical diatribes. These sharp exchanges are taking up a significant amount of column inches in newspapers around the globe on either the importance of religious sensitivity or the sanctity of free speech.

    Events that have unfolded may be summarised as follows: A small Danish newspaper – with a circulation of only about 150,000 – on 30 September 2005 published the cartoons. Following from this, Muslim Danes protested against this act and Islamic states expressed their deep dissatisfaction. From that moment on, what was essentially an issue restricted to Denmark took a global turn when several newspapers in the European Union republished the cartoons while several television stations broadcast the images as well. The result of this has been protests on the streets of Muslim states, the organisation of commercial boycotts of Danish goods and attacks on several Scandinavian embassies.

    The publication of the cartoons has been defended from various positions. The foreign editor of Jyllands-Posten, the Danish paper at the centre of the storm, has maintained that its publication was motivated by a desire to question the issue of self-censorship when Islamic issues are discussed. In France, France Soir, the newspaper that republished the cartoons, defended its actions through the right to freedom of expression. Indeed, when the cartoons ran in the newspaper, the headline for it declared: “Yes we have the right to caricature God.” In Germany, in the newspaper Die Welt, the republication of the cartoons has been defended by its editor as an attempt to expose the “hypocritical” press of the Middle East where Jews are often portrayed in an unfavourable and racist manner.

    The three different defences presented highlight three very different issues that are going on amidst this cultural storm. One, the Danish defence is inspired by the need for not only introspection but also a public discussion on how sensitive matters are treated in the public sphere. Two, the French defence is driven by the desire to uphold an uncompromising principle of free speech; and three, the German defence highlights how the global press need to be balanced when covering events.

    Though all three issues are important and deserve a thorough debate, these issues have obscured the larger and more important matter at hand – freedom of expression is now an issue with intense and immediate global ramifications. As states become more and more multicultural through immigration, and as information is transmitted at increasing speed around the globe, there is a need now to take stock on the global responsibilities that come with the right to freedom of speech.

    The Globalisation of Free Speech

    The right to freedom of expression has been defended for centuries. For example, Socrates maintained its importance in the Greek city state of Athens during his trial; Erasmus was of the view that ‘[i]n a free state, tongues too should be free’; the First Amendment in the US Bill of Rights guarantees free speech; and Article 19 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights holds that everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression.

    What is noticeable about the examples above is that the right to freedom of expression is focussed on the right to free speech within a state. It does not take into account the repercussions of this freedom when it is disseminated around the globe.

    Events surrounding the Danish cartoons have propelled to the fore this disconnection between the rights held by individual citizens of a state and the global responsibility that now comes part and parcel with this right. Previously, more often than not, when controversial issues were discussed, the fallout of a discussion would have repercussions only within a particular state. However, with the globalisation of information, this right to free speech now comes with a global responsibility that takes into account different cultures, histories and religions around the world.

    Hence, although the Danish, French and German newspapers were doubtlessly within their national rights to publish the cartoons as all three countries guarantee the right to freedom of speech, they failed to consider this right in relation to the global audience.

    Being Responsible while Being Free

    If it is agreed that the right to free speech comes coupled with a global responsibility, what does this mean for the three different defences offered by the three different newspapers?

    With regard to Jyllands-Posten, it could be asked if the best catalyst to provoke a debate on self-censorship when it comes to discussing matters concerning Islam was best served via the twelve cartoons. Admittedly, it is sometimes necessary to be controversial in order to provoke people out of their cerebral slumber. But with religious tensions running at a high in the post-9/11 world, it has to be acknowledged that insensitive cartoons are by no means the best method to achieve the goal.

    As for the defence offered by France Soir, the reprinting of the cartoons offered very little to the debate concerning the importance of free speech. If the reprinting accomplished anything at all, it succeeded in heightening emotions and driving the different camps further apart rather than drawing them together with a more detached rational debate. Akin to the 1953 movie The Wild Ones, when the lead character Johnny – leader of a motorcycle gang that rides into a small American town – is asked, “What are you rebelling against?” the reply given is, “What have you got?”. Hence, instead of attempting to foster a mature debate, the editors have decided to act like disaffected teenagers.

    It is from Die Welt’s defence that perhaps some serious lessons can be drawn. There is little doubt that the ‘Muslim’ media often presents anti-Semitic views that do little to forward understanding. The media from both sides now have a duty to engage in some serious self- reflection on their rights and social responsibilities. Just as the ‘Western’ press has a responsibility not to continually focus on fundamentalist Muslims at the expense of the majority moderate position, the ‘Muslim’ press should consider the risk of their furore over this current issue being perceived as an example of the pot calling the kettle black.

    About the Author

    Norman Vasu is a Post-Doctoral Fellow at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Conflict and Stability / Religion in Contemporary Society / Europe / Global

    Last updated on 02/10/2014

    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    THE anger and violence generated by the publication of twelve cartoons representing the Prophet Muhammad in a crude and unfavourable light has led to several polemical diatribes. These sharp exchanges are taking up a significant amount of column inches in newspapers around the globe on either the importance of religious sensitivity or the sanctity of free speech.

    Events that have unfolded may be summarised as follows: A small Danish newspaper – with a circulation of only about 150,000 – on 30 September 2005 published the cartoons. Following from this, Muslim Danes protested against this act and Islamic states expressed their deep dissatisfaction. From that moment on, what was essentially an issue restricted to Denmark took a global turn when several newspapers in the European Union republished the cartoons while several television stations broadcast the images as well. The result of this has been protests on the streets of Muslim states, the organisation of commercial boycotts of Danish goods and attacks on several Scandinavian embassies.

    The publication of the cartoons has been defended from various positions. The foreign editor of Jyllands-Posten, the Danish paper at the centre of the storm, has maintained that its publication was motivated by a desire to question the issue of self-censorship when Islamic issues are discussed. In France, France Soir, the newspaper that republished the cartoons, defended its actions through the right to freedom of expression. Indeed, when the cartoons ran in the newspaper, the headline for it declared: “Yes we have the right to caricature God.” In Germany, in the newspaper Die Welt, the republication of the cartoons has been defended by its editor as an attempt to expose the “hypocritical” press of the Middle East where Jews are often portrayed in an unfavourable and racist manner.

    The three different defences presented highlight three very different issues that are going on amidst this cultural storm. One, the Danish defence is inspired by the need for not only introspection but also a public discussion on how sensitive matters are treated in the public sphere. Two, the French defence is driven by the desire to uphold an uncompromising principle of free speech; and three, the German defence highlights how the global press need to be balanced when covering events.

    Though all three issues are important and deserve a thorough debate, these issues have obscured the larger and more important matter at hand – freedom of expression is now an issue with intense and immediate global ramifications. As states become more and more multicultural through immigration, and as information is transmitted at increasing speed around the globe, there is a need now to take stock on the global responsibilities that come with the right to freedom of speech.

    The Globalisation of Free Speech

    The right to freedom of expression has been defended for centuries. For example, Socrates maintained its importance in the Greek city state of Athens during his trial; Erasmus was of the view that ‘[i]n a free state, tongues too should be free’; the First Amendment in the US Bill of Rights guarantees free speech; and Article 19 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights holds that everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression.

    What is noticeable about the examples above is that the right to freedom of expression is focussed on the right to free speech within a state. It does not take into account the repercussions of this freedom when it is disseminated around the globe.

    Events surrounding the Danish cartoons have propelled to the fore this disconnection between the rights held by individual citizens of a state and the global responsibility that now comes part and parcel with this right. Previously, more often than not, when controversial issues were discussed, the fallout of a discussion would have repercussions only within a particular state. However, with the globalisation of information, this right to free speech now comes with a global responsibility that takes into account different cultures, histories and religions around the world.

    Hence, although the Danish, French and German newspapers were doubtlessly within their national rights to publish the cartoons as all three countries guarantee the right to freedom of speech, they failed to consider this right in relation to the global audience.

    Being Responsible while Being Free

    If it is agreed that the right to free speech comes coupled with a global responsibility, what does this mean for the three different defences offered by the three different newspapers?

    With regard to Jyllands-Posten, it could be asked if the best catalyst to provoke a debate on self-censorship when it comes to discussing matters concerning Islam was best served via the twelve cartoons. Admittedly, it is sometimes necessary to be controversial in order to provoke people out of their cerebral slumber. But with religious tensions running at a high in the post-9/11 world, it has to be acknowledged that insensitive cartoons are by no means the best method to achieve the goal.

    As for the defence offered by France Soir, the reprinting of the cartoons offered very little to the debate concerning the importance of free speech. If the reprinting accomplished anything at all, it succeeded in heightening emotions and driving the different camps further apart rather than drawing them together with a more detached rational debate. Akin to the 1953 movie The Wild Ones, when the lead character Johnny – leader of a motorcycle gang that rides into a small American town – is asked, “What are you rebelling against?” the reply given is, “What have you got?”. Hence, instead of attempting to foster a mature debate, the editors have decided to act like disaffected teenagers.

    It is from Die Welt’s defence that perhaps some serious lessons can be drawn. There is little doubt that the ‘Muslim’ media often presents anti-Semitic views that do little to forward understanding. The media from both sides now have a duty to engage in some serious self- reflection on their rights and social responsibilities. Just as the ‘Western’ press has a responsibility not to continually focus on fundamentalist Muslims at the expense of the majority moderate position, the ‘Muslim’ press should consider the risk of their furore over this current issue being perceived as an example of the pot calling the kettle black.

    About the Author

    Norman Vasu is a Post-Doctoral Fellow at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Conflict and Stability / Religion in Contemporary Society

    Last updated on 02/10/2014

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    CO06010 | Learning from Cartoons The Globalisation of Free Speech

    Commentary

    THE anger and violence generated by the publication of twelve cartoons representing the Prophet Muhammad in a crude and unfavou ...
    more info