• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Cohesive Societies
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Future Issues And Technology (FIT)
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Cohesive Societies
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • COVID-19 Resources
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Islamophobia and Antisemitism in SG: Narratives of Grievance
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO21057 | Islamophobia and Antisemitism in SG: Narratives of Grievance
    Luca Farrow

    07 April 2021

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    The planned attacks on mosques and a synagogue in Singapore show the international reach of the grievance narratives key to Islamophobia and Antisemitism. Counter-narratives and critical perspectives are required to promote inclusivity in Singapore.

    COMMENTARY

    IN THE first few months of 2021 news has broken in Singapore of a planned attack by a Protestant Christian on two mosques, and a planned attack by a Muslim on Jews at a synagogue. These planned attacks demonstrate that grievance narratives, even with very little apparent relevance to Singapore, can inspire violence in the Republic.

    In the first case, little information is publicly available but the 16-year-old plotter was allegedly inspired by Brenton Tarrant and his attack on mosques in Christchurch in 2019. The attacks were planned for 15 March 2021, the second anniversary of the Christchurch attacks. Like Tarrant, the Singaporean youth wrote an Islamophobic manifesto seeking to justify his attack on Muslims and in it he described Tarrant as a “saint”.

    Overseas Narratives and Local Impact

    Tarrant’s overwhelming obsession, suggested by his own manifesto entitled The Great Replacement, was immigration and so-called “white genocide”, the theory of the displacement of white European people from Western countries.

    Notably, this concern would appear to have very little resonance in the context of Singapore and yet the young Singaporean seemingly found aspects of Tarrant’s ideology and actions highly motivational. It goes to show how violent narratives and acts of terror overseas can have a local impact and why non-violent counter-narratives, and critical perspectives must circulate in Singapore, even about ostensibly foreign concerns.

    In the second case, there is again little publicly available information, but it seems Amirull bin Ali had become enraged at what he saw as the oppression of Palestinians by the Israeli government and in particular the killing of Palestinian civilians by the Israeli military, while Jewish people were prospering in Singapore.

    It would appear that in the mind of the would-be perpetrator, his anger could be legitimately channelled into the killing of three Jewish men worshipping at the synagogue, on the assumption that those males would have served compulsory national service in Israel.

    Compulsory national service in Israel applies to Israeli citizens, not to Jews of all nationalities and it is unclear whether Amirull had targeted specific individuals he knew to be Jewish Israeli citizens.

    Narratives of Grievance

    Like the case of the young Singaporean Protestant planning to attack mosques, the narrative inspiring Amirull’s potential violence in Singapore has very little or no connection whatsoever to Singapore. Objectively speaking, Singapore is not embroiled in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and even if it were, it would make no sense for civilians to be targeted thousands of kilometres away in Singapore on the basis of their religion.

    These cases show Islamophobia and Antisemitism to be truly globalised prejudices, with the potential to lead into violence anywhere there are individuals steeped in these mindsets. As illustrated by these plots in Singapore, both Islamophobia and Antisemitism share key features as merely different manifestations of the phenomenon of human prejudice.

    In both cases, we see hatred of a “bad” out-group that is perceived to be thriving, typically via nefarious means and at the expense of a “good” in-group, often conceived as the native population.

    Narratives of grievance are thus key to these prejudices. In the case of much of the Islamophobia afflicting Western countries, but also beyond the West in places such as India, where we see the idea of “love jihad” gaining such traction, Muslims are portrayed as a violent and unassimilable group unfairly growing in number at the expense of the “native” population.

    In the case of Antisemitism across the globe, we encounter the narrative that Jews are unfairly prospering economically and conspiring to control the political system. A more recent but also very widespread feature of Antisemitism is the holding of any and all Jews responsible for the actions of the Israeli government.

    It should go without saying that to suggest Antisemitism and Islamophobia are fundamentally similar, is of course not to say that the experiences of Muslims and Jews across the world are fundamentally similar. That is a much more complicated picture. But in order to best guard against these prejudices, we must identify the similar patterns of meaning making among human beings that fuel hatred.

    How to Respond

    So, how should we respond to cases such as the two cited? Firstly, I would counter the objection many will surely make that no concerted effort should be made to respond to such cases and that to do so would be overly alarmist, given that these cases relate to two particular individuals who may not be at all reflective of the wider population in Singapore.

    It is true that we have limited information on the specifics of these cases and so we must be cautious about the lessons to learn, but I would argue that in general it is surely wrong to see persons who resort to violence as exceptional individuals necessarily suffering from some disorder. We are better off as a society understanding the kind of violent acts planned by the two individuals as existing on the extreme end of a spectrum of hatred.

    At the lower end of this spectrum of hatred we can situate such things as avoiding individuals deemed to be members of a particular undesirable group, making derogatory comments about entire groups of people, or de-prioritising them in job applications. At the upper end of the spectrum could be placed acts of physical violence and ultimately even killing.

    Islamophobia and Antisemitism thrive on the grievance narratives described above. These narratives, which can become widely-held stereotypes about Muslims and Jews, will have real world implications at some level. As scholar of prejudice theory Gordon Allport put it, “It is true that any negative attitude tends somehow, somewhere, to express itself in action”.

    Critical Thinking and Countering Stereotypes

    To counter the spread of insidious narratives and stereotypes, which are sometimes very well entrenched within the community, everybody must be exposed to critical perspectives and counter-narratives that challenge overly simplistic negative beliefs about their deemed out-groups.

    We should emphasise the reality of variegated communities of people, for example some richer, some poorer, some more international in outlook, some more parochial, rather than monolithic blocs of “Jews” or “Muslims” each made up of people sharing essentially the same characteristics.

    Ideally this would take place in the family home so that children are raised to resist black and white, us vs them thinking, and to reject racial and religious stereotypes. The reality is that not all families encourage embracing the other, and this is where schools and teachers are vital in imparting inclusive values.

    There is a role for the teaching of religious literacy and critical thinking skills to children and adults. It is not necessary that we each become an expert in every religion we encounter but we should have the knowledge and skills to readily debunk the negative stereotypes that we so often encounter.

    This is a long-term project that we must all be involved in, from the bottom up, not only to minimise the risk of terrorist attacks, but to build more harmonious and cohesive societies. It is a project that will come up against one of the worst aspects of human behaviour, the tendency to perpetuate stories to justify a preference for one’s own group, but it is a vitally important one.

    About the Author

    Luca Farrow is a Research Analyst with the Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / Religion in Contemporary Society / Terrorism Studies / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Global / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 07/04/2021

    comments powered by Disqus
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    The planned attacks on mosques and a synagogue in Singapore show the international reach of the grievance narratives key to Islamophobia and Antisemitism. Counter-narratives and critical perspectives are required to promote inclusivity in Singapore.

    COMMENTARY

    IN THE first few months of 2021 news has broken in Singapore of a planned attack by a Protestant Christian on two mosques, and a planned attack by a Muslim on Jews at a synagogue. These planned attacks demonstrate that grievance narratives, even with very little apparent relevance to Singapore, can inspire violence in the Republic.

    In the first case, little information is publicly available but the 16-year-old plotter was allegedly inspired by Brenton Tarrant and his attack on mosques in Christchurch in 2019. The attacks were planned for 15 March 2021, the second anniversary of the Christchurch attacks. Like Tarrant, the Singaporean youth wrote an Islamophobic manifesto seeking to justify his attack on Muslims and in it he described Tarrant as a “saint”.

    Overseas Narratives and Local Impact

    Tarrant’s overwhelming obsession, suggested by his own manifesto entitled The Great Replacement, was immigration and so-called “white genocide”, the theory of the displacement of white European people from Western countries.

    Notably, this concern would appear to have very little resonance in the context of Singapore and yet the young Singaporean seemingly found aspects of Tarrant’s ideology and actions highly motivational. It goes to show how violent narratives and acts of terror overseas can have a local impact and why non-violent counter-narratives, and critical perspectives must circulate in Singapore, even about ostensibly foreign concerns.

    In the second case, there is again little publicly available information, but it seems Amirull bin Ali had become enraged at what he saw as the oppression of Palestinians by the Israeli government and in particular the killing of Palestinian civilians by the Israeli military, while Jewish people were prospering in Singapore.

    It would appear that in the mind of the would-be perpetrator, his anger could be legitimately channelled into the killing of three Jewish men worshipping at the synagogue, on the assumption that those males would have served compulsory national service in Israel.

    Compulsory national service in Israel applies to Israeli citizens, not to Jews of all nationalities and it is unclear whether Amirull had targeted specific individuals he knew to be Jewish Israeli citizens.

    Narratives of Grievance

    Like the case of the young Singaporean Protestant planning to attack mosques, the narrative inspiring Amirull’s potential violence in Singapore has very little or no connection whatsoever to Singapore. Objectively speaking, Singapore is not embroiled in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and even if it were, it would make no sense for civilians to be targeted thousands of kilometres away in Singapore on the basis of their religion.

    These cases show Islamophobia and Antisemitism to be truly globalised prejudices, with the potential to lead into violence anywhere there are individuals steeped in these mindsets. As illustrated by these plots in Singapore, both Islamophobia and Antisemitism share key features as merely different manifestations of the phenomenon of human prejudice.

    In both cases, we see hatred of a “bad” out-group that is perceived to be thriving, typically via nefarious means and at the expense of a “good” in-group, often conceived as the native population.

    Narratives of grievance are thus key to these prejudices. In the case of much of the Islamophobia afflicting Western countries, but also beyond the West in places such as India, where we see the idea of “love jihad” gaining such traction, Muslims are portrayed as a violent and unassimilable group unfairly growing in number at the expense of the “native” population.

    In the case of Antisemitism across the globe, we encounter the narrative that Jews are unfairly prospering economically and conspiring to control the political system. A more recent but also very widespread feature of Antisemitism is the holding of any and all Jews responsible for the actions of the Israeli government.

    It should go without saying that to suggest Antisemitism and Islamophobia are fundamentally similar, is of course not to say that the experiences of Muslims and Jews across the world are fundamentally similar. That is a much more complicated picture. But in order to best guard against these prejudices, we must identify the similar patterns of meaning making among human beings that fuel hatred.

    How to Respond

    So, how should we respond to cases such as the two cited? Firstly, I would counter the objection many will surely make that no concerted effort should be made to respond to such cases and that to do so would be overly alarmist, given that these cases relate to two particular individuals who may not be at all reflective of the wider population in Singapore.

    It is true that we have limited information on the specifics of these cases and so we must be cautious about the lessons to learn, but I would argue that in general it is surely wrong to see persons who resort to violence as exceptional individuals necessarily suffering from some disorder. We are better off as a society understanding the kind of violent acts planned by the two individuals as existing on the extreme end of a spectrum of hatred.

    At the lower end of this spectrum of hatred we can situate such things as avoiding individuals deemed to be members of a particular undesirable group, making derogatory comments about entire groups of people, or de-prioritising them in job applications. At the upper end of the spectrum could be placed acts of physical violence and ultimately even killing.

    Islamophobia and Antisemitism thrive on the grievance narratives described above. These narratives, which can become widely-held stereotypes about Muslims and Jews, will have real world implications at some level. As scholar of prejudice theory Gordon Allport put it, “It is true that any negative attitude tends somehow, somewhere, to express itself in action”.

    Critical Thinking and Countering Stereotypes

    To counter the spread of insidious narratives and stereotypes, which are sometimes very well entrenched within the community, everybody must be exposed to critical perspectives and counter-narratives that challenge overly simplistic negative beliefs about their deemed out-groups.

    We should emphasise the reality of variegated communities of people, for example some richer, some poorer, some more international in outlook, some more parochial, rather than monolithic blocs of “Jews” or “Muslims” each made up of people sharing essentially the same characteristics.

    Ideally this would take place in the family home so that children are raised to resist black and white, us vs them thinking, and to reject racial and religious stereotypes. The reality is that not all families encourage embracing the other, and this is where schools and teachers are vital in imparting inclusive values.

    There is a role for the teaching of religious literacy and critical thinking skills to children and adults. It is not necessary that we each become an expert in every religion we encounter but we should have the knowledge and skills to readily debunk the negative stereotypes that we so often encounter.

    This is a long-term project that we must all be involved in, from the bottom up, not only to minimise the risk of terrorist attacks, but to build more harmonious and cohesive societies. It is a project that will come up against one of the worst aspects of human behaviour, the tendency to perpetuate stories to justify a preference for one’s own group, but it is a vitally important one.

    About the Author

    Luca Farrow is a Research Analyst with the Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / Religion in Contemporary Society / Terrorism Studies

    Last updated on 07/04/2021

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    Islamophobia and Antisemitism in SG: Narratives of Grievance

    SYNOPSIS

    The planned attacks on mosques and a synagogue in Singapore show the international reach of the grievance narratives key to Islamophobia and Antise ...
    more info