• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • US Trade Policy on PV Panels is a Reality Check for Southeast Asia Ties
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO23015 | US Trade Policy on PV Panels is a Reality Check for Southeast Asia Ties
    Kevin Chen Xian An

    31 January 2023

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    The recent announcement that photovoltaic cell companies in Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam are under investigation by the United States Commerce Department for circumventing tariffs on China highlights the very real consequences of US-China rivalry for Southeast Asia.

    233101 C0
    Source: Pexels

    COMMENTARY

    In December 2022, the United States Commerce Department issued a preliminary decision affirming that certain photovoltaic (PV) cell and panel imports from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam were circumventing tariffs on China. The Department found that four companies within these countries were assembling PV cells and modules with Chinese-made components to circumvent antidumping duties imposed by the US in 2012.

    The unassuming announcement was largely overlooked in regional news outlets. After all, it was just a preliminary decision, and the final determination for the case is only due in May 2023. Moreover, thanks to a two-year tariff waiver that US President Joe Biden granted in June 2022, any punitive tariffs on solar industry actors would only be levied after June 2024.

    However, the investigation has important implications for US relations with governments from the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Over 2022, the US took pains to convince these governments that it is a reliable partner that does not view their bilateral ties through the prism of strategic competition with China. This development undermines Washington’s strategic promises by reminding regional governments that US fixation on strategic competition with China can still cause collateral damage to its partners.

    A Promising Strategic Premise

    After years of drift under the Trump Administration, the White House under President Joe Biden appeared to hit its stride in improving US-Southeast Asia ties in 2022. Three noteworthy developments occurred during this time.

    First, the US launched the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF) in May 2022, aiming to drive sustainable growth for regional economies. Second, the launch of Biden’s National Security Strategy (NSS) in October 2022 emphasised that Washington would engage its partners “on their own terms”, and based on their support for the international system instead of regime type. Third, the upgrading of the US-ASEAN relationship to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership in November 2022 committed the parties to new high-level dialogues for intensified cooperation, including environmental and energy-related issues.

    These initiatives are still works in progress. As pointed out by other observers, IPEF is an agreement to negotiate instead of a completed agreement, and it remains to be seen how it will gain buy-in from regional governments without offering market access as an incentive. There are also questions about how Washington will balance its strategic attention as the Russian invasion of Ukraine continues unabated.

    Nonetheless, these developments point to a promising strategic premise: Washington intends to remain engaged with the region, and has identified areas for cooperation such as climate change, which the NSS calls “the greatest and potentially existential [problem] for all nations.” Indeed, cooperation on climate and energy issues is already ongoing. The US has offered assistance to Thailand and the Philippines to develop small modular nuclear reactors and to increase their energy security. Meanwhile, Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam accounted for roughly 82 per cent of PV panel imports to the US in the third quarter of 2022.

    Strategic Interests and Their Consequences

    Against this heady context, the Commerce Department investigation is a reality check. Even though the investigation may critically undermine Biden’s domestic goal for America to attain 100 per cent of its energy from clean sources by 2035, there are no signs that it will pull its punches. Indeed, there are reports that Southeast Asian solar producers have pre-emptively halted exports to the US, imperilling 64 per cent of solar installations planned in 2022.

    This is not to say that Southeast Asian governments are hapless bystanders amid great power competition; in fact, they have demonstrated a remarkable ability to manage and benefit from such tensions. During the Trump-initiated trade war, manufacturers in China relocated to countries such as Vietnam to escape tariffs on operations in China, driving foreign direct investment (FDI) into Vietnam to US$19.1 billion in 2018 and US$20.4 billion in 2019. The region also appears poised to benefit from the US’ Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors and Science Act of August 2022 (CHIPS Act). GlobalFoundries Inc. announced plans to build a US$4 billion chipmaking plant in Singapore, and Samsung committed US$3.3 billion to scale-up semiconductor components at its Thai Nguyen factory in Vietnam.

    Yet the investigation is a reminder that US interests and those of its partners do not always align. Indeed, Washington’s efforts to compete with China can have unintended consequences for its other relationships, especially those that are close economic partners with Beijing.

    Regardless of the outcome of the investigation, both Southeast Asian governments and Washington should take heed of its lessons. The former set of leaders cannot afford to take their ties with Washington for granted and should continue dialogues with their American counterparts to promote a better understanding of mutual concerns. Washington, in turn, should better appreciate that strategy formulation is an exercise in prioritisation. There are costs associated with every action – the question is whether Washington is willing to throw a spanner into its relations with Southeast Asia in a bid to compete with China.

    About the Author

    Kevin Chen Xian An is an Associate Research Fellow in the US Programme at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Global / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 31/01/2023

    comments powered by Disqus
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    The recent announcement that photovoltaic cell companies in Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam are under investigation by the United States Commerce Department for circumventing tariffs on China highlights the very real consequences of US-China rivalry for Southeast Asia.

    233101 C0
    Source: Pexels

    COMMENTARY

    In December 2022, the United States Commerce Department issued a preliminary decision affirming that certain photovoltaic (PV) cell and panel imports from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam were circumventing tariffs on China. The Department found that four companies within these countries were assembling PV cells and modules with Chinese-made components to circumvent antidumping duties imposed by the US in 2012.

    The unassuming announcement was largely overlooked in regional news outlets. After all, it was just a preliminary decision, and the final determination for the case is only due in May 2023. Moreover, thanks to a two-year tariff waiver that US President Joe Biden granted in June 2022, any punitive tariffs on solar industry actors would only be levied after June 2024.

    However, the investigation has important implications for US relations with governments from the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Over 2022, the US took pains to convince these governments that it is a reliable partner that does not view their bilateral ties through the prism of strategic competition with China. This development undermines Washington’s strategic promises by reminding regional governments that US fixation on strategic competition with China can still cause collateral damage to its partners.

    A Promising Strategic Premise

    After years of drift under the Trump Administration, the White House under President Joe Biden appeared to hit its stride in improving US-Southeast Asia ties in 2022. Three noteworthy developments occurred during this time.

    First, the US launched the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF) in May 2022, aiming to drive sustainable growth for regional economies. Second, the launch of Biden’s National Security Strategy (NSS) in October 2022 emphasised that Washington would engage its partners “on their own terms”, and based on their support for the international system instead of regime type. Third, the upgrading of the US-ASEAN relationship to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership in November 2022 committed the parties to new high-level dialogues for intensified cooperation, including environmental and energy-related issues.

    These initiatives are still works in progress. As pointed out by other observers, IPEF is an agreement to negotiate instead of a completed agreement, and it remains to be seen how it will gain buy-in from regional governments without offering market access as an incentive. There are also questions about how Washington will balance its strategic attention as the Russian invasion of Ukraine continues unabated.

    Nonetheless, these developments point to a promising strategic premise: Washington intends to remain engaged with the region, and has identified areas for cooperation such as climate change, which the NSS calls “the greatest and potentially existential [problem] for all nations.” Indeed, cooperation on climate and energy issues is already ongoing. The US has offered assistance to Thailand and the Philippines to develop small modular nuclear reactors and to increase their energy security. Meanwhile, Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam accounted for roughly 82 per cent of PV panel imports to the US in the third quarter of 2022.

    Strategic Interests and Their Consequences

    Against this heady context, the Commerce Department investigation is a reality check. Even though the investigation may critically undermine Biden’s domestic goal for America to attain 100 per cent of its energy from clean sources by 2035, there are no signs that it will pull its punches. Indeed, there are reports that Southeast Asian solar producers have pre-emptively halted exports to the US, imperilling 64 per cent of solar installations planned in 2022.

    This is not to say that Southeast Asian governments are hapless bystanders amid great power competition; in fact, they have demonstrated a remarkable ability to manage and benefit from such tensions. During the Trump-initiated trade war, manufacturers in China relocated to countries such as Vietnam to escape tariffs on operations in China, driving foreign direct investment (FDI) into Vietnam to US$19.1 billion in 2018 and US$20.4 billion in 2019. The region also appears poised to benefit from the US’ Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors and Science Act of August 2022 (CHIPS Act). GlobalFoundries Inc. announced plans to build a US$4 billion chipmaking plant in Singapore, and Samsung committed US$3.3 billion to scale-up semiconductor components at its Thai Nguyen factory in Vietnam.

    Yet the investigation is a reminder that US interests and those of its partners do not always align. Indeed, Washington’s efforts to compete with China can have unintended consequences for its other relationships, especially those that are close economic partners with Beijing.

    Regardless of the outcome of the investigation, both Southeast Asian governments and Washington should take heed of its lessons. The former set of leaders cannot afford to take their ties with Washington for granted and should continue dialogues with their American counterparts to promote a better understanding of mutual concerns. Washington, in turn, should better appreciate that strategy formulation is an exercise in prioritisation. There are costs associated with every action – the question is whether Washington is willing to throw a spanner into its relations with Southeast Asia in a bid to compete with China.

    About the Author

    Kevin Chen Xian An is an Associate Research Fellow in the US Programme at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy

    Last updated on 31/01/2023

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    US Trade Policy on PV Panels is a Reality Check for Southeast Asia Ties

    SYNOPSIS

    The recent announcement that photovoltaic cell companies in Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam are under investigation by the United States ...
    more info