• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Southeast Asian Social Cohesion Radar Report
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    Southeast Asian Social Cohesion Radar Report

    06 September 2022

    download pdf

    Executive Summary

    This inaugural research study is a modest attempt to understand the nature of social cohesion within ASEAN against the changing and varying cultural and physical landscape in the region. Conducted under pandemic conditions, this study adapts the Social Cohesion Framework developed by the Bertelsmann Stiftung Foundation, which seeks to understand the level of cohesion in countries using quantitative methods. It also taps into the perspectives of 1,000 thought leaders in Southeast Asia (100 from each country) to explore their views on social cohesion in their country and the region. The findings provide insights that could hopefully allow the various stakeholders to develop strategies and solutions to continue their efforts to strengthen social cohesion in their respective communities.

    Previous studies that examined Southeast Asian countries using secondary data overlooked the strong impact of racial, ethnic, religious, and linguistic identities on social cohesion in the region. The lack of dedicated focus on the 10 ASEAN member states did not allow a complete or adequate appreciation of social cohesion in the region. This inclusive study, taking into account all 10 ASEAN members, seeks to establish a better understanding of the nature of social cohesion within the region, and to enrich the discourse on social cohesion in Southeast Asia. A deeper appreciation of cohesion will help to nuance government policies and initiatives aimed at strengthening social cohesion in the respective countries, and provide insights for civil society actors, non-government (NGOs), and others in their work for social cohesion.

    Respondents from 10 ASEAN states comprising individuals from government agencies, academia, think tanks, research institutions, civil society organisations, non-government organisations, regional and international organisations, and the media were surveyed. The survey questions were based on Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Social Cohesion Framework, which identifies three domains that contribute to social cohesion: social relations, connectedness, and focus on the common good. Each domain is further organised into three dimensions. The social networks, trust in people, and acceptance of diversity dimensions come under the social relations domain. Identification, trust in institutions, and perception of fairness dimensions fall within the connectedness domain. Finally, the solidarity and helpfulness, respect for social rules, and civic participation dimensions are categorised under the focus on the common good domain. Questions to understand the thought leaders’ perceptions of social cohesion within their country and across the region were also included for a cross-country analysis.

    As this is an initial study and based upon particular views and a snapshot in time, it should not be taken as providing a ranking of the most and least socially cohesive societies in Southeast Asia. Rather, it provides perspectives on which factors are seen as most conducive towards social cohesion, and reflects perceptions of the situation on the ground. Such quantifiable metrics may or may not reflect a variety of intangible and qualitative factors that play into the actual situation of cohesion in any location, and diversity within each nation is also noted.

    Perspectives from the Southeast Asian region based on the study were as follows:

    1. The overall level of social cohesion in Southeast Asia was at 69%. This reflected the percentage of those who saw social cohesion overall as “strong”, with 13% seeing it as “weak”. However, within both the region and in each country, there was considerable variation across the three domains of social relations, connectedness and focus on the common good. This established a current benchmark figure, although it was not in itself an absolute indicator.
    2. Of the three domains, social relations had the strongest influence on social cohesion in Southeast Asia, while the domain of focus on the common good had the least impact on social cohesion in the region.
    3. Of the nine dimensions, there was a strong respect for social rules within the region. The dimensions of social networks, trust in people, acceptance of diversity, and identification, fared relatively equally. The dimension of solidarity and helpfulness seemed relatively less influential in determining social cohesion among the regional countries.

    These findings will provide Southeast Asian communities with the opportunity to:

    1. Enhance strategies that strengthen the dimensions that contribute the most to social cohesion;
    2. Engage community and religious leaders as well as relevant stakeholders to support dimensions under the focus on the common good domain; and
    3. Explore initiatives that could boost the domains and dimensions that have been flagged as weaker in building social cohesion, such as solidarity and helpfulness and perception of fairness.

    The survey provided an overview of the level of social cohesion in Southeast Asia. Many factors, such as the ongoing pandemic and the shifting public morale as well as travel restrictions and isolation measures imposed by governments to stem the COVID-19 virus, could have impacted the findings. Some of the influences that are unique to ASEAN member states may not have been significantly addressed by the framework or sampling population. Sentiments towards social cohesion may also change suddenly due to unexpected global and domestic incidents. Moving forward, it would be important to explore the diverse impact of religious traditions, gender, age, sentiments, leaders, general population, and grassroots activists on social cohesion in each country.

    For more info on ICCS, please refer here: www.iccs.sg/

    20220910 203930

    Categories: Commemorative / Event Reports / / Global

    Last updated on 12/09/2022

    comments powered by Disqus

    Executive Summary

    This inaugural research study is a modest attempt to understand the nature of social cohesion within ASEAN against the changing and varying cultural and physical landscape in the region. Conducted under pandemic conditions, this study adapts the Social Cohesion Framework developed by the Bertelsmann Stiftung Foundation, which seeks to understand the level of cohesion in countries using quantitative methods. It also taps into the perspectives of 1,000 thought leaders in Southeast Asia (100 from each country) to explore their views on social cohesion in their country and the region. The findings provide insights that could hopefully allow the various stakeholders to develop strategies and solutions to continue their efforts to strengthen social cohesion in their respective communities.

    Previous studies that examined Southeast Asian countries using secondary data overlooked the strong impact of racial, ethnic, religious, and linguistic identities on social cohesion in the region. The lack of dedicated focus on the 10 ASEAN member states did not allow a complete or adequate appreciation of social cohesion in the region. This inclusive study, taking into account all 10 ASEAN members, seeks to establish a better understanding of the nature of social cohesion within the region, and to enrich the discourse on social cohesion in Southeast Asia. A deeper appreciation of cohesion will help to nuance government policies and initiatives aimed at strengthening social cohesion in the respective countries, and provide insights for civil society actors, non-government (NGOs), and others in their work for social cohesion.

    Respondents from 10 ASEAN states comprising individuals from government agencies, academia, think tanks, research institutions, civil society organisations, non-government organisations, regional and international organisations, and the media were surveyed. The survey questions were based on Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Social Cohesion Framework, which identifies three domains that contribute to social cohesion: social relations, connectedness, and focus on the common good. Each domain is further organised into three dimensions. The social networks, trust in people, and acceptance of diversity dimensions come under the social relations domain. Identification, trust in institutions, and perception of fairness dimensions fall within the connectedness domain. Finally, the solidarity and helpfulness, respect for social rules, and civic participation dimensions are categorised under the focus on the common good domain. Questions to understand the thought leaders’ perceptions of social cohesion within their country and across the region were also included for a cross-country analysis.

    As this is an initial study and based upon particular views and a snapshot in time, it should not be taken as providing a ranking of the most and least socially cohesive societies in Southeast Asia. Rather, it provides perspectives on which factors are seen as most conducive towards social cohesion, and reflects perceptions of the situation on the ground. Such quantifiable metrics may or may not reflect a variety of intangible and qualitative factors that play into the actual situation of cohesion in any location, and diversity within each nation is also noted.

    Perspectives from the Southeast Asian region based on the study were as follows:

    1. The overall level of social cohesion in Southeast Asia was at 69%. This reflected the percentage of those who saw social cohesion overall as “strong”, with 13% seeing it as “weak”. However, within both the region and in each country, there was considerable variation across the three domains of social relations, connectedness and focus on the common good. This established a current benchmark figure, although it was not in itself an absolute indicator.
    2. Of the three domains, social relations had the strongest influence on social cohesion in Southeast Asia, while the domain of focus on the common good had the least impact on social cohesion in the region.
    3. Of the nine dimensions, there was a strong respect for social rules within the region. The dimensions of social networks, trust in people, acceptance of diversity, and identification, fared relatively equally. The dimension of solidarity and helpfulness seemed relatively less influential in determining social cohesion among the regional countries.

    These findings will provide Southeast Asian communities with the opportunity to:

    1. Enhance strategies that strengthen the dimensions that contribute the most to social cohesion;
    2. Engage community and religious leaders as well as relevant stakeholders to support dimensions under the focus on the common good domain; and
    3. Explore initiatives that could boost the domains and dimensions that have been flagged as weaker in building social cohesion, such as solidarity and helpfulness and perception of fairness.

    The survey provided an overview of the level of social cohesion in Southeast Asia. Many factors, such as the ongoing pandemic and the shifting public morale as well as travel restrictions and isolation measures imposed by governments to stem the COVID-19 virus, could have impacted the findings. Some of the influences that are unique to ASEAN member states may not have been significantly addressed by the framework or sampling population. Sentiments towards social cohesion may also change suddenly due to unexpected global and domestic incidents. Moving forward, it would be important to explore the diverse impact of religious traditions, gender, age, sentiments, leaders, general population, and grassroots activists on social cohesion in each country.

    For more info on ICCS, please refer here: www.iccs.sg/

    20220910 203930

    Categories: Commemorative / Event Reports

    Last updated on 12/09/2022

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    Southeast Asian Social Cohesion Radar Report