Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      News ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio Channel
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS
Connect
Search
  • RSIS
  • Publication
  • RSIS Publications
  • Looking into the Trade Abyss
  • Annual Reviews
  • Books
  • Bulletins and Newsletters
  • RSIS Commentary Series
  • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
  • Commemorative / Event Reports
  • Future Issues
  • IDSS Papers
  • Interreligious Relations
  • Monographs
  • NTS Insight
  • Policy Reports
  • Working Papers

CO19203 | Looking into the Trade Abyss
Evan Rogerson

14 October 2019

download pdf

SYNOPSIS

With the outbreak of large-scale trade wars around the world, and the pressures nationalist governments have applied on the World Trade Organisation (WTO), there is an urgent need for an in-depth evaluation of the perils and possibilities for trade policy.

COMMENTARY

TRADE WAR has become a reality. The threat of Brexit is having a chilling effect in Europe. The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) negotiations are unlikely to be concluded this year. And the WTO system moves closer to paralysis with the looming collapse of its appeals function and the continuing inability of its members to make progress in multilateral negotiations.

There is little to offset this gloomy panorama. The EU-Mercosur Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is significant, but its implementation is threatened by political strife over the Amazon. The US-Japan deal is less substantial than the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), now transformed into the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement on TPP (CPTPP) following the withdrawal of the United States. Other initiatives in Asia and Africa are a long way from fruition.

Counting Cost of Economic Nationalism

This is why the second Singapore Trade Policy Forum convened by the Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS) at RSIS, with the support of the governments of Singapore, Australia and New Zealand, comes at a crucial moment. On 21-22 October 2019, around 30 senior trade experts from governments, business and academia, local and international, will take part in an intensive informal debate on key facets of the emerging crisis. These are:

Since this time last year, threats of trade disruption have become reality. Unilateral actions and reactions are having a negative impact not only on trade growth but also on the global economic outlook. From agriculture to high-tech, the uncertain trading climate is affecting investment and confidence.

Questions for the Forum include whether there is an end in sight; the seriousness of the damage so far and what could be the next layer of threats. We need to ask if this is a matter of political cycles or a fundamental shift in the politics of trade. The reaction of business is crucial.

As the WTO has declined, efforts have been invested in regional, plurilateral and bilateral alternatives and in looking for new leadership. There have been positive developments, notably CPTPP, but other structures of trade co-operation from APEC to the G20 have run into similar problems to the multilateral system.

Are existing regional and plurilateral arrangements up to filling the gap? How do they handle the trade-off between depth and breadth, and how can they contribute to rebuilding a more stable trade environment? Are sectoral initiatives the way forward, and can they be brought back into a broader context? How do we deal with the risk that they intensify the rich country/poor country divide?

WTO Reform – What Does it Really Mean?

We need to look behind the catchphrase. The agenda so far is largely a response to US positions; it is not clear that this is a basis for broad agreement. Paradoxically, much of the debate on multilateral reform is taking place either outside the WTO or plurilaterally.

It is essential that more structured discussions be extended to include the whole WTO membership. Dispute Settlement is the most urgent challenge, with the Appellate Body on the brink of collapse.

Special and Differential treatment for developing countries is increasingly divisive. Besides these acute problems, we need to think about decision-making in the WTO and the future of multilateral negotiation. A key question is whether WTO reform means a two- (or more) tier system, or, alternatively, competing systems grouped around competing powers.

Rules for Digital Economy – Stimulus to New Negotiations?

Digital transformation is rapidly changing the economic landscape across the Asia-Pacific region. The issue is whether the trading system can be revitalised to adapt to the pace of technological progress in a digital world economy.

Trade agreements to date have just scratched the surface of the issues governments and business are facing – from data and the use of artificial intelligence, to tax policy and content regulation, to cyber security.

Reluctance in some quarters to engage multilaterally on digital issues in the WTO has led to plurilateral approaches. What do these agreements mean for existing trade regimes and a future agenda for cooperation between governments and the private sector?

In the 1990s, the WTO Agreement on Basic Telecommunications required substantial work between trade ministries and other government entities on issues like access and competition. Are new models for cooperation required for access to broadband and connectivity, along with trade rules?

Trade and Climate Change: Clash Waiting to Happen?

Public awareness and concern about climate change are on the rise. The consequences of global warming are impacting lives now. This trend will intensify, obliging governments to take more stringent action to curb carbon and carbon-equivalent emissions.

Regardless of whether such action will be sufficient or timely enough, intensified efforts will surely raise tensions between trade policy and climate change policy. Governments will become increasingly concerned about “carbon leakage”.

In the absence of international agreement regarding the attribution of responsibilities for action among nations, or the establishment of an appropriate “border adjustment” arrangement, both trade policy and climate change policy will suffer. Is a regime clash inevitable or can governments act to prevent it?

Globalisation – Endangered or Just Evolving?

Aside from the trade war, it is useful to ask how far there has in fact been a reaction against globalisation. This means examining the extent to which rising inequality and a sense of exclusion is blamed on international economic engagement, how robust is the link, and what can be done about it.

Nationalist ideologies imply less reliance on global markets and more reliance on national and perhaps regional ones. The question is how easy that disengagement would be, given the intertwined nature of the production and consumption relationships that have been built up over the last decades.

Does the trade war presage delinkage between China and the United States, bifurcating the global economy and obliging many other countries to make economically costly choices?

There are no easy answers, but frank and informed debate is essential to help shape policies that can rescue the trading system.

About the Author

Evan Rogerson is Adjunct Senior Fellow at the Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS) in the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore, and co-ordinator of the Singapore Trade Policy Forum.

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Europe / South Asia
Related events: Singapore Trade Policy Forum 2019
comments powered by Disqus

SYNOPSIS

With the outbreak of large-scale trade wars around the world, and the pressures nationalist governments have applied on the World Trade Organisation (WTO), there is an urgent need for an in-depth evaluation of the perils and possibilities for trade policy.

COMMENTARY

TRADE WAR has become a reality. The threat of Brexit is having a chilling effect in Europe. The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) negotiations are unlikely to be concluded this year. And the WTO system moves closer to paralysis with the looming collapse of its appeals function and the continuing inability of its members to make progress in multilateral negotiations.

There is little to offset this gloomy panorama. The EU-Mercosur Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is significant, but its implementation is threatened by political strife over the Amazon. The US-Japan deal is less substantial than the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), now transformed into the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement on TPP (CPTPP) following the withdrawal of the United States. Other initiatives in Asia and Africa are a long way from fruition.

Counting Cost of Economic Nationalism

This is why the second Singapore Trade Policy Forum convened by the Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS) at RSIS, with the support of the governments of Singapore, Australia and New Zealand, comes at a crucial moment. On 21-22 October 2019, around 30 senior trade experts from governments, business and academia, local and international, will take part in an intensive informal debate on key facets of the emerging crisis. These are:

Since this time last year, threats of trade disruption have become reality. Unilateral actions and reactions are having a negative impact not only on trade growth but also on the global economic outlook. From agriculture to high-tech, the uncertain trading climate is affecting investment and confidence.

Questions for the Forum include whether there is an end in sight; the seriousness of the damage so far and what could be the next layer of threats. We need to ask if this is a matter of political cycles or a fundamental shift in the politics of trade. The reaction of business is crucial.

As the WTO has declined, efforts have been invested in regional, plurilateral and bilateral alternatives and in looking for new leadership. There have been positive developments, notably CPTPP, but other structures of trade co-operation from APEC to the G20 have run into similar problems to the multilateral system.

Are existing regional and plurilateral arrangements up to filling the gap? How do they handle the trade-off between depth and breadth, and how can they contribute to rebuilding a more stable trade environment? Are sectoral initiatives the way forward, and can they be brought back into a broader context? How do we deal with the risk that they intensify the rich country/poor country divide?

WTO Reform – What Does it Really Mean?

We need to look behind the catchphrase. The agenda so far is largely a response to US positions; it is not clear that this is a basis for broad agreement. Paradoxically, much of the debate on multilateral reform is taking place either outside the WTO or plurilaterally.

It is essential that more structured discussions be extended to include the whole WTO membership. Dispute Settlement is the most urgent challenge, with the Appellate Body on the brink of collapse.

Special and Differential treatment for developing countries is increasingly divisive. Besides these acute problems, we need to think about decision-making in the WTO and the future of multilateral negotiation. A key question is whether WTO reform means a two- (or more) tier system, or, alternatively, competing systems grouped around competing powers.

Rules for Digital Economy – Stimulus to New Negotiations?

Digital transformation is rapidly changing the economic landscape across the Asia-Pacific region. The issue is whether the trading system can be revitalised to adapt to the pace of technological progress in a digital world economy.

Trade agreements to date have just scratched the surface of the issues governments and business are facing – from data and the use of artificial intelligence, to tax policy and content regulation, to cyber security.

Reluctance in some quarters to engage multilaterally on digital issues in the WTO has led to plurilateral approaches. What do these agreements mean for existing trade regimes and a future agenda for cooperation between governments and the private sector?

In the 1990s, the WTO Agreement on Basic Telecommunications required substantial work between trade ministries and other government entities on issues like access and competition. Are new models for cooperation required for access to broadband and connectivity, along with trade rules?

Trade and Climate Change: Clash Waiting to Happen?

Public awareness and concern about climate change are on the rise. The consequences of global warming are impacting lives now. This trend will intensify, obliging governments to take more stringent action to curb carbon and carbon-equivalent emissions.

Regardless of whether such action will be sufficient or timely enough, intensified efforts will surely raise tensions between trade policy and climate change policy. Governments will become increasingly concerned about “carbon leakage”.

In the absence of international agreement regarding the attribution of responsibilities for action among nations, or the establishment of an appropriate “border adjustment” arrangement, both trade policy and climate change policy will suffer. Is a regime clash inevitable or can governments act to prevent it?

Globalisation – Endangered or Just Evolving?

Aside from the trade war, it is useful to ask how far there has in fact been a reaction against globalisation. This means examining the extent to which rising inequality and a sense of exclusion is blamed on international economic engagement, how robust is the link, and what can be done about it.

Nationalist ideologies imply less reliance on global markets and more reliance on national and perhaps regional ones. The question is how easy that disengagement would be, given the intertwined nature of the production and consumption relationships that have been built up over the last decades.

Does the trade war presage delinkage between China and the United States, bifurcating the global economy and obliging many other countries to make economically costly choices?

There are no easy answers, but frank and informed debate is essential to help shape policies that can rescue the trading system.

About the Author

Evan Rogerson is Adjunct Senior Fellow at the Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS) in the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore, and co-ordinator of the Singapore Trade Policy Forum.

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy
Related events: Singapore Trade Policy Forum 2019

Popular Links

About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

Connect with Us

rsis.ntu
rsis_ntu
rsisntu
rsisvideocast
school/rsis-ntu
rsis.sg
rsissg
RSIS
RSS
Subscribe to RSIS Publications
Subscribe to RSIS Events

Getting to RSIS

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

Click here for direction to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
    Help us improve

      Rate your experience with this website
      123456
      Not satisfiedVery satisfied
      What did you like?
      0/255 characters
      What can be improved?
      0/255 characters
      Your email
      Please enter a valid email.
      Thank you for your feedback.
      This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
      OK
      Latest Book
      more info