• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Cohesive Societies
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Cohesive Societies
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • COVID-19 Resources
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO08122 | Is Internet Radicalization Possible?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO08122 | Is Internet Radicalization Possible?
    Bill Durodié, Ng Sue Chia

    21 November 2008

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    Ideas on the Internet do not independently transform people. The Internet is but a medium for communicating ideas that reflects society. If the content of the Internet is to be changed, it will be necessary to address the particular problems in society that the Internet mirrors.

    Internet the Problem?

    IT IS NOW almost eighteen months since the arrest in Singapore of former solicitor and law lecturer Abdul Basheer Abdul Kader under anti-terrorism legislation. This well-educated individual is held by the authorities to have ‘self-radicalized’ under the influence of radical Islamist websites. Many seem to worry that the Internet offers cheap, fast, secure and anonymous connections to supposed radicals. So what do we know about how this process works?

    The answer, unfortunately, is ‘not a lot’, if we go by various reports including those by the New York Police Department and the Homeland Security Policy Institute in the United States. Whilst much effort has been expended to demonstrate a possible association between extremism and Internet usage, the indicators of the linkage between the two are far less clear.

    Irrespective of this paucity of evidence, numerous agencies advocate a range of ‘solutions’ to address what they ‘know’ to be the problem. These range from censorship of particular websites to the promotion of so-called ‘counter-narratives’, by which they hope – or pray – for the misguided to be dissuaded from their path.

    It is our contention that these approaches are highly unlikely to work. This is because by focusing narrowly on the phenomena themselves – the existence of jihadist websites, videos and chat rooms – which are not in dispute, they fail to address the content that these platforms convey and connect with. What is it in this content that resonates with the lives and experiences of those who seek these sites out, rather than stumble across them by accident?

    Sense of Identity and Meaning

    Surfing the web may appear to be a passive experience to the uninitiated. It is far from being so. Users endlessly select and reject content according to their own preferences. In an uncritical culture, this may lead to a tendency to only view, hear and engage with opinions and beliefs one may already hold, thereby amplifying these further.

    This also explains why the vast majority of individuals, coming across supposedly ‘radicalizing’ content, will simply ignore or reject it. People are not mindless sponges, absorbing content and acting upon it. Rather, they actively choose what they want according to previously developed interpretations and models of the world that they have internalized. This selection process usually reflects their own experiences and the content they choose then provides some kind of ‘meaning’ to this.

    No individual approaches the Internet in isolation. They come to it already bearing a vast number of ideas, assumptions and emotions. To this extent web users cannot be caricatured and analyzed as vulnerable little children operating in isolation, but rather as wilful agents, actively engaging with its content. This may be even more so when communicating with others online, as we should distinguish between thought, talk and action.

    The notion that an individual surfing the Internet may come across websites that lead them directly to altering their behaviour suggests a fairly diminished view of human nature. Ideas on the Internet do not independently transform people. And for every radical website an individual may find, there are clearly hundreds of thousands of others that are not.

    The web is a reflection of society in microcosm. Any problems on the web exist elsewhere in the first place. It almost seems as if hard debates about the problems of society are avoided by some in their pursuit of the technical manifestations and transmissions of such problems on the Internet. The focus is then on the battlefield rather than the content of the ideas themselves.

    Rehabilitation

    Groups working to rehabilitate people who have been rescued from a cult often note that it was the absence of meaningful relationships and bonds within everyday life that led these individuals astray. As such, it is not so much the assumed magnetism or ideology of maverick organizations operating online or anywhere else that need to be studied, understood and countered. Rather, it is the absence of any clear structure or sense of shared purpose within the mainstream.

    Likewise, rather than becoming obsessed with the apparently mystical ability of the Internet to warp minds into becoming extremists, we would do well to examine what it is that modern culture provides as an alternative. By this, we do not mean as a ‘counter-narrative’ to others, but rather a narrative of our own. Without a system of coherent values, or mechanisms to confer and affirm a positive identity, it is likely – maybe even inevitable – that young people will seek these elsewhere.

    What’s more, by labeling those ideas as extreme or radical, mainstream society effectively admits to its own inner bankruptcy. The message seems to be that you can believe anything you like so long as you don’t believe it too much. There may be no better way to propel precocious and hungry young minds into the hands of those who, on the surface at least, appear to have some principles.

    What can be done?

    The role played by the Internet remains largely misunderstood. Like rock music and computer games before it, it appears to some to be the route to all evil. This is to grossly underestimate the active and critical role played by those who use it. This also overestimates the power of the ideas and content within it in isolation from their far broader social expressions.

    Of course, professional security agencies will want to keep an eye on the web, just as they would on any other public space. It may make sense to focus their scrutiny on purposeful searches, as well as chat rooms and other interactive areas online. But even this approach may not suffice; much work on the identification of societal triggers remains to be done.

    Ultimately, the Internet is a medium for communicating ideas that reflect society. If we want to see the content of the cyberworld changed, it is best achieved by addressing the issues in society at large – in the real world — that the Internet manifests.

    About the Authors

    Bill Durodié is Senior Fellow and Ng Sue Chia Associate Research Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. They are with the Homeland Defence Programme of the School’s Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS). 

    Categories: Commentaries / Terrorism Studies / Global

    Last updated on 08/10/2014

    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    Ideas on the Internet do not independently transform people. The Internet is but a medium for communicating ideas that reflects society. If the content of the Internet is to be changed, it will be necessary to address the particular problems in society that the Internet mirrors.

    Internet the Problem?

    IT IS NOW almost eighteen months since the arrest in Singapore of former solicitor and law lecturer Abdul Basheer Abdul Kader under anti-terrorism legislation. This well-educated individual is held by the authorities to have ‘self-radicalized’ under the influence of radical Islamist websites. Many seem to worry that the Internet offers cheap, fast, secure and anonymous connections to supposed radicals. So what do we know about how this process works?

    The answer, unfortunately, is ‘not a lot’, if we go by various reports including those by the New York Police Department and the Homeland Security Policy Institute in the United States. Whilst much effort has been expended to demonstrate a possible association between extremism and Internet usage, the indicators of the linkage between the two are far less clear.

    Irrespective of this paucity of evidence, numerous agencies advocate a range of ‘solutions’ to address what they ‘know’ to be the problem. These range from censorship of particular websites to the promotion of so-called ‘counter-narratives’, by which they hope – or pray – for the misguided to be dissuaded from their path.

    It is our contention that these approaches are highly unlikely to work. This is because by focusing narrowly on the phenomena themselves – the existence of jihadist websites, videos and chat rooms – which are not in dispute, they fail to address the content that these platforms convey and connect with. What is it in this content that resonates with the lives and experiences of those who seek these sites out, rather than stumble across them by accident?

    Sense of Identity and Meaning

    Surfing the web may appear to be a passive experience to the uninitiated. It is far from being so. Users endlessly select and reject content according to their own preferences. In an uncritical culture, this may lead to a tendency to only view, hear and engage with opinions and beliefs one may already hold, thereby amplifying these further.

    This also explains why the vast majority of individuals, coming across supposedly ‘radicalizing’ content, will simply ignore or reject it. People are not mindless sponges, absorbing content and acting upon it. Rather, they actively choose what they want according to previously developed interpretations and models of the world that they have internalized. This selection process usually reflects their own experiences and the content they choose then provides some kind of ‘meaning’ to this.

    No individual approaches the Internet in isolation. They come to it already bearing a vast number of ideas, assumptions and emotions. To this extent web users cannot be caricatured and analyzed as vulnerable little children operating in isolation, but rather as wilful agents, actively engaging with its content. This may be even more so when communicating with others online, as we should distinguish between thought, talk and action.

    The notion that an individual surfing the Internet may come across websites that lead them directly to altering their behaviour suggests a fairly diminished view of human nature. Ideas on the Internet do not independently transform people. And for every radical website an individual may find, there are clearly hundreds of thousands of others that are not.

    The web is a reflection of society in microcosm. Any problems on the web exist elsewhere in the first place. It almost seems as if hard debates about the problems of society are avoided by some in their pursuit of the technical manifestations and transmissions of such problems on the Internet. The focus is then on the battlefield rather than the content of the ideas themselves.

    Rehabilitation

    Groups working to rehabilitate people who have been rescued from a cult often note that it was the absence of meaningful relationships and bonds within everyday life that led these individuals astray. As such, it is not so much the assumed magnetism or ideology of maverick organizations operating online or anywhere else that need to be studied, understood and countered. Rather, it is the absence of any clear structure or sense of shared purpose within the mainstream.

    Likewise, rather than becoming obsessed with the apparently mystical ability of the Internet to warp minds into becoming extremists, we would do well to examine what it is that modern culture provides as an alternative. By this, we do not mean as a ‘counter-narrative’ to others, but rather a narrative of our own. Without a system of coherent values, or mechanisms to confer and affirm a positive identity, it is likely – maybe even inevitable – that young people will seek these elsewhere.

    What’s more, by labeling those ideas as extreme or radical, mainstream society effectively admits to its own inner bankruptcy. The message seems to be that you can believe anything you like so long as you don’t believe it too much. There may be no better way to propel precocious and hungry young minds into the hands of those who, on the surface at least, appear to have some principles.

    What can be done?

    The role played by the Internet remains largely misunderstood. Like rock music and computer games before it, it appears to some to be the route to all evil. This is to grossly underestimate the active and critical role played by those who use it. This also overestimates the power of the ideas and content within it in isolation from their far broader social expressions.

    Of course, professional security agencies will want to keep an eye on the web, just as they would on any other public space. It may make sense to focus their scrutiny on purposeful searches, as well as chat rooms and other interactive areas online. But even this approach may not suffice; much work on the identification of societal triggers remains to be done.

    Ultimately, the Internet is a medium for communicating ideas that reflect society. If we want to see the content of the cyberworld changed, it is best achieved by addressing the issues in society at large – in the real world — that the Internet manifests.

    About the Authors

    Bill Durodié is Senior Fellow and Ng Sue Chia Associate Research Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. They are with the Homeland Defence Programme of the School’s Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS). 

    Categories: Commentaries / Terrorism Studies

    Last updated on 08/10/2014

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    CO08122 | Is Internet Radicalization Possible?

    Commentary

    Ideas on the Intern ...
    more info