• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • ASEAN and Myanmar: Litmus Test or Existential Challenge?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO22003 | ASEAN and Myanmar: Litmus Test or Existential Challenge?
    Tan See Seng

    19 January 2022

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    Notwithstanding the progress it reportedly made, the unilateral visit by Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen to Myanmar, in his role as ASEAN Chair, has raised more questions than answers.

    Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen’s controversial visit, meeting Myanmar junta chief Senior General Min Aung Hlaing in Nyapyidaw on 7 Jan 2022: Apparent success or setback? Source: AFP Photo.

    COMMENTARY

    CAMBODIAN PRIME Minister Hun Sen’s meeting with Senior General Min Aung Hlaing on 7 January 2022, ostensibly in his and Cambodia’s role as the current Chair of ASEAN, has raised objections from several member states of the regional grouping. Chief amongst these is Hun Sen’s reported failure to consult with his ASEAN counterparts before embarking on what was essentially a unilateral effort on his part.

    There were also reservations, hinted at by Malaysia’s Foreign Minister Saifuddin Abdullah, that Hun Sen’s visit might be misconstrued as ASEAN’s recognition and legitimation of Min Aung Hlaing and his Myanmar State Administration Council.

    Hun Sen’s Myanmar Move: Success or Setback?

    In their meeting, Hun Sen was informed by Min Aung Hlaing that his government had extended a ceasefire with all ethnic armed organisations in the country that was originally set to expire at the end of February through the end of the year.

    This was a point that was included in a joint statement released by the two leaders as an “important step … embodied in the ASEAN Five-Point Consensus”. According to Ou Virak, president of the Cambodian research group Future Forum, the Myanmar military’s ceasefire with the ethnic groups was precisely what Hun Sen asked for and got.

    Hun Sen’s apparent success in Naypyidaw has been welcomed by some analysts as a bold move that has broken the ice with the ruling junta in Myanmar. The view among those analysts is that ASEAN’s efforts to engage Myanmar have so far been ineffective and that Hun Sen’s initiative, while clearly a contravention of ASEAN’s consensus-driven approach, is a step in the right direction.

    This is especially as far as the Five-Point Consensus, originally agreed between Min Aung Hlaing and ASEAN back in April 2021, is concerned. Despite “going cowboy” on his fellow ASEAN leaders, Hun Sen’s move has in fact established a basis for dialogue where none previously existed.

    Key Sticking Point

    But the sticking point over Hun Sen’s visit revolves around his failure to meet with Aung Sun Suu Kyi, the jailed leader of the National League for Democracy (NLD) party, which won Myanmar’s November 2020 general election by a landslide.

    Suggestions – all unconfirmed at this point – abound about the possibility that Cambodian foreign minister Prak Sokhonn, the special envoy for ASEAN, would eventually be permitted to see and speak with Aung Sun Suu Kyi and her supporters. The Future Forum’s leader Ou Virak told international media that he would be “very shocked and surprised if Cambodia would just accept not being able to meet with Aung San Suu Kyi”.

    Therein lies the rub: will Cambodia’s efforts lead eventually to ASEAN’s ability to engage with all sides – including, especially, Aung San Suu Kyi – in Myanmar’s ongoing conflict, and not just Min Aung Hlaing and the junta? This was the point which the United Nations special envoy to Myanmar, Noeleen Heyzer, reportedly stressed in her discussion with Hun Sen, during which Heyzer advocated for confidence-building measures involving all stakeholders, including the ethnic armed organisations.

    This was also Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s concern, which he conveyed to his Cambodian counterpart in their video call on 14 January. Making clear that Singapore was not against Cambodia’s proposal to coordinate the ceasefire in Myanmar and deliver humanitarian assistance, Lee nevertheless made the point that hitherto ASEAN has not been given access to all the parties in Myanmar.

    Insisting that any decision on ASEAN’s part to change its stance on Myanmar had to be based on “new facts,” Lee argued that ASEAN should keep the status quo to continue inviting a non-political representative from Myanmar to its meetings while excluding Min Aung Hlaing and the junta until they adhere to ASEAN’s demands.

    Myanmar: Litmus Test for ASEAN

    There is justifiable concern over the possibility that Hun Sen, in his apparent mollycoddling of Min Aung Hlaing, may conveniently set aside ASEAN’s requirement for the inclusion of all parties and stakeholders in future talks over Myanmar. Indeed, Prak Sokhonn’s intimation that Cambodia would adopt “different approaches” to the Myanmar crisis perhaps suggests that Hun Sen might push for his own way of resolving the Myanmar question.

    Hun Sen has weathered growing domestic and international criticism over his forced dissolution of the opposition Cambodian National Rescue Party – including his crackdown on journalists, environmentalists and civil society activists. He may deviate significantly from ASEAN’s agreed-upon approach so as to deflect criticism of his own governing style.

    For a regional grouping born and bred on the back of crises, the current Myanmar stalemate could prove the biggest existential challenge for ASEAN yet. As a collection of democratic, semi-democratic and authoritarian states, ASEAN has shown the world that regional peace is possible despite the diversity in culture, ideology and politics among its member nations.

    The Myanmar crisis constitutes a litmus test: is ASEAN ready to assume a new approach to regionalism, one that emphasises an ethical responsibility to one another, despite the short-term costs that come with that?  That said, the hard choice to hunker down and do things right by all in Myanmar, and not just its military elites, could well be the stepping-stone to an ASEAN wholly committed to not only talking the talk but walking it.

    About the Author

    See Seng Tan is Research Adviser at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) and Senior Associate at the Centre for Liberal Arts and Social Sciences (CLASS) both at Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He is concurrently President and CEO of International Students Inc. (ISI), in the United States.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Global / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN

    Last updated on 21/01/2022

    comments powered by Disqus
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    SYNOPSIS

    Notwithstanding the progress it reportedly made, the unilateral visit by Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen to Myanmar, in his role as ASEAN Chair, has raised more questions than answers.

    Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen’s controversial visit, meeting Myanmar junta chief Senior General Min Aung Hlaing in Nyapyidaw on 7 Jan 2022: Apparent success or setback? Source: AFP Photo.

    COMMENTARY

    CAMBODIAN PRIME Minister Hun Sen’s meeting with Senior General Min Aung Hlaing on 7 January 2022, ostensibly in his and Cambodia’s role as the current Chair of ASEAN, has raised objections from several member states of the regional grouping. Chief amongst these is Hun Sen’s reported failure to consult with his ASEAN counterparts before embarking on what was essentially a unilateral effort on his part.

    There were also reservations, hinted at by Malaysia’s Foreign Minister Saifuddin Abdullah, that Hun Sen’s visit might be misconstrued as ASEAN’s recognition and legitimation of Min Aung Hlaing and his Myanmar State Administration Council.

    Hun Sen’s Myanmar Move: Success or Setback?

    In their meeting, Hun Sen was informed by Min Aung Hlaing that his government had extended a ceasefire with all ethnic armed organisations in the country that was originally set to expire at the end of February through the end of the year.

    This was a point that was included in a joint statement released by the two leaders as an “important step … embodied in the ASEAN Five-Point Consensus”. According to Ou Virak, president of the Cambodian research group Future Forum, the Myanmar military’s ceasefire with the ethnic groups was precisely what Hun Sen asked for and got.

    Hun Sen’s apparent success in Naypyidaw has been welcomed by some analysts as a bold move that has broken the ice with the ruling junta in Myanmar. The view among those analysts is that ASEAN’s efforts to engage Myanmar have so far been ineffective and that Hun Sen’s initiative, while clearly a contravention of ASEAN’s consensus-driven approach, is a step in the right direction.

    This is especially as far as the Five-Point Consensus, originally agreed between Min Aung Hlaing and ASEAN back in April 2021, is concerned. Despite “going cowboy” on his fellow ASEAN leaders, Hun Sen’s move has in fact established a basis for dialogue where none previously existed.

    Key Sticking Point

    But the sticking point over Hun Sen’s visit revolves around his failure to meet with Aung Sun Suu Kyi, the jailed leader of the National League for Democracy (NLD) party, which won Myanmar’s November 2020 general election by a landslide.

    Suggestions – all unconfirmed at this point – abound about the possibility that Cambodian foreign minister Prak Sokhonn, the special envoy for ASEAN, would eventually be permitted to see and speak with Aung Sun Suu Kyi and her supporters. The Future Forum’s leader Ou Virak told international media that he would be “very shocked and surprised if Cambodia would just accept not being able to meet with Aung San Suu Kyi”.

    Therein lies the rub: will Cambodia’s efforts lead eventually to ASEAN’s ability to engage with all sides – including, especially, Aung San Suu Kyi – in Myanmar’s ongoing conflict, and not just Min Aung Hlaing and the junta? This was the point which the United Nations special envoy to Myanmar, Noeleen Heyzer, reportedly stressed in her discussion with Hun Sen, during which Heyzer advocated for confidence-building measures involving all stakeholders, including the ethnic armed organisations.

    This was also Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s concern, which he conveyed to his Cambodian counterpart in their video call on 14 January. Making clear that Singapore was not against Cambodia’s proposal to coordinate the ceasefire in Myanmar and deliver humanitarian assistance, Lee nevertheless made the point that hitherto ASEAN has not been given access to all the parties in Myanmar.

    Insisting that any decision on ASEAN’s part to change its stance on Myanmar had to be based on “new facts,” Lee argued that ASEAN should keep the status quo to continue inviting a non-political representative from Myanmar to its meetings while excluding Min Aung Hlaing and the junta until they adhere to ASEAN’s demands.

    Myanmar: Litmus Test for ASEAN

    There is justifiable concern over the possibility that Hun Sen, in his apparent mollycoddling of Min Aung Hlaing, may conveniently set aside ASEAN’s requirement for the inclusion of all parties and stakeholders in future talks over Myanmar. Indeed, Prak Sokhonn’s intimation that Cambodia would adopt “different approaches” to the Myanmar crisis perhaps suggests that Hun Sen might push for his own way of resolving the Myanmar question.

    Hun Sen has weathered growing domestic and international criticism over his forced dissolution of the opposition Cambodian National Rescue Party – including his crackdown on journalists, environmentalists and civil society activists. He may deviate significantly from ASEAN’s agreed-upon approach so as to deflect criticism of his own governing style.

    For a regional grouping born and bred on the back of crises, the current Myanmar stalemate could prove the biggest existential challenge for ASEAN yet. As a collection of democratic, semi-democratic and authoritarian states, ASEAN has shown the world that regional peace is possible despite the diversity in culture, ideology and politics among its member nations.

    The Myanmar crisis constitutes a litmus test: is ASEAN ready to assume a new approach to regionalism, one that emphasises an ethical responsibility to one another, despite the short-term costs that come with that?  That said, the hard choice to hunker down and do things right by all in Myanmar, and not just its military elites, could well be the stepping-stone to an ASEAN wholly committed to not only talking the talk but walking it.

    About the Author

    See Seng Tan is Research Adviser at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) and Senior Associate at the Centre for Liberal Arts and Social Sciences (CLASS) both at Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He is concurrently President and CEO of International Students Inc. (ISI), in the United States.

    Categories: Commentaries / Country and Region Studies

    Last updated on 21/01/2022

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    more info