• Home
  • About RSIS
    • Introduction
    • Building the Foundations
    • Welcome Message
    • Board of Governors
    • Staff Profiles
      • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
      • Dean’s Office
      • Management
      • Distinguished Fellows
      • Faculty and Research
      • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
      • Visiting Fellows
      • Adjunct Fellows
      • Administrative Staff
    • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
    • RSIS Endowment Fund
    • Endowed Professorships
    • Career Opportunities
    • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
    • Research Centres
      • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
      • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
      • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
      • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
      • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
    • Research Programmes
      • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
      • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
    • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
    • [email protected] Newsletter
    • Other Research
      • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
    • Graduate Programmes Office
    • Overview
    • MSc (Asian Studies)
    • MSc (International Political Economy)
    • MSc (International Relations)
    • MSc (Strategic Studies)
    • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
    • PhD Programme
    • Exchange Partners and Programmes
    • How to Apply
    • Financial Assistance
    • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
    • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
    • Alumni
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
    • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
    • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
    • SRP Executive Programme
    • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
    • RSIS Publications
      • Annual Reviews
      • Books
      • Bulletins and Newsletters
      • Commentaries
      • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
      • Commemorative / Event Reports
      • IDSS Paper
      • Interreligious Relations
      • Monographs
      • NTS Insight
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • RSIS Publications for the Year
    • Glossary of Abbreviations
    • External Publications
      • Authored Books
      • Journal Articles
      • Edited Books
      • Chapters in Edited Books
      • Policy Reports
      • Working Papers
      • Op-Eds
      • External Publications for the Year
    • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
    • Great Powers
    • Sustainable Security
    • Other Resource Pages
    • Media Highlights
    • News Releases
    • Speeches
    • Vidcast Channel
    • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsis.sg
Linkedin
instagram instagram rsis.sg
RSS
  • Home
  • About RSIS
      • Introduction
      • Building the Foundations
      • Welcome Message
      • Board of Governors
      • Staff Profiles
        • Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
        • Dean’s Office
        • Management
        • Distinguished Fellows
        • Faculty and Research
        • Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
        • Visiting Fellows
        • Adjunct Fellows
        • Administrative Staff
      • Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
      • RSIS Endowment Fund
      • Endowed Professorships
      • Career Opportunities
      • Getting to RSIS
  • Research
      • Research Centres
        • Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
        • Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
        • Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
        • Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
        • International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      • Research Programmes
        • National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
        • Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      • Future Issues and Technology Cluster
      • [email protected] Newsletter
      • Other Research
        • Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      • Graduate Programmes Office
      • Overview
      • MSc (Asian Studies)
      • MSc (International Political Economy)
      • MSc (International Relations)
      • MSc (Strategic Studies)
      • NTU-Warwick Double Masters Programme
      • PhD Programme
      • Exchange Partners and Programmes
      • How to Apply
      • Financial Assistance
      • Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
      • RSIS Alumni
  • Alumni & Networks
      • Alumni
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
      • Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
      • International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
      • SRP Executive Programme
      • Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
  • Publications
      • RSIS Publications
        • Annual Reviews
        • Books
        • Bulletins and Newsletters
        • Commentaries
        • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
        • Commemorative / Event Reports
        • IDSS Paper
        • Interreligious Relations
        • Monographs
        • NTS Insight
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • RSIS Publications for the Year
      • Glossary of Abbreviations
      • External Publications
        • Authored Books
        • Journal Articles
        • Edited Books
        • Chapters in Edited Books
        • Policy Reports
        • Working Papers
        • Op-Eds
        • External Publications for the Year
      • Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
  • Media
      • Great Powers
      • Sustainable Security
      • Other Resource Pages
      • Media Highlights
      • News Releases
      • Speeches
      • Vidcast Channel
      • Audio/Video Forums
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Contact Us
  • instagram instagram rsis.sg
Connect

Getting to RSIS

Map

Address

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

View location on Google maps Click here for directions to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
    RSISVideoCast RSISVideoCast rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
    instagram instagram rsis.sg
      RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    RSIS Intranet

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
    Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University

    Skip to content

     
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • CO06069 | Prelude to Occupation? Implications of Israel’s War on Hizbullah in Lebanon
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • Commentaries
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • IDSS Paper
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers
    • RSIS Publications for the Year

    CO06069 | Prelude to Occupation? Implications of Israel’s War on Hizbullah in Lebanon
    Christoph Marcinkowski

    26 July 2006

    download pdf
    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    ON July 12, Hizbullah started their “Operation Truthful Promise” and seized two Israeli soldiers. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) countered with “Operation Just Reward”, which was soon renamed “Operation Change of Direction”. Hizbullah’s attacks came just two weeks after Israel’s Gaza offensive, officially aimed at freeing the IDF soldier Gilad Shalit who had been captured by Hamas militants. The disproportionate military response against Hizbullah by the IDF has caused a humanitarian crisis amongst Lebanon’s civilian population – a crisis of unprecedented proportions for the country since the traumatic 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon which resulted in thousands of casualties, mostly civilians. Israel’s present operation has so far resulted in the deaths of about 400 people, including those who perished when Israeli forces used cluster bombs on Hizbullah facilities located amidst civilian populations. Several hundred thousand more Lebanese have been displaced, whereas several thousand foreigners are still waiting to be evacuated.

    The tragedy caused by the Israeli invasion has already had its repercussions in Southeast Asia: in Malaysia’s capital Kuala Lumpur, demonstrations outside the American embassy have occurred – apparently organized by the Islamic opposition party PAS, a Sunni organization. Interestingly, television news coverage showed also demonstrators carrying pictures of the later Shi’a leader Ayatollah Khomeini.

    The “Real Thing”: Lebanon, not Gaza

    Lebanon, like Singapore a multi-religious – and to a limited extent even multi-ethnic – country, was just about to return to prosperity as the “Switzerland of the Levant”. It is now being bombed back to the 1970s. Fouad Siniora, Prime Minister of Lebanon since July 2005, has called for an immediate ceasefire between Israel and Hizbullah, saying that his country “has been torn to shreds”. UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, too, has criticized Israel’s indifferent shelling of mostly civilian areas. So far, Western countries have kept silent, a silence which enables Israel to continue its offensive. Britain’s Tony Blair has supported Israel’s actions, implying that Israel’s full-scale war – a war that is currently taking hostage millions of Lebanese civilians – appears to be “justified” by the official aim to free Israeli soldiers now held by Hizbullah.

    However, the sheer scale of Israel’s military engagement in Lebanon seems to tell otherwise: compared with the Lebanese war, the Gaza issue appears to have lost its prime importance to Israel. Many military observers see in the Israeli air bombardments only a prelude to a much larger, ground offensive. If “Operation Change of Direction” is aimed at rooting-out Hizbullah from Lebanon once and for all, it has so far clearly failed. But it has a larger strategic goal, and it appears to be not so much military in nature.

    Many, if not most Lebanese, whatever their denominational background, tend to see Hizbullah not as a “terrorist organization”, but rather a “resistance movement” that is growing in stature. Siniora, a Sunni and usually seen as a close ally of the US, once said that he and his government consider the “resistance” in the South “a natural and honest expression of the Lebanese people’s national rights to liberate their land and defend their honour against Israeli aggression and threats”. Similar sentiments had been expressed back in 2001 by the late Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in a BBC interview with Tim Sebastian. Consequently, Hariri refused to hand over Hizbullah activists accused by the US of being terrorists. One should keep in mid that since the 1967 war, a stretch of Lebanese territory known as the “Shebaa Farms” is still occupied by Israel. Moreover, although Hizbullah’s activities are mainly military in nature, it has also been a successful social movement involved in the building of schools, clinics and hospitals in the impoverished south of Lebanon. It is also a political party that won an unprecedented 23 seats nationwide in the 2005 general election. All this seems to explain the deep-rooted support for Hizbullah in the South and beyond. The situation is thus different from that of 1982 when Israel could count on the support of local Christians in its fight against the PLO forces in the country who were seen by many Lebanese – even by the Shi’ite Amal movement – as an alien factor.

    The Larger Picture: The US Return to Lebanon?

    The “silence of the West” might also be an indicator for a fundamental shift in US Middle East policy towards a more “holistic”, “long-term” solution for the entire Middle East. US President Bush said explicitly on July 18 that “the world” should address Hizbullah as the “cause” of the current Lebanon crisis. He also accused Syria for allegedly staging a comeback in Lebanon. John Bolton, the US ambassador to the UN, said recently that “we see more clearly the role Syria has and has been playing in frustrating efforts to bring this [i.e. the Hizbullah “issue”] to a resolution”.

    According to the New York Times, the US plans to “give Israel another week more” for its bombardments. Only after that would Condolezza Rice travel to the region to “negotiate” the (re-)establishment of a “buffer zone” and the stationing of international troops intended to be a bit more than mere “peace-keepers”. On July 19, Bush announced the sending of US troops to Lebanon – the first since Hizbullah drove them out in 1984 – officially in order to “evacuate Americans and to protect American property”. Interestingly, those troops are planned to operate from Cyprus where Britain still maintains the Royal Air Force airbases Akrotiri and Dhekelia.

    Could this be the prelude to a permanent US presence in the Levant? Given the fact that US forces are already over-stretched in Iraq and Afghanistan, the likelihood of this happening is remote, for now. Yet, if this scenario eventuates, Israel would have acted as a proxy to “clear the field”. Western, mostly NATO troops, would be present in Lebanon while US troops would be free to settle accounts with Syria (and with Hamas in its rear, for that matter). Although this rather gloomy picture looks somehow fantastic at first glance, it is a possibility that cannot be totally ruled out.

    About the Author

    Dr Christoph Marcinkowski is a Visiting Research Fellow with the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, NTU, and Visiting Affiliate at the Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore. He is the author of Religion and Politics in Iraq: Shi’ite Clerics between Quietism and Resistance (Singapore, 2004). His latest book is Shi’ite Islam in Southeast Asia. Basic Concepts, Cultural and Historical Aspects, Contemporary Implications, is forthcoming.

    Categories: Commentaries /

    Last updated on 03/10/2014

    RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due credit to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected].

    Commentary

    ON July 12, Hizbullah started their “Operation Truthful Promise” and seized two Israeli soldiers. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) countered with “Operation Just Reward”, which was soon renamed “Operation Change of Direction”. Hizbullah’s attacks came just two weeks after Israel’s Gaza offensive, officially aimed at freeing the IDF soldier Gilad Shalit who had been captured by Hamas militants. The disproportionate military response against Hizbullah by the IDF has caused a humanitarian crisis amongst Lebanon’s civilian population – a crisis of unprecedented proportions for the country since the traumatic 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon which resulted in thousands of casualties, mostly civilians. Israel’s present operation has so far resulted in the deaths of about 400 people, including those who perished when Israeli forces used cluster bombs on Hizbullah facilities located amidst civilian populations. Several hundred thousand more Lebanese have been displaced, whereas several thousand foreigners are still waiting to be evacuated.

    The tragedy caused by the Israeli invasion has already had its repercussions in Southeast Asia: in Malaysia’s capital Kuala Lumpur, demonstrations outside the American embassy have occurred – apparently organized by the Islamic opposition party PAS, a Sunni organization. Interestingly, television news coverage showed also demonstrators carrying pictures of the later Shi’a leader Ayatollah Khomeini.

    The “Real Thing”: Lebanon, not Gaza

    Lebanon, like Singapore a multi-religious – and to a limited extent even multi-ethnic – country, was just about to return to prosperity as the “Switzerland of the Levant”. It is now being bombed back to the 1970s. Fouad Siniora, Prime Minister of Lebanon since July 2005, has called for an immediate ceasefire between Israel and Hizbullah, saying that his country “has been torn to shreds”. UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, too, has criticized Israel’s indifferent shelling of mostly civilian areas. So far, Western countries have kept silent, a silence which enables Israel to continue its offensive. Britain’s Tony Blair has supported Israel’s actions, implying that Israel’s full-scale war – a war that is currently taking hostage millions of Lebanese civilians – appears to be “justified” by the official aim to free Israeli soldiers now held by Hizbullah.

    However, the sheer scale of Israel’s military engagement in Lebanon seems to tell otherwise: compared with the Lebanese war, the Gaza issue appears to have lost its prime importance to Israel. Many military observers see in the Israeli air bombardments only a prelude to a much larger, ground offensive. If “Operation Change of Direction” is aimed at rooting-out Hizbullah from Lebanon once and for all, it has so far clearly failed. But it has a larger strategic goal, and it appears to be not so much military in nature.

    Many, if not most Lebanese, whatever their denominational background, tend to see Hizbullah not as a “terrorist organization”, but rather a “resistance movement” that is growing in stature. Siniora, a Sunni and usually seen as a close ally of the US, once said that he and his government consider the “resistance” in the South “a natural and honest expression of the Lebanese people’s national rights to liberate their land and defend their honour against Israeli aggression and threats”. Similar sentiments had been expressed back in 2001 by the late Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in a BBC interview with Tim Sebastian. Consequently, Hariri refused to hand over Hizbullah activists accused by the US of being terrorists. One should keep in mid that since the 1967 war, a stretch of Lebanese territory known as the “Shebaa Farms” is still occupied by Israel. Moreover, although Hizbullah’s activities are mainly military in nature, it has also been a successful social movement involved in the building of schools, clinics and hospitals in the impoverished south of Lebanon. It is also a political party that won an unprecedented 23 seats nationwide in the 2005 general election. All this seems to explain the deep-rooted support for Hizbullah in the South and beyond. The situation is thus different from that of 1982 when Israel could count on the support of local Christians in its fight against the PLO forces in the country who were seen by many Lebanese – even by the Shi’ite Amal movement – as an alien factor.

    The Larger Picture: The US Return to Lebanon?

    The “silence of the West” might also be an indicator for a fundamental shift in US Middle East policy towards a more “holistic”, “long-term” solution for the entire Middle East. US President Bush said explicitly on July 18 that “the world” should address Hizbullah as the “cause” of the current Lebanon crisis. He also accused Syria for allegedly staging a comeback in Lebanon. John Bolton, the US ambassador to the UN, said recently that “we see more clearly the role Syria has and has been playing in frustrating efforts to bring this [i.e. the Hizbullah “issue”] to a resolution”.

    According to the New York Times, the US plans to “give Israel another week more” for its bombardments. Only after that would Condolezza Rice travel to the region to “negotiate” the (re-)establishment of a “buffer zone” and the stationing of international troops intended to be a bit more than mere “peace-keepers”. On July 19, Bush announced the sending of US troops to Lebanon – the first since Hizbullah drove them out in 1984 – officially in order to “evacuate Americans and to protect American property”. Interestingly, those troops are planned to operate from Cyprus where Britain still maintains the Royal Air Force airbases Akrotiri and Dhekelia.

    Could this be the prelude to a permanent US presence in the Levant? Given the fact that US forces are already over-stretched in Iraq and Afghanistan, the likelihood of this happening is remote, for now. Yet, if this scenario eventuates, Israel would have acted as a proxy to “clear the field”. Western, mostly NATO troops, would be present in Lebanon while US troops would be free to settle accounts with Syria (and with Hamas in its rear, for that matter). Although this rather gloomy picture looks somehow fantastic at first glance, it is a possibility that cannot be totally ruled out.

    About the Author

    Dr Christoph Marcinkowski is a Visiting Research Fellow with the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, NTU, and Visiting Affiliate at the Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore. He is the author of Religion and Politics in Iraq: Shi’ite Clerics between Quietism and Resistance (Singapore, 2004). His latest book is Shi’ite Islam in Southeast Asia. Basic Concepts, Cultural and Historical Aspects, Contemporary Implications, is forthcoming.

    Categories: Commentaries

    Last updated on 03/10/2014

    Back to top

    Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
    OK
    Latest Book
    CO06069 | Prelude to Occupation? Implications of Israel’s War on Hizbullah in Lebanon

    Commentary

    ON July 12, Hizbullah started their “Operation Truthful Promise” and seized ...
    more info